Artificial intelligence as an adjunctive tool in hand and wrist surgery: a review
Said Dababneh , Justine Colivas , Nadine Dababneh , Johnny Ionut Efanov
Artificial Intelligence Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 214 -32.
Artificial intelligence as an adjunctive tool in hand and wrist surgery: a review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently utilized across numerous medical disciplines. Nevertheless, despite its promising advancements, AI’s integration in hand surgery remains in its early stages and has not yet been widely implemented, necessitating continued research to validate its efficacy and ensure its safety. Therefore, this review aims to provide an overview of the utilization of AI in hand surgery, emphasizing its current application in clinical practice, along with its potential benefits and associated challenges. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane libraries, adhering to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search focused on identifying articles related to the application of AI in hand surgery, utilizing multiple relevant keywords. Each identified article was assessed based on its title, abstract, and full text. The primary search identified 1,228 articles; after the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria and manual bibliography search of included articles, a total of 98 articles were covered in this review. AI’s primary application in hand and wrist surgery is diagnostic, which includes hand and wrist fracture detection, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), avascular necrosis (AVN), and osteoporosis screening. Other applications include residents’ training, patient-doctor communication, surgical assistance, and outcome prediction. Consequently, AI is a very promising tool that has numerous applications in hand and wrist surgery, though further research is necessary to fully integrate it into clinical practice.
Artificial intelligence / hand surgery / wrist surgery
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Bulstra AEJ; Machine Learning Consortium. A machine learning algorithm to estimate the probability of a true scaphoid fracture after wrist trauma. J Hand Surg Am 2022;47:709-18. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Zech JR, Ezuma CO, Patel S, et al. Artificial intelligence improves resident detection of pediatric and young adult upper extremity fractures. Skeletal Radiol 2024. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
Loos NL, Hoogendam L, Souer JS, et al; the Hand-Wrist Study Group. Machine learning can be used to predict function but not pain after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:1271-84. PMCID:PMC9191288 |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
Hoogendam L, Bakx JAC, Souer JS, Slijper HP, Andrinopoulou ER, Selles RW; Hand Wrist Study Group. Predicting clinically relevant patient-reported symptom improvement after carpal tunnel release: a machine learning approach. Neurosurgery 2022;90:106-13. |
| [73] |
Loos NL, Hoogendam L, Souer JS, et al; Hand-Wrist Study Group. Algorithm versus expert: machine learning versus surgeon-predicted symptom improvement after carpal tunnel release. Neurosurgery 2024;95:110-7. PMCID:PMC11155572 |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
Buul MM, Bos KE, Dijkstra PF, van Beek EJ, Broekhuizen AH. Carpal instability, the missed diagnosis in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture.Injury1993;24:257-62 |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |