Interaction of enzymes with lignocellulosic materials: causes, mechanism and influencing factors

Abstract

For the production of biofuel (bioethanol), enzymatic adsorption onto a lignocellulosic biomass surface is a prior condition for the enzymatic hydrolysis process to occur. Lignocellulosic substances are mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The polysaccharide matrix (cellulose and hemicellulose) is capable of producing bioethanol. Therefore, lignin is removed or its concentration is reduced from the adsorption substrates by pretreatments. Selected enzymes are used for the production of reducing sugars from cellulosic materials, which in turn are converted to bioethanol. Adsorption of enzymes onto the substrate surface is a complicated process. A large number of research have been performed on the adsorption process, but little has been done to understand the mechanism of adsorption process. This article reviews the mechanisms of adsorption of enzymes onto the biomass surfaces. A conceptual adsorption mechanism is presented which will fill the gaps in literature and help researchers and industry to use adsorption more efficiently. The process of enzymatic adsorption starts with the reciprocal interplay of enzymes and substrates and ends with the establishment of molecular and cellular binding. The kinetics of an enzymatic reaction is almost the same as that of a characteristic chemical catalytic reaction. The influencing factors discussed in detail are: surface characteristics of the participating materials, the environmental factors, such as the associated flow conditions, temperature, concentration, etc. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials and optimum range of shear force and temperature for getting better results of adsorption are recommended.

Keywords

Biofuel / Bioethanol / Adsorption / Mechanism / Shear force

References

[1] Al-Haddad M, Al-Jumaily A, Brooks J, Bartley J (2013) Biophysical effects on chronic rhinosinusitis bacterial biofilms, respiratory disease and infection–a new insight. In: Bassam H. Mahboub, IntechOpen, https://doi.org/10.5772/53860. https://www.intechopen.com/books/respiratory-disease-and-infection-a-new-insight/biophysical-effects-on-chronic-rhinosinusitis-bacterial-biofilms

[2] Andersson AAM, Lampi AM, Nystrom L, Piironen V, Li L, Ward JL, Gebruers K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Boros D, Fras A, Dynkowska W, Rakszegi M, Bedo Z, Shewry PR, Aman P. Phytochemical and dietary fibre components in barley varieties in the health grain diversity screen. J Agric Food Chem, 2008, 56: 9767-9776.

[3] Arantes V, Saddler JN. Cellulose accessibility limits the effectiveness of minimum cellulase loading on the efficient hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2011, 4: 3.

[4] Arca-Ramos A, Eibes G, Feijoo G, Lema JM, Moreira MT. Enzymatic reactors for the removal of recalcitrant compounds in wastewater. Biocatal Biotransform, 2018, 36(3): 195-215.

[5] Baig KS (2008) Biosorption of Ni²⁺ and Zn²⁺ on wheat straw. Master’s Thesis presented to School of Graduate Studies at Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

[6] Baig KS (2016a) Strategic adsorption/desorption of cellulases NS 50013 onto/from Avicel PH 101 and protobind 1000. Doctoral Dissertation, presented to School of Graduate Studies at Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

[7] Baig KS. Thermodynamics of adsorption/desorption of cellulases NS 50013 on/from Avicel PH 101 and protobind 1000. Am J Eng Res, 2016, 5(2): 157-165.

[8] Baig KS, Turcotte G, Doan H. Adsorption of cellulose enzymes on lignocellulosic materials and influencing factors: a review. Int J Waste Resour, 2016, 6: 239.

[9] Baig KS, Turcotte G, Doan H. Looking at adsorption of cellulases NS 50013 onto Avicel PH 101 and Protobind 1000 through isotherms and thermodynamics. Int J Waste Resour, 2016

[10] Baig KS, Turcotte G, Doan H. Adsorption and desorption of cellulases NS 50013 onto/from avicel ph 101: a simple functional model. Int J Waste Resour, 2016

[11] Bekard IB, Peter Asimakis P, Bertolini J, Dunstan DE. The effects of shear flow on protein structure and function. Biopolymers, 2011, 95(11): 733-745.

[12] Beldman G, Voragen AGJ, Rombouts FM, Leeuwen MF, Pilnik W. Adsorption and kinetic behaviour of purified endoglucanases and exoglucanases from Trichoderma viride. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1987, 30: 251-257.

[13] Berlin AB, Gilkes N, Kurabi A, Bura R, Tu M, Kilburn D, Saddler NJ. Weak lignin-binding enzymes. A novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2005, 121–124: 163-170.

[14] Bhagia S, Wyman CE, Kumar R. Impacts of cellulase deactivation at the moving air–liquid interface on cellulose conversions at low enzyme loadings. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2019, 12(1): 1-15.

[15] Bonnin E, Alvarado C, Crépeau M, Bouchet B, Garnier C, Jamme F, Devaux M. Mobility of pectin methylesterase in pectin/cellulose gels is enhanced by the presence of cellulose and by its catalytic capacity. Sci Rep, 2019

[16] Bonomo CF, Minim LA, Coimbra JSR, Fontan RCI, Mendes da Silva LH, Minim VPR. Hydrophobic interaction adsorption of whey proteins: effect of temperature and salt concentration and thermodynamic analysis. J Chromatogr B, 2006, 844: 6-14.

[17] Borjesson J, Peterson R, Tjerneld F. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly (ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2007, 40: 754-762.

[18] Brigham JS, Adney WS, Himmel ME. Wyman CE. Hemicelluloses: diversity and applications. Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization, 1996, Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis, 119-142.

[19] Buntić AV, Pavlović MD, Antonović DG, Šiler-Marinković SS, Dimitrijević-Branković SI. Utilization of spent coffee grounds for isolation and stabilization of Paenibacillus chitinolyticus CKS1 cellulase by immobilization. Heliyon, 2016, 2(8): e00146.

[20] Bykov I (2008) Characterization of natural and technical lignins using FTIR spectroscopy. Master’s Thesis. Department of Chemical Engineering and Geosciences. Lulea University of Technology. S-971 87 Lulea

[21] Canizo JR, Cortes-Callejas ML, Dávila-Gomez FJ, Heredia-Olea E, Perez CE, Serna-Saldívar SO. Release of potentially fermentable sugars during dilute acid treatments of Bermuda grass NK37 (Cynodon dactylon) for second-generation ethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2014, 89: 1941-1947.

[22] Coyle WT (2007) The future of biofuels: a global perspective. feature bioenergy. United State Department of Agriculture (USDA). Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2007/november/the-future-of-biofuels-a-global-perspective/. Accessed Nov 10 2019

[23] Creagh AL, Ong E, Jervis E, Kilburn DG, Haynes CA. Binding of the cellulose-binding domain of exoglucanases Cex from Cellulomonas fimi to insoluble microcrystalline cellulose is entropically driven. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 12229-12234.

[24] Dahmen N, Lewandowski I, Zibek S, Weldtmann A. Integrated lignocellulosic value chains in a growing bioeconomy: status quo and perspectives. GCB Bioenergy., 2019, 11: 107-117.

[25] Daoud FB, Kaddour S, Sadoun T. Adsorption of cellulase Aspergillus niger on a commercial activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Colloids Surf B, 2010, 75(1): 93-99.

[26] Das A, Ghosh U, Mohapartra PKD, Pati BR, Mondal KC. Study on thermodynamics and adsorption kinetics of purified endoglucanase (CMCase) from Penicillium notatum NCIM NO-923 produced under mixed solid-state fermentation of waste cabbage and bagasse. Braz J Microbiol., 2012, 43(3): 1103-1111.

[27] Das A, Paul T, Halder SK, Jana A, Ghosh K, Maity C, Mohapatra PKD, Pati BR, Mondal KC. Low cost single-step purification of endoglucanase from Aspergillus fumigatus ABK-9. Indian J Exp Biol, 2013, 51: 954-959.

[28] Davis K, Rover M, Brown R, Bai X, Wen Z, Jarobe LR. Recovery and utilization of lignin monomers as part of the biorefinery approach. Energies, 2016, 9: 808.

[29] Dhowre HS, Rajput S, Russell NA, Zelze M. Responsive cell–material interfaces. Nanomedicine, 2015, 10(5): 14.

[30] Ding B, Wang X, Yu J. Electrospinning: nanofabrication and applications, 2019, Norwich: William Andrew

[31] Djajadi DT, Jensen MM, Oliveira M, Jensen A, Thygesen LG, Pinelo M, Glasius M, Jørgensen H, Meyer AS. Lignin from hydrothermally pretreated grass biomass retards enzymatic cellulose degradation by acting as a physical barrier rather than by inducing nonproductive adsorption of enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2018, 11(1): 85.

[32] Donaldson L, Vaidya A. Visualising recalcitrance by colocalisation of cellulase, lignin and cellulose in pretreated pine biomass using fluorescence microscopy. Sci Rep., 2017, 7: 44386.

[33] Dong M, Wang S, Xu F, Wang J, Yang N, Li Q, Chen J, Li W. Pretreatment of sweet sorghum straw and its enzymatic digestion: insight into the structural changes and visualization of hydrolysis process. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2019

[34] Du R, Su R, Zhang M, Qi W, He Z. Cellulase recycling after high-solids simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of combined pretreated corncob. Front Energy Res, 2014

[35] Duan YH, Ma YY, Zhao XD, Huang RL, Su RX, Qi W, He ZM. Real-time adsorption and action of expansin on cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2018, 1: 317.

[36] Dutta S, Chakraborty S. Pore-scale dynamics of enzyme adsorption, swelling and reactive dissolution determine sugar yield in hemicellulose hydrolysis for biofuel production. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 38173.

[37] Eckard AD, Muthukumarappan K, Gibbons W. A review of the role of amphiphiles in biomass to ethanol conversion. Appl Sci., 2013, 3: 396-419.

[38] Eggeman T, Elander RT. Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol, 2005, 96(18): 2019-2025.

[39] Engler AJ, Chan M, Boettiger D, Schwarzbauer JE. A novel mode of cell detachment from fibrillar fibronectin matrix under shear. J Cell Sci, 2009, 122: 1647-1653.

[40] Faccio G. From protein features to sensing surfaces. Sensors, 2018, 18(4): 1204.

[41] Feller BE, Kellis JT, Cascao-Pereira LG, Robertson CR, Frank CW. The role of electrostatic interactions in protease surface diffusion and the consequence for interfacial biocatalysis. Langmuir, 2010, 26(24): 18916-18925.

[42] Filali L, Brahmi Y, Sib JD, Bouizem Y, Benlakehal D, Zellana K, Lemee N, Bouhekka A, Kail F, Kebab A, Chahed L. Local surface electric field’s effect on adsorbed proteins’ orientation. Surfaces, 2019, 2: 415-431.

[43] Fulton L, Howes T, Hardy J (2004) Biofuels for transport: an international perspective. International Energy Agency, Paris. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppd/free/2004/biofuels2004.pdf

[44] Gosselink RJA, Abächerli A, Semke H, Malherbe R, Käuper P, Nadif A, van Dam JEG. Analytical protocols for characterisation of sulphur-free lignin. Ind Crops Prod, 2004, 19: 271-281.

[45] Hanefeld U, Gardossi L, Magner E. Understanding enzyme immobilisation. Chem Soc Rev, 2009, 38: 453.

[46] Hefford MA, Laderoute K, Willick GE, Yaguchi M, Seligy VL. Bipartite organization of the Bacillus subtilis endo–1, 4-glucanase revealed by C-terminal mutations. Protein Eng, 1992, 5: 433-439.

[47] Hermann J, DiStasio RA, Tkatchenko A. First-principles models for van der Waals interactions in molecules and materials: concepts, theory, and applications. Chem Rev, 2017, 117(6): 4714-4758.

[48] Hilden L, Johansson G. Recent developments on cellulases and carbohydrate-binding modules with cellulose affinity. Biotechnol Lett, 2004, 26: 1683-1693.

[49] Hoarau M, Badieyan S, Marsh ENG. Immobilized enzymes: understanding enzyme-surface interactions at the molecular level. Org Biomol Chem, 2017, 15: 9539-9551.

[50] Hopkins WG, Huner NPA. Introduction to plant physiology, 2017, 4, New York: Wiley.

[51] Hoshino E, Kanda T, Sasaki Y, Nisizawa K. Adsorption mode of exo-cellulases and endocellulases from Irpex lacteus (Polyporus tulipiferae) on cellulose with different crystallinities. J Biochem, 1992, 111: 600-605.

[52] Houston R, Labbe N, Hayes D, Daw CS, Abdoulmoumine. Intermediate temperature water–gas shift kinetics for hydrogen production. React Chem Eng, 2019, 4: 1814-1822.

[53] IEA (2019) Tracking transport. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2019. Accessed Jan 15 2020

[54] Ingesson H, Zacchi G, Yang B, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN. The effect of shaking regime on the rate and extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Biotechnol, 2001, 88: 177-182.

[55] Ioelovich M. Waste paper as promising feedstock for production of biofuel. J Sci Res Rep, 2014, 3(7): 905-916.

[56] Isikgor FH, Becer CR. Lignocellulosic biomass: a sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym Chem, 2015, 6: 4497-4559.

[57] Jager G, Wu Z, Garscchammer K, Engel P, Klement T, Rinaldi Spiess AC, Buchs J. Practical screening of purified cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases with α cellulose and specification of hydrodynamics. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2010, 3(18): 1-12.

[58] Jalak J, Väljamäe P. Multi-mode binding of Cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei to cellulose. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(9): e108181.

[59] Jaspe J, Hagen SJ. Do protein molecules unfold in a simple shear flow?. Biophys J, 2006, 91(9): P3415-P3424.

[60] Jung SJ, Kim S-H, Chung I-M. Comparison of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose contents for biofuels utilization among 4 types of lignocellulosic crops. Biomass Bioenergy, 2015, 83: 322-327.

[61] Kadic A, Palmqvist B, Liden G. Effects of agitation on particle-size distribution and enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated spruce and giant reed. Biotech Biofuel, 2014, 7: 77.

[62] Kang L (2011) Bioconversion of pulp and paper mills sludge and pehydrolysate stream into ethanol and cellulase enzyme. Ph.D. Dissertation, Auburn University, Albama, USA

[63] Katsikogianni M, Missirli YF. Concise review of mechanism of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interaction. Eur Cells Mater, 2004, 8: 37-57.

[64] Katsimpouras C, Kalogiannis KG, Kalogiannis A, Lappas AA, Topakas E. Production of high concentrated cellulosic ethanol by acetone/water oxidized pretreated beech wood. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2017, 10: 54.

[65] Khattab SMR, Watanbe T. Bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: status and perspectives. Bioethanol production from food crops, sustainable sources, interventions, and challenges, 2019, New York: Academic Press, 187-212.

[66] Khodaverdi M, Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ. Kinetic modeling of rapid enzymatic hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose after pretreatment by NMMO. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 39: 429-438.

[67] Kim DW, Hong YG. Ionic strength effect on adsorption of cellobiohydrolases I and II on microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Lett, 2000, 22: 1337-1342.

[68] Kim HW, Han S, Kim W, Lim J, Kim DS. Modulating wall shear stress gradient via equilateral triangular channel for in situ cellular adhesion assay. Biomicrofluidics, 2016, 10: 054119.

[69] Klemm D, Heublein B, Finl H, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2005, 44: 3358-3393.

[70] Kulkarni C, Bejagam KK, Senanayak SP, Narayan KS, Balasubramanian S, George SJ. Dipole-moment-driven cooperative supramolecular polymerization. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 3924-3932.

[71] Kumar R, Wyman CE. An improved method to directly estimate cellulase adsorption on biomass solids. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2008, 42: 426-433.

[72] Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2009, 48(8): 3713-3729.

[73] Kwon S, Lee JH, Kim CM, Jang H, Yun H, Jeon JJ, So I, Park HH. Structural basis of substrate recognition by a novel thermostable (S)-enantioselective ω-transaminase from Thermomicrobium roseum. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 6958.

[74] Lara-Serrano M, Morales-delaRosa S, Campos-Martín JM, Fierro JLG. Fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass by selective precipitation from ionic liquid dissolution. Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 1862-1879.

[75] Le Costaouec T, Pakarinen A, Varnai A, Puranen T, Viikari L. The role of carbohydrate binding module (CBM) at high substrate consistency: comparison of Trichoderma reesei and Thermoascus aurantiacus Cel7A (CBHI) and Cel5A (EGII). Bioresour Technol, 2013, 143: 196-203.

[76] Lee S (1999) Molecular adsorption at solid/liquid interfaces using self assembled monolayer films. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Chemical Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[77] Lee T, Alarcon-Correa MC, Miksch C, Hahn K, Gibbs J, Fischer GP. Self-propelling nanomotors in the presence of strong Brownian forces. Nano Lett, 2014, 2014(14): 2407-2412.

[78] Lehtio J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 484-489.

[79] Li Y, Wang J, Liu X, Zhang S. Towards a molecular understanding of cellulose dissolution in ionic liquids: anion/cation effect, synergistic mechanism and physicochemical aspects. Chem Sci, 2018, 9(17): 4027-4043.

[80] Lindman B, Medronho B, Alves L, Costa C, Edlund H, Norgren M. The relevance of structural features of cellulose and its interactions to dissolution, regeneration, gelation and plasticization phenomena. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 2017(19): 23704-23718.

[81] Lippok S, Radtke M, Obser T, Kleemeier L, Schneppenheim R, Budde U, Rädler JO. Shear-induced unfolding and enzymatic cleavage of full-length VWF multimers. Biophys J, 2016, 110(3): 545-554.

[82] Liu R, Yu H, Huang Y. Structure and morphology of cellulose in wheat straw. Cellulose, 2005, 12: 25-34.

[83] Liu H, Sun J, Leu S, Chen S. Toward a fundamental understanding of cellulase-lignin interactions in the whole slurry enzymatic saccharification process. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin, 2016, 10: 648-663.

[84] Lou H, Zhu JY, Lan TQ, Lai H, Qiu X. pH-induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Chem Suspens Chem, 2013, 6: 919-927.

[85] Lourenco A, Pereira H. Poletto M. Compositional variability of lignin in biomass. Lignin–trends and applications, 2018, New York: Intech Open

[86] Lu Y, Lu Y-C, Hu H-Q, Xie F-J, Wei X-Y, Fan X. Structural characterization of lignin and its degradation products with spectroscopic methods. J Spectrosc, 2017

[87] Lutzen NW, Nielsen MH, Oxenboell KM, Schulein M, Stentebjerg-Olesen B. Cellulases and their application in the conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars. Philos Trans R Soc B, 1983, 300: 283-9.

[88] Lundell SJ (2018) Quantum mechanical studies of N–H···N hydrogen bonding in acetamide derivatives and amino acids. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7309. Utah State University. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7309

[89] Machado DL, Moreira NJ, da Cruz Pradella JG, Bonomi A, Rabelo SC, da Costa AC. Adsorption characteristics of cellulase and β-glucosidase on Avicel, pretreated sugarcane bagasse, and lignin. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2015, 62(5): 681-689.

[90] Mandels M, Weber J. The production of cellulases. Adv Chem Ser, 1969, 95: 391-413.

[91] Mansor AM, Lim JS, Ani FN, Hashim H, Ho WS. Characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin of MD2 pineapple biomass. Chem Eng Trans, 2019, 72: 79-84.

[92] Marriot PE, Gomez LD, McQueen Mason SJ. Unlocking the potential of lignocellulosic biomass through plant science. New Phytol, 2016, 209: 1366-1381.

[93] Matsakas L, Nitsos C, Raghavendran V, Yakimenko O, Persson G, Olsson E, Rova U, Olsson L, Christakopoulos P. A novel hybrid organosolv: steam explosion method for the efficient fractionation and pretreatment of birch biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2018, 11(1): 160.

[94] Maurer SA, Bedbrook CN, Radke CJ. Cellulase adsorption and reactivity on a cellulose surface from flow ellipsometry. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2012, 51(35): 11389-11400.

[95] Medve J, Stahlberg J, Tjerneld F. Adsorption and synergism of cellobiohydrolase I and II of Trichoderma reesei during hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1994, 44(9): 1064-1073.

[96] Mercon F, Erbes VL, Sant`Anna GL, Nobrega R. Lipase immobilized membrane reactor applied to babassu oil hydrolysis. Braz J Chem Eng, 1997, 14(1): 1-10.

[97] Mohamed N, Rainier TR Jr, Ross JM. Novel experimental study of receptor-mediated bacterial adhesion under the influence of fluid shear. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2000, 68(6): 628-636.

[98] Mok YK (2015) The role of adsorbed enzymes in determining the hydrolysis kinetics of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. Ph. D. Thesis. Faculty of graduate and postdoctoral studies (Forestry). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/24/items/1.0167205/source

[99] Nakagame S, Chandra RP, Kadla JF, Saddler JN. The isolation, characterization and effect of lignin isolated from steam pretreated Douglas-fir on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102: 4507-4517.

[100] National Forestry Data Base—Annual Inventory (2017) http://nfdp.ccfm.org/en/index.php. Accessed 1 Mar 2020

[101] Navarro-Sanchez J, Almora-Barrios N, Lerma-Berlanga B, Ruiz-Pernía JJ, Lorenz-Fonfria VA, Tunon I, Marti-Gastaldo C. Translocation of enzymes into a mesoporous MOF for enhanced catalytic activity under extreme conditions. Chem Sci, 2019, 10: 4082-4088.

[102] Netrabukkana R, Lourvanij K, Rorrer GL. Diffusion of glucose and glucitol in microporous and mesoporous silicate/alumino silicate catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1996, 35(2): 458-464.

[103] Nghiem NP, Toht MJ. Pretreatment of sweet sorghum bagasse for ethanol production using Na₂CO₃ obtained by NaOH absorption of CO₂ generated in sweet sorghum juice ethanol fermentation. Fermentation, 2019, 5(4): 91.

[104] Nidetzky B, Steiner W. A new approach for modeling cellulase-cellulose adsorption and the kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1993, 42(4): 469-479.

[105] Nimlos MR, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, Brady JW, Adney WS, Cleary JM, Zhong L, Himmel ME. Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of Family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Protein Eng Des Sel, 2007, 20(4): 179-187.

[106] Nitsos CK, Lazaridis PA, Mach-Aigner A, Matis KA, Triantafyllidis KS. Enhancing lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by hydrothermal pretreatment, extraction of surface lignin, wet milling and production of cellulolytic enzymes. Chemsuschem, 2019, 12(6): 1179-1195.

[107] O’Sullivan AC. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose, 1997, 4: 173-207.

[108] Ooshima H, Sakata M, Harano Y. Adsorption of cellulase from Trichoderma viride on cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1983, 25: 3103-3114.

[109] Palmqvist B, Wiman M, Lidén G. Effect of mixing on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce: a quantitative analysis of conversion and power consumption. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2011, 4: 10.

[110] Palonen H, Tenkanen M, Linder M. Dynamic interaction of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases Cel6A and Cel7A and cellulose at equilibrium and during hydrolysis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65: 5229-5233.

[111] Pareek N, Gillgren T, Jönsson LJ. Adsorption of proteins involved in hydrolysis of lignocellulose on lignins and hemicelluloses. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 148: 70-77.

[112] Park D, Jhon DY, Lee CW, Ryu SH, Rhee SG. Removal of the carboxyl-terminal region of phospholipase C-beta 1 by calpain abolishes activation by G alpha q. J Biol Chem, 1993, 268: 3710-3714.

[113] Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J, 2008, 54: 559-568.

[114] Piccolo C, Wiman M, Bezzo F, Liden G. Enzyme adsorption on SO2 catalyzed steam-pretreated wheat and spruce material. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2010, 46: 159-169.

[115] Podgorbunskikh EM, Bychkov AL, Lomovsky OI. Determination of surface accessibility of the cellulose substrate according to enzyme sorption. Polymers, 2019, 11: 1201.

[116] Qin Z, Buehler MJ. Molecular mechanics of mussel adhesion proteins. J Mech Phys Solids, 2014, 62: 19-30.

[117] Queiros CSGP, Cardoso S, Lourenҫo A, Ferreira J, Miranda I, Lourenҫo MJV, Pereira H. Characterization of walnut, almond, and pine nut shells regarding chemical composition and extract composition. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2019

[118] Qureshi N, Annous BA, Ezeji TC. Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microb Cell Fact, 2005, 4: 24.

[119] Ragnar M, Lindgren CT, Nilvebrant N. pKa-values of guaiacyl and syringyl phenols related to lignin. J Wood Chem Technol, 2000, 20: 277-305.

[120] Rahikainen JL, Evans JD, Mikander S, Kalliola A, Puranen T, Tamminen T, Marjamaa K, Kruus K. Cellulase–lignin interactions—the role of carbohydrate-binding module and pH in non-productive binding. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2013, 53: 315-321.

[121] Ramalingam K, Aimoto S, Bello J. Conformational studies of anionic melittin analogues: effect of peptide concentration, pH, ionic strength and temperature—models for protein folding and halophilic proteins. Biopolymers, 1992, 32: 981-992.

[122] Reinikainen T, Teleman O, Teeri TT. Effects of pH and high ionic strength on the adsorption and activity of native and mutated cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform, 1995, 22: 392-403.

[123] Reis CLB, de Sousa EYA, Serpa JF, Oliveira RC, Santos JCS. Design of immobilized enzyme biocatalysis: drawbacks and opportunities. Quím Nova, 2018, 42: 7.

[124] Reyes-Rivera J, Canché-Escamilla G, Soto-Hernández M, Terrazas T. Wood chemical composition in species of Cactaceae: the relationship between lignification and stem morphology. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(6): e0130240.

[125] Reza M, Bertinetto C, Kesari KK, Engelhardt Peter, Ruokolainen J, Vuorinen T. Cellulose elementary fibril orientation in the spruce S1–2 transition layer. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 3869.

[126] Ribeiro M, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP. Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions. Biomatter, 2012, 2(4): 176-194.

[127] Robert P, Nicolas A, Aranda-Espinoza S, Bongrand P, Limozin L. Minimal encounter time and separation determine ligand-receptor binding in cell adhesion. Biophys J, 2011, 100(11): 2642-2651.

[128] Rofiqah U, Kurniawan A, Aji RWN. Effect of temperature in ionic liquids pretreatment on the structure of lignocellulose from corncob. J Phys, 2019

[129] Romanczuk P, Bär M, Ebeling W, Linder B, Schimansky-Geier L. Active Brownian particles: from individual to collective stochastic dynamics. Eur Phys J Spec Top, 2012

[130] Rosgaard L, Andric P, Dam-Johansen K, Pedersen S, Meyer AS. Effect of substrate loading on enzymatic hydrolysis and viscosity of pretreated barley straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2007, 143: 27-40.

[131] Rutledge LR, Wetmore SD. Quantum biochemistry, 2010, Hoboken: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 307-336.

[132] Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L. Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech, 2015, 5(4): 337-353.

[133] Scott EE, Wolf CR, Otyepka M, Humphreys SC. The role of protein–protein and protein–membrane interactions on P450 function. Drug Metab Dispos, 2016, 44: 576-579.

[134] Sethi B, Mishra S, Bisaria VS. Adsorption characteristics of cellulases from a constitutive of Trichoderma reesei, 1998, India: J Indian Institute of Technology

[135] Shi J, Wu D, Zhang L, Simmons BA, Singh S, Yang B, Charles E, Wyman CE. Dynamic changes of substrate reactivity and enzyme adsorption on partially hydrolyzed cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2016

[136] Singh J, Kaur M. Partial purification of cellulase enzyme from Fusarium oxysporum by using egg white matrix. Br Biotechnol J, 2014, 4(2): 108-115.

[137] Singh A, Kumar PKR, Schugerl K. Adsorption and reuse of cellulases during saccharification of cellulosic materials. J Biotechnol, 1991, 18: 205-212.

[138] Sridhar SL, Ortega JKE, Vernerey FJ. A statistical model of cell wall dynamics during expansive growth. Biology, 2018

[139] Srisodusk M, Reinikainen T, Pentilla M, Teeri TT. Role of the interdomain linker peptide of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I in its interaction with crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem, 1993, 268(20): 756-761.

[140] Steiner W, Sattler W, Esterbauer H. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei cellulase on cellulose: experimental data and their analysis by different equations. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1988, 32: 853-865.

[141] Stewart JJ, Akiyama T, Chapple C, Ralph J, Mansfield SD. The effects on lignin structure of overexpression of ferulate 5-hydroxylase in hybrid poplar. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 621-635.

[142] Stuart JY, Ristoph DL. Analysis of cellulose-cellulase adsorption data: a fundamental approach. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1984, 27: 1056-1059.

[143] Sukumaran RK, Abraham A, Mathew AK. Sugathan S, Pradeep N, Abdulhameed S. Enzymes for bioenergy. Bioresources and bioprocess in biotechnology, 2017, Singapore: Springer.

[144] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol, 2002, 83(1): 1-11.

[145] Taegtmeyer H. Cardiomyocyte metabolism: all is in flux. Muscle: fundamental biology and mechanisms of disease, 2012, New York: Academic Press, 187-202.

[146] Tamer TM, Omer AM, Hassan M. Methods of enzyme immobilization. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res, 2016, 7(6): 385-392.

[147] Tervasmäki P, Sotaniemi V, Kangas J, Taskila S, Ojamo H, Tanskanen J. A discretized model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in a fed-batch process. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 227: 112-124.

[148] Thomas CR, Geer D. Effects of shear on proteins in solution. Biotechnol Lett, 2010, 33(3): 443-456.

[149] Tokunaga Y, Nagata T, Suetomi T, Oshiro S, Kondo K, Katahira M, Watanabe T. NMR analysis on molecular interaction of lignin with amino acid residues of carbohydrate-binding module from Trichoderma reesei Cel7A. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 1977.

[150] Tomme P, Heriban V, Claeyssens M. Adsorption of two cellobiohydrolases from Trichoderma reesei to Avicel: evidence for exoexo synergism and possible loose complex formation. Biotechnol Lett, 1990, 12: 525-530.

[151] Tu M, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. Recycling cellulases during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated Lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog, 2007, 23: 1130-1137.

[152] Tu M, Pan X, Saddler JN. Adsorption of cellulase on cellulolytic enzyme lignin from Lodgepole pine. J Agric Food Chem, 2009, 57: 7771-7778.

[153] Varnai A, Siikaaho M, Viikari L. Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2010, 46: 185-193.

[154] Várnai A, Viikari L, Marjamaa K, Siika-aho M. Adsorption of monocomponent enzymes in enzyme mixture analyzed quantitatively during hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102(2): 1220-1227.

[155] Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-Aho M. Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 2007, 108: 121-145.

[156] Vladkova TG. Surface engineered polymeric biomaterials with improved biocontact properties. Int J Polym Sci, 2010, 2010: 296094.

[157] Voegele E (2019) IEA predicts growth in global ethanol production through 2023. Ethanol Producer Magazine. http://ethanolproducer.com/. Accessed 14 Jan 2020

[158] Walstra P. Miller R. Effect of agitation on proteins. Food Colloids: fundamentals of formulation, 2001, London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 245-254.

[159] Wang DW (2010) Optimizing enzymatic preparations of mechanical pulp through the characterization of new laccases and non-productive interactions between enzymes and lignin. Master’s thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto

[160] Wang F, Zhang D, Chen M, Weiming Y, Wang L. Characteristics of corn stover components pyrolysis at low temperature based on detergent fibers. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019

[161] Wilson DB. Biochemistry and genetics of Actinomycetes cellulases. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 1992, 12: 45-63.

[162] Wilson KA, Kellie JL, Wetmore SD. DNA–protein-interactions in nature: abundance, structure, composition and strength of contacts between aromatic amino acids and DNA nucleobases or deoxyribose sugar. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(10): 6726-6741.

[163] Yanagishima T, Laohakunakorn N, Keyser UF, Eiser E, Tanaka H. Influence of internal viscoelastic modes on the Brownian motion of a λ-DNA coated colloid. Soft Matter, 2014, 10: 1738-1745.

[164] Yang H, Coolman R, Karanjkar P, Wang H, Domath P, Chen H, Fan W, Conner WC, Mountziaris TJ, Huber G. The effects of contact time and coking on the catalytic fast pyrolysis of cellulose. Green Chem, 2017, 19: 286-297.

[165] Yang M, Zhao W, Sing S, Simmons B, Cheng G. On the solution structure of kraft lignin in ethylene glycol and its implication for nanoparticle preparation. Nanoscale Adv, 2019, 1: 299-304.

[166] Yarbrough JM, Mittal A, Mansfield E, Taylor LE, Hobdey SE, Sammond DW, Bomble YJ, Crowley MF, Decker SR, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB. New perspective on glycoside hydrolase binding to lignin from pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015, 8: 124.

[167] Ying W, Shi Z, Yang H, Xu G, Zheng Z, Yang J. Effect of alkaline lignin modification on cellulase–lignin interactions and enzymatic saccharification yield. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2018

[168] Yuan Y, Zhai R, Li Y, Chen X, Jin M. Developing fast enzyme recycling strategy through elucidating enzyme adsorption kinetics on alkali and acid pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2018

[169] Zdarta J, Meyer AS, Jesionowski T, Pinelo M. A general overview of support materials for enzyme immobilization: characteristics, properties, practical utility. Catalyst, 2018, 8: 92.

[170] Zhang Y, Hess H. Enhanced diffusion of catalytically active enzymes. ACS Cent Sci, 2019, 5(6): 939-948.

[171] Zhao K, Mason TG. Assembly of colloidal particles in solution. Rep Prog Phys, 2018, 18: 12.

[172] Zheng Y, Zhang S, Miao S, Su Z, Wang P. Temperature sensitivity of cellulase adsorption on lignin and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. J Biotechnol, 2013, 166(3): 135-145.

[173] Zheng AQ, Zhao ZL, Chang S, Huang Z, Wang XB, He F, Li HB. Effect of torrefaction on structure and fast pyrolysis behavior of corncobs. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 128: 370-377.

[174] Zoghlami A, Paes G. Lignocellulosic biomass: understanding recalcitrance and predicting hydrolysis. Front Chem, 2019