Conversion of anaerobic digestates into biochar for sustainable fodder production in soilless agriculture

Ana L. Navas-Romero , Eliana Sánchez , Romina Zabaleta , Erick Torres , Viviana N. Fernández-Maldonado , Mathias Riveros-Gómez , Patricia Bres , Germán Mazza , M. Paula Fabani , Rosa Rodriguez

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 49

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) :49 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-026-01014-7
Research
research-article
Conversion of anaerobic digestates into biochar for sustainable fodder production in soilless agriculture
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The valorization of anaerobic digestates through slow pyrolysis offers a sustainable pathway for agricultural systems. This study assessed the effects of digestate type (swine, cattle, and dairy) and pyrolysis temperature (400, 500, and 600 °C) on biochar properties and evaluated their impact on maize (Zea mays) fodder grown under hydroponic-like soilless conditions. Thirty-six treatments were evaluated in a factorial design combining digestate source, temperature, and application rate (0–6.25 g per container). Biochar from dairy digestate (BDST) pyrolyzed at 500 °C exhibited the most favorable characteristics, with high carbon content (60.4%), low electrical conductivity (≈ 916 µS cm−1), and improved water and nutrient retention. At an application rate of 6.25 g per container, BDST–500 also achieved the highest SPAD and dry mass values. In contrast, swine- and cattle-derived biochars presented higher ash and salinity, reducing their agronomic performance. Multivariate analysis indicated that digestate type was the main determinant of plant physiological performance, beyond the individual effects of pyrolysis temperature and application rate. Overall, dairy-derived biochar demonstrates strong potential as a functional amendment for hydroponic fodder systems and as a tool to advance circular bioeconomy practices.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Carbon-rich amendments / Soilless agriculture / Resource efficiency / Sustainable livestock feeding / Bio-waste / Circular economy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ana L. Navas-Romero, Eliana Sánchez, Romina Zabaleta, Erick Torres, Viviana N. Fernández-Maldonado, Mathias Riveros-Gómez, Patricia Bres, Germán Mazza, M. Paula Fabani, Rosa Rodriguez. Conversion of anaerobic digestates into biochar for sustainable fodder production in soilless agriculture. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2026, 13(1): 49 DOI:10.1186/s40643-026-01014-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abzazou T, Salvadó H, Cárdenas-Youngs Y, Becerril-Rodríguez A, Cebirán EMC, Huguet A, Araujo RM. Characterization of nutrient-removing microbial communities in two full-scale WWTP systems using a new qPCR approach. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 618: 858-865

[2]

AENOR. UNE-EN: Mejoradores de suelo y sustratos de cultivo, 2001, Madrid. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación

[3]

Alburquerque JA, Calero JM, Barrón V, Torrent J, del Campillo MC, Gallardo A, Villar R. Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci, 2014, 177: 16-25

[4]

AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2010, 18Washington, DC. AOAC

[5]

Ashworth AJ, Sadaka S, Allen FL, Sharara MA, Keyser PD. Influence of pyrolysis temperature and production conditions on switchgrass biochar for use as a soil amendment. BioResources, 2014, 9: 7622-7635

[6]

ASTM (2001) ASTM D1102–84: Standard test method for ash in wood. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[7]

ASTM (2006) ASTM E872–82: Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis of particulate wood fuels. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

[8]

Balliu A, Zheng Y, Sallaku G, Fernández JA, Gruda NS, Tuzel Y. Environmental and cultivation factors affect the morphology, architecture and performance of root systems in soilless grown plants. Horticulturae, 2021, 7: 243

[9]

Banik C, Koziel JA, De M, Bonds D, Chen B, Singh A, Licht MA. Biochar-swine manure impact on soil nutrients and carbon under controlled leaching experiment using a midwestern mollisols. Front Environ Sci, 2021, 9 609621

[10]

Bayhan B. Quality of forages: current knowledge and trends. MAS J Appl Sci, 2023, 8: 134-143

[11]

Belda RM, Lidón A, Fornes F. Biochars and hydrochars as substrate constituents for soilless growth of myrtle and mastic. Ind Crops Prod, 2016, 94: 132-142

[12]

Biederman LA, Harpole WS. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 202-214

[13]

Botyanszká L, Vitková J, Botková N, Toková L, Gaduš J. The effects of biochar grain size on radish plants under low water availability. Plant Soil Environ, 2024, 70 4

[14]

Capossio JP, Fabani MP, Reyes-Urrutia A, Torres-Sciancalepore R, Deng Y, Baeyens J, Rodriguez R, Mazza G. Sustainable solar drying of brewer’s spent grains: a comparison with conventional electric convective drying. Processes, 2022, 10: 339

[15]

Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 535

[16]

Castro-Herrera D, Prost K, Schäfer Y, Kim D, Yimer F, Tadesse M, Gebrehiwot M, Brüggemann N. Nutrient dynamics during composting of human excreta, cattle manure, and organic waste affected by biochar. J Environ Qual, 2022, 51: 19-32

[17]

Chand S, Indu SRK, Govindasamy P. Agronomical and breeding approaches to improve the nutritional status of forage crops for better livestock productivity. Grass Forage Sci, 2022, 77: 11-32

[18]

Chopra A, Rao P, Prakash O. Biochar-enhanced soilless farming: a sustainable solution for modern agriculture. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 2024, 29 72

[19]

Cucina M, Castro L, Escalante H, Ferrer I, Garfí M. Benefits and risks of agricultural reuse of digestates from plastic tubular digesters in Colombia. Waste Manag, 2021, 135: 220-228

[20]

Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK, Sinha K. Compositional heterogeneity of different biochar: effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstocks. J Environ Manag, 2021, 278 111501

[21]

Didaran F, Kordrostami M, Ghasemi-Soloklui AA, Pashkovskiy P, Kreslavski V, Kuznetsov V, Allakhverdiev SI. The mechanisms of photoinhibition and repair in plants under high light conditions and interplay with abiotic stressors. J Photochem Photobiol B, 2024, 259 113004

[22]

Elkhlifi Z, Iftikhar J, Sarraf M, Ali B, Saleem MH, Ibranshahib I, Bispo MD, Meili L, Ercisli S, Kayabasi ET, Ansari NA, Hegedusova A, Chen Z. Potential role of biochar on capturing soil nutrients, carbon sequestration and managing environmental challenges: a review. Sustainability, 2023, 15: 2527

[23]

Ephraim W, Paul NN, Rebbeca Y. Rice husk biochar for carbon sequestration, soil fertility and plant health improvement: a review. Afr Phytosanitary J, 2024, 4: 54-84

[24]

Faloye OT, Ajayi AE, Kamchoom V, Akintola OA, Oguntunde PG. Evaluating impacts of biochar and inorganic fertilizer applications on soil quality and maize yield using principal component analysis. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 1761

[25]

Fernandes PB, Santos CAD, Gurgel ALC, Gonçalves LF, Fonseca NN, Moura RB, Costa KAP, Paim TP. Non-destructive methods used to determine forage mass and nutritional condition in tropical pastures. AgriEngineering, 2023, 5: 1614-1629

[26]

Grafmüller J, Böhm A, Zhuang Y, Spahr S, Müller P, Otto TN, Bucheli TD, Leifeld J, Giger R, Tobler M, Schmidt H-P, Dahmen N, Hagemann N. Wood ash as an additive in biomass pyrolysis: effects on biochar yield, properties, and agricultural performance. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2022, 10: 2720-2729

[27]

Gupta B, Huang B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics, 2014, 2014 701596

[28]

Gusiatin MZ. Advantages of co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with agricultural and forestry waste. Energies, 2024, 17: 5736

[29]

Harrison BP, Gao S, Gonzales M, Thao T, Bischak E, Ghezzehei TA, Berhe AA, Diaz G, Ryals RA. Dairy manure co-composting with wood biochar plays a critical role in meeting global methane goals. Environ Sci Technol, 2022, 56: 10987-10996

[30]

Hu Y, Thomsen TP, Fenton O, Sommer SG, Shi W, Cui W. Effects of dairy processing sludge and derived biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from Danish and Irish soils. Environ Res, 2023, 216 114543

[31]

Ippolito JA, Cui L, Kammann C, Wrage-Mönnig N, Estavillo JM, Fuertes-Mendizabal T, Borchard N. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar, 2020, 2: 421-438

[32]

Iqbal H, Garcia-Perez M, Flury M. Effect of biochar on leaching of organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus from compost in bioretention systems. Sci Total Environ, 2015, 521: 37-45

[33]

Jagdeep-Singh V-S. Chlorophyll meter based precision nitrogen management in spring maize. J Plant Nutr, 2022, 46: 17-27

[34]

Jennewein JS, Eitel JUH, Joly K, Long RA, Maguire AJ, Vierling LA, Weygint W. Estimating integrated measures of forage quality for herbivores by fusing optical and structural remote sensing data. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16 075006

[35]

John V, Braga ARdO, Danielli CKAdO, Sousa HM, Danielli FE, de Araujo RO, Guerra JFC. Characterization of biochar produced in a mobile handmade kiln from small-sized waste biomass for agronomic and climate change benefits. Agronomy, 2024, 14 1861

[36]

Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L, Bolan NS, Budai A. How biochar works, and when it doesn’t: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 2021, 13: 173-197

[37]

Kamal MZU, Sarker U, Roy SK, Alam MS, Azam MG, Miah MY, Hossain N, Ercisli S, Alamri S. Manure-biochar compost mitigates the soil salinity stress in tomato plants by modulating the osmoregulatory mechanism, photosynthetic pigments, and ionic homeostasis. Sci Rep, 2024, 14 21929

[38]

Kashyap S, Kumar R, Ram H, Kumar A, Basak N, Sheoran P, Bhatacharjee S, Biswal B, Ali G, Kumar B. Quantitative and qualitative response of fodder maize to use of bulk and nano-fertilizers in north western plains of India. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 1889

[39]

Katoch R (2022) Nutritional and anti-nutritional constituents in forages. In: Nutritional quality management of forages in the Himalayan region. Springer, Singapore, pp 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5437-4_8.

[40]

Khan MN, Zhang K, Hu L, Luo T. Coupling of biochar with nitrogen supplements improves soil fertility, nitrogen utilization efficiency and rapeseed growth. Agronomy, 2020, 10: 1661

[41]

Kracmarova-Farren M, Alexova E, Kodatova A, Mercl F, Szakova J, Tlustos P, Stiborova H. Biochar-induced changes in soil microbial communities: a comparison of two feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. Environ Microbiol, 2024, 19 87

[42]

Krounbi L, Enders A, Gaunt J, Ball M, Lehmann J. Plant uptake of nitrogen adsorbed to biochars made from dairy manure. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 15001

[43]

Kunnen K, Ali MM, Lataf A, Van Hees M, Nauts R, Horemans N, Cuypers A. From crop left-overs to nutrient resource: growth-stimulating potential of biochar in nutrient solutions for wheat soilless cultivation systems. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15 1414212

[44]

Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma, 2010, 158: 443-449

[45]

Lehmann J, Joseph SLehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology, and implementation, 2009, London. Routledge: 1-12

[46]

Li Y, Gupta R, Zhang Q, You S. Review of biochar production via crop residue pyrolysis: development and perspectives. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 369 128423

[47]

Loc NX, Do TM. Optimizing biochar production: a review of recent progress in lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. Front Agric Sci Eng, 2025, 12: 148-172

[48]

Luigi M, Manglli A, Dragone I, Antonelli MG, Contarini M, Speranza S, Bertin S, Tiberini A, Gentili A, Varvaro L, Tomassoli L, Faggioli F. Effects of biochar on the growth and development of tomato seedlings and on the response of tomato plants to the infection of systemic viral agents. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13 862075

[49]

Madani RM, Liang J, Cui L, Zhang D, Otitoju TA, Elsalahi RH, Song X. Novel simultaneous anaerobic ammonium and sulfate removal process: a review. Environ Technol Innov, 2021, 23 101661

[50]

Magan JB, O’Callaghan TF, Kelly AL, McCarthy NA. Compositional and functional properties of milk and dairy products derived from cows fed pasture- or concentrate-based diets. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 2021, 20: 2769-2800

[51]

Malik A, Gul S, Buriro AH, Kakar H, Ziad T, Gul S (2022) Particle size of biochar as co-composted fertilizer: influence on growth performance of lettuce and concentration of bioavailable soil nutrients under salinity stress conditions. Preprints 2022010337. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202201.0337.v1.

[52]

Manolikaki I, Diamadopoulos E. Positive effects of biochar and biochar-compost on maize growth and nutrient availability in two agricultural soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2019, 50: 512-526

[53]

Maqhuzu AB, Yoshikawa K, Takahashi F. Prospective utilization of brewers’ spent grains (BSG) for energy and food in Africa and its global warming potential. Sustain Prod Consum, 2021, 26: 146-159

[54]

Meyer S, Glaser B, Quicker P. Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: a literature review. Environ Sci Technol, 2011, 45: 9473-9483

[55]

Murtaza G, Usman M, Iqbal J, Tahir MN, Elshikh MS, Alkahtani J, Toleikienė M, Iqbal R, Akram MI, Gruda NS. The impact of biochar addition on morpho-physiological characteristics, yield and water use efficiency of tomato plants under drought and salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol, 2024, 24: 356

[56]

Nkoa R. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2014, 34: 473-492

[57]

Nkomo N, Odindo AO, Musazura W, Missengue R. Optimising pyrolysis conditions for high-quality biochar production using black soldier fly larvae faecal-derived residue as feedstock. Heliyon, 2021, 7 e07025

[58]

Novak JM, Watts DW, Sigua GC, Myers WT, Ducey TF, Rushmiller HC. Biochar stability in a highly weathered sandy soil under four years of continuous corn production. Energies, 2021, 14: 6157

[59]

Pariyar P, Kumari K, Jain MK, Jadhao PS. Evaluation of change in biochar properties derived from different feedstock and pyrolysis temperature for environmental and agricultural application. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 713 136433

[60]

Pawar A, Panwar NL. A comparative study on morphology, composition, kinetics, thermal behaviour and thermodynamic parameters of Prosopis Juliflora and its biochar derived from vacuum pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 18 101053

[61]

Peters KC, Hughes MP, Daley O. Field-scale calibration of the PAR ceptometer and FieldScout CM for real-time estimation of herbage mass and nutritive value of rotationally grazed tropical pasture. Smart Agric Technol, 2022, 2 100037

[62]

Rathnayake D, Schmidt HP, Leifeld J, Mayer J, Epper CA, Bucheli TD, Hagemann N. Biochar from animal manure: a critical assessment on technical feasibility, economic viability, and ecological impact. GCB Bioenergy, 2023, 15: 1078-1104

[63]

Roberts KG, Gloy BA, Joseph S, Scott NR, Lehmann J. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 827-833

[64]

Rodriguez-Ortiz L, Torres E, Zalazar D, Zhang H, Rodriguez R, Mazza G. Influence of pyrolysis temperature and bio-waste composition on biochar characteristics. Renewable Energy. 2020;155:837–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.181

[65]

Sanchez E, Zabaleta R, Navas AL, Torres-Sciancalepore R, Fouga G, Fabani MP, Rodriguez R, Mazza G. Assessment of pistachio shell-based biochar application in the sustainable amendment of soil and its performance in enhancing bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) growth. Sustainability, 2024, 16 4429

[66]

Seyedghasemi SM, Rezvani Moghaddam P, Esfahani M. Optimization of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer in rice cultivation. J Plant Nutr, 2021, 44: 1705-1718

[67]

Shehab H (2023) Assessing the morphological and physiological traits of smooth brome pastures under long-term grazing and nutrient enrichment in Eastern Nebraska. MSc Thesis, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

[68]

Shit N. Hydroponic fodder production: an alternative technology for sustainable livestock production in India. Explor Anim Med Res, 2019, 9(2): 108-119

[69]

Shyam S, Ahmed S, Joshi SJ, Sarma H. Biochar as a soil amendment: implications for soil health, carbon sequestration, and climate resilience. Discov Soil, 2025, 2 18

[70]

Simkin AJ, Kapoor L, Doss CGP, Hofmann TA, Lawson T, Ramamoorthy S. The role of photosynthesis related pigments in light harvesting, photoprotection and enhancement of photosynthetic yield in planta. Photosynth Res, 2022, 152: 23-42

[71]

Singh SK, Gupta G, Patil AK, Dwivedi PN, Pathak PK, Kautkar S, Satpute AN. Climate-smart hydroponic chamber for efficient green fodder production under resource deficit conditions of semi-arid region. J Plant Nutr, 2024, 47: 2799-2810

[72]

Solaiman ZM, Murphy DV, Abbott LK. Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil, 2012, 353: 273-287

[73]

Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W. Long-term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil, 2007, 291: 275-290

[74]

Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 2020, 19: 191-215

[75]

Tsai WT, Liu SC, Chen HR, Chang YM, Tsai YL. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere, 2012, 89: 198-203

[76]

Tusar HM, Uddin MK, Mia S, Suhi AA, Wahid SBA, Kasim S, Sairi NA, Alam Z, Anwar F. Biochar-acid soil interactions—a review. Sustainability, 2023, 15 13366

[77]

Ullah MS, Malekian R, Randhawa GS, Gill YS, Singh S, Esau TJ, Zaman QU, Afzaal H, Du DL, Farooque AA. The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—a critical review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 2024, 23: 1105-1130

[78]

Wang C, Luo D, Zhang X, Huang R, Cao Y, Liu G, Zhang Y, Wang H. Biochar-based slow-release of fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: a mini review. Environ Sci Ecotechnol, 2022, 10 100167

[79]

Wang D, Li C, Parikh SJ, Scow KM. Impact of biochar on water retention of two agricultural soils—a multi-scale analysis. Geoderma, 2019, 340: 185-191

[80]

Wang K, Peng N, Lu G, Dang Z. Effects of pyrolysis temperature and holding time on physicochemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar. Waste Biomass Valor, 2020, 11: 613-624

[81]

Wilkinson JM, Rinne M. Highlights of progress in silage conservation and future perspectives. Grass Forage Sci, 2018, 73: 40-52

[82]

Xiang W, Zhang X, Chen J, Zou W, He F, Hu X, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Gao B. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chemosphere, 2020, 252 126539

[83]

Yuan H, Lu T, Wang Y, Huang H, Chen Y. Influence of manure-based biochars on soil nitrogen transformation and plant nitrogen uptake. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 838 156427

[84]

Zabaleta R, Sanchez E, Fabani P, Mazza G, Rodriguez R. Almond shell biochar: characterization and application in soilless cultivation of Eruca sativa. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2024, 14: 18183-18200

[85]

Zhang C, Li X, Yan H, Ullah I, Zuo Z, Li L, Yu J. Effects of irrigation quantity and biochar on soil physical properties, growth characteristics, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato. Agric Water Manag, 2020, 241 106263

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/