Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) assay and on-site rapid detection evaluation for Rodentibacter heylii and Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

Huiqiong Yan , Sisi Chen , Yuhan Gan , Jing Xing , Yufang Feng , Xin Wen , Jie Fang , Jiangtao Du , Shasang Zhou , Honggang Guo , Xiaoyin Jin , Zhiyuan Wang , Junhao Tao , Lingqun Lu , Qingming Kong , Huazhong Ying , Wei Han , Fangwei Dai

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (7) : 1395 -1408.

PDF (8519KB)
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (7) :1395 -1408. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.70214
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) assay and on-site rapid detection evaluation for Rodentibacter heylii and Rodentibacter pneumotropicus
Author information +
History +
PDF (8519KB)

Abstract

Background: Rodentibacter pneumotropicus and Rodentibacter heylii are important exclusion pathogens in specific pathogen-free (SPF) laboratory animals. However, routine detection methods such as traditional bacterial culture remain labor-intensive and time-consuming. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick (LAMP–LFD) assay provides a self-contained format for nucleic acid testing that combines speed, sensitivity, and specificity while minimizing aerosol contamination, making it well-suited for point-of-need applications.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a streamlined, on-site detection platform capable of rapidly identifying both pathogens with high analytical accuracy, operational simplicity, and suitability for routine laboratory surveillance.

Methods: A LAMP–LFD system was established for the detection of the two pathogens using primers designed against the conserved 16S–23S rRNA ITS region. The assay's specificity, sensitivity, repeatability, and limit of detection (LoD) were evaluated.

Results: The assay achieved detection limits of 1 × 10−4 ng/μL for R. pneumotropicus and 1 × 10−5 ng/μL for R. heylii, demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than PCR. No cross-reactivity was observed with 15 non-target bacteria. Among 28 infected samples, the method detected 19 positives, compared with 21 by multiplex PCR and 23 by qPCR. In 842 laboratory animal samples, culture-based, qPCR, and LAMP–LFD detected 2, 41, and 37 positive samples, respectively. The LoDs were 102 and 101 CFU/mL in fecal samples and 101 and 100 CFU/mL in throat swab samples for R. pneumotropicus and R. heylii, respectively.

Conclusions: This method provides an approach for monitoring the health status of laboratory mice by enabling the detection of these two target pathogens.

Keywords

LAMP-LFD / novel detection method / Rodentibacter heylii / Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huiqiong Yan, Sisi Chen, Yuhan Gan, Jing Xing, Yufang Feng, Xin Wen, Jie Fang, Jiangtao Du, Shasang Zhou, Honggang Guo, Xiaoyin Jin, Zhiyuan Wang, Junhao Tao, Lingqun Lu, Qingming Kong, Huazhong Ying, Wei Han, Fangwei Dai. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) assay and on-site rapid detection evaluation for Rodentibacter heylii and Rodentibacter pneumotropicus. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2026, 9 (7) : 1395-1408 DOI:10.1002/ame2.70214

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Fingas F, Volke D, Hassert R, et al. Sensitive and immunogen-specific serological detection of Rodentibacter pneumotropicus infections in mice. BMC Microbiol. 2019; 19(1):43.

[2]

Adhikary S, Nicklas W, Bisgaard M, et al. Rodentibacter gen. nov. including Rodentibacter pneumotropicus comb. nov., Rodentibacter heylii sp. nov., Rodentibacter myodis sp. nov., Rodentibacter ratti sp. nov., Rodentibacter heidelbergensis sp. nov., Rodentibacter trehalosifermentans sp. nov., Rodentibacter rarus sp. nov., Rodentibacter mrazii and two genomospecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. Jun 2017; 67(6): 1793-1806.

[3]

Adhikary S, Bisgaard M, Dagnæs-Hansen F, Christensen H. Clonal outbreaks of [Pasteurella] pneumotropica biovar Heyl in two mouse colonies. Lab Anim. 2017; 51(6): 613-621.

[4]

Fornefett J, Krause J, Klose K, et al. Comparative analysis of humoral immune responses and pathologies of BALB/c and C57BL/6 wildtype mice experimentally infected with a highly virulent Rodentibacter pneumotropicus (Pasteurella pneumotropica) strain. BMC Microbiol. 2018; 18(1):45.

[5]

Dafni H, Greenfeld L, Oren R, Harmelin A. The likelihood of misidentifying rodent Pasteurellaceae by using results from a single PCR assay. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019; 58(2): 201-207.

[6]

Benga L, Engelhardt E, Benten WPM, Nicklas W, Sager M. Differentiation among the most important Rodentibacter species by multiplex PCR assays targeting the ITS(ile+ala) sequences of the rRNA operons. J Microbiol Methods. 2021; 182:106150.

[7]

Kähl S, Maier T, Benga L, Fingas F, Baums CG. Differentiation of Rodentibacter pneumotropicus, Rodentibacter heylii and Muribacter muris by MALDI-TOF MS. J Microbiol Methods. 2020; 169:105836.

[8]

Ragland NH, Miedel EL, Engelman RW. PCR prevalence of murine opportunistic microbes and their mitigation by using vaporized hydrogen peroxide. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019; 58(2): 208-215.

[9]

Dubelko AR, Zuwannin M, McIntee SC, Livingston RS, Foley PL. PCR testing of filter material from IVC lids for microbial monitoring of mouse colonies. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018; 57(5): 477-482.

[10]

Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28(12):E63.

[11]

Kapalamula TF, Thapa J, Akapelwa ML, et al. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for specific detection of Mycobacterium bovis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(1):e0008996.

[12]

Wu B, Tong X, Chen B, et al. Development of microfluidic chip-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for detection of carbapenemase producing bacteria. Microbiol Spectrum. 2022; 10(5):e0032222.

[13]

Augustine R, Hasan A, Das S, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective point-of-care test for coronaviruses in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Biology. 2020; 9(8):182.

[14]

Chaouch M. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): an effective molecular point-of-care technique for the rapid diagnosis of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Rev Med Virol. 2021; 31(6):e2215.

[15]

Crego-Vicente B, Fernández-Soto P, García-Bernalt Diego J, Febrer-Sendra B, Muro A. Development of a duplex LAMP assay with probe-based readout for simultaneous real-time detection of Schistosoma mansoni and Strongyloides spp.—a laboratory approach to point-of-care. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1):893.

[16]

Lv X, Ai J, Mo X, et al. Rapid discriminative identification of the two predominant echinococcus species from canine fecal samples in the Tibetan region of China by loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick assay. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9(6):136.

[17]

Liu W, Lu G, Wang Y, et al. A novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick method for Helicobacter pylori detection. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1094600.

[18]

Fu S, Qin X, Wang Z, et al. Screening of specific nucleic acid targets for Cronobacter sakazakii and visual detection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification and lateral flow dipstick method in powdered infant formula. J Dairy Sci. 2021; 104(5): 5152-5165.

[19]

Xue Y, Kong Q, Ding H, et al. A novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral-flow-dipstick (LAMP-LFD) device for rapid detection of Toxoplasma gondii in the blood of stray cats and dogs [Un nouveau dispositif de bandelette à flux latéral d'amplification isotherme médiée par les boucles (LAMP-LFD) pour la détection rapide de Toxoplasma gondii dans le sang des chats et chiens errants]. Parasite. 2021; 28:41.

[20]

Wang H, Dong C, Tian X, et al. Development and application of a dual LAMP-LFD assay for the simultaneous detection of Streptococcus suis and Glaesserella parasuis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025; 15:1575365.

[21]

Tao J, Yan H, Chen S, et al. Establishment and application of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) method for detecting Clostridium piliforme. Vet Med Sci. 2024; 10(1):e1318.

[22]

Guo SX, Zhang Q, Bai NN, et al. Swift and portable detection of soybean mosaic virus SC7 through RNA extraction and loop-mediated isothermal amplification using lateral flow device. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1478218.

[23]

Lu H, Tang J, Sun K, Yu X. Identification of a new Badnavirus in the chinaberry (Melia azedarach) tree and establishment of a LAMP-LFD assay for its rapid and visual detection. Viruses. 2021; 13(12):2408.

[24]

Benga L, Benten PM, Engelhardt E, et al. Differentiation among Rodentibacter species based on 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer analysis. Comp Med. 2020; 70(6): 487-491.

[25]

Benga L, Benten WP, Engelhardt E, Bleich A, Gougoula C, Sager M. Development of a multiplex PCR assay based on the 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer for the detection and identification of rodent Pasteurellaceae. J Microbiol Methods. 2013; 95(2): 256-261.

[26]

Benga L, Benten WP, Engelhardt E, Christensen H, Sager M. Analysis of 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer regions in Pasteurellaceae isolated from laboratory rodents. J Microbiol Methods. 2012; 90(3): 342-349.

[27]

Buchheister S, Roegener F, Zschemisch NH, Talbot SR, Christensen H, Bleich A. One for two: a novel and highly sensitive virulence factor-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for the simultaneous detection of Rodentibacter pneumotropicus and Rodentibacter heylii in environmental sample material. Lab Anim. 2020; 54(3): 239-250.

[28]

Kim SW, Shin HJ, Park SH, et al. Microbiological survey of Korean mouse facilities from 2014 to 2019. Exp Anim. 2022; 71(1): 109-115.

[29]

Boguś MI, Wrońska AK, Kaczmarek A, et al. A comprehensive analysis of chemical and biological pollutants (natural and anthropogenic origin) of soil and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) samples. PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280810.

[30]

Lupini L, Bassi C, Guerriero P, Raspa M, Scavizzi F, Sabbioni S. Microbiota and environmental health monitoring of mouse colonies by metagenomic shotgun sequencing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022; 39(1):37.

[31]

Smoglica C, Evangelisti G, Fani C, et al. Antimicrobial resistance profile of bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections in companion animals in Central Italy. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(10):1363.

[32]

Nakahara T, Nakamura A, Tamai K, Komatsu M, Ohkusu K. Rodentibacter abscessus sp. nov. isolated from pet hamster subcutaneous abscess. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2025; 75(4).

[33]

Sasaki H, Ueshiba H, Yanagisawa N, et al. Genomic and pathogenic characterization of RTX toxin producing Rodentibacter sp. that is closely related to Rodentibacter haemolyticus. Infect Genet Evol. 2022; 102:105314.

[34]

FELASA Working Group on Revision of Guidelines for Health Monitoring of Rodents and Rabbits, Mähler M, Berard M, et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. 2014; 48(3): 178-192.

[35]

Quang Tran K, Hung Pham V, Minh Vo C, Minh Pham Q, Minh Nguyen P. Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and culture for targeting pathogens in pediatric severe community-acquired pneumonia. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024; 59(4): 383-389.

[36]

Belayneh M, Alemu F, Idosa BA, et al. Diagnostic comparison of microbial culture and polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in a tertiary hospital, North West Ethiopia. IJID Reg. 2025; 17:100743.

[37]

Busch A, Schotte U, Jeßberger N, Frentzel H, Plötz M, Abdulmawjood A. Establishment and validation of a two-step LAMP assay for detection of Bacillus cereus-group isolates in food and their possibility of non-haemolytic enterotoxin production. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:930648.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.

PDF (8519KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉