Application of gene expression programming, artificial neural network and multilinear regression in predicting hydrochar physicochemical properties

Abstract

Globally, the provision of energy is becoming an absolute necessity. Biomass resources are abundant and have been described as a potential alternative source of energy. However, it is important to assess the fuel characteristics of the various available biomass sources. Soft computing techniques are presented in this study to predict the mass yield (MY), energy yield (EY), and higher heating value (HHV) of hydrothermally carbonized biomass using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), multiple-input single output-artificial neural network (MISO-ANN), and Multilinear regression (MLR). The three techniques were compared using statistical performance metrics. The coefficient of determination (R ²), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean bias error (MBE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. The MISO-ANN with 5-10 to 10-1 and 5-15-15-1 network architectures provided the most satisfactory performance of the three proposed models (R ² = 0.976, 0.955, 0.996; MAE = 2.24, 2.11, 0.93; MBE = 0.16, 0.37, 0.12) for MY, EY and HHV, respectively. The GEP technique’s ability to predict hydrochar properties based on the input parameters was found to be satisfactory, while MLR provided an unsatisfactory predictive model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and the analysis revealed that volatile matter (VM) and temperature (Temp) have more influence on the MY, EY, and HHV.

Keywords

Artificial neural network / Biomass / Gene expression programming / Higher heating value / Hydrochars / Hydrothermal carbonization

References

[1] Aladejare AE, Onifade M, Lawal AI (2020) Application of metaheuristic based artificial neural network and multilinear regression for the prediction of higher heating values of fuels. Int J Coal Prep Util:1–22

[2] Bach Q-V, Tran K-Q, Skreiberg Ø. Hydrothermal pretreatment of fresh forest residues: effects of feedstock pre-drying. Biomass Bioenerg, 2016, 85: 76-83.

[3] Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA. New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenerg, 2014, 66: 176-185.

[4] Danso-Boateng E (2015) Biomass hydrothermal carbonisation for sustainable engineering. Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University

[5] Estiati I, Freire FB, Freire JT, Aguado R, Olazar M. Fitting performance of artificial neural networks and empirical correlations to estimate higher heating values of biomass. Fuel, 2016, 180: 377-383.

[6] Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0102027. Accessed 22 Jul 2020

[7] Funke A, Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuel BioprodBior, 2010, 4(2): 160-177.

[8] Gao L, Volpe M, Lucian M, Fiori L, Goldfarb JL. Does hydrothermal carbonization as a biomass pretreatment reduce fuel segregation of coal-biomass blends during oxidation? Energy Convers. Manage, 2019, 181: 93-104.

[9] Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model, 2003, 160(3): 249-264.

[10] Ghugare SB, Tiwary S, Tambe SS. Computational intelligence based models for prediction of elemental composition of solid biomass fuels from proximate analysis. Int J Sys Ass EngMgt, 2017, 8(4): 2083-2096.

[11] Guven A, Aytek A. New approach for stage-discharge relationship: gene-expression programming. J HydrolEng, 2009, 14(8): 812-820.

[12] Hansen JV, Meservy RD. Learning experiments with genetic optimization of a generalized regression neural network. Decis Support Syst, 1996, 18(3–4): 317-325.

[13] He X, Liu Z, Niu W, Yang L, Zhou T, Qin D, Niu Z, Yuan Q. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on the physicochemical properties of gas and biochar obtained from pyrolysis of crop residues. Energy, 2018, 143: 746-756.

[14] Holtmeyer ML, Li G, Kumfer BM, Li S, Axelbaum RL. The impact of biomass cofiring on volatile flame length. Energ Fuel, 2013, 27(12): 7762-7771.

[15] Hwang I-H, Aoyama H, Matsuto T, Nakagishi T, Matsuo T. Recovery of solid fuel from municipal solid waste by hydrothermal treatment using subcritical water. J Waste Manag, 2012, 32(3): 410-416.

[16] Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Comput J, 1996, 29(3): 31-44.

[17] Kambo HS, Dutta A. Strength, storage, and combustion characteristics of densified lignocellulosic biomass produced via torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization. Appl Energy, 2014, 135: 182-191.

[18] Kambo HS, Dutta A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties, and applications. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2015, 45: 359-378.

[19] Khandelwal M, Singh T. Prediction of macerals contents of Indian coals from proximate and ultimate analyses using artificial neural networks. Fuel, 2010, 89(5): 1101-1109.

[20] Kim D, Lee K, Park KY. Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested sludge for solid fuel production and energy recovery. Fuel, 2014, 130: 120-125.

[21] Krylova AY, Zaitchenko V. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a review. Solid Fuel Chem, 2018, 52(2): 91-103.

[22] Kubacki ML, Ross AB, Jones JM, Williams A. Small-scale co-utilisation of coal and biomass. Fuel, 2012, 101: 84-89.

[23] Lawal AI. An artificial neural network-based mathematical model for the prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in granite quarries in Ibadan, Oyo State Nigeria. Sci Afr, 2020, 8: e00413.

[24] Lawal AI, Aladejare AE, Onifade M, Bada S, Idris MA. Predictions of elemental composition of coal and biomass from their proximate analyses using ANFIS, ANN, and MLR. Int J Coal Sci Technol, 2020

[25] Lee J, Sohn D, Lee K, Park KY. Solid fuel production through hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and microalgae Chlorella sp. from wastewater treatment plant. Chemosphere, 2019, 230: 157-163.

[26] Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici M-M, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes, and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels, 2011, 2(1): 71-106.

[27] Majumder AK, Jain R, Banerjee P, Barnwal J. Development of a new proximate analysis based correlation to predict calorific value of coal. Fuel, 2008, 87(13–14): 3077-3081.

[28] Makwarela M, Bada S, Falcon R. Co-firing combustion characteristics of different ages of Bambusabalcooa relative to a high ash coal. Renew Energy, 2017, 105: 656-664.

[29] Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Jewiarz M, Dziedzic K. Assessment of energy parameters of biomass and biochars, leachability of heavy metals, and phytotoxicity of their ashes. J Mater Cycles Waste, 2019, 21(4): 786-800.

[30] Mumme J, Eckervogt L, Pielert J, Diakité M, Rupp F, Kern J. Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested maize silage. BioresourTechnol, 2011, 102(19): 9255-9260.

[31] Onifade M, Lawal AI, Aladejare AE, Bada S, Idris MA (2019) Prediction of gross calorific value of solid fuels from their proximate analysis using soft computing and regression analysis. Int J Coal Prep Util:1–15

[32] Park KY, Lee K, Kim D. Characterized hydrochar of algal biomass for producing solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization. BioresourTechnol, 2018, 258: 119-124.

[33] Parshetti GK, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R. Chemical, structural and combustion characteristics of carbonaceous products obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of palm empty fruit bunches. BioresourTechnol, 2013, 135: 683-689.

[34] Patel N (2019) Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Marine Seaweed (Macroalgae) for Producing Hydro-Char. Masters thesis, Dalhousie University

[35] Patel SU, Kumar BJ, Badhe YP, Sharma B, Saha S, Biswas S, Chaudhury A, Tambe SS, Kulkarni BD. Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks. Fuel, 2007, 86(3): 334-344.

[36] Peng C, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Xu B, Wang T, Li C, Zeng G. Production of char from sewage sludge employing hydrothermal carbonization: char properties, combustion behavior, and thermal characteristics. Fuel, 2016, 176: 110-118.

[37] Perlack RD, Eaton LM, Turhollow Jr AF, Langholtz MH, Brandt CC, Downing ME, Graham RL, Wright LL, Kavkewitz JM, Shamey AM (2011) US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=abe_eng_reports. Accessed 16 Jul 2020

[38] Pradhan P, Mahajani SM, Arora A. Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: a review. Fuel Process Technol, 2018, 181: 215-232.

[39] Reza MT, Uddin MH, Lynam JG, Hoekman SK, Coronella CJ. Hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine: reaction chemistry and water balance. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2014, 4(4): 311-321.

[40] Rousset P, Macedo L, Commandré J-M, Moreira A. Biomass torrefaction under different oxygen concentrations and its effect on the composition of the solid by-product. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2012, 96: 86-91.

[41] Saadat M, Khandelwal M, Monjezi M. An ANN-based approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration of Gol-E-Gohar iron ore mine. Iran J Rock MechGeotechEng, 2014, 6(1): 67-76.

[42] Saba A, Saha P, Reza MT. Co-Hydrothermal Carbonization of coal-biomass blend: Influence of temperature on solid fuel properties. Fuel Process Technol, 2017, 167: 711-720.

[43] Sadiku NA, Oluyege AO, Sadiku IB. Analysis of the calorific and fuel value index of bamboo as a source of renewable biomass feedstock for energy generation in Nigeria. Lignocellulose, 2016, 5(1): 34-49.

[44] Safarian S, Unnþórsson R, Richter C. A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2019, 110: 378-391.

[45] Said KO, Onifade M, Lawal AI, Githiria JM (2020a) An artificial intelligence-based model for the prediction of spontaneous combustion liability of coal based on its proximate analysis. Combust Sci Technol:1–18

[46] Said KO, Onifade M, Lawal AI, Githiria JM (2020b) Computational intelligence-based models for predicting the spontaneous combustion liability of coal. Int J Coal Prep Util:1–25

[47] Saidur R, Abdelaziz E, Demirbas A, Hossain M, Mekhilef S. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2011, 15(5): 2262-2289.

[48] Saldarriaga JF, Aguado R, Pablos A, Amutio M, Olazar M, Bilbao J. Fast characterization of biomass fuels by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Fuel, 2015, 140: 744-751.

[49] Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon, 2009, 47(9): 2281-2289.

[50] Seyedsadr S, Al Afif R, Pfeifer C. Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues: a case study of the farm residues-based biogas plants. Carbon Resour Convers, 2018, 1(1): 81-85.

[51] Sheng C, Azevedo J. Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenerg, 2005, 28(5): 499-507.

[52] Silakova M (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of the tropical biomass.

[53] Stemann J, Erlach B, Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonisation of empty palm oil fruit bunches: laboratory trials, plant simulation, carbon avoidance, and economic feasibility. Waste Biomass Valori, 2013, 4(3): 441-454.

[54] Tekin K, Karagöz S, Bektaş S. A review of hydrothermal biomass processing. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2014, 40: 673-687.

[55] Teodorescu L, Sherwood D. High energy physics event selection with gene expression programming. Comput Phys Commun, 2008, 178(6): 409-419.

[56] Uzun H, Yıldız Z, Goldfarb JL, Ceylan S. Improved prediction of higher heating value of biomass using an artificial neural network model based on proximate analysis. BioresourTechnol, 2017, 234: 122-130.

[57] Vargas-Moreno J, Callejón-Ferre A, Pérez-Alonso J, Velázquez-Martí B. A review of the mathematical models for predicting the heating value of biomass materials. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2012, 16(5): 3065-3083.

[58] Volpe M, Goldfarb JL, Fiori L. Hydrothermal carbonization of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes: role of process parameters on hydrochar properties. BioresourTechnol, 2018, 247: 310-318.

[59] Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Li C, Zeng G. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew SustEnerg Rev, 2018, 90: 223-247.

[60] Wasserman PD. Advanced methods in neural computing, 1993, New York: Wiley.

[61] Wiedner K, Naisse C, Rumpel C, Pozzi A, Wieczorek P, Glaser B. Chemical modification of biomass residues during hydrothermal carbonization–What makes the difference, temperature or feedstock?. Org Geochem, 2013, 54: 91-100.

[62] Xiong J-B, Pan Z-Q, Xiao X-F, Huang H-J, Lai F-Y, Wang J-X, Chen S-W. Study on the hydrothermal carbonization of swine manure: The effect of process parameters on the yield/properties of hydrochar and process water. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2019, 144: 104692.

[63] Xu Q, Qian Q, Quek A, Ai N, Zeng G, Wang J. Hydrothermal carbonization of macroalgae and the effects of experimental parameters on the properties of hydrochars. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2013, 1(9): 1092-1101.

[64] Yang Y, Zhang Q. A hierarchical analysis for rock engineering using artificial neural networks. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 1997, 30(4): 207-222.

[65] Zhang Z, Pang S. Experimental investigation of tar formation and producer gas composition in biomass steam gasification in a 100 kW dual fluidised bed gasifier. Renew Energy, 2019, 132: 416-424.

[66] Zhu Y, Si Y, Wang X, Zhang W, Shao J, Yang H, Chen H. Characterization of hydrochar pellets from hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural residues. Energ Fuel, 2018, 32(11): 11538-11546.

Funding

National Research Foundation, South Africa(86421)