Integrated evaluation of antifungal activity of pomegranate peel polyphenols against a diverse range of postharvest fruit pathogens
Muhammad Nawaz , Junkun Pan , Hui Liu , Muhammad Jawad Umer , Jiechao Liu , Wenbo Yang , Zhenzhen Lv , Qiang Zhang , Zhonggao Jiao
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 34
Integrated evaluation of antifungal activity of pomegranate peel polyphenols against a diverse range of postharvest fruit pathogens
The search for safe, natural antimicrobial agents has received significant attention for controlling postharvest diseases in fruits. This study evaluated the antifungal activity of pomegranate peel extracts (PPE) against 9 pathogenic fungi by different methods. Additionally, the key antifungal polyphenol compounds were identified. Results revealed that the n-hexane partitioned fraction of ethanolic extract exhibited the highest inhibition efficacy. A total 36 polyphenols, including 10 newly discovered compounds in pomegranate peel were recognized. Among these, 9 specific polyphenols were found to be relatively abundant in the n-hexane fraction, highlighting their potential as primary antifungal agents. Notably, the newly identified polyphenol compound nobiletin demonstrated the strongest inhibitory effects against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Rhizopus stolonifer and Aspergillus niger with inhibition diameters of 12.2, 12.0, and 12.5 mm, respectively. Salidroside exhibited significant antifungal activity against Monilinia fructicola and A. niger (inhibition diameters > 12.0 mm). Furthermore, cinnamic acid that was enriched in hexane fraction, showed the highest inhibitory zones against Alternaria alternata, C. gloeosporioides and Botryosphaeria dothidea (11.8 ~ 12.7 mm). Caffeic acid and protocatechuic acid both displayed the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on Penicillium expansum. The study demonstrated the potential of PPE, particularly the n-hexane fraction, as a broad-spectrum natural antifungal agent for postharvest disease management.
Pomegranate peel / Polyphenols / Antifungal activity / Fruit / Postharvest pathogens
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Bautista-Baños S, Bosquez-Molina E, Barrera-Necha LL (2014) Rhizopus stolonifer (soft rot). In: Postharvest decay, PP 1–44. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411552-1.00001-6 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Elkahoui S, Jamal A, Ben Abbes W, Gzara L, Charradi K, Haddaji N, Kachout M, Abdelgadir A, Bardakci F, Badraoui R (2024) Investigation of the valorization of methanolic extract of Punica granatum L. peel in terms of phytochemical, trace element, antioxidant activities and ADMET profile of active compounds. Pol J Environ Stud 33(3). https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/175022 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Fang J, Luo L, Li W, Li H (2025) Application of novel adsorbents in methanol removal from ethanol: Citric acid-modified 4A zeolites and Cu@ZIF-7. Biochem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2025.109719 |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
Kahramanoğlu İ (2024) Postharvest challenges, chemical control of postharvest diseases and concerns over agrochemicals. In: Postharvest Physiology and Handling of Horticultural Crops CRC, pp 85–101 |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Lv Z, Liu H, Yang W, Zhang Q, Chen D, Jiao Z, Liu J (2024) Comprehensive analysis of physicochemical properties and volatile compounds in different strawberry wines under various pre-treatments. Molecules 29(9): 2045. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092045 |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Rosas-Burgos EC, Cortez-Rocha MO, Cinco-Moroyoqui FJ, Robles-Zepeda RE, López-Cervantes J, Sánchez-Machado DI, Lares-Villa F (2009) Antifungal activity in vitro of Baccharis glutinosa and Ambrosia confertiflora extracts on Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus and Fusarium verticillioides. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25: 2257–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0116-1 |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Zaushintsena A, Babich O, Bryukhachev E, Milenteva I, Starcev A (2020) Opportunities for using biologically active substances Rhodiola Rosea L. in the production of functional food with consideration for antimicrobial activity. In: E3S Web of Conferences, 2020. EDP Sciences, p 01011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017601011 |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |