Energy recovery from syngas and pyrolysis wastewaters with anaerobic mixed cultures

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion of aqueous condensate from fast pyrolysis is a promising technology for enhancing carbon and energy recovery from waste. Syngas, another pyrolysis product, could be integrated as a co-substrate to improve process efficiency. However, limited knowledge exists on the co-fermentation of pyrolysis syngas and aqueous condensate by anaerobic cultures and the effects of substrate toxicity. This work investigates the ability of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic mixed cultures to co-ferment syngas and the aqueous condensate from either sewage sludge or polyethylene plastics pyrolysis in semi-batch bottle fermentations. It identifies inhibitory concentrations for carboxydotrophic and methanogenic reactions, examines specific component removal and assesses energy recovery potential. The results show successful co-fermentation of syngas and aqueous condensate components like phenols and N-heterocycles. However, the characteristics and load of the aqueous condensates affected process performance and product formation. The toxicity, likely resulting from the synergistic effect of multiple toxicants, depended on the PACs’ composition. At 37 °C, concentrations of 15.6 g_COD/g_VSS and 7.8 g_COD/g_VSS of sewage sludge-derived aqueous condensate inhibited by 50% carboxydotrophic and methanogenic activity, respectively. At 55 °C, loads between 3.9 and 6.8 g_COD/g_VSS inhibited by 50% both reactions. Polyethylene plastics condensate showed higher toxicity, with 2.8 g_COD/g_VSS and 0.3 g_COD/g_VSS at 37 °C decreasing carboxydotrophic and methanogenic rates by 50%. At 55 °C, 0.3 g_COD/g_VSS inhibited by 50% CO uptake rates and methanogenesis. Increasing PAC loads reduced methane production and promoted short-chain carboxylates formation. The recalcitrant components in sewage sludge condensate hindered e-mol recovery, while plastics condensate showed high e-mol recoveries despite the stronger toxicity. Even with challenges posed by substrate toxicity and composition variations, the successful conversion of syngas and aqueous condensates highlights the potential of this technology in advancing carbon and energy recovery from anthropogenic waste streams.

Keywords

Pyrolysis wastewater / Phenolics / Nitrogen heterocycles / Open cultures / Volatile fatty acids / Sewage sludge / Polyethylene / Energy recovery / Carbon capture

References

[1] Alvarez J, . Characterization of the bio-oil obtained by fast pyrolysis of sewage sludge in a conical spouted bed reactor. Fuel Process Technol, 2016, 149: 169-175.

[2] Angenent LT, . Chain Elongation with reactor microbiomes: open-culture biotechnology to produce biochemicals. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50(6): 2796-2810.

[3] Arens M, Worrell E, Eichhammer W, Hasanbeigi A, Zhang Q. Pathways to a low-carbon iron and steel industry in the medium-term—the case of Germany. J Clean Prod, 2017, 163: 84-98.

[4] Arnold S, Moss K, Dahmen N, Henkel M, Hausmann R. Pretreatment strategies for microbial valorization of bio-oil fractions produced by fast pyrolysis of ash-rich lignocellulosic biomass. GCB Bioenergy, 2019, 11(1): 181-190.

[5] Astals S, Peces M, Batstone DJ, Jensen PD, Tait S. Characterising and modelling free ammonia and ammonium inhibition in anaerobic systems. Water Res, 2018, 143: 127-135.

[6] Bachmann M, Völker S, Kleinekorte J, Bardow A. Syngas from what? Comparative Life-cycle assessment for syngas production from biomass, CO2, and steel mill off-gases. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2023, 11(14): 5356-5366.

[7] Baleeiro FCF, Kleinsteuber S, Neumann A, Sträuber H. Syngas-aided anaerobic fermentation for medium-chain carboxylate and alcohol production: the case for microbial communities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2019, 103(21–22): 8689-8709.

[8] Battersby NS, Wilson V. Survey of the anaerobic biodegradation potential of organic chemicals in digesting sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1989, 55(2): 433-439.

[9] Biswas B, Sarkar B, Rusmin R, Naidu R. Bioremediation of PAHs and VOCs: advances in clay mineral-microbial interaction. Environ Int, 2015, 85: 168-181.

[10] Black BA, . Aqueous stream characterization from biomass fast pyrolysis and catalytic fast pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2016, 4(12): 6815-6827.

[11] Blum DJW, Speece RE. A database of chemical toxicity to environmental bacteria and its use in interspecies comparisons and correlations. Res J Water Pollut Control Fed, 1991, 63(3): 198-207.

[12] Braz GHR, Fernandez-Gonzalez N, Lema JM, Carballa M. The time response of anaerobic digestion microbiome during an organic loading rate shock. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2018, 102(23): 10285-10297.

[13] Chanaka Udayanga WD, Veksha A, Giannis A, Lisak G, Lim TT. Effects of sewage sludge organic and inorganic constituents on the properties of pyrolysis products. Energy Convers Manag, 2019, 196: 1410-1419.

[14] Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol, 2008, 99(10): 4044-4064.

[15] Chen Y, He J, Wang YQ, Kotsopoulos TA, Kaparaju P, Zeng RJ. Development of an anaerobic co-metabolic model for degradation of phenol, m-cresol and easily degradable substrate. Biochem Eng J, 2016, 106: 19-25.

[16] Chen H, . Hydrothermal conversion of sewage sludge: focusing on the characterization of liquid products and their methane yields. Chem Eng J, 2019, 357: 367-375.

[17] Chen H, . Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of aqueous phase generated from hydrothermal liquefaction of cornstalk: molecular and metabolic insights. Water Res, 2020, 168.

[18] Cieslik BM, Namiesnik J, Konieczka P. Review of sewage sludge management: standards, regulations and analytical methods. J Clean Prod, 2015, 90: 1-15.

[19] Dijk JA, Stams AJM, Schraa G, Ballerstedt H, De Bont JAM, Gerritse J. Anaerobic oxidation of 2-chloroethanol under denitrifying conditions by Pseudomonas stutzeri strain JJ. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2003, 63(1): 68-74.

[20] Djebbar M, Djafri F, Bouchekara M, Djafri A. Adsorption of phenol on natural clay. Appl Water Sci, 2012, 2(2): 77-86.

[21] Evode N, Qamar SA, Bilal M, Barceló D, Iqbal HMN. Plastic waste and its management strategies for environmental sustainability. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng, 2021

[22] Fang HHP, Liang DW, Zhang T, Liu Y. Anaerobic treatment of phenol in wastewater under thermophilic condition. Water Res, 2006, 40(3): 427-434.

[23] Fedorak PM, Hrudey SE. Inhibition of anaerobic degradation of phenolics and methanogenesis by coal coking wastewater. Water Sci Technol, 1987, 19(1–2): 219-228.

[24] Fonts I, Gea G, Azuara M, Ábrego J, Arauzo J. Sewage sludge pyrolysis for liquid production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2012, 16(5): 2781-2805.

[25] Fotidis IA, Karakashev D, Kotsopoulos TA, Martzopoulos GG, Angelidaki I. Effect of ammonium and acetate on methanogenic pathway and methanogenic community composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2013, 83(1): 38-48.

[26] Fuchs W, Rachbauer L, Rittmann SKMR, Bochmann G, Ribitsch D, Steger F. Eight up-coming biotech tools to combat climate crisis. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(6): 1-25.

[27] Funke A, Tomasi Morgano M, Dahmen N, Leibold H. Experimental comparison of two bench scale units for fast and intermediate pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2017, 124: 504-514.

[28] García Rea VS, . Syntrophic acetate oxidation having a key role in thermophilic phenol conversion in anaerobic membrane bioreactor under saline conditions. Chem Eng J, 2023

[29] Hajji KT, Lépine F, Bisaillon JG, Beaudet R. Simultaneous removal of phenol, ortho- and para-cresol by mixed anaerobic consortia. Can J Microbiol, 1999, 45(4): 318-325.

[30] Hübner T, Mumme J. Integration of pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion—use of aqueous liquor from digestate pyrolysis for biogas production. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 183: 86-92.

[31] Ismail S, . Response of anammox bacteria to short-term exposure of 1,4-dioxane: bacterial activity and community dynamics. Sep Purif Technol, 2021, 266: 118539.

[32] Jaramillo-Arango A, Fonts I, Chejne F, Arauzo J. Product compositions from sewage sludge pyrolysis in a fluidized bed and correlations with temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2016, 121: 287-296.

[33] Kaiser JP, Feng Y, Bollag JM. Microbial metabolism of pyridine, quinoline, acridine, and their derivatives under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Microbiol Rev, 1996, 60(3): 483-498.

[34] Khalid H, . Syngas conversion to biofuels and biochemicals: a review of process engineering and mechanisms. Sustain Energy Fuels, 2023, 8(1): 9-28.

[35] Kick C, Uchaikina A, Apfelbacher A, Daschner R, Helmreich B, Hornung A. Aqueous phase of thermo-catalytic reforming of sewage sludge—quantity, quality, and its electrooxidative treatment by a boron-doped diamond electrode. Sep Purif Technol, 2022, 286: 120392.

[36] Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MC. Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy production. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2007, 18(3): 207-212.

[37] Koster IW, Lettinga G. Anaerobic digestion at extreme ammonia concentrations. Biol Wastes, 1988, 25(1): 51-59.

[38] Küçükaǧa Y, . Conversion of pyrolysis products into volatile fatty acids with a biochar-packed anaerobic bioreactor. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2022, 61(45): 16624-16634.

[39] Li Y, Gu G, Zhao J, Yu H. Anoxic degradation of nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds by acclimated activated sludge. Process Biochem, 2001, 37(1): 81-86.

[40] Li R, . Enhanced anaerobic digestion of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater: bio-methane production, carbon distribution and microbial metabolism. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 837: 155659.

[41] Liang Y, . Utilization of acetic acid-rich pyrolytic bio-oil by microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: reducing bio-oil toxicity and enhancing algal toxicity tolerance. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 133: 500-506.

[42] Liu J, Li J, Guocheng S, Chen J, Liu L. Biological production of l -malate: recent advances and future prospects. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2018, 34(1): 1-8.

[43] Navarro SS, Cimpoia R, Bruant G, Guiot SR. Biomethanation of syngas using anaerobic sludge: shift in the catabolic routes with the CO partial pressure increase. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7: 1-13.

[44] Niebel A, . Fast pyrolysis of wheat straw—improvements of operational stability in 10 years of bioliq pilot plant operation. Energy Fuels, 2021, 35(14): 11333-11345.

[45] Parku GK, Krutof A, Funke A, Richter D, Dahmen N. Using fractional condensation to optimize aqueous pyrolysis condensates for downstream microbial conversion. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2023, 62(6): 2792-2803.

[46] Perret L, Lacerda de Oliveira Campos B, Herrera Delgado K, Zevaco TA, Neumann A, Sauer J. COx fixation to elementary building blocks: anaerobic syngas fermentation vs. chemical catalysis. Chem-Ing-Tech, 2022, 94: 1667-1687.

[47] Pham M, Schideman L, Scott J, Rajagopalan N, Plewa MJ. Chemical and biological characterization of wastewater generated from hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina. Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 47(4): 2131-2138.

[48] Poirier S, Bize A, Bureau C, Bouchez T, Chapleur O. Community shifts within anaerobic digestion microbiota facing phenol inhibition: towards early warning microbial indicators?. Water Res, 2016, 100: 296-305.

[49] Posmanik R, Labatut RA, Kim AH, Usack JG, Tester JW, Angenent LT. Coupling hydrothermal liquefaction and anaerobic digestion for energy valorization from model biomass feedstocks. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 233: 134-143.

[50] Robazza A, Welter C, Kubisch C, Baleeiro FCF, Ochsenreither K, Neumann A. Co-fermenting pyrolysis aqueous condensate and pyrolysis syngas with anaerobic microbial communities enables l-malate production in a secondary fermentative stage. Fermentation, 2022

[51] Schnu A. Effects of temperature on biological degradation of phenols, benzoates and phthalates under methanogenic conditions. Int Biodeter Biodegr, 2005, 55: 153-160.

[52] Seyedi S, Venkiteshwaran K, Zitomer D. Toxicity of various pyrolysis liquids from biosolids on methane production yield. Front Energy Res, 2019, 7: 1-12.

[53] Shen Y, Jarboe L, Brown R, Wen Z. A thermochemical-biochemical hybrid processing of lignocellulosic biomass for producing fuels and chemicals. Biotechnol Adv, 2015, 33(8): 1799-1813.

[54] Shi J, Han Y, Xu C, Han H. Anaerobic bioaugmentation hydrolysis of selected nitrogen heterocyclic compound in coal gasification wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 278: 223-230.

[55] Si BC, . Continuous production of biohythane from hydrothermal liquefied cornstalk biomass via two-stage high-rate anaerobic reactors. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2016, 9(1): 1-15.

[56] Sun JQ, Xu L, Tang YQ, Chen FM, Liu WQ, Wu XL. Degradation of pyridine by one Rhodococcus strain in the presence of chromium (VI) or phenol. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 191(1–3): 62-68.

[57] Telliard WA. Method1684 Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids in Water, Solids, and Biosolids Draft January 2001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Office of Science and Technology Engineering and Analysis Division (4303) U.S. EPA. no. January, pp. 1–13, 2001.

[58] Tomasi Morgano M, Leibold H, Richter F, Stapf D, Seifert H. Screw pyrolysis technology for sewage sludge treatment. Waste Manag, 2018, 73: 487-495.

[59] Tommaso G, Chen WT, Li P, Schideman L, Zhang Y. Chemical characterization and anaerobic biodegradability of hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous products from mixed-culture wastewater algae. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 178: 139-146.

[60] Torri C, Fabbri D. Biochar enables anaerobic digestion of aqueous phase from intermediate pyrolysis of biomass. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 172: 335-341.

[61] Usman M, . Characterization and utilization of aqueous products from hydrothermal conversion of biomass for bio-oil and hydro-char production: a review. Green Chem, 2019, 21(7): 1553-1572.

[62] Vogt C, Kleinsteuber S, Richnow HH. Anaerobic benzene degradation by bacteria. Microb Biotechnol, 2011, 4(6): 710-724.

[63] Wang H, Zhang Y, Angelidaki I. Ammonia inhibition on hydrogen enriched anaerobic digestion of manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Water Res, 2016, 105: 314-319.

[64] Wang C, Wu C, Hornung U, Zhu W, Dahmen N. Suppression of tar and char formation in supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge by additive addition. Chemosphere, 2021, 262.

[65] Wang Z, . Distinguishing responses of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens to ammonia stress in mesophilic mixed cultures. Water Res, 2022

[66] Watson J, Wang T, Si B, Chen WT, Aierzhati A, Zhang Y. Valorization of hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase: pathways towards commercial viability. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2020, 77.

[67] Wu B, He C, Yuan S, Hu Z, Wang W. Hydrogen enrichment as a bioaugmentation tool to alleviate ammonia inhibition on anaerobic digestion of phenol-containing wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 276: 97-102.

[68] Xu L, . New attempts on acidic anaerobic digestion of poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) wastewater in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Hazard Mater, 2024, 461: 132586.

[69] Yang L, . Improve the biodegradability of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater with ozone: conversion of phenols and N-heterocyclic compounds. Water Sci Technol, 2018, 2017(1): 248-255.

[70] Yenigün O, Demirel B. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochem, 2013, 48(5–6): 901-911.

[71] Zeller M, Netsch N, Richter F, Leibold H, Stapf D. Chemical recycling of mixed plastic wastes by pyrolysis—pilot scale investigations. Chem-Ing-Tech, 2021, 93(11): 1763-1770.

[72] Zheng M, . Anaerobic digestion of wastewater generated from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina: toxicity assessment and minimization. Energy Convers Manag, 2017, 141: 420-428.

[73] Zhou GM, Fang HHP. Co-degradatiion of phenol and m-cresol in a UASB reactor. Bioresour Technol, 1997, 61(1): 47-52.

[74] Zhou H, Brown RC, Wen Z. Anaerobic digestion of aqueous phase from pyrolysis of biomass: Reducing toxicity and improving microbial tolerance. Bioresour Technol, 2019, 292: 121976.

Funding

Materials and Technologies for the Energy Transition (MTET), Topic 3: Chemical Energy Carriers

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (4220)