Genomic Evaluation of Recombination in Small Highly Inbred Beef Cattle Populations

E. Hay , A. S. Ling

Animal Research and One Health ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 261 -267.

PDF
Animal Research and One Health ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 261 -267. DOI: 10.1002/aro2.103
ARTICLE

Genomic Evaluation of Recombination in Small Highly Inbred Beef Cattle Populations

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is key for genetic diversity, but its dynamics are underexplored in small inbred beef cattle populations. This study examines recombination in closed beef cattle populations and identifies related genomic regions. Using genotypic data from 1020 Line 1 Hereford and 3420 Composite Gene Combination (CGC) cattle, recombination rates were estimated through offspring and progenitor haplotypes. The CGC composite displayed a higher recombination rate (27.24 events) than the Line 1 population (26.38 events), with reduced rates in Line 1 potentially due to extended homozygous segments. Recombination varied by autosome length, increasing with longer autosomes. A genome-wide association study revealed novel genomic regions associated with recombination: significantly associated SNP markers were found on Bos taurus autosome (BTA) 1, 7, 13, 15, and 19 in the Line 1 population, and numerous others in the CGC population, indicating complex polygenic influences.

Keywords

cattle / genome / recombination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
E. Hay, A. S. Ling. Genomic Evaluation of Recombination in Small Highly Inbred Beef Cattle Populations. Animal Research and One Health, 2025, 3(3): 261-267 DOI:10.1002/aro2.103

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

L. Kauppi, A. J. Jeffreys, and S. Keeney, “Where the Crossovers are: Recombination Distributions in Mammals,” Nature Reviews Genetics5, no. 6 (2004): 413-424, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1346.

[2]

N. H. Barton and B. Charlesworth, “Why Sex and Recombination?,” Science281, no. 5385 (1998): 1986-1990, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5385.1986.

[3]

Z.-Q. Weng, M. Saatchi, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and D. J. Garrick, “Recombination Locations and Rates in Beef Cattle Assessed From Parent-Offspring Pairs,” Genetics Selection Evolution46, no. 1 (2014): 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-46-34.

[4]

B. Shen, J. Jiang, E. Seroussi, G. E. Liu, and L. Ma, “Characterization of Recombination Features and the Genetic Basis in Multiple Cattle Breeds,” BMC Genomics19, no. 1 (2018): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4705-y.

[5]

C. Brekke, S. Johnston, A. B. Gjuvsland, and P. Berg, “Variation and Genetic Control of Individual Recombination Rates in Norwegian Red Dairy Cattle,” Journal of Dairy Science106, no. 2 (2023): 1130-1141, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22368.

[6]

S. Qanbari and D. Wittenburg, “Male Recombination Map of the Autosomal Genome in German Holstein,” Genetics Selection Evolution52, no. 1 (2020): 73, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00593-z.

[7]

J. Hidalgo, S. Tsuruta, D. Lourenco, et al., “Changes in Genetic Parameters for Fitness and Growth Traits in Pigs Under Genomic Selection,” Journal of Animal Science98, no. 2 (2020): skaa032, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa032.

[8]

I. Misztal, I. Aguilar, D. Lourenco, L. Ma, J. P. Steibel, and M. Toro, “Emerging Issues in Genomic Selection,” Journal of Animal Science99, no. 6 (2021): skab092, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab092.

[9]

V. Leesburg, M. MacNeil, and F. Neser, “Influence of Miles City Line 1 on the United States Hereford Population,” Journal of Animal Science92, no. 6 (2014): 2387-2394, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6890.

[10]

M. MacNeil, “Invited Review: Research Contributions From Seventy-Five Years of Breeding Line 1 Hereford Cattle at Miles City, Montana,” Journal of Animal Science87, no. 8 (2009): 2489-2501, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1909.

[11]

S. Newman, M. MacNeil, W. Reynolds, B. Knapp, and J. Urick, “Fixed Effects in the Formation of a Composite Line of Beef Cattle: I. Experimental Design and Reproductive Performance,” Journal of Animal Science71, no. 8 (1993): 2026-2032, https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7182026x.

[12]

M. H. Ferdosi, B. P. Kinghorn, J. H. Van der Werf, S. H. Lee, and C. Gondro, “Hsphase: An R Package for Pedigree Reconstruction, Detection of Recombination Events, Phasing and Imputation of Half-Sib Family Groups,” BMC Bioinformatics15, no. 1 (2014): 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-172.

[13]

J. B. Haldane, “The Combination of Linkage Values and the Calculation of Distances Between the Loci of Linked Factors,” Journal of Genetics8, no. 29 (1919): 299-309.

[14]

A. V. Zimin, A. L. Delcher, L. Florea, et al., “A Whole-Genome Assembly of the Domestic Cow, Bos taurus,” Genome Biology10, no. 4 (2009): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r42.

[15]

S. Purcell, B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown, et al., “PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses,” American Journal of Human Genetics81, no. 3 (2007): 559-575, https://doi.org/10.1086/519795.

[16]

R. McQuillan, A.-L. Leutenegger, R. Abdel-Rahman, et al., “Runs of Homozygosity in European Populations,” American Journal of Human Genetics83, no. 3 (2008): 359-372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007.

[17]

P. Sumreddee, S. Toghiani, E. H. Hay, A. Roberts, S. E. Agrrey, and R. Rekaya, “Inbreeding Depression in Line 1 Hereford Cattle Population Using Pedigree and Genomic Information,” Journal of Animal Science97, no. 1 (2019): 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky385.

[18]

L. Ma, J. R. O'Connell, P. M. VanRaden, et al., “Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control From a Large Pedigree Analysis,” PLoS Genetics11, no. 11 (2015): e1005387, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005387.

[19]

G. C. Russell, J. Benavides, D. M. Grant, et al., “Host Gene Expression Changes in Cattle Infected With Alcelaphine Herpesvirus 1,” Virus Research169, no. 1 (2012): 246-254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.08.011.

[20]

H. Matsumoto, K. Sasaki, T. Bessho, et al., “The SNPs in the ACACA Gene are Effective on Fatty Acid Composition in Holstein Milk,” Molecular Biology Reports39, no. 9 (2012): 8637-8644, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1718-5.

[21]

K. Guo, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, J. Zhao, L. Liu, and H. Wang, “GGNBP2 Regulates Histone Ubiquitination and Methylation in Spermatogenesis,” Epigenetics19, no. 1 (2024): 2381849, https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2024.2381849.

[22]

S. E. Johnston, C. Bérénos, J. Slate, and J. M. Pemberton, “Conserved Genetic Architecture Underlying Individual Recombination Rate Variation in a Wild Population of Soay Sheep (Ovis aries),” Genetics203, no. 1 (2016): 583-598, https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.185553.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Published 2025. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Animal Research and One Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

56

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/