Development and evaluation of a functional bioreactor for CO fermentation into ethanol

Abstract

Background

In a conventional syngas fermentation process, gas was released into the fermentation broth through a single orifice or multiple orifices, except the hollow fiber membrane reactor. Consequently, a simplified bioreactor has been developed employing an innovative gas supply and effluent extraction systems.

Results

A continuous stirred tank bioreactor (CSTBR) has been developed by incorporating an innovative gas supply and effluent extraction system to ferment syngas into ethanol. The working volume of the bioreactor was controlled to 2 L. The CO gas was fermented in the developed bioreactor by using a microorganism (Clostridium ljungdahlii) with different gas (5–15 mL/min), media, and effluent flow rates (0.25–0.75 mL/min) and stirrer speed (300–500 rpm). Gas was diffused into the fermenting broth through an aqueous aeration tube commonly used in the small household aquarium, placed at the bottom layer throughout the periphery. The effluent was extracted from the top layer of the broth by using a membrane separator. Ethanol and acetic acid concentrations were varied from 0.17–1.17 and 8.50–23.68 g/L-effluent, respectively.

Conclusions

It seems that the performance of CSTBR can be enhanced with an innovative gas supply system, which may reduce the gas bubble size and result in higher lateral velocity at the releasing point, especially, throughout the periphery instead of the center of the reactor through a single or multiple orifice.

Keywords

Bioreactor / Continuous stirred tank / Microorganism / CO / Fermentation / Ethanol

References

[1] Abubackar HN, Veiga MC, Kennes C. Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gases to bioethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref, 2011, 5: 93-114.

[2] Alsaker KV, Paredes C, Papoutsakis ET. Metabolite stress and tolerance in the production of biofuels and chemicals: gene-expression-based systems analysis of butanol, butyrate, and acetate stresses in the anaerobe Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2010, 105: 1131-1147.

[3] Bakker A, Smith J, Myers KJ. How to disperse gases in liquids. Chem Eng, 1994, 101: 98-104.

[4] Bredwell MD, Srivastava P, Worden RM. Reactor design issues for synthesis-gas fermentations. Biotechnol Prog, 1999, 15: 834-844.

[5] Bredwell MD, Worden RM. Mass-transfer properties of microbubbles. 1. Experimental studies. Biotechnol Prog, 1998, 14: 31-38.

[6] Chang IS, Kim DH, Kim BH, Shin PK, Sung HC, Lovitt RW. CO fermentation of Eubacterium limosum KIST612. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 1998, 8: 134-140.

[7] Cotter JL, Chinn MS, Grunden AM. Influence of process parameters on growth of Clostridium ljungdahlii and Clostridium autoethanogenum on synthesis gas. Enzy Microb Technol, 2009, 44: 281-288.

[8] Daniell J, Köpke M, Simpson SD. Commercial biomass syngas fermentation. Energies, 2012, 5: 5372-5417.

[9] Datar RP, Shenkman RM, Cateni BG, Huhnke RL, Lewis RS. Fermentation of biomass-generated producer gas to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2004, 86: 587-594.

[10] Datta R, Maher MA, Jones C, Brinker RW. Ethanol—the primary renewable liquid fuel. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2011, 86: 473-480.

[11] Devarapalli M, Atiyeh HK, Phillips JR, Orgill JJ, Lewis RS, Huhnke, RL (2013) Comparison of syngas fermentation reactors for biological alcohol production. http://sungrant.tennessee.edu/NR/rdonlyres/DDF120E1-C312-4065-B095-6EC87BD11DA8/3731/Atiyeh_Hasan.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2014)

[12] Elshahed MS. Microbiological aspects of biofuel production: current status and future directions. J Ad Res, 2010, 1: 103-111.

[13] Griffin DW, Schultz MA. Fuel and chemical products from biomass syngas: a comparison of gas fermentation to thermochemical conversion routes. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 2012, 31: 219-224.

[14] He J, Zhang W. Techno-economic evaluation of thermo-chemical biomass-to-ethanol. App Energy, 2011, 88: 1224-1232.

[15] Heiskanen H, Virkajarvi I, Viikari L. The effects of syngas composition on the growth and product formation of Butyribacterium methylotrophicum. Enzy Microb Technol, 2007, 41: 362-367.

[16] Henstra AM, Sipma J, Rinzema A, Stams AJ. Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2007, 18: 200-206.

[17] Jiang Y, Liu J, Jiang W, Yang Y, Yang S. Current status and prospects of industrial bio-production of n-butanol in China. Biotechnol Adv, 2015, 33: 1493-1501.

[18] Klasson KT, Ackerson MD, Clausen EC, Gaddy JL. Biological conversion of coal and coal-derived synthesis gas. Fuel, 1993, 72: 1673-1678.

[19] Kundiyana DK, Wilkins MR, Maddipati P, Huhnke RL. Effect of temperature, pH and buffer presence on ethanol production from synthesis gas by Clostridium ragsdalei. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102: 5794-5799.

[20] Lee PH, Ni SQ, Chang SY, Sung S, Kim SH. Enhancement of carbon monoxide mass transfer using an innovative external hollow fiber membrane (HFM) diffuser for syngas fermentation: experimental studies and model development. Chem Eng J, 2012, 184: 268-277.

[21] Lee PH (2010) Syngas fermentation to ethanol using innovative hollow fiber membrane. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Paper 12377, Iowa State University, USA

[22] Liu K, Atiyeh HK, Stevenson BS, Tanner RS, Wilkins MR, Huhnke RL (2014) Continuous syngas fermentation for the production of ethanol, n-propanol and n-butanol. Bioresour Technol 151:69–77

[23] Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD, Younesi H, Lahijani P, Uzir MH, Mohamed AR. Bioconversion of synthesis gas to second generation biofuels: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2011, 15: 4255-4273.

[24] Mohammadi M, Younesi H, Najafpour G, Mohamed AR. Sustainable ethanol fermentation from synthesis gas by Clostridium ljungdahlii in a continuous stirred tank bioreactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2012, 87: 837-843.

[25] Munasinghe PC, Khanal SK. Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 5013-5022.

[26] Najafpour G, Younesi H. Ethanol and acetate synthesis from waste gas using batch culture of Clostridium ljungdahlii. Enzy Microb Technol, 2006, 38: 223-228.

[27] Pereira EG, da Silva JN, de Oliveira JL, Machado CS. Sustainable energy: a review of gasification technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2012, 16: 4753-4762.

[28] Rajagopalan S, Datar RP, Lewis RS. Formation of ethanol from carbon monoxide via a new microbial catalyst. Biomass Bioen, 2002, 23: 487-493.

[29] Ramachandriya KD, Wilkins MR, De Lorme MM, Zhu X, Kundiyana DK, Atiyeh HK, Huhnke RL. Reduction of acetone to isopropanol using producer gas fermenting microbes. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2011, 108: 2330-2338.

[30] Richter H, Martin ME, Angenent LT. A two-stage continuous fermentation system for conversion of syngas into ethanol. Energies, 2013, 6: 3987-4000.

[31] Roy P. Life Cycle Assessment of Ethanol produced from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Techno-economic and Environmental Evaluation (Doctoral dissertation), 2014, Ontario: University of Guelph.

[32] Shen Y, Brown R, Wen Z. Syngas fermentation of Clostridium carboxidivoran P7 in a hollow fiber membrane biofilm reactor: evaluating the mass transfer coefficient and ethanol production performance. Biochem Engg J, 2014, 85: 21-29.

[33] Subramani V, Gangwal SK. A review of recent literature to search for an efficient catalytic process for the conversion of syngas to ethanol. Energy Fuels, 2008, 22: 814-839.

[34] Sudiyo R, Andersson B. Bubble trapping and coalescence at the baffles in stirred tank reactors. AIChE J, 2007, 53: 2232-2239.

[35] Ukpong MN, Atiyeh HK, De Lorme MM, Liu K, Zhu X, Tanner RS, Wilkins MR, Stevenson BS. Physiological response of Clostridium carboxidivorans during conversion of synthesis gas to solvents in a gas-fed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2012, 109: 2720-2728.

[36] Ungerman AJ, Heindel TJ. Carbon monoxide mass transfer for syngas fermentation in a stirred tank reactor with dual impeller configurations. Biotechnol Prog, 2007, 23: 613-620.

[37] Weber C, Farwick A, Benisch F, Brat D, Dietz H, Subtil T, Boles E. Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels. App Microbiol Biotechnol, 2010, 87: 1303-1315.

[38] Younesi H, Najafpour G, Mohamed AR. Ethanol and acetate production from synthesis gas via fermentation processes using anaerobic bacterium, Clostridium ljungdahlii. Biochem Eng J, 2005, 27: 110-119.

[39] Younesi H, Najafpour G, Mohamed AR. Liquid fuel production from synthesis gas via fermentation process in a continuous tank bioreactor (CSTBR) using Clostridium ljungdahlii. Iranian J Biotechnol, 2006, 4: 45-53.

[40] van Kasteren JMN, Dizdarevic D, van der Waall WR, Guo J, Verberne R (2005) Bio-ethanol from Syngas. Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), I. &. E, Ed

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada(400495)