Optimization of pyrolysis conditions for Catha edulis waste-based biochar production using response surface methodology

Abstract

Catha edulis (Khat) waste (KW) is one of the challenging waste managements in Ethiopian urban areas. While biochar from other biomass sources has been studied, the effect of pyrolysis conditions on Catha edulis waste-based biochar yield and quality remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to optimize the biochar production process from Catha edulis waste for high yield and desirable characteristics. The KW and biochar were characterized using FTIR, BET, proximate analysis and other key parameters. The results indicated that KW possesses favorable properties for thermochemical conversion, with low ash content (4.35% wt. dry basis) and significant organic constituents (46.89% cellulose, 28.53% lignin, 19.62% hemicellulose, 4.96% extractives). The effect of pyrolysis process variables embracing reaction temperature, reaction time, and particle size on biochar yield and quality was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with central composite design (CCD). The biochar was desirably characterized by a pH of 8.96, fixed carbon of 60.08%, ash content of 10.55%, and a yield of 45.12% at the optimum production processes of 390 °C, 44 min, and 0.7 mm particle size. Moreover, the study found that pyrolysis temperature was the most influential factor across all responses (yield and quality). Consequently, the biochar (yield and quality) was significantly (p < 0.05) influenced by pyrolysis temperature. In conclusion, the study inferred that KW holds substantial potential for biochar production with remarkable soil amendment characteristics.

Keywords

Biochar / Catha edulis waste / CCD / Optimization / Pyrolysis conditions / RSM

References

[1] AbdulhafizY Liquid fuel production through pyrolysis of khat and plastic waste mixture, 2014 Addis Ababa Addis Ababa University

[2] AfessaG, SakaA, TesfayeJL, et al.. Synthesis of plant-derived Khat waste for environmental application. J Nanomater, 2022

[3] Al-RumaihiA, ShahbazM, MckayG, et al.. A review of pyrolysis technologies and feedstock: a blending approach for plastic and biomass towards optimum biochar yield. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 167: 112715

[4] BeesleyL, Moreno-JiménezE, Gomez-EylesJL, et al.. A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut, 2011, 159: 3269-3282

[5] BrassardP, RaghavanV. Pyrolysis in auger reactors for biochar and bio-oil production: a review. Biosyst Eng, 2017, 161: 80-92

[6] CochraneL, O’ReganD. Legal harvest and illegal trade: trends, challenges, and options in khat production in Ethiopia. Int J Drug Policy, 2016, 30: 27-34

[7] DarAA, RatherMY, ManzoorJ, et al.. Biochar: preparation, properties and applications in sustainable agriculture biochar: preparation, properties and applications in sustainable agriculture. Int J Theor Appl Sci, 2019, 11: 29-40

[8] de Campos CP (2019) Guidelines for small scale biochar production system to optimise carbon sequestration outcome. 1–139

[9] El OuadrhiriF, ElyemniM, LahkimiA, et al.. Mesoporous carbon from optimized date stone hydrochar by catalytic hydrothermal carbonization using response surface methodology: application to dyes adsorption. Int J Chem Eng, 2021

[10] FitoJ, SaidH, FelekeS, WorkuA. Fluoride removal from aqueous solution onto activated carbon of Catha edulis through the adsorption treatment technology. Environ Syst Res, 2019, 8: 1-10

[11] GarciaB, RijoB, LourinhoG, NobreC. Biochar: production, applications, and market prospects in Portugal. Environemnts, 2022, 9: 1-21

[12] Gebreyes EF (2018) Production and characterization of fuel briquette from khat (catha edulis forsk) residue for diversification of household energy sources

[13] GeffertA, GeffertovaJ, DudiakM. Direct method of measuring the pH value of wood. Forests, 2019, 10: 6-10

[14] Kandari LS, Yadav HR, Thakur AK, Kandari T (2014) Chat (Catha edulis): a socio economic crop in Harar Region, Eastern Ethiopia. 1–9

[15] KirosY, MuluA, LetaS, SetargeY Heliyon The effect of brewery sludge biochar on immobilization of bio-available cadmium and growth of Brassica carinata, 2020 Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd

[16] KnaufMJ, MoniruzzamanM. Lignocellulosic biomass processing: a perspective. Int Sugar J, 2004, 106: 147-150

[17] KochitoJ, GureA, AbdissaN, et al.. MnOx- Coffea arabica husk and Catha edulis leftover biochar nanocomposites for removal of methylene blue from wastewater. Sci World J, 2024

[18] LehmannJ, JosephS Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2024 London Taylor & Francis

[19] LehmannJ, CowieA, MasielloCA, et al.. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nat Geosci, 2021, 14: 883-892

[20] MajorJ, RondonM, MolinaD, et al.. Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil, 2010, 333: 117-128

[21] MariyamS, AlherbawiM, PradhanS, et al.. Biochar yield prediction using response surface methodology: effect of fixed carbon and pyrolysis operating conditions. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2024, 14: 28879-28892

[22] MaryGS, NivedithaPSS, MaryGS. Production, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod ( Pisum sativum ), leaf ( Brassica oleracea ) and peel ( Citrus sinensis ) wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric, 2016, 5: 43-53

[23] MenyaE. Optimization of pyrolysis conditions for char production from rice husks and its characterization as a precursor for production of activated carbon. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2020, 10: 57-72

[24] MoniMNZ, YusufS, ManafASA, RahmanW. Optimization of slow pyrolysis of bamboo for biochar production using Taguchi ’ s L9 orthogonal array. E3S Web Conf, 2021, 287: 02004

[25] MoredaGA, TolasaSD, TeklemariyemDA. Modeling and simulation of Khat waste fast pyrolysis for energy recovery. Heliyon, 2024, 10: e24176

[26] MoussaouiF, El OuadrhiriF, SalehEAM, et al.. Enhancing hydrochar production and proprieties from biogenic waste: merging response surface methodology and machine learning for organic pollutant remediation. J Saudi Chem Soc, 2024, 28: 101920

[27] MukherjeeA, LalR, ZimmermanAR. Effects of biochar and other amendments on the physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions of an artificially degraded soil. Sci Total Environ, 2014, 487: 26-36

[28] MurtazaG, AhmedZ, UsmanM. Feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature and acid modification effects on physiochemical attributes of biochar and soil quality. Arab J Geosci, 2022

[29] NarzariR, BordoloiN, ChutiaRS, et al. ChoudhuryH, et al.. Biochar: an overview on its production, properties and potential benefits. Biology, biotechnology and sustainable development, 2015 New Delhi Research India Publication 13-29

[30] NawazA, RazzakSA, KumarP. Pyrolysis parameter based optimization study using response surface methodology and machine learning for potato stalk. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, 2024, 159: 105476

[31] NhuchhenDR. Prediction of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen compositions of raw and torrefied biomass using proximate analysis. Fuel, 2016, 180: 348-356

[32] NiyitegekaH, KassahunSK, NyangiMJ. Removal of fluoride from water using aluminum-modified activated carbon prepared from khat (Catha edulis) stems. J Environ Clean Up Cost Technol Tech, 2023

[33] PradhanS, ShahbazM, AbdelaalA, et al.. Optimization of process and properties of biochar from cabbage waste by response surface methodology. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2022, 12: 5479-5491

[34] PugliaM, MorselliN, LumiM, et al.. Assessment of hemp hurd-derived biochar produced through different thermochemical processes and evaluation of its potential use as soil amendment. Heliyon, 2023

[35] RatherRA, BerhanuS, AbaynahL, SultanM. Prevalence of Khat (Catha edulis) chewing and its determinants: a respondent-driven survey from Hossana, Ethiopia. Subst Abuse Rehabil, 2021, 12: 41-48

[36] SahooSS, VijayVK, ChandraR, KumarH. Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo. Clean Eng Technol, 2021, 3: 100101

[37] ShenJ, ZhuS, LiuX, et al.. The prediction of elemental composition of biomass based on proximate analysis. Energy Convers Manag, 2010, 51: 983-987

[38] SopandiTP, SuliantoAA, AnugrohoF, et al.. RSM-optimized biochar production from young coconut waste (Cocos nucifera): multivariate analysis of non-linear interactions between temperature, time, and activator concentration. Ind Crops Prod, 2025, 223: 120157

[39] TefaraSF, JiruEB, G/Meskel BairuA. Optimization of fermentation condition for production of lactic acid from khat (“Catha edulis”) waste by using immobilized Lactobacillus plantarum. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2024, 14: 6637-6647

[40] TessfawZA, BeyeneA, NebiyuA, PikoK. Co-composting of khat-derived biochar with municipal solid waste: a sustainable practice of waste management. Susainabllity, 2020, 12: 1-14

[41] Tessfaw ZA, Beyene A, Nebiyu A, et al (2021) Short term effects of municipal solid waste compost , Khat- derived biochar and co-composted biochar on soil quality and faba bean yield and protein content. 1–16

[42] TomczykA. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Bio/technol, 2020, 19: 191-215

[43] ZhengRL, CaiC, LiangJH, et al.. Florets & rosettes: meristem genes in maize and arabidopsis. Chemosphere, 2014, 37: 3269-3282

[44] ZhouR, ZhangM, LiJ, ZhaoW. Optimization of preparation conditions for biochar derived from water hyacinth by using response surface methodology (RSM) and its application in Pb 2 + removal. J Environ Chem Eng, 2020, 8: 104198

[45] Zhang H, Chen C, Gray EM, Boyd SE (2017) Effect of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on properties ofbiochar governing end use efficacy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 105;136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.024.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)