Animal research in the UK: Regulation, implementation, welfare and development of new approach methodologies

Abstract

Use of animals in biomedical research is still considered essential by many in academia, industry and regulatory authorities. Therefore, it is important that legal, governance and welfare procedures are in place to ensure that only necessary procedures using animals are carried out and that this occurs within a framework with animal welfare at its core. Animal research in the United Kingdom is conducted under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and animal research in the United Kingdom has long been seen as a flag bearer for high quality–high welfare research. An example of the leading role taken in supporting animal welfare in research was establishment of the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) to support reducing the scale and impact of animal research. Here, we provide an overview of governance and licensing procedures of animal research in the United Kingdom, coupled with explanations of how excellent welfare underpins high quality research, and examine the development of new approach methodologies.

Keywords

3Rs / New approach methodologies / Regulation / Welfare

References

[1] Shmuely S. Law and the laboratory: the British vivisection inspectorate in the 1890s. Law Soc Inq. 2021; 46(4): 933-963.

[2] Ahmed IA, Jameron I. On the history and legacy of the Grammont act, France's first animal protection law. The UK Journal of Animal Law. 2022; 6(2): 37-40.

[3] HMSO. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act. HMSO; 1986. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/14

[4] Russell WMS, Burch RL. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co; 1959.

[5] Brambell FWR. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. HMSO; 1965.

[6] Farm Animal Welfare Council. Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. FAWC; 2009.

[7] World Organisation for Animal Health. Animal Welfare. Accessed March 28, 2026. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/animal-health-and-welfare/animal-welfare/

[8] Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, et al. The 2020 five domains model: including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals. 2020; 10(10):1870.

[9] Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off J Eur Union. 2010; 276: 33-79.

[10] MacArthur Clark JA, Sun D. Guidelines for the ethical review of laboratory animal welfare People's Republic of China National Standard GB/T 35892-2018 [issued 6 February 2018 effective from 1 September 2018]. Anim Models and Exp Med. 2020; 3(1): 103-113.

[11] National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://www.nc3rs.org.uk

[12] Lilley E. Review of animal use requirements in WHO biologics guidelines. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://nc3rs.org.uk/our-portfolio/review-animal-use-requirements-who-biologics-guidelines

[13] Halder M. Three Rs potential in the development and quality control of immunobiologicals. ALTEX. 2001; 18(Suppl 1): 13-47.

[14] Uhlrich S, Coppens E, Moysan F, Nelson S, Nougarede N. 3Rs in quality control of human vaccines: opportunities and barriers. In: H Kojima, T Seidle, H Spielmann, eds. Alternatives to Animal Testing. Springer; 2019: 76-82.

[15] WHO. Guidelines on the replacement or removal of animal tests for the quality control of biological products. Accessed November 21, 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/guidelines-on-replacement-of-animal-tests-for-quality-control

[16] NC3Rs. Our portfolio. https://nc3rs.org.uk/our-portfolio

[17] NC3Rs. CRACK IT. https://nc3rs.org.uk/crackit/

[18] Steensma DP, Kyle RA, Shampo MA. Abbie Lathrop, the “mouse woman of Granby”: rodent fancier and accidental genetics pioneer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(11):e83.

[19] Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet Scand. 2008; 50(S1):S1.

[20] Reimert I, Webb LE, Van Marwijk MA, Bolhuis JE. Review: towards an integrated concept of animal welfare. Animal. 2023; 17:100838.

[21] Bailoo JD, Murphy E, Boada-Saña M, et al. Effects of cage enrichment on behavior, welfare and outcome variability in female mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:232.

[22] Cait J, Winder CB, Mason GJ. How much “enrichment” is enough for laboratory rodents? A systematic review and meta-analysis re-assessing the impact of well-resourced cages on morbidity and mortality. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2024; 278:106361.

[23] Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, Unwin L, Lally C. Technology Alternatives to Animals in Life Sciences Research. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology; 2026.

[24] Nahon DM, Moerkens R, Aydogmus H, et al. Standardizing designed and emergent quantitative features in microphysiological systems. Nat Biomed Eng. 2024; 8(8): 941-962.

[25] Goldring CE, Russomanno G, Pin C, et al. Quantitative systems toxicology: modelling to mechanistically understand and predict drug safety. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2026; 25(2): 138-153.

[26] Lorenzo-Martín LF, Hübscher T, Langer J, Nikolaev M, Lutolf MP. Bioengineering mini-colons for ex vivo colorectal cancer research. Nat Protoc. 2025.

[27] Levy RJ, Paşca SP. From organoids to assembloids: experimental approaches to study human neuropsychiatric disorders. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2025; 48(1): 363-379.

[28] Lutolf MP, Radisic M, Beekman J, et al. In vitro human cell-based models: what can they do and what are their limitations? Cell. 2024; 187(17): 4439-4443.

[29] Tran M, Jeong HW, An M, et al. A 3D gut-brain-vascular platform for bidirectional crosstalk in gut-neuropathogenesis. Nat Commun. 2026; 17:2504.

[30] Hartung T, Kleinstreuer N. Challenges and opportunities for validation of AI-based new approach methods. ALTEX. 2025; 42(1): 3-21.

[31] Ashworth JC, Cox TR. The importance of 3D fibre architecture in cancer and implications for biomaterial model design. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024; 24(7): 461-479.

[32] Durkin N, Hall GT, Lutman R, et al. Functional integration of an autologous engineered esophagus in a large-animal model. Nat Biotechnol. 2026.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.