Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches
Mei Zhou , Kayode Taiwo , Han Wang , Jean-Nepomuscene Ntihuga , Largus T. Angenent , Joseph G. Usack
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 47
Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches
Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.
Hydrothermal treatment / Process water / Anaerobic digestion / Biogas / Inhibition / Detoxification
| [1] |
Adams P, Bridgwater T, Lea-Langton A, Ross A, Watson I (2018) Chapter 8 - Biomass conversion technologies. In: Thornley P, Adams P (eds) Greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems. Academic Press |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Angenent LT, Usack JG, Sun T, Fink C, Molitor B, Labatut R, Posmanik R, Hörl M, Hafenbradl D (2022) Upgrading anaerobic digestion within the energy economy—the methane platform. In: Pikaar I, Guest J, Ganigué R, Jensen P, Rabaey K, Seviour T, Trimmer J, van der Kolk O, Vaneeckhaute C, Verstraete W (eds) Resource Recovery from Water: Principles and Application. IWA Publishing |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Bayat H, Dehghanizadeh M, Jarvis JM, Brewer CE, Jena U (2021) Hydrothermal liquefaction of food waste: effect of process parameters on product yields and chemistry. Front Sustain Food Syst 5 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
do Nascimento JGD, Silva EVA, dos Santos AB, da Silva MER, Firmino PIM (2021) Microaeration improves the removal/biotransformation of organic micropollutants in anaerobic wastewater treatment systems. Environ Res 198 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Knapp JS, Bromley-Challoner KCA (2003) 34—Recalcitrant organic compounds. In: Mara D, Horan N (eds) Handbook of Water and Wastewater Microbiology. Academic Press, London |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |