Noninvasive electrodiagnostic and motor function assessment of the common fibular nerve regeneration in the rabbit hindlimb

Olivier Larrivée , Alexane Thibodeau , Rosemarie Rinfret-Paquet , Todd Galbraith , Oumayma Hayouni , Hélène T. Khuong , François Berthod

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (11) : 2080 -2090.

PDF
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (11) :2080 -2090. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.70085
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Noninvasive electrodiagnostic and motor function assessment of the common fibular nerve regeneration in the rabbit hindlimb
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background: Although widely used, the rat model remains poorly transferable to humans for peripheral nerve regeneration studies. The rabbit is a much better choice from an anatomical perspective. However, it remains little used due to the lack of available literature. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of an electrophysiological protocol combined with a motor function assessment to analyze nerve repair.

Methods: Ten white New Zealand rabbits underwent a 4 cm transection of the fibular nerve. Autograft regeneration over 36 weeks was compared to non-repaired controls. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded in the tibialis anterior and the extensor digitorum brevis. An electromyogram (EMG) was obtained after needle insertion and resting muscle activity recording. The electrophysiological results were compared to the toe spread index (TSI), which assesses the motor functional recovery promoted by fibular nerve regeneration.

Results: The autograft group regeneration starts between weeks 18 and 21 and normal EMG was observed around the 30th week. These electrophysiological results were compared to the well-defined toe spread reflex. This motor test showed a significant functional return of 59% at 36 weeks (p < 0.05). Rabbits regain nearly 80% of their muscle mass.

Conclusion: Nerve conduction allows detection of nerve regeneration of the muscle while electromyography indicates when muscle activity returns to normal. These studies are reliable and non-invasive techniques to evaluate fibular nerve regeneration in the rabbit's hindlimb. Nonetheless, it is necessary to have qualified personnel, since inter-manipulator variations have been observed.

Keywords

denervation / electromyogram / fibular (peroneal) nerve / motor function / nerve conduction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Olivier Larrivée, Alexane Thibodeau, Rosemarie Rinfret-Paquet, Todd Galbraith, Oumayma Hayouni, Hélène T. Khuong, François Berthod. Noninvasive electrodiagnostic and motor function assessment of the common fibular nerve regeneration in the rabbit hindlimb. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2025, 8(11): 2080-2090 DOI:10.1002/ame2.70085

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Taylor RS. Epidemiology of refractory neuropathic pain. Pain Pract. 2006;6(1):22-26.

[2]

Evans GR. Peripheral nerve injury: a review and approach to tissue engineered constructs. Anat Rec. 2001;263(4):396-404.

[3]

Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998;45(1):116-122.

[4]

Nasiri Y, Mohammadi R. Effect of local Administration of Laminin and Fibronectin with chitosan conduit on peripheral nerve regeneration: a rat sciatic nerve transection model. Iran J Vet Surg. 2015;10(1):39-46.

[5]

Angius D, Wang H, Spinner RJ, Gutierrez-Cotto Y, Yaszemski MJ, Windebank AJ. A systematic review of animal models used to study nerve regeneration in tissue-engineered scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012;33(32):8034-8039.

[6]

Kaplan HM, Mishra P, Kohn J. The overwhelming use of rat models in nerve regeneration research may compromise designs of nerve guidance conduits for humans. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26(8):226.

[7]

Lischer M, di Summa PG, Petrou IG, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in nerve tissue engineering: bridging nerve gap injuries in large animals. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):7800.

[8]

Mapara M, Thomas BS, Bhat KM. Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research. Dental Res J. 2012;9(1):111-118.

[9]

Thibodeau A, Galbraith T, Hayouni O, Khuong HT, Berthod F. Long-term immunosuppression of rabbits through oral tacrolimus administration. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2025:1-10.

[10]

Mligiliche NL, Tabata Y, Kitada M, et al. Poly lactic acid-caprolactone copolymer tube with a denatured skeletal muscle segment inside as a guide for peripheral nerve regeneration: A morphological and electrophysiological evaluation of the regenerated nerves. Anat Sci Int. 2003;78(3):156-161.

[11]

Graur D, Duret L, Gouy M. Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies). Nature. 1996;379(6563):333-335.

[12]

Derr JJ, Micklesen PJ, Robinson LR. Predicting recovery after fibular nerve injury: which electrodiagnostic features are most useful? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(7):547-553.

[13]

Hotson JR. Noninvasive peroneal sensory and motor nerve conduction recordings in the rabbit distal hindlimb: feasibility, variability and neuropathy measure. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92694.

[14]

Kodera N, Aoki T, Ito H. Electrophysiological and histological investigation on the gradual elongation of rabbit sciatic nerve. J Nippon Med Sch. 2011;78(3):166-173.

[15]

Mansiz-Kaplan B, Pervane-Vural S, Gursoy K, Nacir B. Median nerve conduction studies in rabbits. BMC Neurosci. 2020;21(1):4.

[16]

Song CH, Zhang F, Zhang Z, et al. Neuroma-in-continuity model in rabbits. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(3):317-322.

[17]

Suzuki Y, Yasuyuki. Motor nerve conduction analysis of double crush syndrome in a rabbit model. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(1):69-74.

[18]

Zhang F, Blain B, Beck J, et al. Autogenous venous graft with one-stage prepared Schwann cells as a conduit for repair of long segmental nerve defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18(4):295-300.

[19]

Bensley BA, Craigie EH. In: Craigie EH, ed. Bensley's Practical Anatomy of the Rabbit: an Elementary Laboratory Text-Book in Mammalian Anatomy. 8th fully rev ed. University of Toronto Press; 1948.

[20]

Alsmadi NZ, Bendale GS, Kanneganti A, et al. Glial-derived growth factor and pleiotrophin synergistically promote axonal regeneration in critical nerve injuries. Acta Biomater. 2018;78:165-177.

[21]

Preston DC, Comte BS. Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders. 3rd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.

[22]

Khuong HT, Midha R. Advances in nerve repair. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13(1):8.

[23]

Wood MD, Kemp SWP, Weber C, Borschel GH, Gordon T. Outcome measures of peripheral nerve regeneration. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2011;193(4):321-333.

[24]

Liu SY, Wang RG, Luo D, et al. Effects of electroacupuncture on recovery of the electrophysiological properties of the rabbit gastrocnemius after contusion: an in vivo animal study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:10.

[25]

Schmitz HC, Beer GM. The toe-spreading reflex of the rabbit revisited-functional evaluation of complete peroneal nerve lesions. Lab Anim. 2001;35(4):340-345.

[26]

Navarro X, Udina E. Chapter 6: Methods and protocols in peripheral nerve regeneration experimental research: part III-electrophysiological evaluation. In: Geuna S, Tos P, Battiston B, eds. International Review of Neurobiology. Vol 87. Elsevier; 2009:105-126.

[27]

Bulstra LF, Hundepool CA, Friedrich PF, Bishop AT, Hovius SER, Shin AY. Functional outcome after reconstruction of a long nerve gap in rabbits using optimized decellularized nerve allografts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(6):1442-1450.

[28]

Bulstra LF, Hundepool CA, Friedrich PF, Nijhuis TH, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Motor nerve recovery in a rabbit model: description and validation of a noninvasive ultrasound technique. J Hand Surg. 2016;41(1):27-33.

[29]

Sahakyants T, Lee JY, Friedrich PF, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Return of motor function after repair of a 3-cm gap in a rabbit peroneal nerve: a comparison of autograft, collagen conduit, and conduit filled with collagen-GAG matrix. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(21):1952-1958.

[30]

Gutmann E. Factors affecting recovery of motor function after nerve lesions. J Neurol Psychiatry. 1942;5(3–4):81-95.

[31]

Gutmann E, Sanders FK. Functional recovery following nerve grafts and other types of nerve bridge. Brain. 1942;65:373-408.

[32]

Giusti G, Kremer T, Willems WF, Friedrich PF, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Description and validation of isometric tetanic muscle force test in rabbits. Microsurgery. 2012;32(1):35-42.

[33]

Singh I. One-sided dominance in the limbs of rabbits and frogs, as evidenced by asymmetry in bone weight. J Anat. 1971;109(Pt 2):271-275.

[34]

Mekaj AY, Morina AA, Manxhuka-Kerliu S, et al. Electrophysiological and functional evaluation of peroneal nerve regeneration in rabbit following topical hyaluronic acid or tacrolimus application after nerve repair. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(3):179-184.

[35]

Schmitz HC, Beer GM. Muscle-sparing approach to the peroneal nerve of the rabbit. Lab Anim. 2001;35(4):334-339.

[36]

Navarro X, Udina E, Ceballos D, Gold BG. Effects of FK506 on nerve regeneration and reinnervation after graft or tube repair of long nerve gaps. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(7):905-915.

[37]

Gold BG, Katoh K, Storm-Dickerson T. The immunosuppressant FK506 increases the rate of axonal regeneration in rat sciatic nerve. J Neurosci. 1995;15(11):7509-7516.

[38]

Tajdaran K, Chan K, Shoichet MS, Gordon T, Borschel GH. Local delivery of FK506 to injured peripheral nerve enhances axon regeneration after surgical nerve repair in rats. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:211-221.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/