Experimental evaluation of the influential factors of acetate production driven by a DC power system via CO2 reduction through microbial electrosynthesis

Tian-shun Song , Guangrong Wang , Haoqi Wang , Qiong Huang , Jingjing Xie

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 29

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 29 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-019-0265-5
Research

Experimental evaluation of the influential factors of acetate production driven by a DC power system via CO2 reduction through microbial electrosynthesis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is potentially useful for the biological conversion of carbon dioxide into value-added chemicals and biofuels. The study evaluated several limiting factors that affect MES performance. Among all these factors, the optimization of the applied cell voltage, electrode spacing, and trace elements in catholytes may significantly improve the MES performance. MES was operated under the optimal condition with an applied cell voltage of 3 V, an electrode spacing of 8 cm, 2× salt solution, and 8× trace element of catholyte for 100 days, and the maximum acetate concentration reached 7.8 g L−1. The microbial community analyses of the cathode chamber over time showed that Acetobacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, Arcobacter, Sulfurospirillum, and Thioclava were the predominant genera during the entire MES process. The abundance of Acetobacterium first increased and then decreased, which was consistent with that of acetate production. These results provided useful hints for replacing the potentiostatic control of the cathodes in the future construction and operation of MES. Such results might also contribute to the practical operation of MES in large-scale systems.

Keywords

Microbial electrosynthesis / Acetate / Microbial community / Limiting factors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tian-shun Song, Guangrong Wang, Haoqi Wang, Qiong Huang, Jingjing Xie. Experimental evaluation of the influential factors of acetate production driven by a DC power system via CO2 reduction through microbial electrosynthesis. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2019, 6(1): 29 DOI:10.1186/s40643-019-0265-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ammam F, Tremblay PL, Lizak DM, Zhang T. Effect of tungstate on acetate and ethanol production by the electrosynthetic bacterium Sporomusa ovata. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2016, 9: 163.

[2]

Bajracharya S, ter Heijne A, Benetton XD, Vanbroekhoven K, Buisman CJN, Strik DPBTB, Pant D. Carbon dioxide reduction by mixed and pure cultures in microbial electrosynthesis using an assembly of graphite felt and stainless steel as a cathode. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 195: 14-24.

[3]

Bajracharya S, Burga BVD, Vanbroekhovena K, Wever HD, Buisman CJN, Panta D, Strik DPBTB. In situ acetate separation in microbial electrosynthesis from CO2 using ion-exchange resin. Electrochim Acta, 2017, 237: 267-275.

[4]

Batlle-Vilanova P, Ganigué R, Ramió-Pujol S, Bañera L, Jiménez G, Hidalgo M, Balaguer MD, Colprima J, Puiga S. Microbial electrosynthesis of butyrate from carbon dioxide: production and extraction. Bioelectrochemistry, 2017, 117: 57-64.

[5]

Blaser MB, Dreisbach LK, Conrad R. Carbon isotope fractionation of 11 acetogenic strains grown on H2 and CO2. Appl Environ Microb, 2013, 79(6): 1787-1794.

[6]

Cheng SA, Liu H, Logan BE. Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40: 2426-2432.

[7]

Christodoulou X, Velasquez-Orta SB. Microbial electrosynthesis and anaerobic fermentation: an economic evaluation for acetic acid production from CO2 and CO. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50: 11234-11242.

[8]

Dong ZW, Wang HQ, Tian SH, Yang Y, Yuan H, Huang Q, Song TS, Xie JJ. Fluidized granular activated carbon electrode for efficient microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 269: 203-209.

[9]

Fan YZ, Sharbrough E, Liu H. Quantification of the internal resistance distribution of microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 8101-8107.

[10]

Fedorovich V, Knighton MC, Pagaling E, Ward FB, Free A, Goryanin I. Novel electrochemically active bacterium phylogenetically related to arcobacter butzleri, isolated from a microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microb, 2009, 75(23): 7326-7334.

[11]

Giddings CGS, Nevin KP, Woodward T, Lovley DR, Butler CS. Simplifying microbial electrosynthesis reactor design. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 468.

[12]

Gildemyn S, Verbeeck K, Slabbinck R, Andersen SJ, Prevoteau A, Rabaey K. Integrated production, extraction, and concentration of acetic acid from CO2 through microbial electrosynthesis. Environ Sci Tech Lett, 2015, 2(11): 325-328.

[13]

Gildemyn S, Verbeeck K, Jansen R, Rabaey K. The type of ion selective membrane determines stability and production levels of microbial electrosynthesis. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 224: 358-364.

[14]

Jourdin L, Freguia S, Donose BC, Chen J, Wallace GG, Keller J, Flexer V. A novel carbon nanotube modified scaffold as an efficient biocathode material for improved microbial electrosynthesis. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2(32): 13093-13102.

[15]

Jourdin L, Grieger T, Monetti J, Flexer V, Freguia S, Lu Y, Chen J, Romano M, Wallace GG, Keller J. High acetic acid production rate obtained by microbial electrosynthesis from carbon dioxide. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(22): 13566-13574.

[16]

Li XH, Angelidaki I, Zhang YF. Salinity-gradient energy driven microbial electrosynthesis of value-added chemicals from CO2 reduction. Water Res, 2018, 142: 396-404.

[17]

Lovley DR. Live wires: direct extracellular electron exchange for bioenergy and the bioremediation of energy-related contamination. Energy Environ Sci, 2011, 4(12): 4896-4906.

[18]

Lovley DR, Nevin KP. Electrobiocommodities: powering microbial production of fuels and commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide with electricity. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2013, 24(3): 385-390.

[19]

Marshall CW, Ross DE, Fichot EB, Norman RS, May HD. Long-term operation of microbial electrosynthesis systems improves acetate production by autotrophic microbiomes. Environ Sci Technol, 2013, 47(11): 6023-6029.

[20]

Marshall CW, Ross DE, Handley KM, Weisenhorn PB, Edirisinghe JN, Henry CS, Gilbert JA, May HD, Norman RS. Metabolic reconstruction and modeling microbial electrosynthesis. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 8391.

[21]

Modestra JA, Mohan SK. Microbial electrosynthesis of carboxylic acids through CO2 reduction with selectively enriched biocatalyst: microbial dynamics. J CO2 Utiliz, 2017, 20: 190-199.

[22]

Nevin KP, Woodard TL, Franks AE, Summers ZM, Lovley DR. Microbial electrosynthesis: feeding microbes electricity to convert carbon dioxide and water to multicarbon extracellular organic compounds. MBio, 2010, 1(2): e00103-10.

[23]

Nevin KP, Hensley SA, Franks AE, Summers ZM, Ou JH, Woodard TL, Snoeyenbos-West OL, Lovley DR. Electrosynthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide is catalyzed by a diversity of acetogenic microorganisms. Appl Environ Microb, 2011, 77(9): 2882-2886.

[24]

Nie HR, Zhang T, Cui MM, Lu HY, Lovley DR, Russell TP. Improved cathode for high efficient microbial-catalyzed reduction in microbial electrosynthesis cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15(34): 14290-14294.

[25]

O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M. Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol. Science, 2002, 296: 1971-1972.

[26]

Patil SA, Arends JBA, Vanwonterghem I, van Meerbergen J, Guo K, Tyson GW, Rabaey K. Selective enrichment establishes a stable performing community for microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO2. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(14): 8833-8843.

[27]

Rabaey K, Rozendal RA. Microbial electrosynthesis revisiting the electrical route for microbial production. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2010, 8: 706-716.

[28]

Rosenbaum M, Aulenta F, Villano M, Angenent LT. Cathodes as electron donors for microbial metabolism: which extracellular electron transfer mechanisms are involved?. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102: 324-333.

[29]

Shin HJ, Jung KA, Nam CW, Park JM. A genetic approach for microbial electrosynthesis system as biocommodities production platform. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 245: 1421-1429.

[30]

Song TS, Zhang HK, Liu HX, Zhang DL, Wang HQ, Yang Y, Yuan H, Xie JJ. High efficiency microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide by a self-assembled electroactive biofilm. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 243: 573-582.

[31]

Song TS, Fei KQ, Zhang HK, Yuan H, Yang Y, Ouyang PK, Xie JJ. High efficiency microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide using a novel graphene–nickel foam as cathode. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2018, 93: 457-466.

[32]

Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Spiridonova EM, Rainey FA, Muyzer G. Thioclava pacifica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively autotrophic, marine, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from a near-shore sulfidic hydrothermal area. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2005, 55: 1069-1075.

[33]

Tanner RS, Miller LM, Yang D. Clostridium ljungdahlii sp. nov., an acetogenic species in clostridial rRNA homology group I. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 1993, 43: 232-236.

[34]

Xiang YB, Liu GL, Zhang RD, Lu YB, Luo HP. High-efficient acetate production from carbon dioxide using a bioanode microbial electrosynthesis system with bipolar membrane. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 233: 227-235.

[35]

Zhang T, Nie HR, Bain TS, Lu HY, Cui MM, Snoeyenbos-West OL, Franks AE, Nevin KP, Russell TP, Lovley DR. Improved cathode materials for microbial electrosynthesis. Energy Environ Sci, 2013, 6(1): 217-224.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/