Brazilian industrial yeasts show high fermentative performance in high solids content for corn ethanol process

Abstract

An imminent change in the world energy matrix makes it necessary to increase the production of renewable fuels. The United States and Brazil are the world's largest producers, but their production methods are very different, using different raw materials, ground corn and sugarcane juice, respectively. In recent years, strong investments have been made to expand the use of corn in Brazilian ethanol production. The combination of the sugar cane and corn ethanol industries has generated innovations in the sector, such as the "flex" mills, which are traditional sugar cane mills adapted to produce corn ethanol in the sugar cane off-season. Brazil has a portfolio of robust industrial yeasts for sugarcane ethanol production, naturally evolved and selected over the past 50 years. In this work, we analyze for the first time the performance of Brazilian industrial strains (BG-1, CAT-1, PE-2 and SA-1, widely used in sugarcane ethanol production) in corn ethanol production using different stress conditions. Ethanol Red yeast, traditionally used in corn ethanol plants around the world, was used as a control. In terms of tolerance to temperature (35 °C), strains BG-1 and SA-1 stood out. In fermentations with high solids concentration (35%), strain BG-1 reached ethanol contents higher than 19% w/v and had a productivity gain of 5.8% compared to fermentation at 30%. This was the first time that these industrial strains were evaluated using the high solids concentration of 35% and the results point to ways to improve the corn ethanol production process.

Keywords

Bioethanol / Dry-grind / High-solid fermentation / Saccharomyces cerevisiae

References

[1] Abdel-Banat BMA, Hoshida H, Ano A, . High-temperature fermentation: how can processes for ethanol production at high temperatures become superior to the traditional process using mesophilic yeast?. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2010, 85: 861-867.

[2] Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res, 2008, 8(7): 1155-1163.

[3] Basso LC, Basso TO, Rocha SN. Bernardes MAS. Ethanol production in Brazil: The industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. Biofuel production, 2011, InTech: Rijeka, 85-100.

[4] Chaddad FR (2016) The economics and organization of Brazilian agriculture: recent evolution and productivity gains. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.

[5] Dunn B et al (2012) Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res 22(5):908–24

[6] IEA. World energy outlook 2012, 2012, Paris: International Energy Agency.

[7] Ingledew WM (2009) Ethanol Fuel Production: Yeast Processes. In: Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology. Wiley, pp 1–14

[8] Jacobus AP, Gross J, Evans JH, Ceccato-Antonini SR, Gombert AK. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used industrially for bioethanol production. Essays Biochem, 2021, 65(2): 147-161.

[9] Kumar D. Corn. Bioethanol production from corn, 2019, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 615-631.

[10] Kumar D, Singh V. Dry-grind processing using amylase corn and superior yeast to reduce the exogenous enzyme requirements in bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2016, 9: 228.

[11] Kumar, D, Moy, K., & Singh, V (2017). Ethanol yield calculation method – “An unaccounted factor” responsible for yield variations. Paper presented at ASABE Annual International Meeting, Spokane, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201701287

[12] Lima UA, Basso LC, Amorin HV. Processos fermentativos e enzimáticos, 2001, São Paulo: Edgard Blucher, 1-43.

[13] Masiero G. Desenvolvimento dos biocombustíveis no Brasil e no Leste Asiático: experiências e desafios. Rev Bras Polít Int, 2011

[14] Moreira MR, Seabra JEA, Lynd LR, Arantes SM, Cunha MP, Guilhoto JJM. Socio-environmental and land-use impacts of double-cropped maize ethanol in Brazil. Nat Sustain, 2020

[15] Mukherjee V, Radecka D, Aerts G, . Phenotypic landscape of non-conventional yeast species for different stress tolerance traits desirable in bioethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2017, 10: 216.

[16] Murthy GS, Johnston DB, Rausch KD, Tumbleson M, Singh V. Starch hydrolysis modeling: application to fuel ethanol production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2011, 34: 879-890.

[17] Nagamatsu ST, Coutouné N, José J, Fiamenghi MB, Pereira GAG, Oliveira JVC, Carazzolle MF. Ethanol production process driving changes on industrial strains. FEMS Yeast Res, 2021

[18] RFA (2021) Essential Energy - 2021 pocket guide to Ethanol. Renewable Fuels Association. https://d35t1syewk4d42.cloudfront.net/file/276/2021-Pocket-Guide.pdf

[19] Shihadeh JK, Huang H, Rausch KD, Tumbleson ME, Singh V. Vacuum stripping of ethanol during high solids fermentation of corn. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2014, 173(2): 486-500.

[20] Silva FMB, Nascimento CO (2018) Análise de viabilidade da produção de etanol derivado do milho: um estudo comparativo. Unirv. <http://www.unirv.edu.br/conteudos/fckfiles/files/AN%C3%81LISE%20DE%20VIABILIDADE%20DA%20PRODU%C3%87%C3%83O%20DE%20ETANOL.pdf>.

[21] Suryawati L, Wilkins MR, Bellmer DD, Huhnke RL, Maness NO, Banat IM. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of kanlow switchgrass pretreated by hydrothermolysis using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB4. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2008, 101: 894-902.

[22] UNEM (2022) Demanda aquecida e sustentabiloidade vão nortear investimentos para etanol de milho. http://54.162.173.158/2021/11/19/demanda-aquecida-e-sustentabilidade-vao-nortear-investimentos-em-etanol-de-milho/

Funding

Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis

Sinochem Petróleo Brasil Ltda

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (BR).