Real-time and on-line monitoring of ethanol fermentation process by viable cell sensor and electronic nose

Abstract

In this study, introduction of a viable cell sensor and electronic nose into ethanol fermentation was investigated, which could be used in real-time and on-line monitoring of the amount of living cells and product content, respectively. Compared to the conventional off-line biomass determination, the capacitance value exhibited a completely consistent trend with colony forming units, indicating that the capacitance value could reflect the living cells in the fermentation broth. On the other hand, in comparison to the results of off-line determination by high-performance liquid chromatography, the ethanol concentration measured by electronic nose presented an excellent consistency, so as to realize the on-line monitoring during the whole process. On this basis, a dynamic feeding strategy of glucose guided by the changes of living cells and ethanol content was developed. And consequently, the ethanol concentration, productivity and yield were enhanced by 15.4%, 15.9% and 9.0%, respectively. The advanced sensors adopted herein to monitor the key parameters of ethanol fermentation process could be readily extended to an industrial scale and other similar fermentation processes.

Keywords

Ethanol / On-line / Viable cell sensor / Electronic nose

References

[1] Alves-Rausch J, Bienert R, Grimm C, Bergmaier D. Real time in-line monitoring of large scale Bacillus fermentations with near-infrared spectroscopy. J Biotechnol, 2014, 189: 120-128.

[2] Buratti S, Ballabio D, Giovanelli G, Dominguez CMZ, Moles A, Benedetti S, Sinelli N. Monitoring of alcoholic fermentation using near infrared and mid infrared spectroscopies combined with electronic nose and electronic tongue. Anal Chim Acta, 2011, 697(1–2): 67-74.

[3] Burphan T, Tatip S, Limcharoensuk T, Kangboonruang K, Boonchird C, Auesukaree C. Enhancement of ethanol production in very high gravity fermentation by reducing fermentation-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 13069.

[4] Dekker L, Polizzi KM. Sense and sensitivity in bioprocessing-detecting cellular metabolites with biosensors. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2017, 40: 31-36.

[5] Grassi S, Alamprese C, Bono V, Picozzi C, Foschino R, Casiraghi E. Monitoring of lactic acid fermentation process using Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy. J near Infrared Spec, 2013, 21(5): 417-425.

[6] Guo Q, Chu J, Zhuang Y, Gao Y. Controlling the feed rate of propanol to optimize erythromycin fermentation by on-line capacitance and oxygen uptake rate measurement. Bioproc Biosyst Eng, 2016, 39(2): 255-265.

[7] Hirsch E, Pataki H, Domjan J, Farkas A, Vass P, Feher C, Barta Z, Nagy ZK, Marosi GJ, Csontos I. Inline noninvasive Raman monitoring and feedback control of glucose concentration during ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Progr, 2019, 35(5): e2848.

[8] Horta ACL, da Silva AJ, Sargo CR, Cavalcanti-Montano ID, Galeano-Suarez CA, Velez AM, Santos MP, Goncalves VM, Giordano RC, Zangirolami TC. On-line monitoring of biomass concentration based on a capacitance sensor: assessing the methodology for different bacteria and yeast high cell density fed-batch cultures. Braz J Chem Eng, 2015, 32(4): 821-829.

[9] Jagtap RS, Mahajan DM, Mistry SR, Bilaiya M, Singh RK, Jain R. Improving ethanol yields in sugarcane molasses fermentation by engineering the high osmolarity glycerol pathway while maintaining osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2019, 103: 1031-1042.

[10] Ji H, Yu J, Zhang X, Tan T. Characteristics of an immobilized yeast cell system using very high gravity for the fermentation of ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotech, 2012, 168(1): 21-28.

[11] Jiang H, Xu WD, Ding YH, Chen QS. Quantitative analysis of yeast fermentation process using Raman spectroscopy: comparison of CARS and VCPA for variable selection. Spectrochim Acta A, 2020, 228: 117781.

[12] Kedia G, Passanha P, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ, Lee M, Esteves SR. Addressing the challenge of optimum polyhydroxyalkanoate harvesting: Monitoring real time process kinetics and biopolymer accumulation using dielectric spectroscopy. Bioresource Technol, 2013, 134: 143-150.

[13] Khongsay N, Laopaiboon L, Jaisil P, Laopaiboon P. Optimization of agitation and aeration for very high gravity ethanol fermentation from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae using an orthogonal array design. Energies, 2012, 5(3): 561-576.

[14] Kroll P, Stelzer IV, Herwig C. Soft sensor for monitoring biomass subpopulations in mammalian cell culture processes. Biotechnol Lett, 2017, 39(11): 1667-1673.

[15] Legner R, Wirtz A, Koza T, Tetzlaff T, Nickisch-Hartfiel A, Jaeger M. Application of green analytical chemistry to a green chemistry process: Magnetic resonance and Raman spectroscopic process monitoring of continuous ethanolic fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2019, 116(11): 2874-2883.

[16] Li L, Wang ZJ, Chen XJ, Chu J, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL. Optimization of polyhydroxyalkanoates fermentations with on-line capacitance measurement. Bioresource Technol, 2014, 156: 216-221.

[17] Li J, Ding T, Liao XY, Chen SG, Ye XQ, Liu DH. Synergetic effects of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Staphylococcus aureus evaluated by flow cytometry and electron microscopy. Ultrason Sonochem, 2017, 38: 711-719.

[18] Li K, Xia J, Mehmood MA, Zhao XQ, Liu CG, Bai FW. Extracellular redox potential regulation improves yeast tolerance to furfural. Chem Eng Sci, 2019, 196: 54-63.

[19] Liu CG, Xue C, Lin YH, Bai FW. Redox potential control and applications in microaerobic and anaerobic fermentations. Biotechnol Adv, 2013, 31(2): 257-265.

[20] Liu K, Yuan X, Liang LM, Fang JP, Chen YQ, He WJ, Xue T. Using CRISPR/Cas9 for multiplex genome engineering to optimize the ethanol metabolic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Eng J, 2019, 145: 120-126.

[21] Mendez-Rodriguez KB, Figueroa-Vega N, Ilizaliturri-Hernandez CA, Cardona-Alvarado M, Borjas-Garcia JA, Kornhauser C, Malacara JM, Flores-Ramirez R, Perez-Vazquez FJ. Identification of metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes by ultrafast gas chromatography coupled to electronic nose. A pilot study. Biomed Chromatogr, 2020, 34(12): e4956.

[22] Metcalfe GD, Smith TW, Hippler M. On-line analysis and in situ pH monitoring of mixed acid fermentation by Escherichia coli using combined FTIR and Raman techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2020, 412(26): 7307-7319.

[23] Muncan J, Tei K, Tsenkova R. Real-time monitoring of yogurt fermentation process by aquaphotomics near-infrared spectroscopy. Sensors-Basel, 2021, 21(1): 177.

[24] Naghshbandi MP, Tabatabaei M, Aghbashlo M, Gupta VK, Sulaiman A, Karimi K, Moghimi H, Maleki M. Progress toward improving ethanol production through decreased glycerol generation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic and genetic engineering approaches. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2019, 115: 109353.

[25] Nascimento RJA, de Macedo GR, dos Santos ES, de Oliveira JA. Real time and in situ near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for quantitative monitoring of biomass, glucose, ethanol and glycerine concentrations in an alcoholic fermentation. Braz J Chem Eng, 2017, 34(2): 459-468.

[26] Papagianni M, Boonpooh Y, Mattey M, Kristiansen B. Substrate inhibition kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fed-batch cultures operated at constant glucose and maltose concentration levels. J Ind Microbiol Biot, 2007, 34(4): 301-309.

[27] Park SW, Lee SJ, Sim YS, Choi JY, Park EY, Noh BS. Analysis of ethanol in soy sauce using electronic nose for halal food certification. Food Sci Biotechnol, 2017, 26(2): 311-317.

[28] Pinto ASS, Pereira SC, Ribeiro MPA, Farinas CS. Monitoring of the cellulosic ethanol fermentation process by near-infrared spectroscopy. Bioresource Technol, 2016, 203: 334-340.

[29] Raspagliesi F, Bogani G, Benedetti S, Grassi S, Ferla S, Buratti S. Detection of ovarian cancer through exhaled breath by electronic nose: a prospective study. Cancers, 2020, 12(9): 2408-2420.

[30] Rehman O, Shahid A, Liu CG, Xu JR, Javed MR, Eid NH, Gull M, Nawaz M, Mehmood MA. Optimization of low-temperature energy-efficient pretreatment for enhanced saccharification and fermentation of Conocarpus erectus leaves to produce ethanol using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass Convers Bior, 2019, 10(4): 1269-1278.

[31] Sabater-Munoz B, Mattenberger F, Fares MA, Toft C. Transcriptional rewiring, adaptation, and the role of gene duplication in the metabolism of ethanol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mSystems, 2020, 5(4): e00416-20.

[32] Schalk R, Braun F, Frank R, Radle M, Gretz N, Methner FJ, Beuermann T. Non-contact Raman spectroscopy for in-line monitoring of glucose and ethanol during yeast fermentations. Bioproc Biosyst Eng, 2017, 40(10): 1519-1527.

[33] Taiwo AE, Madzimbamuto TN, Ojumu TV. Optimization of corn steep liquor dosage and other fermentation parameters for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae type 1 and anchor instant yeast. Energies, 2018, 11(7): 20.

[34] Tsai SY, Hsu YC, Shu CM, Lin KH, Lin CP. Synchronization of isothermal calorimetry and liquid cultivation identifying the beneficial conditions for producing ethanol by yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation. J Therm Anal Calorim, 2020, 142(2): 829-840.

[35] Vann L, Layfield JB, Sheppard JD. The application of near-infrared spectroscopy in beer fermentation for online monitoring of critical process parameters and their integration into a novel feedforward control strategy. J I Brewing, 2017, 123(3): 347-360.

[36] Wang ZJ, Zhang W, Zhang JW, Guo MJ, Zhuang YP. Optimization of a broth conductivity controlling strategy directed by an online viable biomass sensor for enhancing Taxus cell growth rate and Taxol productivity. RSC Adv, 2016, 6(47): 40631-40640.

[37] Wisniewska P, Sliwinska M, Dymerski T, Wardencki W, Namiesnik J. The analysis of vodka: a review paper. Food Anal Method, 2015, 8(8): 2000-2010.

[38] Wu RZ, Chen D, Cao SW, Lu ZL, Huang J, Lu Q, Chen Y, Chen XL, Guan N, Wei YT, Huang RB. Enhanced ethanol production from sugarcane molasses by industrially engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae via replacement of the PHO4 gene. RSC Adv, 2020, 10(4): 2267-2276.

[39] Xiong ZQ, Guo MJ, Guo YX, Chu J, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL. Real-time viable-cell mass monitoring in high-cell-density fed-batch glutathione fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae T65 in industrial complex medium. J Biosci Bioeng, 2008, 105(4): 409-413.

[40] Zeiser A, Bedard C, Voyer R, Jardin B, Tom R, Kamen AA. On-line monitoring of the progress of infection in Sf-9 insect cell cultures using relative permittivity measurements. Biotechnol and Bioeng, 1999, 63(1): 122-126.

[41] Zhang Y, Lin YH. Metabolic flux analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during redox potential-controlled very high-gravity ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Appl Bioc, 2020, 67(1): 140-147.

[42] Zhang Q, Wu D, Lin Y, Wang X, Kong H, Tanaka S. Substrate and product inhibition on yeast performance in ethanol fermentation. Energ Fuel, 2015, 29(2): 1019-1027.

[43] Zhao HT, Pang KY, Lin WL, Wang ZJ, Gao DQ, Guo MJ, Zhuang YP. Optimization of the n-propanol concentration and feedback control strategy with electronic nose in erythromycin fermentation processes. Process Biochem, 2016, 51(2): 195-203.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program(2017YFB0309302)

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(WF1814032)