Effect of carbon-rich-waste addition as co-substrate on the performance and stability of anaerobic digestion of abattoir wastewater without agitation
Abrha Mulu Hailu , Seyoum Leta Asfaw , Tenalem Ayenew Tegaye
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2020, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 44
Effect of carbon-rich-waste addition as co-substrate on the performance and stability of anaerobic digestion of abattoir wastewater without agitation
Multiple wastes’ co-digestion is one of the alternatives for improved anaerobic digestion (AD) process of industrial and municipal wastes. The present work investigated the influence of fruit–vegetable solid waste (FVW) addition as a co-substrate on the performance of AD of abattoir wastewater (AWW). The co-digestion was done at a lab-scale-based experiment under mesophilic condition using a two-phase anaerobic sequencing batch reactor without agitation. It was tested at different mixing ratios (100%AWW; 75%AWW:25%FVW; 50%AWW:50%FVW; 25%AWW:75%FVW; 100%FVW) with the intention of looking for the best mixing ratio with the best performance. It was fed on a semi-continuous basis and operated for 18 days (d) total retention time (HRT): 3 days for the acidogenesis reactor and 15 days for methanogenesis reactor. The addition of FVW enhanced biogas yield and VS removal by 70.26% and 57.11%, respectively, at optimum mixing ratio. Moreover, to some extent improvement of AD process stability verified by the decreased TVFA:TAlk ratio and free ammonia nitrogen was observed upon progressive addition of FVW. Finally, this co-digestion process should further be studied for its performance at different HRTs with agitation.
Abattoir wastewater / Biogas / Fruits–vegetables waste / Mixing ratios / Phased anaerobic co-digestion
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 2005, Washington: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
FAO (2017) Appendix Xvi : Methods of Feed Analysis. Feed Feed fish Shrimp 1–8 |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Hach. DR/2400 Spectrophotometer procedure manual, 2004, Loveland: Hach Company. |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Medina VF, Waisner S, Cosper S, Rodriguez G, Gilbert D, Tucker R, Macallister I, Scholze R, Burken J, Wang J (2014) Anaerobic Digestion Assessment for Contingency Base Waste Engineer Research and Development. ERDC TR-14-3 |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Nrel DC (2008) Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Natl Renew Energy Lab Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Tesema (2010) Overview of Addis Ababa City. 39 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Westerholm M, Schnürer A (2019) Microbial Responses to Different Operating Practices for Biogas Production Systems. In: Anaerobic Digestion. pp 1–36 |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |