Optimization of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis using commercial and isolated bacterial enzyme cocktail for bioethanol production from corn husk through yeast co-culture batch fermentation
Barsha Samantaray , Rashmi Ranjan Mishra , Sonali Mohapatra , Sakti Rath , Bikash Chandra Behera , Hrudayanath Thatoi
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 69
This study assesses the impact of physicochemical pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and co-culture fermentation strategies on bioethanol production from corn husk biomass (CHB). Under optimal alkali pretreatment conditions (1.75% alkali, 4.0 g substrate concentration, 120 °C, 10 h), 35% lignin removal was achieved, with 48% cellulose and 39% hemicellulose recovery. In contrast, acid pretreatment resulted in 30% lignin removal, 45% cellulose recovery, and 34% hemicellulose recovery, showing lower efficiency than alkali pretreatment. During ultrasonication alkali pretreatment enhanced cellulose and hemicellulose exposure up to 51 and 46% and delignification up to 49%. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated corn husk biomass was performed using commercial enzymes [Celluclast 1.5 L (700 EGU or 854 U mL−1) and Viscozyme (13.4 FBG/mL)] and isolated bacterial enzymes, including cellulase from Bacillus licheniformis (9.3 ± 0.3 U mL−1) and xylanase from Enterobacter asburiae PQ396173 (7.0 ± 0.4 U mL−1). The developed enzyme cocktail in ratio 3:2:3:1 (v/v; U mL−1) (Celluclast: Viscozyme: native cellulase: native xylanse) using a cocktail of native and commercial enzymes, yielded total reducing sugar of 740 mg g−1 glucose and 54.6 mg g−1 xylose. Fermentation of hydrolysate prepared with commercial enzymes using monoculture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris yielded 17.6 g L−1 and 12.2 g L−1 bioethanol separately. Co-cultured yeasts produced 26.8 g L−1 ethanol at 96 h of incubation, exceeding monoculture yields. The fermentation with integration of commercial and isolated bacterial enzyme cocktails yielded the highest bioethanol output of 37.3 g L−1 at 96 h incubation, indicating that enzymatic saccharification with a combination of commercial and native enzyme cocktails results in maximum bioethanol production.
Corn husk biomass / Ultrasonication pretreatment / Enzymatic hydrolysis / Enzyme cocktail / Fermentation / Bioethanol
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Jin T, Chen Y, Jarboe LR (2016) Evolutionary methods for improving the production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals. In: Biotechnology for biofuel production and optimization. Elsevier, pp 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63475-7.00010-8 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
Kumar B, Verma P (2024) Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass at high solids loading. In: Bisaria V. (eds) Handbook of biorefinery research and technology: Biomass logistics to saccharification. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6308-1_76 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Majumdar R, Mishra U, Bhunia B (2018) Synergistic treatment strategy for efficient release of reducing sugar from orange peel during acid and enzymatic treatment process. In: 2018 International conference and utility exhibition on green energy for sustainable development (ICUE). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICUE-GESD.2018.8635664 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Nath P, Maibam PD, Singh S, Rajulapati V, Goyal A (2021) Sequential pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse by alkali and organosolv for improved delignification and cellulose saccharification by chimera and cellobiohydrolase for bioethanol production. 3 Biotech 11:59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02600-y |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Rana N, Sharma V, Rathour RK, Ahuja V, Bhatia RK, Bhatt AK (2019) Utilization of corn cob waste for xylanase production by newly isolated Bacilluspumilus XRL5 and its application in saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Trend Carbohydrat Res 11(3) |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Sharif S, Shah AH, Fariq A, Jannat S, Rasheed SR (2023). Production, characterization and applications of cellulase from thermophilic Anoxybacillus and Bacillus. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370568559 |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Sindhu R, Binod P, Pandey A, Ankaram S, Duan Y, Awasthi MK (2019). Biofuel production from biomass: toward sustainable development. In: Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, pp. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64083-3.00005-1 |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |