Public satisfaction with the quality of First Health Facility Services in Indonesia: Does sociodemographic matter?

Zainul Khaqiqi Nantabah , Rofingatul Mubasyiroh , Antonius Yudi Kristanto , Lely Indrawati , Astridya Paramita , Dwi Hapsari Tjandrarini , Agung Dwi Laksono

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) : 409 -417.

PDF (398KB)
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) :409 -417. DOI: 10.4103/1995-7645.386257
Original Article
research-article
Public satisfaction with the quality of First Health Facility Services in Indonesia: Does sociodemographic matter?
Author information +
History +
PDF (398KB)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate individual characteristics related to satisfaction with the quality of First Health Facility Services (FHFS) in Indonesia. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzes national representation data. Meanwhile, the study involved 9 846 representative respondents in 2019. Respondent’s satisfaction with FHFS based on the five dimensions of service quality (SERVQUAL) is a dependent variable. Independent variables consist of sex, marital status, age, education, employment, insurance ownership, and economics. The study used multivariate logistic regression to explain the relationship between individual characteristics and FSHS quality. Results: 77.3% Respondents were satisfied with FHFS, with the highest order of satisfaction dimensions being assurance (59.4%), empathy (57.3%), reliability (53.6%), responsiveness (52.7%), and then tangibility (49.1%). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that divorce was 1.48 more likely than never-married to be satisfied (95% CI 1.17-1.87). Employees were 0.77 less likely than the unemployed to get satisfied (95% CI 0.70-0.86). Respondents with higher education was 0.82 less likely than those with primary education to be satisfied (95% CI 0.67-0.99). Meanwhile, respondents who had government-run insurance were 1.61 more likely than uninsured to be satisfied (95% CI 1.42-1.80). Moreover, the rich were 0.82 less likely than the poor to get satisfied (95% CI 0.73-0.92). Conclusions: Community satisfaction with FHFS is generally high, though some areas could be improved. Demographic factors are still strongly related to satisfaction ratings. The government can assess the quality of services in accordance with standards and disseminate information about service standards for primary facilities to all levels of society, ensuring that service satisfaction is rated as good by all groups.

Keywords

Health services quality / Satisfaction / National health insurance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zainul Khaqiqi Nantabah, Rofingatul Mubasyiroh, Antonius Yudi Kristanto, Lely Indrawati, Astridya Paramita, Dwi Hapsari Tjandrarini, Agung Dwi Laksono. Public satisfaction with the quality of First Health Facility Services in Indonesia: Does sociodemographic matter?. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2023, 16 (9) : 409-417 DOI:10.4103/1995-7645.386257

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

World Health Organization. Arguing for universal health coverage. Geneva: WHO;2013.

[2]

Chapman AR. The contributions of human rights to universal health coverage. Health Hum Rights 2016; 18(2):1-5.

[3]

International Labour Organization. Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System. [Online]. Available from:https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_isn=69781&p_lang=en. [Accessed on 6 May 2023].

[4]

Indonesian Ministry of Health. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for implementation of the National Health Security Program. Indonesia: Indonesian Ministry of Health ; 2014.

[5]

Trintinaglia V. Primary health care quality: An analysis based on its attributes. Int J Innov Educ Res 2022; 10(3):224-238.

[6]

Teshnizi SH, Aghamolaei T, Kahnouji K, Teshnizi SMH, Ghani J. Assessing quality of health services with the SERVQUAL model in Iran. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 30(2):82-89.

[7]

Agyapong A, Afi JD, Kwateng KO. Examining the effect of perceived service quality of health care delivery in Ghana on behavioural intentions of patients: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Int J Healthc Manag 2018; 11(4):276-288.

[8]

Sharifi T, Hosseini SE, Mohammadpour S, Javan-Noughabi J, Ebrahimipour H, Hooshmand E. Quality assessment of services provided by health centers in Mashhad, Iran: SERVQUAL versus HEALTHQUAL scales. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21(1):1-7.

[9]

Nguyen TLH, Nagase K. The influence of total quality management on customer satisfaction. Int J Healthc Manag 2019; 12(4):277-285.

[10]

Sarker AR, Sultana M, Ahmed S, Mahumud RA, Morton A, Khan JAM. Clients’ experience and satisfaction of utilizing healthcare services in a community based health insurance program in bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(8). doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081637.

[11]

Afader M, Rahman PHA, Sunjaya DK. Patients’ satisfaction in public and private primary health care: A study in Karawang Regency, West Java, Indonesia. Althea Med J 2021; 8(4):224-230.

[12]

Akbar FH, Pasinringi S, Awang AH. Assessment of patient satisfaction level to dental health care services in Indonesia. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2020; 20:1-8.

[13]

Akbar JM, Gondodiputro S, Raksanagara AS. Elderly satisfaction on chronic disease management program at public health center, Bandung City, West Java, Indonesia. Int J Integr Heal Sci 2020; 8(1):14-21.

[14]

Setiawan B. Customer satisfaction index model on three level of socioeconomic status in Bogor case study: Customer satisfaction on branded cooking oil product. ASEAN Mark J 2014; 6(1):15-24.

[15]

Berliana N, Amelia D. Analysis of maternity satisfaction level to sntenatal care quality in primary health care Markanding Muaro Jambi 2016. J Glob Res Public Health 2018; 3(1):61-67.

[16]

Nasution SK, Mahendradhata Y, Trisnantoro L. Can a national health insurance policy increase equity in the utilization of skilled birth attendants in Indonesia? A secondary analysis of the 2012 to 2016 national socio-economic survey of Indonesia. Asia Pac J Public Health 2020; 32(1):19-26.

[17]

Okeke HC, Bassey P, Oduwole OA, Adindu A. Client characteristics and satisfaction with the quality of primary health-care services in Calabar, Nigeria. Calabar J Health Sci 2020; 3(1):1-8.

[18]

Berry LL, Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 1988; 64(1):12-40.

[19]

Prihatmojo B, Anindita R. Analysis of strawberry farmer’s satisfaction for utilization of “X” fungicide in Pandanrejo Village, Batu City. Habitat 2017; 28(3):106-113.

[20]

Pramesti W, Utami W, Fitriani F. Regresi logistik backward elimination pada risiko penyebaran Covid-19 di Jawa Timur. J Variansi 2021; 3(3):162-170.

[21]

Mendenhall W, Sincich T. A second course in statistics regression analysis. 8th ed. United States: Pearson; 2020.

[22]

Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional, BPJS Kesehatan. Statistik JKN 2014-2018: Mengungkap Fakta dengan Data. Jakarta: Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional ; 2019.

[23]

Liu C, Yen L. The effects of service quality, tourism impact, and tourist satisfaction on tourist choice of leisure farming types. African J Bus Manag 2010; 4:1529-1545.

[24]

Okoro CS. Assessing the quality of care received by diabetes patients under the Nigeria national health insurance scheme: Does enrollment in health insurance matter? Boston University School of Public Health; 2017. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

[25]

Fenny AP, Enemark U, Asante FA, Hansen KS. Patient satisfaction with primary health care-a comparison between the insured and non-insured under the National Health Insurance Policy in Ghana. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 6(4):9-21.

[26]

Maharlouei N, Akbari M, Akbari M, Lankarani KB. Socioeconomic status and satisfaction with public healthcare system in Iran. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2017; 5(1):22-29.

[27]

Vuong QH, Vuong TT, Ho TM, Nguyen HV. Psychological and socio-economic factors affecting social sustainability through impacts on perceived health care quality and public health: The case of Vietnam. Sustain 2017; 9(8). doi: 10.3390/su9081456.

[28]

Devadasan N, Criel B, Van Damme W, Lefevre P, Manoharan S, van der Stuyft P. Community health insurance schemes & patient satisfaction-Evidence from India. Indian J Med Res 2011; 133(1):40-49.

[29]

Park K, Park J, Kwon YD, Kang Y, Noh JW. Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system. Health Policy (New York) 2016; 120(6):621-629.

[30]

Alenazi AAR, Alhazmi TMA, Almatrafi ARH, Alshammari MBA. Patient’s satisfaction with primary health care services in Arar city, Saudi Arabia. Med Sci 2021; 25(113):1558-1566.

[31]

Ali Jadoo SA, Yaseen SM, Al-Samarrai MAM, Mahmood AS. Patient satisfaction in outpatient medical care: The case of Iraq. J Ideas Health 2020; 3(2):176-182.

[32]

Papanikolaou V, Zygiaris S. Service quality perceptions in primary health care centres in Greece. Health Expect 2014; 17(2):197-207.

[33]

Osiya D, Ogaji D, Onotai L. Patients’ satisfaction with healthcare services. Niger Health J 2017; 17(1):1-14.

[34]

Mohamed EY, Sami W, Alotaibi A. Patients’ satisfaction with primary health care centers’ services, Majmaah, Kingdom of Saudi of Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2015; 9(2):159-165.

[35]

Owolabi O, Zhang Z, Wei X, Yang N, Li H, Wong SY, et al. Patients’ socioeconomic status and their evaluations of primary care in Hong Kong. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13(1). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-487.

[36]

Soewondo P, Johar M, Pujisubekti R. Akses pelayanan kesehatan keluarga berstatus ekonomi rendah di era JKN. J Ekon dan Pembang Indones 2021; 21(1):108-124.

[37]

World Health Organization. The Republic of Indonesia health system review. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

[38]

Hidayat B, Mundiharno, Němec J, Rabovskaja V, Rozanna CS, Spatz J, et al. Out-of-pocket payments in the National Health Insurance of Indonesia: A first year review. 2015. [Online]. Available from:https://d-nb.info/1097758281/34. [Accessed on 28 August 2023].

PDF (398KB)

19

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/