Engineering a wild-type diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for second-generation bioethanol production

Abstract

Background

The cost-effective production of second-generation bioethanol, which is made from lignocellulosic materials, has to face the following two problems: co-fermenting xylose with glucose and enhancing the strain’s tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors. Based on our previous study, the wild-type diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BSIF with robustness and good xylose metabolism genetic background was used as a chassis for constructing efficient xylose-fermenting industrial strains. The performance of the resulting strains in the fermentation of media with sugars and hydrolysates was investigated.

Results

The following two novel heterologous genes were integrated into the genome of the chassis cell: the mutant MGT05196 ^N360F, which encodes a xylose-specific, glucose-insensitive transporter and is derived from the Meyerozyma guilliermondii transporter gene MGT05196, and Ru-xylA (where Ru represents the rumen), which encodes a xylose isomerase (XI) with higher activity in S. cerevisiae. Additionally, endogenous modifications were also performed, including the overproduction of the xylulokinase Xks1p and the non-oxidative PPP (pentose phosphate pathway), and the inactivation of the aldose reductase Gre3p and the alkaline phosphatase Pho13p. These rationally designed genetic modifications, combined with alternating adaptive evolutions in xylose and SECS liquor (the leach liquor of steam-exploding corn stover), resulted in a final strain, LF1, with excellent xylose fermentation and enhanced inhibitor resistance. The specific xylose consumption rate of LF1 reached as high as 1.089 g g⁻¹ h⁻¹ with xylose as the sole carbon source. Moreover, its highly synchronized utilization of xylose and glucose was particularly significant; 77.6% of xylose was consumed along with glucose within 12 h, and the ethanol yield was 0.475 g g⁻¹, which is more than 93% of the theoretical yield. Additionally, LF1 performed well in fermentations with two different lignocellulosic hydrolysates.

Conclusion

The strain LF1 co-ferments glucose and xylose efficiently and synchronously. This result highlights the great potential of LF1 for the practical production of second-generation bioethanol.

Keywords

Xylose-specific transporter / Xylose isomerase / Synchronous utilization of xylose and glucose / Lignocellulosic ethanol / Budding yeast

References

[1] Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2007, 82: 340-349.

[2] Bamba T, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Disruption of PHO13 improves ethanol production via the xylose isomerase pathway. AMB Expres, 2016, 6: 4.

[3] Bao X, Shen Y, GE R (2013) Nucleic acid molecule for encoding xylose isomerase and xylose isomerase encoded by the nucleic acid molecule. US Patent 8,586,336 B2, 19 Nov 2013. http://xs1.hntvchina.com/patents/US8586336

[4] Blazeck J, Garg R, Reed B, Alper HS. Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2012, 109: 2884-2895.

[5] Brandberg T, FranzéN CJ, Gustafsson L. The fermentation performance of nine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures in dilute-acid wood hydrolysate. J Biosci Bioeng, 2004, 98: 122-125.

[6] Brat D, Boles E, Wiedemann B. Functional expression of a bacterial xylose isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009, 75: 2304-2311.

[7] Cho KM, Yoo YJ, Kang HS. δ-Integration of endo/exo-glucanase and β-glucosidase genes into the yeast chromosomes for direct conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1999, 25: 23-30.

[8] Demeke M, Dietz H, Li Y, Foulquie-Moreno M, Mutturi S, Deprez S, Den Abt T, Bonini B, Liden G, Dumortier F, . Development of a d-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2013, 6: 89.

[9] Diao L, Liu Y, Qian F, Yang J, Jiang Y, Yang S. Construction of fast xylose-fermenting yeast based on industrial ethanol-producing diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae by rational design and adaptive evolution. BMC Biotechnol, 2013, 13: 110.

[10] Farwick A, Bruder S, Schadeweg V, Oreb M, Boles E. Engineering of yeast hexose transporters to transport d-xylose without inhibition by d-glucose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 5159-5164.

[11] Fujitomi K, Sanda T, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Deletion of the PHO13 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetic and formic acids, and furfural. Bioresour Technol, 2012, 111: 161-166.

[12] Güldener U, Heck S, Fiedler T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res, 1996, 24: 2519-2524.

[13] Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund M. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2007, 74: 937-953.

[14] Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microb Biotechnol, 2008, 1: 497-506.

[15] Ho NW, Chen Z, Brainard AP, Sedlak M. Successful design and development of genetically engineered Saccharomyces yeasts for effective cofermentation of glucose and xylose from cellulosic biomass to fuel ethanol. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 1999, 65: 163-192.

[16] Hou J, Lages NF, Oldiges M, Vemuri GN. Metabolic impact of redox cofactor perturbations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2009, 11: 253-261.

[17] Hou J, Vemuri GN, Bao X, Olsson L. Impact of overexpressing NADH kinase on glucose and xylose metabolism in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 82: 909-919.

[18] Hou J, Suo F, Wang CQ, Li XW, Shen Y, Bao XM. Fine-tuning of NADH oxidase decreases byproduct accumulation in respiration deficient xylose metabolic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Biotechnol, 2014

[19] Hou J, Shen Y, Jiao C, Ge R, Zhang X, Bao X. Characterization and evolution of xylose isomerase screened from the bovine rumen metagenome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng, 2016, 121: 160-165.

[20] Hou J, Jiao C, Peng B, Shen Y, Bao X. Mutation of a regulator Ask10p improves xylose isomerase activity through up-regulation of molecular chaperones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2016, 38: 241-250.

[21] Jin Y-S, Ni H, Laplaza J, Jeffries T. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate d-xylulokinase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003, 69: 495-503.

[22] Kim SR, Park YC, Jin YS, Seo JH. Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnol Adv, 2013, 31: 851-861.

[23] Ko JK, Um Y, Woo HM, Kim KH, Lee S-M. Ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates using engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae harboring xylose isomerase-based pathway. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 209: 290-296.

[24] Kuyper M, Harhangi HR, Stave AK, Winkler AA, Jetten MSM, de Laat WTAM, den Ridder JJJ, Op den Camp HJM, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. High-level functional expression of a fungal xylose isomerase: the key to efficient ethanolic fermentation of xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae?. FEMS Yeast Res, 2003, 4: 69-78.

[25] Kuyper M, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Minimal metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle. FEMS Yeast Res, 2004, 4: 655-664.

[26] Kuyper M, Hartog MMP, Toirkens MJ, Almering MJH, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res, 2005, 5: 399-409.

[27] Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res, 2005, 5: 925-934.

[28] Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG, Hwang S. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol, 2006, 123: 273-280.

[29] Lee S-M, Jellison T, Alper H. Systematic and evolutionary engineering of a xylose isomerase-based pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient conversion yields. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2014, 7: 122.

[30] Li H, Wu M, Xu L, Hou J, Guo T, Bao X, Shen Y. Evaluation of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains as the chassis cell for second-generation bioethanol production. Microb Biotechnol, 2015, 8: 266-274.

[31] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402-408.

[32] Madhavan A, Tamalampudi S, Ushida K, Kanai D, Katahira S, Srivastava A, Fukuda H, Bisaria VS, Kondo A. Xylose isomerase from polycentric fungus Orpinomyces: gene sequencing, cloning, and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioconversion of xylose to ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 82: 1067-1078.

[33] Moon J, Lewis Liu Z, Ma M, Slininger PJ. New genotypes of industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered with YXI and heterologous xylose transporters improve xylose utilization and ethanol production. Bio catal Agric Biotechnol, 2013, 2: 247-254.

[34] Moysés DN, Reis VCB, Almeida JRMd, Moraes LMPd, Torres FAG. Xylose Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: challenges and prospects. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17: 207.

[35] Nijland JG, Shin HY, de Jong RM, de Waal PP, Klaassen P, Driessen AJ. Engineering of an endogenous hexose transporter into a specific d-xylose transporter facilitates glucose-xylose co-consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2014, 7: 1-11.

[36] Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol, 2000, 74: 25-33.

[37] Pannunzio NR, Manthey GM, Liddell LC, Fu BXH, Roberts CM, Bailis AM. Rad59 regulates association of Rad52 with DNA double-strand breaks. Microbiol Open, 2012, 1: 285-297.

[38] Peng B, Chen X, Shen Y, Bao X. Effect of controlled overexpression of xylulokinase by different promoters on xylose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Microbiol Sin., 2011, 51(7): 914-922.

[39] Peng B, Shen Y, Li X, Chen X, Hou J, Bao X. Improvement of xylose fermentation in respiratory-deficient xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2012, 14: 9-18.

[40] Reider Apel A, Ouellet M, Szmidt-Middleton H, Keasling JD, Mukhopadhyay A. Evolved hexose transporter enhances xylose uptake and glucose/xylose co-utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 19512.

[41] Robberecht C, Voet T, Esteki MZ, Nowakowska BA, Vermeesch JR. Nonallelic homologous recombination between retrotransposable elements is a driver of de novo unbalanced translocations. Genome Res, 2013, 23: 411-418.

[42] Romaní A, Pereira F, Johansson B, Domingues L. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanol strains PE-2 and CAT-1 for efficient lignocellulosic fermentation. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 179: 150-158.

[43] Runquist D, Fonseca C, Rådström P, Spencer-Martins I, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Expression of the Gxf1 transporter from Candida intermedia improves fermentation performance in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 82: 123-130.

[44] Salusjarvi L, Kankainen M, Soliymani R, Pitkanen J-P, Penttila M, Ruohonen L. Regulation of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact, 2008, 7: 18.

[45] Sharma S, Sharma S, Singh S, Lata Arora A. Kumar S, Khanal KS, Yadav KY. Improving yeast strains for pentose hexose co-fermentation: successes and hurdles. Proceedings of the first international conference on recent advances in bioenergy research. Springer Proceedings in Energy, 2016, New Delhi: Springer.

[46] Shen Y, Chen X, Peng B, Chen L, Hou J, Bao X. An efficient xylose-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained through adaptive evolution and its global transcription profile. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 96: 1079-1091.

[47] Shin HY, Nijland JG, de Waal PP, de Jong RM, Klaassen P, Driessen AJ. An engineered cryptic Hxt11 sugar transporter facilitates glucose–xylose co-consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2015, 8: 176.

[48] Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Pecoraro Vincent L. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Oxidants and antioxidants Part A methods in enzymology, 1999, New York: Academic Press, 152-178.

[49] Smith J, van Rensburg E, Goergens JF. Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase. BMC Biotechnol, 2014, 14: 41.

[50] Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Larsson C, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Boles E, Olsson L, Spencer-Martins I, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Sauer U. Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2004, 87: 90-98.

[51] Subtil T, Boles E. Competition between pentoses and glucose during uptake and catabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2012, 5: 1.

[52] Tan L, Yu Y, Li X, Zhao J, Qu Y, Choo YM, Loh SK. Pretreatment of empty fruit bunch from oil palm for fuel ethanol production and proposed biorefinery process. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 135: 275-282.

[53] van Maris AJ, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MA, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2006, 90: 391-418.

[54] Van Vleet J, Jeffries T. Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2009, 20: 300-306.

[55] Van Vleet J, Jeffries T, Olsson L. Deleting the para-nitrophenyl phosphatase (pNPPase), PHO13, in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and ethanol production on d-xylose. Metab Eng, 2008, 10: 360-369.

[56] Walfridsson M, Bao X, Anderlund M, Lilius G, Bülow L, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Ethanolic fermentation of xylose with Saccharomyces cerevisiae harboring the Thermus thermophilus xylA gene, which expresses an active xylose (glucose) isomerase. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62: 4648-4651.

[57] Walfridsson M, Anderlund M, Bao X, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Expression of different levels of enzymes from the Pichia stipitis XYL1 and XYL2 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its effects on product formation during xylose utilisation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1997, 48: 218-224.

[58] Wang Y, Shi W-L, Liu X-Y, Shen Y, Bao X-M, Bai F-W, Qu Y-B. Establishment of a xylose metabolic pathway in an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett, 2004, 26: 885-890.

[59] Wang C, Bao X, Li Y, Jiao C, Hou J, Zhang Q, Zhang W, Liu W, Shen Y. Cloning and characterization of heterologous transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of important amino acids for xylose utilization. Metab Eng, 2015, 30: 79-88.

[60] Wang M, Yu C, Zhao H. Directed evolution of xylose specific transporters to facilitate glucose–xylose co-utilization. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2016, 113: 484-491.

[61] Xu H, Kim S, Sorek H, Lee Y, Jeong D, Kim J, Oh EJ, Yun EJ, Wemmer DE, Kim KH. PHO13 deletion-induced transcriptional activation prevents sedoheptulose accumulation during xylose metabolism in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2016, 34: 88-96.

[62] Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Novel strategy for yeast construction using δ-integration and cell fusion to efficiently produce ethanol from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2010, 85: 1491-1498.

[63] Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials using a diploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with optimized cellulase expression. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2011, 4: 8.

[64] Zha J, Hu ML, Shen MH, Li BZ, Wang JY, Yuan YJ. Balance of XYL1 and XYL2 expression in different yeast chassis for improved xylose fermentation. Front Microbiol, 2012, 3: 355.

[65] Zhang X, Shen Y, Shi W, Bao X. Ethanolic cofermentation with glucose and xylose by the recombinant industrial strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae NAN-127 and the effect of furfural on xylitol production. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 7104-7110.

[66] Zhou H, J-s Cheng, Wang BL, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng, 2012, 14: 611-622.

Funding

Project of National Energy Administration of China(NY20130402)

National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China((2014AA021903)

National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China(2014BAD02B07)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(31270151)

State Key Laboratory of Motor Vehicle Biofuel Technology(2013004)

State Key Laboratory of Motor Vehicle Biofuel Technology(KFKT2013002)

Shandong Key Laboratory of Straw Biorefinement Technologies and Taishan Scholar Construction Project