Evaluation of gas supply configurations for microbial product formation involving multiple gaseous substrates

Erik B. G. Häusler , Luuk A. M. van der Wielen , Adrie J. J. Straathof

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2016, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 18

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2016, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 18 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-016-0095-7
Research

Evaluation of gas supply configurations for microbial product formation involving multiple gaseous substrates

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background

Gaseous substrates such as O2 and CO2 are often required in fermentation processes. However, a simple methodology to compare different gas supply strategies using gaseous substrates from different sources is missing.

Results

In this study, we present a methodology to identify and theoretically compare different configurations to supply mixtures of gaseous compounds to fermentations that consume these gases. For the different configurations that were identified, all gas flow rates can be calculated in terms of other process parameters such as optimal concentrations of the gaseous compounds in the liquid phase, top pressures of the fermentation, and consumption/production rates. The approach is demonstrated for fumaric acid fermentation with Rhizopus delemar, which consumes O2 and can theoretically produce or consume CO2. Three different gas supply configurations were identified: Air supplemented with O2, a mixture of O2 and CO2, and air supplemented with CO2. All three configurations lead to gas supply costs in the same order of magnitude. O2 and CO2 prices and consumption rates determine which configuration is best. However, the overall production costs will not be dominated by the gas costs, but by the glucose costs.

Conclusions

The presented methodology enables a simple way to identify and compare different gas supply strategies for fermentations that require more than one gaseous substrate. This includes the costs for compression of gases. Other substrate costs are easily added for overall process optimization.

Keywords

Gas–liquid mass transfer / Bioreactors / Modeling / Bioprocess design / Fumaric acid / Multiple gaseous substrates

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Erik B. G. Häusler, Luuk A. M. van der Wielen, Adrie J. J. Straathof. Evaluation of gas supply configurations for microbial product formation involving multiple gaseous substrates. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2016, 3(1): 18 DOI:10.1186/s40643-016-0095-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bäumchen C, Knoll A, Husemann B, Seletzky J, Maier B, Dietrich C, Amoabediny G, Büchs J. Effect of elevated dissolved carbon dioxide concentrations on growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum on d-glucose and l-lactate. J Biotechnol, 2007, 128(4): 868-874.

[2]

Chang H, Kim M, Fei Q, Choi J-D-R, Shang L, Kim N-J, Kim J, Park H. Economic evaluation of off-gas recycle pressure swing adsorption (PSA) in industrial scale poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) fermentation. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 2010, 15(6): 905-910.

[3]

Chang HN, Jung K, Choi JDR, Lee JC, Woo HC. Multi-stage continuous high cell density culture systems: a review. Biotechnol Adv, 2014, 32(2): 514-525.

[4]

Cussler EL. Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems, 2009, 3, New York: Cambridge University Press

[5]

de Bont JAM, van Ginkel CG, Tramper J, Luyben KCAM. Ethylene oxide production by immobilized Mycobacterium Py1 in a gas-solid bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1983, 5(1): 55-59.

[6]

de Ory I, Romero LE, Cantero D. Operation in semi-continuous with a closed pilot plant scale acetifier for vinegar production. J Food Eng, 2004, 63(1): 39-45.

[7]

Fu YQ, Li S, Chen Y, Xu Q, Huang H, Sheng XY. Enhancement of fumaric acid production by Rhizopus oryzae using a two-stage dissolved oxygen control strategy. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2010, 162(4): 1031-1038.

[8]

Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnol Adv, 2009, 27(2): 153-176.

[9]

Green DW, Perry RH. Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 2007, 8, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[10]

Hou C. Propylene oxide production from propylene by immobilized whole cells of Methylosinus sp. CRL 31 in a gas-solid bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1984, 19(1): 1-4.

[11]

Hurst KM, Lewis RS. Carbon monoxide partial pressure effects on the metabolic process of syngas fermentation. Biochem Eng J, 2010, 48(2): 159-165.

[12]

Initiative NEOR (2012) Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery: a critical domestic energy, economic, and environmental opportunity. http://www.neori.org/NEORI_Report.pdf. Accessed 02 Jul 2014

[13]

Jansen MLA, van Gulik WM. Towards large scale fermentative production of succinic acid. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2014, 30: 190-197.

[14]

Lide DR. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 2009, 90, Boca Raton: CRC Press.

[15]

Liu K, Atiyeh HK, Stevenson BS, Tanner RS, Wilkins MR, Huhnke RL. Continuous syngas fermentation for the production of ethanol, n-propanol and n-butanol. Bioresour Technol, 2014, 151: 69-77.

[16]

McIntyre M, McNeil B. Effect of carbon dioxide on morphology and product synthesis in chemostat cultures of Aspergillus niger A60. Enzyme Microb Technol, 1997, 21(7): 479-483.

[17]

Monteiro JS, de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo O, de Medeiros J. Sustainability metrics for eco-technologies assessment, part I: preliminary screening. Clean Technol Environ Policy, 2009, 11(2): 209-214.

[18]

Nagy E, Neubeck M, Mayr B, Moser A. Simulation of the effect of mixing, scale-up and pH-value regulation during glutamic acid fermentation. Bioprocess Eng, 1995, 12(5): 231-238.

[19]

Papagianni M. Advances in citric acid fermentation by Aspergillus niger: biochemical aspects, membrane transport and modeling. Biotechnol Adv, 2007, 25(3): 244-263.

[20]

Patel RN, Hou CT, Laskin AI, Felix A, Derelanko P. Microbial oxidation of gaseous hydrocarbons: production of secondary alcohols from corresponding n-alkanes by methane-utilizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1980, 39(4): 720-726.

[21]

Roa Engel CA, Straathof AJJ, Zijlmans TW, van Gulik WM, van der Wielen LAM. Fumaric acid production by fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2008, 78(3): 379-389.

[22]

Roa Engel CA, van Gulik WM, Marang L, van der Wielen LAM, Straathof AJJ. Development of a low pH fermentation strategy for fumaric acid production by Rhizopus oryzae. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2011, 48(1): 39-47.

[23]

Sho Kobayashi H, van Hassel B (2005) CO2 reduction by oxy-fuel combustion: economics and opportunities. http://www.gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/RxsY3908kaqwVPacX9DLcQ/kobayashi_coal_mar05.pdf. Accessed 02 Jul 2014

[24]

Sinnott RK. Coulson and Richardson’s chemical engineering—chemical engineering design, 2005, 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[25]

Song H, Lee JW, Choi S, You JK, Hong WH, Lee SY. Effects of dissolved CO2 levels on the growth of Mannheimia succiniciproducens and succinic acid production. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2007, 98(6): 1296-1304.

[26]

Steelonthenet.com (2014) Conversion costs for BOF steelmaking. http://www.steelonthenet.com/cost-bof.html. Accessed 02 Jul 2014

[27]

Straathof AJJ. Moo-Young M. The proportion of downstream costs in fermentative production processes. Comprehensive biotechnology, 2011, 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 811-814.

[28]

United States Department of Agriculture (2014) US wholesale list price for glycose syrup, midwest markets, monthly, quarterly, and by calendar and fiscal year. http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/Sugar_and_Sweeteners_Yearbook_Tables/World_and_US_Sugar_and_Corn_Sweetener_Prices/TABLE07.XLS. Accessed 02 Jul 2014

[29]

van ’t Riet K, Tramper J. Basic bioreactor design, 1991, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

[30]

Zelle RM, de Hulster E, Kloezen W, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Key process conditions for production of C4 dicarboxylic acids in bioreactor batch cultures of an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010, 76(3): 744-750.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

126

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/