Protection and immersive experience of cultural heritage in the digital age: Technological empowerment, spatial reproduction, and future risks

Abstract

Cultural heritage serves as a vital foundation for preserving collective memory and shaping social identity, as it embodies the shared history, values, and traditions of a community. Technologies, such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and artificial intelligence (AI) are more often used in heritage preservation and tourism in the digital era, thus changing how people engage with and perceive the past. This paper uses the theory of space production to examine how immersive experiences across three interconnected dimensions - physical space, mental space, and social space - reproduce cultural heritage. Drawing on chosen case studies, the study shows that digital technology can enhance the sensory and emotional involvement of visitors, encourage participatory cultural expression, and assist the revival of local culture and urban memory. By connecting historical stories with modern audiences, immersive technologies produce dynamic exchanges between tradition and innovation. The article also discusses the issues facing digital reproduction as well, such as worries about authenticity, cultural uniformity, and possible marginalization of local voices. This paper offers an integrated framework connecting technology mediation, spatial transformation, and cultural sustainability to balance invention with cultural integrity. The framework provides an understanding of how immersive digital practices could be tools for social empowerment and heritage interpretation. In the end, this article underlines the need of striking a balance between technological progress and the preservation of cultural diversity and authenticity by stressing the role of digital media in transforming cultural settings. It also adds to the ongoing discourse on this topic.

Keywords

Cultural heritage / Space production / Immersive experience / Digital technology / Cultural reproduction

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO; 2003.

[2] Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China. Smart Tourism Innovation Development Action Plan; 2024. [In Chinese] Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202405/content_6950881.htm

[3] Bec A, Moyle B, Schaffer V, Timms K. Virtual reality and mixed reality for second chance tourism. Tour Manage. 2020; 83:104256.. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104256

[4] Chen ZW, Fan JS. The application of cultural and technological integration in the protection of cultural heritage: A case study of the digitalization of Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes. Dunhuang Res. 2016;(2):100-107. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13584/j.cnki.issn1000-4106.2016.02.014

[5] Xu F, Jin XP. A review of research on the digital protection of cultural heritage based on linked data. J Natl Libr China. 2020; 4:90-99. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13666/j.cnki.jnlc.2020.0409

[6] Lefebvre H. The production of space (1991). The people, place, and space reader. United Kingdom: Routledge, 2014. p. 289-293.

[7] Liu K, Wu H, Ji Y, Zhu C. Archaeology and restoration of costumes in Tang tomb murals based on reverse engineering and human-computer interaction technology. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):6232. doi: 10.3390/su14106232

[8] Zhu XX, Qiao JJ. Research on the sustainable development of rural tourism communities: An analysis based on the triadic dialectic perspective of spatial production theory. Econ Geogr. 2020; 8:153-164. [In Chinese] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.08.019

[9] Lv XY. Analysis of the symbiotic relationship between technological realization and theatrical arts in immersive cultural tourism. Soc Sci. 2024; 2:100-105. [In Chinese]

[10] He JW, Xu H, Da L. Cultural-oriented spatial production and value generation of ethnic villages: A case study of Basha Miao Village. Tour Sci. 2024; 5:23-40. [In Chinese] doi: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2024.05.002

[11] Ye C, Chai YW, Zhang XL. The theory of “production of space” research progress, and its implications for urban studies in China. Econ Geogr. 2011;(3):409-413. [In Chinese] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2011.03.010

[12] Sun JX. Tourism as a choice for cultural heritage protection. Tour J. 2010; 5:10-11. [In Chinese] doi: CNKI:SUN:LYXK.0.2010-05-007

[13] Fu CW, Chen G. The protection and development model of contemporary Chinese cultural heritage. J Hubei Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed). 2010; 4:93-98. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13793/j.cnki.42-1020/c.2010.04.008

[14] Chen SP, Huang C. Thoughts on the protection and development of cultural heritage. Geogr Res. 2005; 4:489-498. [In Chinese] doi: CNKI:SUN:DLYJ.0.2005-04-001

[15] UNESCO. Ethics of Digital Heritage. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529

[16] ICOMOS. Charter for the Protection and Preservation of Digital Heritage. Paris: ICOMOS; 2017. Available from: https://www.icomos.org

[17] IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being. 2^nd ed. IEEE; 2020. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2020.2990500

[18] European Commission. TIME MACHINE Project: Large-scale Digitization of Cultural Heritage. Brussels: European Commission; 2023. Available from: https://pro.europeana.eu/post/europeana-and-time-machine-take-next-steps-towards-new-applications-for-digital-cultural-heritage

[19] Picard RW. Affective Computing in Cultural Heritage Applications. Cambridge: MIT Media Lab. Technical Report No.: MIT-ML-TR-2022-1; 2022.

[20] Google Arts & Culture Lab. Case Studies on Digital Heritage Preservation. Mountain View: Google LLC; 2023. Available from: https://artsandculture.google.com

[21] IBM Research. Quantum Computing for Cultural Heritage Analysis. Armonk: IBM Corporation. White Paper No.: IBM-WP-2023-004;2023.

[22] VERITAS Consortium. 3D Reconstruction Standards for European Heritage. Brussels:EU Horizon 2020. Deliverable No.: D6.2; 2022. Available from: https://veritas-project.eu

[23] British Museum. Virtual Reality Tour Technical Documentation. London: British Museum Press; 2023.

[24] Bailenson JN. Virtual Human Interaction Lab Annual Report 2021. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2021. doi: 10.25740/vhil2021

[25] World Monuments Fund & Arweave. Blockchain for Heritage Preservation: Partnership Report. New York: WMF; 2023. Available from: https://www.wmf.org/press-releases/world-monuments-fund-and-global-heritage-fund-announce-new-affiliation-protect?utmsource=chatgpt.com