Determining the sequence of extracting Pinus radiata bark to maximize the total yield of extractives–towards the development of a bark-based biorefinery

Abstract

Abstract

Pinus radiata is the dominant tree species in exotic plantation forestry of New Zealand producing timber for construction and pulp and paper. Additionally, the processing yields large amounts of bark as a byproduct that is either left at the harvest site or used for landscaping. P. radiata bark is rich in biochemical extractives containing polyphenols and waxes on sequential extraction with hydrophilic and lipophilic solvents, respectively. Previous studies have exclusively focussed on the effect of parameters such as solvent type, bark to solvent ratio, and extraction time on the yield of extractives. However, two parameters were always maintained constant: solvent order (lipophilic to hydrophobic) and particle size. This work investigated the the combined impact of these two parameters on total yield and product quality by using two solvents- water and hexane. Total extractives were highest when water was used first (11.74% and 9.45%) compared to hexane (10.53% and 6.53%). The individual yields of hexane extractives were in the range of 2.25–2.9% while those of water were 4.30–9.24%. Chemical analyses of the extracts and residues showed no qualitative differences, indicating the order in which bark is extracted does not alter the extract composition. Moreover, the results have successfully established that extracting bark with water first followed by hexane will increase the total yield of extractives and increasing particle size decreases the total yield of the sequential extraction.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Pinus radiata / Bark biorefinery / Sequential extraction / Extractives / Hydrophilic / Lipophilic / Circular bioeconomy

References

[1] AbilleiraF, VarelaP, CancelaÁ, ÁlvarezX, SánchezÁ, ValeroE. Tannins extraction from Pinus pinaster and Acacia dealbata bark with applications in the industry. Ind Crops Prod, 2021, 164: 113394.

[2] Arshanitsa A, Ponomarenko J, Lauberte L, Jurkjane V, Pals M, Akishin Y, Lauberts M, Jashina L, Bikovens O (2022) Advantages of MW-assisted water extraction, combined with steam explosion, of black alder bark in terms of isolating valuable compounds and energy efficiency. Industrial Crops and Products 181:114832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114832.

[3] ASTM. (2020). Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. In (Vol. D-4442, pp. 5): ASTM International.

[4] AutorE, CornejoA, BimbelaF, MaisterraM, GandíaLM, Martínez-MerinoV. Extraction of phenolic compounds from Populus salicaceae bark. Biomolecules, 2022.

[5] BarbiniS, SriranganadaneD, España OrozcoS, KabrelianA, KarlströmK, RosenauT, PotthastA. Tools for bark biorefineries: studies toward improved characterization of lipophilic lignocellulosic extractives by combining supercritical fluid and gas chromatography. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2021, 931323-1332.

[6] Bento A, Escórcio R, Tome AS, Robertson M, Gaugler CG, Malthus SJ, Raymond LG, Hill SJ, Pereira CS (2022) Pinus radiata bark sequentially processed using scCO2 and an ionic liquid catalyst yields plentiful resin acids and alkanoic acids enriched suberin. Industrial Crops and Products 185:115172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115172.

[7] BlairMJ, CabralL, MabeeWE. Biorefinery strategies: exploring approaches to developing forest-based biorefinery activities in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada. Technol Anal Strat Manag, 2017, 295528-541.

[8] BridsonJH, ThummA, Cooke-WillisM, CampionS, TuttK, WestM. Comparison of near infrared and mid infrared spectroscopy for the prediction of Pinus radiata bark chemical properties relevant to a biorefinery. Biomass Bioenergy, 2024, 185: 107235.

[9] ChenH, ChauhanP, YanN. “Barking” up the right tree: biorefinery from waste stream to cyclic carbonate with immobilization of CO₂ for non-isocyanate polyurethanes. Green Chem, 2020, 22206874-6888.

[10] ChupinL, MaunuSL, ReynaudS, PizziA, CharrierB, Charrier-El BouhtouryF. Microwave assisted extraction of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) bark: impact of particle size and characterization. Ind Crops Prod, 2015, 65: 142-149.

[11] ConterattoC, ArtuzoFD, Benedetti SantosOI, TalaminiE. Biorefinery: a comprehensive concept for the sociotechnical transition toward bioeconomy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 151: 111527.

[12] da SilvaRPFF, Rocha-SantosTAP, DuarteAC. Supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds. Trends Anal Chem, 2016, 76: 40-51.

[13] de JongE, JungmeierGPandeyA, HöferR, TaherzadehM, NampoothiriKM, LarrocheC. Biorefinery concepts in comparison to petrochemical refineries. Industrial biorefineries & white biotechnology, 2015AmsterdamElsevier3-33.

[14] DhawalePV, VineethSK, GadhaveRV, FatimaMJJ, SupekarMV, ThakurVK, RaghavanP. Tannin as a renewable raw material for adhesive applications: a review. Mater Adv, 2022, 383365-3388.

[15] DönmezİE, ÖnemE. Chemical composition and in vitro antibacterial activity of bark extractives and suberin monomers from Pinus brutia and Pinus nigra. Eur J Wood and Wood Prod, 2023.

[16] ElustondoD, RaymondL, RisaniR, DonaldsonL, Le GuenMJ. Exploratory pressure impregnation process using supercritical CO2, Co-solvents, and multi-cycle implementation. Forests, 2022.

[17] FengS, ChengS, YuanZ, LeitchM, XuC. Valorization of bark for chemicals and materials: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2013, 26: 560-578.

[18] FerreiraJPA, QuilhóT, PereiraH. Characterization of Betula pendula outer bark regarding cork and phloem components at chemical and structural levels in view of biorefinery integration. J Wood Chem Technol, 2017, 37110-25.

[19] Ferreira-SantosP, ZanusoE, GenishevaZ, RochaCMR, TeixeiraJA. Green and sustainable valorization of bioactive phenolic compounds from Pinus by-products. Molecules, 2020, 25121-29.

[20] FolinO, CiocalteuV. On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. J Biol Chem, 1927, 732627-650.

[21] GüntherHNMR spectroscopy: basic principles, concepts and applications in chemistry, 2013HobokenWiley

[22] HafizoğluH, HolmbomB, ReunanenM. Chemical composition of lipophilic and phenolic constituents of barks from Pinus nigra, Abies bornmülleriana and Castanea sativa. Holzforschung, 2002, 563257-260.

[23] ISO. (2016–03). ISO 17827–1:2016. In Solid biofuels- Determination of particle size distribution for uncompressed fuels Part 1: Oscillating screen method using sieves with apertures of 3,15 mm and above (Vol. 17827–1 ).

[24] JablonskyM, VernarecováM, HázA, DubinyováL, SkulcovaA, SladkováA, SurinaI. Extraction of phenolic and lipophilic compounds from spruce (Picea abies) bark using accelerated solvent extraction by ethanol. Wood Res, 2015, 604583-590

[25] KuCS, MunSP. Characterization of proanthocyanidin in hot water extract isolated from Pinus radiata bark. Wood Sci Technol, 2007, 413235-247.

[26] KuCS, MunSP, JangJP. Effects of water extraction temperatures on the yield, molecular weight, and antioxidant activity of proanthocyanidins extracted from Pinus radiata bark. Forest Prod J, 2011, 614321-325.

[27] MunSP. Efficacy and reusability of commercial adsorbent for isolation of proanthocyanidins from hot water extract of Pinus radiata bark. J Korean Wood Sci Technol, 2014, 422207-213.

[28] MunJS, KimHC, MunSP. Chemical characterization of neutral extracts prepared by treating <i>Pinus radiata</i> bark with sodium bicarbonate. J Korean Wood Sci Technol, 2020, 486878-887.

[29] NeivaDM, AraújoS, GominhoJ, CarneiroADC, PereiraH. An integrated characterization of Picea abies industrial bark regarding chemical composition, thermal properties and polar extracts activity. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13111-14.

[30] NeivaDM, RencoretJ, MarquesG, GutiérrezA, GominhoJ, PereiraH, del RíoJC. Lignin from tree barks: chemical structure and valorization. ChemSusChem, 2020, 13174537-4547.

[31] OttoneSP, BaldwinRC. The relationship of extractive content to particle size distribution in milled yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) bark. Wood Fiber Sci, 1981, 13274-85

[32] PatelSD, BrunschwigC, RobertsonM, MurrayR, ThummA, RaymondL, HillSJ, WeberCC. Extraction and isolation of hydrophobic compounds and tannins from Pinus radiata bark using switchable hydrophilicity solvents. Ind Crops Prod, 2024, 209: 117966.

[33] PătrăuanuOA, LazărL, PopaVI, VolfI. Influence of particle size and size distribution on kinetic mechanism of spruce bark polyphenols extraction. Cell Chem Technol, 2019, 531–271-78.

[34] Posit-team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software.

[35] PotrzebowskiMJ, TekelyP, DusausoyY. Comment to ¹³C-NMR studies of α-and γ-polymorphs of glycine. Solid State Nuclear Mag Reson, 1998, 113253-257.

[36] QuilterHC, RisaniR, GallagherS, RobertsonM, ThummA, ThomasHP, AbbelR. Synthesis of hydrophobic biopolyesters from depolymerized Pinus radiata bark suberin. Holzforschung, 2024, 785303-316.

[37] R-Core-Team. (2024). R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved 23 April from

[38] RicciA, OlejarKJ, ParpinelloGP, KilmartinPA, VersariA. Application of fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in the characterization of Tannins. Appl Spectrosc Rev, 2015, 505407-442.

[39] RietzlerB, EkM. Adding value to spruce bark by the isolation of nanocellulose in a biorefinery concept. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2021, 931398-1405.

[40] RietzlerB, KarlssonM, KwanI, LawokoM, EkM. Fundamental insights on the physical and chemical properties of organosolv lignin from Norway spruce bark. Biomacromol, 2022, 2383349-3358.

[41] Sandoval-RivasD, MoczkoE, MoralesDV, HeppMI. Evaluation and characterization of a new method of extracting bark wax from Pinus radiata D. Don. Ind Crops Prod, 2021, 174: 114161.

[42] SantosJ, Escobar-AvelloD, FuentealbaC, Cabrera-BarjasG, González-ÁlvarezJ, MartinsJM, CarvalhoLH. Forest by-product valorization: pilot-scale Pinus radiata and eucalyptus globulus bark mixture extraction. Forests, 2023.

[43] ŞenU, EstevesB, PereiraH. Pyrolysis and extraction of bark in a biorefineries context: a critical review. Energies, 2023, 16131-23.

[44] SingletonVL, OrthoferR, Lamuela-RaventósRMSingletonVL, OrthoferR, Lamuela-RaventósRM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods in enzymology, 1999CambridgeAcademic Press.

[45] SupriyadiD, DamayantiD, VeigelS, HansmannC, Gindl-AltmutterW. Unlocking the potential of tree bark: review of approaches from extractives to materials for higher-added value products. Mater Today Sustain, 2025, 29: 101074.

[46] VangeelT, NeivaDM, QuilhóT, CostaRA, SousaV, SelsBF, PereiraH. Tree bark characterization envisioning an integrated use in a biorefinery. Biomass Conv Biorefin, 2023, 1332029-2043.

[47] WijeyekoonS, SucklingI, FahmyM, HallP, BennettP. Techno-economic analysis of tannin and briquette co-production from bark waste: a case study quantifying symbiosis benefits in biorefinery. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin, 2021, 1551332-1344.

[48] WillförS, AliM, KaronenM, ReunanenM, ArfanM, HarlamowR. Extractives in bark of different conifer species growing in Pakistan. Holzforschung, 2009, 635551-558.

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment(C04×1802)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)