New Model of Multicomponent Raw Materials and Its Use in Intensifying Hydrotreating Process of Diesel Fuel

Abstract

Hydrotreating of diesel fuel aims to reduce the sulfur content in the fuel to 10 ppm to meet environmental standards. However, this deep purification of diesel requires the use of expensive catalysts at hydrotreating plants with giant reactors with a capacity of 200-600 cubic meters. Such large volumes of reactors are associated with classical kinetic methods for chemical reactions, where the feedstock is in the reactor until the required conversion depth is reached. All known mathematical models for diesel hydrotreatment have a common drawback: they rely on approximations about the composition of multicomponent raw materials containing dozens of different organic sulfur compounds that react differently in hydrogenation reactions. This raw material is often presented in a mathematical model as a combination of two to six pseudo-components or lumps combining organosulfur impurities from one or more homologous groups. This theoretical basis allows us to simulate the current state of hydrotreating technology, but does not develop and promote it. We propose a new approach to mathematical modelling of diesel fuel hydrotreating, in which the structure of the mathematical model considers the composition of raw material as a set of 10-20 narrow fractions. The set of hydrogenated organosulfuric impurities within each fraction is treated as a single pseudocomponent. This allows us to integrate the system of differential equations of the model and adapt the rate constant to the concentration of hydrogenated organosulfur impurities at any given time during the process. The developed model has also allowed us to propose a new technology, hydrotreatment: separating the feedstock into two or three wide fractions, combining the corresponding narrow fractions, and then subjecting them to individual hydrogenation processes. As a new approach, this differential hydrotreatment technique will reduce the catalyst load in the hydrotreatment unit by approximately 50%, while maintaining efficiency of processing, or double efficiency while maintaining a similar catalyst load using traditional technology.

Keywords

Diesel fuel / Hydrodesulfurization process / Mathematical modeling / Diesel feedstock / Pseudo-components / Industrial reactor block

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this study are available from author upon reasonable request.

Funding

Not funding.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The author declare that have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1] Song C. An Overview of New Approaches to Deep Desulfurization for Ultra-clean Gasoline, Diesel Fuel and Jet Fuel. Catal. Today 2003, 86, 211-263. doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00412-7.

[2] Ahmed ZM, Gasmelseed GA. Modelling and Control of a Diesel Hydrotreating Process. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 1940-1944. doi:10.21275/ART20177709.

[3] Palmer E, Polcar S, Wong A. Clean Diesel Hydrotreating. Design Considerations for Clean Diesel Hydrotreating. Pet. Technol. Q. 2009, 14, 91-103.

[4] Samoilov NA. Kinetic Characteristic of the Reaction Rate Constant in Multicomponent Reaction Systems. Pet. Chem. 2021, 61, 1040-1051. doi:10.1134/S0965544121090036.

[5] Babich IV, Moulijn JV. Science and Technology of Novel Processes for Deep Desulfurization of Oil Refinery Streams: A Review. Fuel 2003, 82, 607-631. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00324-1.

[6] Gasimova ZА, Mukhtarova GS, Basforhiriva TK, Huseynova RI, Andrushchenco NK. Hydrotreatment of diesel fuels involving distillation fractions. Process. Petrochem. Oil Refin. 2024, 25, 376-388. doi:10.62972/1726-4685.2024.2.376.

[7] Gheni SA, Awad SA, Ahmed SM, Abdullah GH, Al Dahhan M. Nanoparticle Catalyzed Hydrodesulfurization of Diesel Fuel in a Trickle Bed Reactor: Experimental and Optimization Study. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2020, 10, 33911-33927. doi:10.1039/D0RA05748G.

[8] Verstraete JJ, Le Lannic K, Guibard I. Modeling Fixed-bed Residue Hydrotreating Processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 5402-5408. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.020.

[9] Li H, Vang J, Weng H, Wang J. Kinetic Study of Liquid-phase Hydrodesulfurization of FCC Diesel in Tubular Reactors. China Pet. Process. Petrochem. Technol. 2015, 17, 1-8.

[10] Solmanov PS, Maximov NM, Eremina YV, Zhilkina EO, Dryaglin YY, Tomina NN. Hydrotreating of Mixtures of Diesel Fractions with Gasoline and Light Coking Gas Oil. Pet. Chem. 2013, 53, 177-185. doi:10.1134/S0965544113030109.

[11] Nakano K, Ali SA, Kim HJ, Kim T, Alhooshani K, Park JI, et al. Deep Desulfurization of Gas Oil Over NiMoS Catalysis Supported on Alumina Coated USY-zeolite. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 116, 44-51. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.04. 2007, 49, 48-59.

[12] Leal E, Torres-Mancera P, Alonso F, Luna R, Muñoz JA, Ancheyta J. Optimization Methodology of Dual-Bed Catalyst Stacking Systems to Produce Ultralow-Sulfur Diesel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 17857-17867.

[13] Al-Zeghayer YS, Jibri BY. Kinetics of Hydrodesulfurization of Dibenzothiophene on Sulfide Commercial Co-Mo/γ-Al₂O₃Catalyst. J. Eng. Res. 2006, 3, 38-42.

[14] Chen X, Orton KA, Mukarakate C, Tuxworth L, Griffin MB, Iisa K. Diesel production via standalone and cohydrotreating of catalytic fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Adv. 2024, 3, 1121-1131. doi:10.1039/rsc_crossmark_policy.

[15] Shokri S, Ahmadi Marvast M, Tajerian M. Production of ultra low sulfur diesel: Simulation and softwartsulfur development. Pet. Coal 2007, 49, 48-59.

[16] Astarita G, Sandler SI. Kinetics and thermodynamics lumping of multicomponent mixtures Energy. Fuels 1991, 25, 1939-1949.

[17] Bannatham P, Teeraboonchaikul S, Patirupanon T, Ramachandran PA. Kinetic Evaluation of the Hydrodesulfurization Process Using a Lumpy Model in a Thin-layer Reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4878-4886. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0038.

[18] Jiang H, Shao Z, Chen W, Qin K, Ju X, Li M. Study on Diesel Hydrotreating Kinetics and the Synergistic Effect of CoMo and NiMo Catalysts. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 6314-6324.

[19] Tataurshchicov AA, Krivtcova NI. Non-stationary Mathematical Model of Industrial Diesel Fuel Hydrotreating Process. Pet. Coal 2018, 60, 104-112.

[20] Tang X, Li S, Yue C, He J, Hou J. Lumping kinetics of hudrodesulfurization and hydrodenitrogenization of the middle distillate from Chinese shale oil. Oil Shale 2013, 30, 517-536.

[21] Samoilov NA, Zhilina VA. On the Formation of Psevdo-components in the Raw Organosulfur Materials of the Diesel Fuel Hydrotreating Process. Prog. Petrochem. Sci. 2020, 3, 389-381. doi:10.31031/PPS.2020.03.000573.

[22] Samoilov NA. Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Diesel-fuel Hydrotreatin. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2021, 55, 99-109. doi:10.1134/S0040579520060202.

[23] Loginov SA, Lebedev BL, Kapustin VM, Lugovskoy AI, Kurganov VM, Rudiak KB. Development of a new technology for the process of hydrodesulfurization of diesel fuels. Oil Refin. Petrochem. 2001, 11, 67-74.

[24] Mnushkin IA, Samoilov NA, Zhilina VA. Method Hydrotreating of Diesel Fuel. Patent RU, 2691965, 25 January 2019.

[25] Mnushkin IA, Maltsev DI, Samoilov NA. Method Hydrotreating of Diesel Fuel. Patent RU, 2798566, 4 June 2022.