A comparative study on enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of diverse herbaceous and woody wastes by promising dilute acid and alkaline pretreatments

Abstract

Biomass recalcitrance makes pretreatment process a key step for efficient bioconversion process. In this study, differential effects of promising acid (AP) and alkaline pretreatments (ALP) on enzymatic hydrolysis of diverse herbaceous and woody wastes were systematically investigated. Four biomass samples were separately pretreated and sugar recovery was then recorded in the subsequent hydrolysis. Results showed that both dilute AP and ALP exhibited efficacy in the removal of hemicellulose. Specifically, soybean straw AP demonstrated the highest recovery of soluble sugars at the pretreatment stage [270 mg/g raw stalk (RS)], against 71–212 mg/g RS achieved in AP and ALP of other wastes. Compared with herbaceous soybean straw, both AP and ALP of more recalcitrant woody biomass (e.g., bamboo and poplar) showed much lower enzymatic sugar yields. Among tested samples, ALP soybean straw produced stronger structure modification, morphological changes and higher delignification, which increased its availability to cellulases. As a result, the sugar yield of ALP soybean straw using 1.5% NaOH reached 787 mg/g, which is much higher than those of other tested AP & ALP biomass wastes. The present study revealed differential responses of diverse biomass wastes to AP & ALP, hence providing valuable information for the development of effective bioconversion process of these promising biomass. Looking ahead, these classic AP and ALP will be further investigated together with other potential and emerging pretreatments (e.g., green solvent pretreatments) to provide a foundation for high value utilization of biomass.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Dilute acid and alkaline pretreatment / Differential response / Enzymatic hydrolysis / Herbaceous and woody wastes

References

[1] Abd-ElhalimBT, El-SawyM, GamalRF, Abou-TalebKA. Production of amylases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens under submerged fermentation using some agro-industrial by-products. Ann Agric Sci, 2015, 60: 193-202.

[2] Abd-ElhalimBT, GamalRF, Abou-TalebKHA, HarounAA. Biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using bacterial supernatant optimized with certain agro-industrial byproducts. Novel Res Microbiol J, 2019, 3: 558-578.

[3] APHAStandard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 199820Washington, DCAmerican Public Health Association

[4] BaAA, KouassiEA, KadjoBS, YaoKB, TyagiRD. Optimization of mild alkaline pretreatment and acid hydrolysis of Typha Australis stems for biofuel conversion. Biomass Convers Bior, 2024.

[5] BrienzoM, FikizoloS, BenjaminY, TyhodaL, GörgensJ. Influence of pretreatment severity on structural changes, lignin content and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse samples. Renew Energy, 2017, 104: 271-280.

[6] CaiCG, WangZB, MaL, XuZX, YuJM, LiFG. Cotton stalk valorization towards bio-based materials, chemicals, and biofuels: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2024, 202. 114651

[7] ChakrabortyP, KumarR, ChakraborttyS, SahaS, ChattarajS, RoyS, BanerjeeA, TripathySK, GhoshAK, JeonBH. Technological advancements in the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for effective valorization: a review of challenges and prospects. J Ind Eng Chem, 2024, 137: 29-60.

[8] ChenN, JiangKJ, ZhaoM, ZhangC, JinYC, WuWJ. Pretreatment process of lignocellulosic biomass: a review of pseudo-lignin formation. Biomass Bioenergy, 2024, 188. 107339

[9] ChengXY, LuoY, GaoYF, LiS, XuCM, TangSY, YangYK, ZhangZH, JiangH, XuHL, ShiSB, YanQ. Surfactant-assisted alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of Miscanthus sinensis for enhancing sugar recovery with a reduced enzyme loading. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10. 918126

[10] CuiMJ, BaiGM. Promoting enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob through alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment and addition of additives. Biomass Convers Bioresour, 2024.

[11] ElianaC, JorgeR, JuanP, LuisR. Effects of the pretreatment method on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentability of the cellulosic fraction from elephant grass. Fuel, 2014, 118: 41-47.

[12] FuSF, ChenKQ, ZhuR, SunWX, ZouH, GuoRB. Improved anaerobic digestion performance of Miscanthusfloridulus by different pretreatment methods and preliminary economic analysis. Energ Convers Manage, 2018, 159: 120-128.

[13] Goering HK, Van-Soest PJ (1970) Agricultural handbook No. 379. Forage fiber analyses, apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. U.S, Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1970.

[14] HoangAT, NguyenXP, DuongXQ, AgbulutÜ, LenC, NguyenPQP, KchaouM, ChenWH. Steam explosion as sustainable biomass pretreatment technique for biofuel production: characteristics and challenges. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 385. 129398

[15] HsuT, GuoG, ChenW, HwangW. Effect of dilute acid pretreatment of rice straw on structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 101: 4907-4913.

[16] JinS, ZhangG, ZhangP, LiF, WangS, FanS, ZhouS. Microwave assisted alkaline pretreatment to enhance enzymatic saccharification of catalpa sawdust. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 221: 26-30.

[17] JoseD, VasudevanS, VenkatachalamP, MaitySK, SeptevaniAA, GuptaM, TantayotaiP, El BariH, SriaryanunM. Effective deep eutectic solvent pretreatment in one-pot lignocellulose biorefinery for ethanol production. Ind Crop Prod, 2024, 222. 119626

[18] KangXH, SunYM, LiLH, KongXY, YuanZH. Improving methane production from anaerobic digestion of Pennisetum Hybrid by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 255: 205-212.

[19] KassayeS, PantKK, JainS. Hydrolysis of cellulosic bamboo biomass into reducing sugars via a combined alkaline solution and ionic liquid pretreatment steps. Renew Energy, 2017, 104: 177-184.

[20] KimD. Physico-chemical conversion of lignocellulose: Inhibitor effects and detoxification strategies: a mini review. Molecules, 2018, 23: 309.

[21] KumariD, SinghR. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 90: 877-891.

[22] LangD, WuR, WangW. Cotton stalk-based biomass. Bio-based polymers: farm to industry: chemistry and feedstocks, 2024American Chemical Society43-62. 1

[23] LiuCZ, ChengXY. Improved hydrogen production via thermophilic fermentation of corn stover by microwave-assisted acid pretreatment. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 8945-8952.

[24] MengXZ, WangYX, ConteAJ, ZhangSY, RyuJ, WieJJ, PuYQ, DavisonBH, YooCG, RagauskasAJ. Applications of biomass-derived solvents in biomass pretreatment—strategies, challenges, and prospects. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 368. 128280

[25] MillerGL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem, 1959, 31: 426-428.

[26] ObengAK, PremjetD, PremjetS. Fermentable sugar production from the peels of two durian (Duriozibethinus Murr.) cultivars by phosphoric acid pretreatment. Resources, 2018, 7: 60.

[27] PandeyAK, NegiS. Impact of surfactant assisted acid and alkali pretreatment on lignocellulosic structure of pine foliage and optimization of its saccharification parameters using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 192: 115-125.

[28] ParkS, BakerJO, HimmelME, ParillaPA, JohnsonDK. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2010, 3: 10.

[29] PhitsuwanP, SakkaK, RatanakhanokchaiK. Structural changes and enzymatic response of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) stem induced by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 218: 247-256.

[30] PrasadS, MalavMK, KumarS, SinghA, PantD, RadhakrishnanS. Enhancement of bio-ethanol production potential of wheat straw by reducing furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Bioresour Technol Rep, 2018, 4: 50-56.

[31] SabanciK, BuyukkileciAQ. Comparison of liquid hot water, very dilute acid and alkali treatments for enhancing enzymatic digestibility of hazelnut tree pruning residues. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 261: 158-165.

[32] SalemKS, KaseraNK, RahmanMA, JameelH, HabibiY, EichhornSJ, FrenchAD, PalL, LuciaLA. Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination. Chem Soc Rev, 2023, 52: 6417-6446.

[33] SamantarayB, MohapatraS, MishraRR, BeheraBC, ThatoiH. Bioethanol production from agro-wastes: a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation. Int J Green Energy, 2024, 21: 1398-1424.

[34] SandyM, ManningA, BolletF. Changes in the crystallinity of cellulose in response to changes in relative humidity and acid treatment. Restaur-Int J Preserv Libr Arch Mater, 2010, 31: 1-18.

[35] ShimizuFL, MonteiroPQ, GhiraldiPHC, MelatiRB, PagnoccaFC, SouzaW, Sant’AnnaC, BrienzoM. Acid, alkali and peroxide pretreatments increase the cellulose accessibility and glucose yield of banana pseudostem. Ind Crops Prod, 2018, 115: 62-68.

[36] SunQ, FostonM, SawadaD, PingaliSV, O'NeillHM, LiH, RagauskasAJ. Comparison of changes in cellulose ultrastructure during different pretreatments of poplar. Cellulose, 2014, 21: 2419-2431.

[37] SunW, LiX, ZhaoJ, QinY. Pretreatment strategies to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis and cellulosic ethanol production for biorefinery of corn stover. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23: 13163.

[38] TangSY, XuCM, KhanhVuLT, LiuSC, YeP, LiLC, WuYX, ChenMY, XiaoY, WuY, WangYN, YanQ, ChengXY. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of Pennisetum alopecuroides by dilute acid, alkaline and ferric chloride pretreatments. Molecules, 2019, 24: 1715.

[39] TobaK, YamamotoH, YoshidaM. Crystallization of cellulose microfibrils in wood cell wall by repeated dry-and-wet treatment, using X-ray diffraction technique. Cellulose, 2013, 20: 633-643.

[40] TsaiMH, LeeWC, KuanWC, SirisansaneeyakulS, SavarajaraA. Evaluation of different pretreatments of Napier grass for enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production. Energy Sci Eng, 2018, 6: 683-692.

[41] WangW, LeeDJ. Lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment by deep eutectic solvents on lignin extraction and saccharification enhancement: a review. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 339. 125587

[42] WangZN, HouXF, SunJ, LiM, ChenZY, GaoZZ. Comparison of ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid and alkaline pretreatment of Eucalyptus for enhancing enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 254: 145-150.

[43] WangJH, LanDM, ZhuangJP, WangYH. Pretreatment of Camellia oleifera shell by ethanolamine-based solvents selective delignification and enhanced enzymatic saccharification. Ind Crop Prod, 2024, 222. 119523

[44] WuWX, ZhuPW, LuoLP, LinHY, TaoYH, RuanLY, WangLQ, QingQ. p-Toluenesulfonic acid enhanced neutral deep eutectic solvent pretreatment of soybean straw for efficient lignin removal and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 2024, 395. 130338

[45] XimenesE, KimY, MosierN, DienB, LadischM. Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2011, 48: 54-60.

[46] XingWR, XuGH, DongJJ, HanRZ, NiY. Novel dihydrogen-bonding deep eutectic solvents: Pretreatment of rice straw for butanol fermentation featuring enzyme recycling and high solvent yield. Chem Eng J, 2018, 333: 712-720.

[47] YuJM, XuZX, LiuL, ChenST, WangSW, JinMJ. Process integration for ethanol production from com and com stover as mixed substrates. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 279: 10-16.

[48] ZhangHD, LyuGJ, ZhangAP, LiX, XieJ. Effects of ferric chloride pretreatment and surfactants on the sugar production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 265: 93-101.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)