White paper: requirements for routine data recording in the operating room

Abstract

This white paper documents the consensus opinion of the authors and Artificial Intelligence Surgery editorial board members regarding common requirements needed to implement routine recording of data in the operating room. The statements were agreed upon by all authors and they attempted to outline common barriers that need to be addressed when implementing such recordings.

Keywords

Data recording / domain-specific interconnectivity / cloud-based storage / deidentification / coding of data / data access / automated features

References

[1] Gumbs AA,Karcz K.White paper: definitions of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in clinical surgery.Art Int Surg2022;2:93-100

[2] Maier-Hein L,Sarikaya D.Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Med Image Anal2022;76:102306

[3] Levin M,Kruse CC,Grantcharov TP.Surgical data recording in the operating room: a systematic review of modalities and metrics.Br J Surg2021;108:613-21

[4] Shah P,Turrin D. Informed consent. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/. [Last accessed on 16 Jan 2023]

[5] Dalen ASHM,Schlack WS,Schijven MP.Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment.Br J Surg2019;106:1433-41

[6] Chenthara S,Wang H,Chen Z.Healthchain: a novel framework on privacy preservation of electronic health records using blockchain technology.PLoS One2020;15:e0243043

[7] Madani A,Altieri MS.Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Ann Surg2022;276:363-9

[8] Mascagni P,Sestini L.Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value.NPJ Digit Med2022;5:163

[9] Dimick JB.A video is worth a thousand operative notes.JAMA Surg2019;154:389-90

[10] Shiroshita H,Akira S.Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan: the 15th National Survey of Endoscopic Surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery.Asian J Endosc Surg2022;15:415-26

[11] Prigoff JG,Divino CM.Ethical recommendations for video recording in the operating room.Ann Surg2016;264:34-5

[12] D’Acquisto G,Kikiras P,de Montjoye YA. Privacy by design in big data: an overview of privacy enhancing technologies in the era of big data analytics. 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2824/641480. [Last accessed on 16 Jan 2024]

[13] Filicori F.Intellectual property and data ownership in the age of video recording in the operating room.Surg Endosc2022;36:3772-4

[14] Li L,Tse M.A review of applications in federated learning.Comput Ind Eng2020;149:106854

[15] Li T,Talwalkar A.Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions.IEEE Signal Process Mag2020;37:50-60

[16] Ahmadi SA,Scheufler KM,Weber B.Malpractice claims in spine surgery in Germany: a 5-year analysis.Spine J2019;19:1221-31

[17] Morton JM,Brethauer SA.First report from the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery closed-claims registry: prevalence, causes, and lessons learned from bariatric surgery medical malpractice claims.Surg Obes Relat Dis2022;18:943-7

[18] Delaunay F,Van Vyve E.Club CoelioAnalysis of malpractice claims: the Franco-Belgian “Cœlio Club” experience.J Visc Surg2019;156:S33-9

[19] De Ravin E, Sell EA, Newman JG, Rajasekaran K. Medical malpractice in robotic surgery: a Westlaw database analysis.J Robot Surg2023;17:191-6

[20] Douglas RN,Posner KL.Communication failures contributing to patient injury in anaesthesia malpractice claims.Br J Anaesth2021;127:470-8

[21] Humphrey KE,Milliren CE,Landrigan CP.Frequency and nature of communication and handoff failures in medical malpractice claims.J Patient Saf2022;18:130-7

[22] Levinson W,Mullooly JP,Frankel RM.Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.JAMA1997;277:553-9