Operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: considering the role of machine learning platforms in clinical practice

Abstract

Aim: Computer vision is a subset of machine learning (ML) technology that allows automated analysis of large operative video datasets. The aim of this study was to use a commercially available ML-driven platform to evaluate a subjective grading of operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods: Patients undergoing LC prospectively consented, and their operations were recorded. The intra-operative findings were prospectively graded (1-4) based on intraoperative gallbladder appearance assessments. Deidentified videos were uploaded to Touch Surgery^TMand run through the platform’s algorithm, providing automated analytics including the total operative length and operative phase length. The rate of critical view of safety (CVS) achievement was also included in the analysis.

Results: 206 LC were included. 27 LC were excluded due to incomplete video recording and were therefore not amenable to the final data analysis. Grade 1 and 2 patients had significantly shorter operative time than grade 3 and 4 patients [17min and 53s (IQR 15min and 24s- 21min and 38s) vs. 25 min and 49s (IQR 20min and 12s-38min and 38s) (P < 0.010)]. The operative phases for each step were significantly longer in patients with gallbladders graded 3 or 4 compared to those patients graded 1 or 2 (P < 0.043). The CVS was achieved in 94% of grade 1 patients, 88% of grade 2 patients, 85% of grade 3 patients and 73% of grade 4 patients (P = 0.177).

Conclusion: Increased operative time and decreased ability to achieve the CVS with more difficult intraoperative findings supports the utility of the proposed grading system. ML in surgery is a nascent field, but this study demonstrates the potential of commercially available platforms for use in operative analytics, documentation, audit and training of future surgeons.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy / machine learning / artificial intelligence / difficulty grading

References

[1] Hashimoto DA,Witkowski ER.Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Ann Surg2019;270:414-21 PMCID:PMC7216040

[2] Volkov M,Rosman G,Rus D.Machine learning and coresets for automated real-time video segmentation of laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery.Proc - IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom2017;p. 754-59

[3] Gupta N,Arora MP.Validation of a scoring system to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Int J Surg2013;11:1002-6

[4] Madni TD,Minshall CT.The Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis.The American Journal of Surgery2018;215:625-30

[5] Wennmacker SZ,van Dijk AH,de Reuver PR.Predicting operative difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute biliary presentations.ANZ J Surg2019;89:1451-6 PMCID:PMC6899702

[6] Griffiths EA,Vohra RS.West Midlands Research CollaborativeUtilisation of an operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc2019;33:110-21 PMCID:PMC6336748

[7] Hugh TB,Hugh TJ.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective study of outcome in 100 unselected patients.Med J Aust1992;156:318-20

[8] Birkmeyer JD,O'Reilly A.Michigan bariatric surgery collaborativesurgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery.N Engl J Med2013;369:1434-42

[9] Zisimopoulos O,Luengo I.DeepPhase: surgical phase recognition in CATARACTS videos. In: Frangi AF, Schnabel JA, Davatzikos C, Alberola-lópez C, Fichtinger G, editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 265-72.

[10] Kadkhodamohammadi A,Giataganas P.Towards video-based surgical workflow understanding in open orthopaedic surgery.2021;9:286-93

[11] Twinanda AP,Mutter D,de Mathelin M.EndoNet: A Deep architecture for recognition tasks on laparoscopic videos.IEEE Trans Med Imaging2017;36:86-97

[12] Fried G. Mastery of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. 4th ed. (Lee L. Swanström NJS, ed.). Lippincott Williams and Wilkens; 2014.

[13] Pignata G,Lazzara F.Laparoscopic surgery: key points, operating room setup and equipment. Springer; 2016.

[14] Ellison CE. Zollinger’s Atlas of surgical operations.

[15] Bonjer JH. Surgical principals of minimally invasive procedures: manual of the European association of endoscopic surgery. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-43196- [Last accessed on 23 Mar 2022]

[16] Pucher PH,Fanelli RD,Aggarwal R.SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc2015;29:3074-85

[17] Deal SB,Telem D.Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc2017;31:5094-100

[18] O'Neill RS,Bhimani N,de Reuver P.Unsuspected choledocholithiasis found by routine intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.ANZ J Surg2020;90:2279-84

[19] Virtanen P,Oliphant TE.SciPy 10 Contributors. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.Nat Methods2020;17:261-72 PMCID:PMC7056644

[20] Vallat R.Pingouin: statistics in Python.J Open Source Softw2018;3:1026

[21] Schneider DF,Oltmann SC,Sippel RS.Novel thyroidectomy difficulty scale correlates with operative times.World J Surg2014;38:1984-9 PMCID:PMC4251734

[22] Tseng JF,Lee JE.The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.Surgery2007;141:456-63

[23] Bourgouin S,Monchal T,Bordes J.How to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy?.Am J Surg2016;212:873-81

[24] Cheng K,Wu S.Artificial intelligence-based automated laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical phase recognition and analysis.Surg Endosc2021;

[25] Garrow CR,Li L.Machine learning for surgical phase recognition: a systematic review.Ann Surg2021;273:684-93

[26] Wakabayashi G,Hibi T.Tokyo guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci2018;25:73-86

[27] Nijssen MA,Meyer Z,Crolla RM.Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a video evaluation study of whether the critical view of safety was reached.World J Surg2015;39:1798-803

[28] Sebastian M,Rudnicki J.Recommendation for photographic documentation of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World J Surg2021;45:81-7 PMCID:PMC7752874

[29] Mascagni P,Urade T.Formalizing video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.Surg Endosc2020;34:2709-14

[30] Greenberg JA.Entrustable professional activities: the future of competency-based education in surgery may already be here.Ann Surg2019;269:407-8

[31] Knox ADC,Kasten SJ,Anastakis DJ.Competency-based medical education for plastic surgery: where do we begin?.Plast Reconstr Surg2014;133:702e-10e

[32] Nousiainen MT,Hynes M.CBC Planning CommitteeEight-year outcomes of a competency-based residency training program in orthopedic surgery.Med Teach2018;40:1042-54

[33] Kundu S.AI in medicine must be explainable.Nat Med2021;27:1328

[34] Repici A,Maselli R.Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial.Gastroenterology2020;159:512-520.e7

[35] Repici A,Antonelli G.Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials.Gut2022;71:757-65

[36] Madani A,Altieri MS.Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Ann Surg2020; PMCID:PMC8186165