Magnetic-driven dynamic culture promotes osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cell

Mengyang Hao , Minghao Xiong , Yangyang Liu , Wen-song Tan , Haibo Cai

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 15

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2021, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 15 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00368-4
Research

Magnetic-driven dynamic culture promotes osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cell

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Effective nutrient transport and appropriate mechanical stimulation play important roles in production of tissue-engineered bone grafts. In this study, an experimental set-up for magnetic-driven dynamic culture of cells was designed to mimic the microenvironment of the bone tissue. Here, its ability to contribute to osteogenic differentiation was investigated by inoculating human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUMSCs) on magnetic scaffolds. The cytocompatibility of the developed magnetic scaffolds was verified for HUMSCs. Magnetic scaffolds seeded with HUMSCs were exposed to magnetic fields. The results showed that magnetic fields did not affect cell activity and promoted HUMSCs osteogenic differentiation. The magnetic scaffolds were magnetically driven for dynamic culture in the experimental set-up to evaluate the influence of HUMSCs osteoblast differentiation. The results indicated that magnetic-driven dynamic culture increased cell alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (p < 0.05) and calcium release (p < 0.05) compared with static culture. The effect was demonstrated in the expression of bone-associated genes. Overall, this study showed that magnetic-driven dynamic culture is a promising tool for regenerative bone engineering.

Keywords

Dynamic culture / Osteogenesis / Magnetic fields / Mesenchymal stem cell / Scaffolds

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mengyang Hao, Minghao Xiong, Yangyang Liu, Wen-song Tan, Haibo Cai. Magnetic-driven dynamic culture promotes osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cell. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2021, 8(1): 15 DOI:10.1186/s40643-021-00368-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Beskardes IG, Aydin G, Bektas S, Cengiz A, Gumusderelioglu M. A systematic study for optimal cell seeding and culture conditions in a perfusion mode bone-tissue bioreactor. Biochem Eng J, 2018, 132: 100-111.

[2]

Chang CY, Lew WZ, Feng SW, Wu CL, Wang HH, Hsieh SC, Huang HM. Static magnetic field-enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells via matrix vesicle secretion. Int J Radiat Biol, 2020, 96: 1207-1217.

[3]

Filippi M, Dasen B, Guerrero J, Garello F, Isu G, Born G, Ehrbar M, Martin I, Scherberich A. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogels and static magnetic field stimulate the osteoblastic and vasculogenic profile of adipose-derived cells. Biomaterials, 2019, 223: 119468.

[4]

Ge JH, Zhai MD, Zhang Y, Bian J, Wu JL. Biocompatible Fe3O4/chitosan scaffolds with high magnetism. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019, 128: 406-413.

[5]

Gonzaga VDM, Poli AL, Gabriel JS, Tezuka DY, Valdes TA, Leitao A, Rodero CF, Bauab TM, Chorilli M, Schnnitt CC. Chitosan-laponite nanocomposite scaffolds for wound dressing application. J Biomed Mater Res B, 2020, 108: 1388-1397.

[6]

Kang KS, Hong JM, Kang JA, Rhie JW, Jeong YH, Cho DW. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by controlling electromagnetic field conditions. Exp Mol Med, 2013, 45: e6.

[7]

Kumar P, Dey B, Sekhar GPR. Nutrient transport through deformable cylindrical scaffold inside a bioreactor: an application to tissue engineering. Int J Eng Sci, 2018, 127: 201-216.

[8]

Lee JH, Han WJ, Jang HS, Choi HJ. Highly tough, biocompatible, and magneto-responsive Fe3O4/Laponite/PDMAAm nanocomposite hydrogels. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 15024.

[9]

Li JJ, Ebied M, Xu J, Zreiqat H. Current approaches to bone tissue engineering: the interface between biology and engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 2018, 7: e1701061.

[10]

Li S, Wei CL, Lv YG. Preparation and application of magnetic responsive materials in bone tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res T, 2020, 15: 428-440.

[11]

Li WH, Zhao SR, He W, Zhang M, Li S, Xu YH. Static magnetic fields accelerate osteogenesis by regulating FLRT/BMP pathway. Biochem Bioph Res Co, 2020, 527: 83-89.

[12]

Liu LY, Yuan WJ, Wang JF. Mechanisms for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells induced by fluid shear stress. Biomech Model Mechan, 2010, 9: 659-670.

[13]

Liu C, Yu J, Yang Y, Tang X, Zhao D, Zhao W, Wu H. Effect of 1 mT sinusoidal electromagnetic fields on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 2013, 34: 453-464.

[14]

Liu MX, Zheng HJ, Chen J, Li SL, Huang JF, Zhou CR. Chitosan-chitin nanocrystal composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 2016, 152: 832-840.

[15]

Maharjan B, Park J, Kaliannagounder VK, Awasthi GP, Joshi MK, Park CH, Kim CS. Regenerated cellulose nanofiber reinforced chitosan hydrogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 2021, 251: 117023.

[16]

Mitra D, Whitehead J, Yasui OW, Leach JK. Bioreactor culture duration of engineered constructs influences bone formation by mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 2017, 146: 29-39.

[17]

Ressler A, Rodenas-Rochina J, Ivankovic M, Ivankovic H, Rogina A, Ferrer GG. Injectable chitosan-hydroxyapatite hydrogels promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Carbohydr Polym, 2018, 197: 469-477.

[18]

Rodling L, Volz EM, Raic A, Brandle K, Franzreb M, Lee-Thedieck C. Magnetic macroporous hydrogels as a novel approach for perfused stem cell culture in 3D scaffolds via contactless motion control. Adv Healthc Mater, 2018, 7: e1701403.

[19]

Soundarya SP, Menon AH, Chandran SV, Selvamurugan N. Bone tissue engineering: scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. Int J Biol Macromol, 2018, 119: 1228-1239.

[20]

Toosi S, Behravan N, Behravan J. Nonunion fractures, mesenchymal stem cells and bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2018, 106: 2552-2562.

[21]

Vetsch JR, Muller R, Hofmann S. The evolution of simulation techniques for dynamic bone tissue engineering in bioreactors. J Tissue Eng Regen M, 2015, 9: 903-917.

[22]

Wang R, Wu H, Yang Y, Song MY. Effects of electromagnetic fields on osteoporosis: a systematic literature review. Electromagn Biol Med, 2016, 35: 384-390.

[23]

Wang J, Zhou LH, Sun QH, Cai HB, Tan WS. Porous chitosan derivative scaffolds affect proliferation and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cell via reducing intracellular ROS. Carbohyd Polym, 2020, 237: 116108.

[24]

Wang S, He YF, Ma J, Yu L, Wen JK, Ye XJ. Dynamic bioreactor culture for Infiltration of bone mesenchymal stem cells within electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for annulus fibrosus repair. Orthop Surg, 2020, 12: 304-311.

[25]

Xia Y, Sun J, Zhao L, Zhang F, Liang XJ, Guo Y, Weir MD, Reynolds MA, Gu N, Xu HHK. Magnetic field and nano-scaffolds with stem cells to enhance bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 2018, 183: 151-170.

[26]

Yeatts AB, Fisher JP. Bone tissue engineering bioreactors: dynamic culture and the influence of shear stress. Bone, 2011, 48: 171-181.

[27]

Yu JZ, Wu H, Yang Y, Liu CX, Liu Y, Song MY. Osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells regulated by osteoblasts under EMF exposure in a co-culture system. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2014, 34: 247-253.

[28]

Zhang Y, Chen M, Tian J, Gu P, Cao H, Fan X, Zhang W. In situ bone regeneration enabled by a biodegradable hybrid double-network hydrogel. Biomater Sci, 2019, 7: 3266-3276.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

139

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/