Deep learning for automated spinopelvic parameter measurement from radiographs: a meta-analysis
Dylan Glaser , Ahmad K. AlMekkawi , James P. Caruso , Candace Y. Chung , Eshal Z. Khan , Hicham M. Daadaa , Salah G. Aoun , Carlos A. Bagley
Artificial Intelligence Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -15.
Deep learning for automated spinopelvic parameter measurement from radiographs: a meta-analysis
Aim: Quantitative measurement of spinopelvic parameters from radiographs is important for assessing spinal disorders but is limited by the subjectivity and inefficiency of manual techniques. Deep learning may enable automated measurement with accuracy rivaling human readers.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies. Eligible studies were published in English, used deep learning for automated spinopelvic measurement from radiographs, and reported performance against human raters. Mean absolute errors and correlation coefficients were pooled in a meta-analysis.
Results: Fifteen studies analyzing over 10,000 radiographs met the inclusion criteria, employing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and other deep learning architectures. Pooled mean absolute errors were 4.3° [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-5.4] for Cobb angle, 3.9° (95%CI 2.7-5.1) for thoracic kyphosis, 3.6° (95%CI 2.8-4.4) for lumbar lordosis, 1.9° (95%CI 1.3-2.5) for pelvic tilt (PT), 4.1° (95%CI 2.7-5.5) for pelvic incidence (PI), and
Conclusion: Deep learning demonstrates promising accuracy for automated spinopelvic measurement, potentially rivaling experienced human readers. However, further optimization and rigorous multicenter validation are required before clinical implementation. These technologies may eventually improve the efficiency and reliability of quantitative spine image analysis.
Deep learning / spine parameters / pelvic parameters
| [1] |
Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine.Eur Spine J2019;28:1889-905 |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Jamaludin A, Lootus M, Kadir T, et al; Genodisc Consortium. ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1374-83. |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Sounderajah V, Ashrafian H, Golub RM, et al; STARD-AI Steering Committee. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11:e047709. PMCID:PMC8240576 |
| [39] |
Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e537-48. PMCID:PMC8183333 |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Valenzuela JG, Cirillo Totera JI, Turkieltaub DH, Echaurren CV, Álvarez Lemos FL, Arriagada Ramos FI. Spino-pelvic radiological parameters: comparison of measurements obtained by radiologists using the traditional method versus spine surgeons using a semi-automated software (Surgimap).Acta Radiol Open2023;12:20584601231177404 PMCID:PMC10201147 |
| [51] |
Khalifé M, Lafage R, Daniels AH, et al; International Spine Study Group. Assessing abnormal proximal junctional angles in adult spinal deformity: a normative data approach to define proximal junctional kyphosis. Spine. 2025;50:103-9. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |