Sustaining ethanol production from lime pretreated water hyacinth biomass using mono and co-cultures of isolated fungal strains with Pichia stipitis

Chinnathambi Pothiraj , Ramasubramanian Arumugam , Muthukrishnan Gobinath

Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 27

PDF
Bioresources and Bioprocessing ›› 2014, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 27 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-014-0027-3
Research

Sustaining ethanol production from lime pretreated water hyacinth biomass using mono and co-cultures of isolated fungal strains with Pichia stipitis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background

The high rate of propagation and easy availability of water hyacinth has made it a renewable carbon source for biofuel production. The present study was undertaken to screen the feasibility of using water hyacinth's hemicelluloses as a substrate for alcohol production by microbial fermentation using mono and co-cultures of Trichoderma reesei and Fusarium oxysporum with Pichia stipitis.

Results

In separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), the alkali pretreated water hyacinth biomass was saccharified by crude fungal enzymes of T. reesei, F. oxysporum and then fermented by P. stipitis. In simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), the saccharification and fermentation was carried out simultaneously at optimized conditions using mono and co-cultures of selected fungal strains. Finally, the ethanol production kinetics were analyzed by appropriate methods. The higher crystalline index (66.7%) and the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra showed that the lime pretreatment possibly increased the availability of cellulose and hemicelluloses for enzymatic conversion. In SSF, the co-culture fermentation using T. reesei and P. stipitis was found to be promising with a higher yield of ethanol (0.411 g g−1) at 60 h. The additional yield comparable with the monocultures was due to the xylanolytic activity of P. stipitis which ferments pentose sugars into ethanol. In SHF, the pretreatment followed by crude enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation resulted in a significantly lesser yield of ethanol (0.344 g g−1) at 96 h.

Conclusions

It is evident from the study that the higher ethanol production was attained in a shorter period in the co-culture system containing T. reesei and the xylose fermenting yeast P. stipitis. SSF of pretreated water hyacinth biomass (WHB) with P. stipitis instead of traditional yeast is found to be an effective biofuel production process.

Keywords

Water hyacinth / Hemicelluloses / Xylose / T. reesei / F. oxysporum / P. stipitis / SSF

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chinnathambi Pothiraj, Ramasubramanian Arumugam, Muthukrishnan Gobinath. Sustaining ethanol production from lime pretreated water hyacinth biomass using mono and co-cultures of isolated fungal strains with Pichia stipitis. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2014, 1(1): 27 DOI:10.1186/s40643-014-0027-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chang KL, Thitikorn-amorn J, Hsieh JF, Ou BM, Chen SH, Ratanakhanokchai K, Huang PJ, Chen ST. Enhanced enzymatic conversion with freeze pretreatment of rice straw. Biomass Bioenergy, 2011, 35 1 90-95.

[2]

Guragain YN, De Coninck J, Husson F, Durand A, Rakshit SK. Comparison of some new pretreatment methods for second generation bioethanol production from wheat straw and water hyacinth. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102 6 4416-4424.

[3]

Quintero JA, Montoya MI, Sánchez OJ, Giraldo OH, Cardona CA. Fuel ethanol production from sugarcane and corn: comparative analysis for a Colombian case. Energy, 2008, 33 3 385-399.

[4]

Balat M. Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energy Convers Manage, 2011, 52 2 858-875.

[5]

Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A. Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocelluloses saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renew Energy, 2009, 34 2 421-424.

[6]

Lee Y, Kim M, Kim K, Park K, Ryu Y, Seo J. A parametric study on ethanol production from xylose Pichia stipitis. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 2000, 5: 27-31.

[7]

Ganguly A, Das S, Bhattaacharya A, Dey A, Chatterjee PK. Enzymatic hydrolysis of water hyacinth biomass for the production of ethanol: optimization of driving parameters. Ind J Exp Biol, 2013, 51: 556-566.

[8]

Gunnarsson CC, Petersen CM. Water hyacinth as a resource in agriculture and energy production: a literature review. Waste Man, 2007, 27: 117-129.

[9]

Nigam JN. Bioconversion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to motor fuel ethanol by xylose-fermenting yeast. J Biotech, 2002, 97: 107-116.

[10]

Zabala I, Ferrer A, Ledesma A, Aiello C. Galindo E, Ramirez OT. Microbial protein production by submerged fermentation of mixed cellulolytic cultures. Advances in Bioprocess Engineering, 1994, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 455-460.

[11]

Singhal V, Rai JP. Biogas production from water hyacinth and channel grass used for phytoremediation of industrial effluents. Bioresour Technol, 2003, 86: 221-225.

[12]

Sornvoraweat B, Kongkiattikajorn J. Separated hydrolysis and fermentation of water hyacinth leaves for ethanol production. KKU Res J, 2010, 15 9 794-802.

[13]

Idrees M, Adman A, Sheikh S, Qureshi FA. Optimization of dilute acid pretreatment of water hyacinth biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. EXCLI J, 2013, 12: 30-40.

[14]

Bhattacharya A, Ganguly A, Das S, Chatterjee PK, Dey A. Fungal isolates from local environment: isolation, screening and application for the production of ethanol from water hyacinth. Int J Emerg Tech Adv Engi, 2013, 3 3 58-65.

[15]

Kumari N, Bhattacharya A, Dey A, Ganguly A, Chatterjee PK. Bioethanol production from water hyacinth biomass using isolated fungal strain from local environment. Biolife, 2014, 2 2 516-522.

[16]

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Methods ofanalysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1975, Washington DC: Association ofOfficial Analytical Chemists.

[17]

Robertson JB, van Soest PJ. James WPT, Thiander O. The Detergent System of Analysis and its application to human foods. The analysis of dietary fibers in food, 1981, New York: Marcel Dekker, 123-158.

[18]

Alexopoulos CJ, Beneke ES. Laboratory manual for introductory mycology, 1962, Minneapolis: 1, 2 Burgess publishing Co.

[19]

Chang VS, Burr B, Holtzapple MT. Lime pretreatment of switchgrass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 1997, 63 65 3-19.

[20]

Mukhopadhyay S, Nandi B. Cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei on pretreated water hyacinth: effect of nutrients. J Mycopathol Res, 2001, 39 1 57-60.

[21]

Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulose activities. Pure Applied Chem, 1987, 59 257 268.

[22]

Bailey M, Buchert J, Viikari L. Effect of pH on production of xylanase of Trichoderma reesei on xylan- and cellulose-based media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1993, 40: 224-229.

[23]

Mukhopadhyay S, Mukherjee PS, Chatterjee NC. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of water hyacinth by Trichoderma reesei vis-à-vis production of fermentable sugars. Acta Aliment, 2008, 37 3 367-377.

[24]

Trinder P. Micro-determination of xylose in plasma. Analyst, 1975, 100: 12-15.

[25]

Miller GL. Use of DNS reagent for the determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem, 1959, 31: 426-428.

[26]

Caputi A, Veda M, Brown T. Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol in wine. American J Enol Viticul, 1968, 19: 160-165.

[27]

Doelle HW, Greenfield PF. The production of ethanol from sucrose using Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Microbial Biotechnol, 1985, 22: 405-441.

[28]

Abate C, Callieri D, Rodriguez E, Garro O. Ethanol production by mixed culture of flocculent strains of Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces sp. Appl Microbial Biotechnol, 1996, 45: 580-583.

[29]

Duncan BD. Multiple range tests for correlated and heteroscedastic means. Biometrics, 1957, 13 2 359-364.

[30]

Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using X –Ray diffractometer. Text Res J, 1959, 29: 786-794.

[31]

Wang LS, Zhang YZ, Gao PJ, Shi DX, Liu HW, Gao HJ. Changes in the structural properties and rate of hydrolysis of cotton fibers during extended enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2006, 93 3 443-456.

[32]

Aswathy US, Sukumaran RK, Lalitha Devi G, Rajasree KP, Singhania RR, Pandey A. Bio-ethanol from water hyacinth biomass: an evaluation of enzymatic saccharification strategy. Biores Technol, 2010, 101: 925-930.

[33]

Satyanagalakshmi K, Sindhu R, Binod P, Janu KU, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Bioethanol production from acid pretreated water hyacinth by separate hydrolysis and fermentation. J Sci Ind Res, 2011, 70: 156-161.

[34]

Mishima D, Kuniki M, Sei K, Soda S, Ike M, Fujita M. Ethanol production from candidate energy crops: water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). Biores Technol, 2008, 99: 2495-2500.

[35]

Chang VS, Nagwani M, Holtzapple MT. Lime pretreatment of crop residues bagasse and wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 1998, 74: 135-159.

[36]

Chang VS, Nagwani M, Kim CH, Holtzapple MT. Oxidative lime pretreatment of high-lignin biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2001, 94: 1-28.

[37]

Karr WE, Holtzapple MT. The multiple benefits of adding non-ionic surfactant during the enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1998, 59: 419-427.

[38]

Peng HD, Li HQ, Luo H, Xu J. A novel combined pretreatment of ball milling and microwave irradiation for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 130: 81-87.

[39]

Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Bioresource Technol, 2006, 97: 583-591.

[40]

Li L, Wenbing Z, Hongwei W, Yun Y, Fen L, Duanwei Z. Relationship between crystallinity index and enzymatic hydrolysis performance of cellulose separated from aquatic and terrestrial plant materials. Bioresources, 2014, 9 3 3993-4005.

[41]

Converse AO, Kwartneg IK, Grethlein HE, Ooshima H. Kinetics of thermochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 1989, 20 21 63-78.

[42]

Maeda RB, Serpa VI, Rocha RAL, Mesquita RAA, Anna LMMS, De Carlo AM, Driemeier CE, Pereira N, Polikarpov I. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugar cane baggase using Penicillium funiculosum and Trichoderma harzianum cellulases. J Process Biochem, 2011, 30: 5-8.

[43]

Hu J, Arantes J, Saddler JN. The enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysisof lignocellulosic substrates by the addition of accessory enzymes such asxylanase: is it an additive or synergistic effect. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2011, 4: 36.

[44]

Langkilde FW, Svantesson A. Identification of celluloses with Fouriertransform(FT) mid-infrared, FT-Raman and near-infrared spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 1995, 13: 409.

[45]

Marimuthu TS, Atmakuru R. Isolation and characterization of cellulosenanofibers from the aquatic weed water hyacinth-Eichhornia crassipes. Carbohydr Polym, 2012, 87: 1701.

[46]

Deshpande SK, Bhotmange MG, Chakrabarti T, Shastri PN. Production of cellulase and xylanase by Trichoderma reesei (QM 9414 mutant), Aspergillus niger and mixed culture by solid state fermentation (SSF) of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Ind J Chem Tech, 2008, 15: 449-456.

[47]

Toyama M, Ogawa K. Ghosh TK, Ghosh TK. Cellulase production of Trichoderma viride in solid and submerged culture methods. Proc. symp. On bioconversion of cellulosic substrates into energy, chemical and microbial protein, 1977, New Delhi, India: IIT, 305-312.

[48]

Kang SW, Park YS, Lee JS, Hong SI, Kim SW. Production of cellulose and hemicellulases by Aspergillus niger KK2 from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol, 2004, 91: 153-156.

[49]

Polizeli MLT, Rizzati ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorin DS. Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2005, 67 5 577-591.

[50]

Mussatto SI, Teixeira JA. Méndez-Vilas A. Lignocellulose as raw material in fermentation processes. Current research, technology and education topics in applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology, 2010, Badajoz: Formatex Research Center, 897-907.

[51]

Sun YC, Weu JL, Xu F, Sun RC. Structure and thermal characterizationof hemicelluloses isolated by organic solvents and alkaline solutions fromTamarix austromongolica. Biores Technol, 2011, 102: 5947.

[52]

Arantes V, Saddler JN. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2010, 3 4 1-11.

[53]

Preez JC, Bosch M, Prior BA. Temperature profiles of growth and ethanol tolerance of xylose fermenting yeasts Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1987, 25: 521-525.

[54]

Mukhopadhyay S, Chatterjee NC. Bioconversion of water hyacinth hydrolysate into ethanol. BioResourses, 2010, 5 2 1301-1310.

[55]

Agbogbo FK, Coward-Kelly G, Torry-Smith M, Wenger KS. Fermentation of glucose/xylose mixtures using Pichia stipitis. Process Biochem, 2006, 41: 2333-2336.

[56]

Gupta R, Sharma KK, Kuhad RC. Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) of Prosopis juliflora, woody substrate for the production of cellulosic ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis- NCIM 3498. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 1214-1220.

[57]

Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Khasa YP, Singh A. Bioethanol production from Lantana camara (red sage): pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour Technol, 2010, 101: 8348-8354.

[58]

Manilal VB, Narayanan CS, Balagopalan C. Cassava starch effluent treatment with concomitant SCP production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 1991, 7: 185-190.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

131

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/