Objective: To identify the attitudes of infertile couples toward their surplus frozen embryos.
Methods: This study was according to PRISMA-ScR as the guideline for scoping review. Studies that assessed the attitudes of patients or infertile couples who had surplus embryos were included. We conducted systematic searches in English studies from April 2011-April 2021 using 7 databases: PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Sage Journals, and Google Scholar. Data were charted based on author, year of publication, country, purpose, data collection, key findings, and research focus/domain.
Results: A total of 37 research articles were included in the analysis. Their attitudes encompassed: supporting the donation of the surplus embryos for both research and reproductive purposes, continuing to store the frozen embryos, and disposing of the surplus embryos.
Conclusions: Most of the infertile patients support donating their surplus embryos for research and reproductive purposes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
Funding
The study received no extramural funding.
Authors’ contributions
Agung Dewanto provided the definition, concept, and design of intellectual material. Investigation, literature search, and data analysis were all done by I Gusti Agung Ngurah Agung Sentosa and Sarrah Ayuandari. I Gusti Agung Ngurah Agung Sentosa, Sarrah Ayuandari, Rafhani Rosyidah, and Agung Dewanto wrote, edited, and reviewed the paper.
| [1] |
Chen Y, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Han X, Li D, Zhang C. Cumulative live birth and surplus embryo incidence after frozen-thaw cycles in PCOS : How many oocytes do we need? J Assist Reprod Genet 2017;34:1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0959-6.
|
| [2] |
Alexander VM, Riley JK, Jungheim ES. Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37(11):2797-2804. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01927-y.
|
| [3] |
Riggan KA, Allyse M. Compassionate transfer: An alternative option for surplus embryo disposition. Hum Reprod 2019; 34(5):791-794. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez038.
|
| [4] |
Bruno C, Sibony CD, Berthaut I, Weil E, Brunet L, Fortier C, et al. Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: The crucial role of symbolic embryo representation. Hum Reprod 2016; 31(7):1508-1514. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew104.
|
| [5] |
Takahashi S, Fujita M, Fujimoto A, Fujiwara T, Yano T, Tsutsumi O. The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: A qualitative study. BioMed Cent Med Ethics 2012;13(9):1-11 [Online] Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/9%0APage.
|
| [6] |
Peters M, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, Mcinerney P, Parker D, Soares BC. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evidenced-Based Healthc 2015; 13(3):141-146. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
|
| [7] |
Álvarez-díaz JA. Embryo donation among Latin-Americans who have attended assisted reproduction techniques: A first empirical approach. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25(1):81-89. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200055.
|
| [8] |
Raz A, Vardi J, Reisner S, Meiri A, Barkan G, Azem F. Social science & medicine unmet communication needs and moral work in the disposition decision concerning surplus frozen embryos: The perspectives of IVF users. Soc Sci Med 2021; 274:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113804.
|
| [9] |
Hertz R. Single mothers as bricoleurs: Crafting embryos and kin. J Fam Issues 2021; 42(1):58-87. doi: 10.1177/0192513X20910767.
|
| [10] |
Zimon AE, Shepard DS, Prottas J, Rooney KL, Ungerleider J, Halasarappel YA, et al. Embryo donation: Survey of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients and randomized trial of complimentary counseling. PLoS One 2019; 14(8):1-17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221149.
|
| [11] |
Faustini F, Forte M, Capalbo A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. The main will of the patients of a private Italian IVF clinic for their aneuploid/affected blastocysts would be donation to research: A currently forbidden choice. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36(8):1555-1560. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01465-2.
|
| [12] |
Chandy A, Waanbah B, Yadav B, Kunjummen AT, Riley DJS, Kamath MS. Knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples towards disposition of supernumerary cryopreserved embryos: An Indian perspective. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2019; 9:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.002.
|
| [13] |
Banerjee K, Singla B. Acceptance of donor eggs, donor sperms, or donor embryos in indian infertile couples. J Hum Reprod Sci 2018; 11(2):169-172. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_63_17.
|
| [14] |
Rosemann A, Luo H. Attitudes towards the donation of human embryos for stem cell research among Chinese IVF patients and students. Bioethical Inq 2018;15:441-457. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9862-9.
|
| [15] |
Yamamoto N, Hirata T, Izumi G, Nakazawa A, Fukuda S, Neriishi K, et al. A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014. PLoS One 2018; 13(10):1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198499.
|
| [16] |
Chun-lin L, Liu J, Pei-ling L, Zhi-heng C, Heng-xi Z, Chun-quan O, et al. Factors associated with the disposition of frozen embryos after a live birth through IVF treatment in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.007.
|
| [17] |
de Lacey S. Death in the clinic: Women's perceptions and experiences of discarding supernumerary IVF embryos. Sociol Health Illn 2016; 39(3):397-411. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12497.
|
| [18] |
Deniz SG, Hughes EG, Neal MS, Faghih M, Amin S, Karnis MF. Are health care providers adequately educating couples for embryo disposition decisions. Fertil Steril 2016; 105(3):684-689. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.025.
|
| [19] |
Cattapan A, Doyle A. Patient decision-making about the disposition of surplus cryopreserved embryos in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.11.007.
|
| [20] |
Raz A, Amer-alshiek J, Goren-margalit M, Jacobi G, Hochberg A, Amit A, et al. Donation of surplus frozen pre-embryos to research in Israel: Underlying motivations. Isr J Health Policy Res 2016; 5(25):1-7. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0085-4.
|
| [21] |
Samorinha C, Severo M, Machado H, Figueiredo B, De Freitas C, Silva S. Couples’ willingness to donate embryos for research: A longitudinal study. J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016; 95(8):912-919. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12900.
|
| [22] |
Samorinha C, Severo M, Alves E, Machado H, Figueiredo B, Silva S. Factors associated with willingness to donate embryos for research among couples undergoing IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 32(2):247-256. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.11.018.
|
| [23] |
Jonlin EC. The voices of the embryo donors. Trends Mol Med 2015; 21(2):55-57. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.007.
|
| [24] |
Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Ghasemi-esmailabad S, Nabi A, Shamsi F. Zoroastrians support oocyte and embryo donation program for infertile couples. J Reprod Infertil 2014; 15(5):222-228.
|
| [25] |
Cote S, Affdal A, Kadoch I, Hamet P, Ravitsky V. Posthumous reproduction with surplus in vitro fertilization embryos: A study exploring users’ choices. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(5):1410-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1202.
|
| [26] |
Kato M. Giving a gift to the gift: Women's experiences of embryo donation in Japan. Anthropol Forum 2014; 24(4):351-363. doi: 10.1080/00664677.2014.969680.
|
| [27] |
Jin X, Wang G, Liu S, Liu M, Zhang J, Shi Y. Patients’ attitudes towards the surplus frozen embryos in China. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:1-9. doi: 10.1155/2013/934567.
|
| [28] |
Millbank J, Chandle E, Karpin I, Stuhmcke A. Embryo donation for reproductive use in Australia. J Law Med 2013; 20:789-810 [Online] Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286072596%0AEmbryo.
|
| [29] |
Wanggren K, Prag F, Svanberg AS. Attitudes towards embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age. Upsala J Med Sci 2013;118:187-195. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2013.808294.
|
| [30] |
Wanggren K, Alden J, Bergh T, Svanberg AS. Attitudes towards embryo donation among infertile couples with frozen embryos. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(9):2432-2439. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det252.
|
| [31] |
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Something of the two of us. The emotionally loaded embryo disposition decision making of patients who view their embryo as a symbol of their relationship. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2012; 33(2):45-52. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.676111.
|
| [32] |
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Van De Velde A, Dhont M. Trends in embryo disposition decisions: Patients’ responses to a 15-year mailing program. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(2):506-514. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der419.
|
| [33] |
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Dhont M. A private matter: How patients decide what to do with cryopreserved embryos after infertility treatment. Br Fertil Soc 2012; 15(4):210-216. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2012.745015.
|
| [34] |
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van De Velde A, Dhont M. To continue or discontinue storage of cryopreserved embryos? Patients’ decisions in view of their child wish. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(4):861-872. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq392.
|
| [35] |
Hill GA, Freeman MR. Embryo disposition: Choices made by patients and donor oocyte recipients. Fertil Steril 2011; 95(3):940-943. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.002.
|
| [36] |
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Decisions on embryo disposition in cross-border reproductive care: Differences between Belgian and Dutch patients at a Belgian fertility center. J Fact View Vis Obstet Gynecol Reprod Heal 2011; 3(4):293-301.
|
| [37] |
Lyerly AD, Nakagawa S, Kuppermann M. Decisional conflict and the disposition of frozen embryos: Implications for informed consent. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(3):646-654. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq368.
|
| [38] |
Frith L, Blyth E, Paul MS, Berger R. Conditional embryo relinquishment: Choosing to relinquish embryos for family-building through a Christian embryo ‘adoption’ programme. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(12):3327-3338. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der313.
|
| [39] |
Sharma H, Johnstone EB, Gates E, Sohn SH, Huddleston HG, Fujimoto VY. Asian immigrants to the United States are less likely to donate cryopreserved embryos for research use. Fertil Steril 2011; 95(5):1672-1676. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.123.
|
| [40] |
Samorinha C, Pereira M, Machado H, Silva S. Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: A systematic review. Hum Reprod 2014; 20(5):641-655. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu026.
|
| [41] |
Roudsari R, Jafari H, Taghipour A. The relationship of sociocultural beliefs and infertile couples’ attitude toward reproductive donation: A descriptive-correlational study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2019; 17(5):315-324. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i5.4599.
|