Exploring productive sequence space in directed evolution using binary patterning versus conventional mutagenesis strategies

Abstract

Background

Recent methodology development in directed evolution of stereoselective enzymes has shown that various mutagenesis strategies based on saturation mutagenesis at sites lining the binding pocket enable the generation of small and smart mutant libraries requiring minimal screening.

Methods

In this endeavor, limonene epoxide hydrolase (LEH) has served as an experimental platform, the hydrolytic desymmetrization of cyclohexene oxide being the model reaction with formation of (R,R)- and (S,S)-cyclohexane-1,2-diol. This system has now been employed for testing reduced amino acid alphabets based on the Hecht concept of binary patterning, with and without additional hydrophobic amino acids.

Results and Conclusions

It turns out that in binary pattern based saturation mutagenesis as applied to LEH, polar amino acids are seldom introduced. When applying binary patterning in combination with additional hydrophobic amino acids as building blocks in iterative saturation mutagenesis, excellent LEH variants were evolved for the production of both (R,R)- and (S,S)-diols (80–97 % ee), but again the introduction of polar amino acids occurs rarely. Docking computations explain the source of enhanced and inverted stereoselectivity. Some of the best variants are also excellent catalysts in the hydrolytic desymmetrization of other meso-epoxides, although both enantiomeric diols are not always accessible.

Keywords

Directed evolution / Reduced amino acid alphabet / Epoxide hydrolases / Saturation mutagenesis / Stereoselectivity

References

[1] Acevedo-Rocha CG, Hoebenreich S, Reetz MT. Gillam EMJ, Copp JN, Ackerley DF. Iterative saturation mutagenesis: a powerful approach to engineer proteins by systematically simulating Darwinian evolution. Directed evolution library creation, methods and protocols, 2014, 2, Totowa: Humana Press, 103-128.

[2] Akanuma S, Kigawa T, Yokoyama S. Combinatorial mutagenesis to restrict amino acid usage in an enzyme to a reduced set. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99(21): 13549-13553.

[3] Arand M, Hallberg BM, Zou J, Bergfors T, Oesch F, van der Werf MJ, de Bont JAM, Jones TA, Mowbray SL. Structure of Rhodococcus erythropolis limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase reveals a novel active site. EMBO J, 2003, 22(11): 2583-2592.

[4] Bommarius AS. Biocatalysis: a status report. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng, 2015, 6(1): 319-345.

[5] Denard CA, Ren H, Zhao H. Improving and repurposing biocatalysts via directed evolution. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2015, 25: 55-64.

[6] Estell DA, Graycar TP, Wells JA. Engineering an enzyme by site-directed mutagenesis to be resistant to chemical oxidation. J Biol Chem, 1985, 260(11): 6518-6521.

[7] Fellouse FA, Li B, Compaan DM, Peden AA, Hymowitz SG, Sidhu SS. Molecular Recognition by a Binary Code. J Mol Biol, 2005, 348(5): 1153-1162.

[8] Glide (2014) Version 6.5. Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[9] Hopmann KH, Hallberg BM, Himo F. Catalytic mechanism of limonene epoxide hydrolase, a theoretical study. J Am Chem Soc, 2005, 127(41): 14339-14347.

[10] Impact (2014) Version 6.5. Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[11] Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong HY, Babik JM, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino-acids. Science, 1993, 262(5140): 1680-1685.

[12] Koide A, Gilbreth RN, Esaki K, Tereshko V, Koide S. High-affinity single-domain binding proteins with a binary-code interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(16): 6632-6637.

[13] Li T, Fan K, Wang J, Wang W. Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping. Protein Eng Des Sel, 2003, 16(5): 323-330.

[14] LigPrep (2014) Version 3.2. Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[15] Lutz S, Bornscheuer UT (2009) Protein Engineering Handbook. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

[16] Maestro (2014) V10.0. Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[17] Nov Y. When second best is good enough: another probabilistic look at saturation mutagenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2012, 78(1): 258-262.

[18] Olsson MHM, Søndergaard CR, Rostkowski M, Jensen JH. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J Chem Theory Comput, 2011, 7(2): 525-537.

[19] Patrick WM, Firth AE. Strategies and computational tools for improving randomized protein libraries. Biomol Eng, 2005, 22(4): 105-112.

[20] Prime (2015) Version 3.9. Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[21] Reetz MT. Laboratory evolution of stereoselective enzymes: a prolific source of catalysts for asymmetric reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2011, 50(1): 138-174.

[22] Reetz MT, Carballeira JD. Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat Protocols, 2007, 2(4): 891-903.

[23] Reetz MT, Wilensek S, Zha D, Jaeger KE. Directed evolution of an enantioselective enzyme through combinatorial multiple-cassette mutagenesis. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2001, 40: 3589-3591.

[24] Reetz MT, Bocola M, Carballeira JD, Zha D, Vogel A. Expanding the range of substrate acceptance of enzymes: combinatorial active-site saturation test. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2005, 44(27): 4192-4196.

[25] Reetz MT, Wang LW, Bocola M. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes: iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2006, 45(8): 1236-1241. Erratum, 2494

[26] Roy S, Hecht MH. Cooperative thermal denaturation of proteins designed by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Biochemistry, 2000, 39: 4603-4607.

[27] Schrödinger Suite 2015-1 (2015) Protein Preparation Wizard; Epik version 3.1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2015; Impact version 6.6, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2015; Prime version 3.9, Schrödinger, LLC, New York

[28] Sun Z, Lonsdale R, Kong XD, Xu JH, Zhou J, Reetz MT. Reshaping an enzyme binding pocket for enhanced and inverted stereoselectivity: use of smallest amino acid alphabets in directed evolution. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54(42): 12410-12415.

[29] Sun Z, Wikmark Y, Bäckvall J-E, Reetz MT. New concepts for increasing the efficiency in directed evolution of stereoselective enzymes. Chem Eur J, 2016, 22: 5046-5054.

[30] Sun Z, Lonsdale R, Wu L, Li G, Li A, Wang J, Zhou J, Reetz MT. Structure-guided triple-code saturation mutagenesis: efficient tuning of the stereoselectivity of an epoxide hydrolase. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6: 1590-1597.

[31] Sun Z, Lonsdale R, Li G, Reetz MT. Comparing different strategies in directed evolution of enzyme stereoselectivity: single- versus double-code saturation mutagenesis. ChemBioChem., 2016

[32] van der Werf MJ, Overkamp KM, de Bont JAM. Limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase from rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 belongs to a novel class of epoxide hydrolases. J Bacteriol, 1998, 180(19): 5052-5057.

[33] Wahler D, Reymond JL. The adrenaline test for enzymes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2002, 41(7): 1229-1232.

[34] Walter KU, Vamvaca K, Hilvert D. An active enzyme constructed from a 9-amino acid alphabet. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280(45): 37742-37746.

[35] Williams E, Copp JN, Ackerley DF. Gillam EMJ, Copp JN, Ackerley DF. Site-saturation mutagenesis by overlap extension PCR. Directed evolution library creation, methods and protocols, 2014, 2, Totowa: Humana Press, 83-101.

[36] Zheng H, Reetz MT. Manipulating the stereoselectivity of limonene epoxide hydrolase by directed evolution based on iterative saturation mutagenesis. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132(44): 15744-15751.