Fostering community belonging through STEAM education: Board game design in a university art appreciation course

Abstract

Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education integrates diverse disciplines through a transdisciplinary approach, emphasizing design thinking and inquiry-based learning to develop technical skills and social connection. This study explores a STEAM-focused project implemented in an Art Appreciation course for non-art majors at a university in Nacogdoches, Texas, where 27 students designed board games to strengthen their sense of belonging to the university and local community. Using the principles of design thinking—empathy, ideation, prototyping, and testing—students combined technological skills and collaborative practices to create engaging and meaningful outcomes that reflected their understanding of community identity. The study addresses two key research questions: (1) How do students design board games using the framework of design thinking to express community identity and belonging? (2) How do their reflections and creative processes contribute to fostering a sense of belonging to the university and community? Drawing on Strayhorn’s framework of academic belonging, findings demonstrate that the integration of creative production with community storytelling strengthened students’ connections to place, peers, and institution. Through inquiry-based learning, students developed both technical proficiency and deeper community engagement, while their board games served as cultural artifacts that encoded shared experiences and values. This research advances our understanding of how STEAM education can simultaneously promote technical innovation and strengthen community belonging. It contributes to the broader understanding of STEAM’s role in general education curricula, suggesting new approaches for combining practical skill development with meaningful community connection. In addition, it offers implications for curriculum design and pedagogical practices in higher education, particularly in fostering student engagement through creative, community-centered projects.

Keywords

STEAM education / Design thinking / Inquiry-based learning / Maker movement / Transdisciplinary curriculum / Community engagement / Sense of belonging / Student identity

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

Sheng Kuan Chung is an Editorial Board Member of this journal but was not in any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. Separately, other authors declared that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References

[1] Hetland L, Winner E, Veenema S, Sheridan KM. Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits of Visual Arts Education. New York: Teachers College Press; 2007.

[2] Bers MU. Blocks to Robots:Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press; 2007.

[3] Martin L. The promise of the maker movement for education. J Pre Coll Eng Educ Res. 2015; 5(1):30-39. doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1099

[4] Drezner ND, Pizmony-Levy O. I belong, therefore, I give? The impact of sense of belonging on graduate student alumni engagement. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2021; 50(4):753-777. doi: 10.1177/0899764020977687

[5] Gillen-O’Neel C. Sense of belonging and student engagement: A daily study of first-and continuing-generation college students. Res High Educ. 2021; 62(1):45-71. doi: 10.1007/s11162-019-09570-y

[6] Pope D, Miles S. A caring climate that promotes belonging and engagement. Phi Delta Kappan. 2022; 103(5):8-12. doi: 10.1177/00317217221079972

[7] Strayhorn TL. College Students’ Sense of Belonging:A Key to Educational Success for All Students. New York: Routledge; 2019.

[8] Walker SR. Teaching Meaning in Artmaking. United States: Davis Publications; 2001.

[9] Kaplan H. In dialogue: Initial steps toward inquiry, meaning-making, and democracy. Art Educ. 2024; 77(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2023.2269363

[10] Briggs JA, DeLosa N. A mini body of work: Art practice as research. Art Educ. 2019; 72(1):35-45. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2019.1534438

[11] Willcox L, Hamrock J. Practice what we preach: Possibilities for higher education curricular and pedagogical practices. Art Educ. 2023; 76(1):58-62. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2022.2131207

[12] Hanning K. Tan Zi Xi, Yodogawa technique, and Cai Lun: Exploring paper, pollution, and environmental advocacy. Art Educ. 2020; 73(6):48-58. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2020.1785796

[13] Romanski NM. Reigniting the transformative power of puppets through narrative pedagogy, contemporary art, and transdisciplinary approaches in art education. Art Educ. 2019; 72(4):36-42. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2019.1602496

[14] Liao C. From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Educ. 2016; 69(6):44-49. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873

[15] Costantino T. STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Educ Policy Rev. 2018; 119(2):100-106. doi: 10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973

[16] Hunter-Doniger T, Radakovic N, O’Byrne WI, et al. 3D printed iron gates: Celebrating an African American artist through a transdisciplinary lesson. Art Educ. 2022; 75(4):33-38. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2022.2053463

[17] Graham MA. Deconstructing the bright future of STEAM and design thinking. Art Educ. 2020; 73(3):6-12. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2020.1717820

[18] Hunter-Doniger T. Forming artist/scientist habits. Art Educ. 2021; 74(2):16-21. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2020.1852376

[19] Glass D, Wilson C. The art and science of looking: Collaboratively learning our way to improved STEAM integration. Art Educ. 2016; 69(6):8-14. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2016.1224822

[20] Gross K, Gross S. Transformation: Constructivism, design thinking, and elementary STEAM. Art Educ. 2016; 69(6):36-43. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869

[21] Schad M, Jones WM. The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. J Res Technol Educ. 2020; 52(1):65-78. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2019.1688739

[22] Lindberg L, Fields DA, Kafai YB. STEAM maker education: Conceal/reveal of personal, artistic and computational dimensions in high school student projects. Front Educ. 2020; 5:51.. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00051

[23] Sickler-Voigt DC. STEAM Teaching and Learning through the Arts and Design: A Practical Guide for PK-12 Educators. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2023.

[24] Ahn MY, Davis H. Students’ sense of belonging and their socio-economic status in higher education: A quantitative approach. Teach High Educ. 2020; 28(1):136-149. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1778664

[25] Meloche A, Katz‐Buonincontro J. Developing divas: The potential of “artpreneurism” for art and design education. Art Educ. 2021; 74(4):39-43. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2021.1905432