Definition of critical skin defect and concepts of structural and functional repairs: Proposal and verification in a rat model

Abstract

Background: Rats are often used to prepare skin defect models. However, the skin defect sizes of the models prepared by researchers are different, and the lack of consensus on the critical-size defect makes it difficult to compare their research results.

Methods: The time for wound closure was evaluated and recorded through gross observation. The regression equation between the healing time and the diameter of skin defect was established, which can be used to predict the healing time for a certain skin defect size in rats. Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining was used to observe the regeneration and reconstruction of skin appendages, and the functional skin repair was quantitatively scored.

Results: The critical-size defect of rats was determined based on the maximum capacity of structural skin repair, and the functional skin repair was quantitatively scored based on the regeneration and reconstruction of skin appendages. The allowable range of critical-size skin defect of SD rats lies between 45 and 50 mm in diameter. The concept of structural repair and the category of functional repair of injured skin are put forward. The regression equation between the structural skin healing time and defect diameters is established.

Conclusion: The allowable range of skin critical-size defect of SD rats lies between 45 and 50 mm in diameter. The regression equation between the structural skin healing time and defect diameters can be used to predict the healing time for a certain skin defect size in rats.

Keywords

critical defect / functional repair / quantitative evaluation / skin defect / structural repair

References

[1] Faniku C, Wright CS, Martin PE. Connexins and pannexins in the integumentary system: the skin and appendages. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015; 72(15): 2937-2947.

[2] Ferreira MCTPJ, Carvalho VF, Kamamoto F. Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2006; 61: 571-578.

[3] Gravitz L. Skin. Nature. 2018; 563: S83.

[4] Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Wound healing in the 21st century. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 63(5): 866-881.

[5] Reinke JM, Sorg H. Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res. 2012; 49(1): 35-43.

[6] Yokoyama H, Maruoka T, Aruga A, et al. Prx-1 expression in Xenopus laevis scarless skin-wound healing and its resemblance to epimorphic regeneration. J Invest Dermatol. 2011; 131(12): 2477-2485.

[7] Richardson R, Slanchev K, Kraus C, Knyphausen P, Eming S, Hammerschmidt M. Adult zebrafish as a model system for cutaneous wound-healing research. J Invest Dermatol. 2013; 133(6): 1655-1665.

[8] Yannas CJ IV, Wai YC. Wound contraction and scar synthesis during development of the amphibian Rana catesbeiana. Wound Repair Regen. 1996; 4: 31-41.

[9] Adzick N, Longaker MT. Scarless fetal healing:therapeutic implications. Ann Surg. 1992; 215: 3-7.

[10] Adzick N, Longaker MT. Animal models for the study of fetal tissue repair. J Surg Res. 1991; 51: 216-222.

[11] Maden M, Brant JO. Insights into the regeneration of skin from Acomys, the spiny mouse. Exp Dermatol. 2019; 28(4): 436-441.

[12] Sandoval AGW, Maden M. Regeneration in the spiny mouse, Acomys, a new mammalian model. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2020; 64: 31-36.

[13] Wong W, Kim A, Monaghan JR, Seifert AW, Maden M, Crane JD. Spiny mice (Acomys) exhibit attenuated hallmarks of aging and rapid cell turnover after UV exposure in the skin epidermis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241617.

[14] Rowlatt U. Intrauterine wound healing in a 20 week human fetus. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1979; 381: 353-361.

[15] Monavarian M, Kader S, Moeinzadeh S, Jabbari E. Regenerative scar-free skin wound healing. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019; 25(4): 294-311.

[16] Seifert AW, Kiama SG, Seifert MG, Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Maden M. Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature. 2012; 489(7417): 561-565.

[17] Cass DLBK, Sylvester KG, Yang EY, Longaker MT, Adzick NS. Wound size and gestational age modulate scar formation in fetal wound repair. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32: 411-415.

[18] Brewer CM, Nelson BR, Wakenight P, et al. Adaptations in hippo-yap signaling and myofibroblast fate underlie scar-free ear appendage wound healing in spiny mice. Dev Cell. 2021; 56(19): 2722-2740.e2726.

[19] Tumbar T, Guasch G, Greco V, et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science. 2004; 303(5656): 359-363.

[20] Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Geoghegan A, Polak L, Fuchs E. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell. 2004; 118(5): 635-648.

[21] Tumbar T. Epithelial skin stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006; 419: 73-99.

[22] Lingzhi Z, Meirong L, Xiaobing F. Biological approaches for hypertrophic scars. Int Wound J. 2020; 17(2): 405-418.

[23] Srivastava A, DeSagun EZ, Jennings LJ, et al. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix as a dermal substitute in rats. Ann Surg. 2001; 233(3): 400-408.

[24] Aoki M, Ogai K, Kobayashi M, et al. Comparison of ceramide retention in the stratum corneum between dry skin and normal skin using animal model with fluorescent imaging method. Skin Res Technol. 2019; 25(2): 158-164.

[25] Liu N, Matsumura H, Kato T, et al. Stem cell competition orchestrates skin homeostasis and ageing. Nature. 2019; 568(7752): 344-350.

[26] Hemmati AA, Larki-Harchegani A, Shabib S, Jalali A, Rezaei A, Housmand G. Wound healing property of milk in full thickness wound model of rabbit. Int J Surg. 2018; 54(Pt A): 133-140.

[27] Lu GN, Tawfik O, Sykes K, Kriet JD, Durham D, Humphrey CD. Association of Skin and Cartilage Variables with Composite Graft Healing in a rabbit model. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019; 21(1): 44-49.

[28] Zhang L, Huang T, Bi J, et al. Long-term toxicity study of topical Administration of a Highly-Stable rh-aFGF carbomer 940 hydrogel in a rabbit skin wound model. Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11: 58.

[29] Philandrianos C, Andrac-Meyer L, Mordon S, et al. Comparison of five dermal substitutes in full-thickness skin wound healing in a porcine model. Burns. 2012; 38(6): 820-829.

[30] Khiao In M, Richardson KC, Loewa A, Hedtrich S, Kaessmeyer S, Plendl J. Histological and functional comparisons of four anatomical regions of porcine skin with human abdominal skin. Anat Histol Embryol. 2019; 48(3): 207-217.

[31] Jimi S, Matsumura H. Effect of chymase activity on skin thickness in the Clawn miniature pig hypertrophic scarring model. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017; 51(6): 446-452.

[32] Blackstone BN, Kim JY, McFarland KL, et al. Scar formation following excisional and burn injuries in a red Duroc pig model. Wound Repair and Regeneration: Official Publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. 2017; 25(4): 618-631.

[33] El-Tookhy OS, Shamaa AA, Shehab GG, Abdallah AN, Azzam OM. Histological evaluation of experimentally induced critical size defect skin wounds using Exosomal solution of mesenchymal stem cells derived microvesicles. Int J Stem Cells. 2017; 10(2): 144-153.

[34] Cugmas B, Olivry T. Evaluation of skin erythema severity by dermatoscopy in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2021; 32(2): 183-146.

[35] Brizzi G, Crepaldi P, Roccabianca P, et al. Strain elastography for the assessment of skin nodules in dogs. Vet Dermatol. 2021; 32(3): 272-e275.

[36] Sparks DS, Saifzadeh S, Savi FM, et al. A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction. Nat Protoc. 2020; 15(3): 877-924.

[37] Al-Bayaty FH, Abdulla MA, Abu Hassan MI, Ali HM. Effect of Andrographis paniculata leaf extract on wound healing in rats. Nat Prod Res. 2012; 26(5): 423-429.

[38] Oryan A, Mohammadalipour A, Moshiri A, Tabandeh MR. Avocado/soybean unsaponifiables: a novel regulator of cutaneous wound healing, modelling and remodelling. Int Wound J. 2015; 12(6): 674-685.

[39] Qayoom A, Aneesha VA, Anagha S, Dar JA, Kumar P, Kumar D. Lecithin-based deferoxamine nanoparticles accelerated cutaneous wound healing in diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019; 858:172478.

[40] Ray PG, Pal P, Dhara S, Basak P. Eggshell membrane reinforced with chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) electrospun nanofibers to fabricate a Bi-layered scaffold for wound healing applications. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017; 23: S75.

[41] Li J, Zhai D, Lv F, et al. Preparation of copper-containing bioactive glass/eggshell membrane nanocomposites for improving angiogenesis, antibacterial activity and wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2016; 36: 254-266.

[42] Buechler MB, Pradhan RN, Krishnamurty AT, et al. Cross-tissue organization of the fibroblast lineage. Nature. 2021; 593(7860): 575-579.

[43] Yamamoto N, Kiyosawa T, Arai K, Nakayama Y. Dermal neoformation during skin wound healing as demonstrated using scanning electron microscopy. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52(4): 398-406.

[44] Pirila E, Ramamurthy N, Maisi P, et al. Wound healing in ovariectomized rats: effects of chemically modified tetracycline (CMT-8) and estrogen on matrix metalloproteinases −8, −13 and type I collagen expression. Curr Med Chem. 2001; 8(3): 281-294.

[45] Hsu YH, Lin YF, Chen CH, Chiu YJ, Chiu HW. Far infrared promotes wound healing through activation of Notch1 signaling. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017; 95(11): 1203-1213.

[46] Wang W, Yu Y, Jiang Y, et al. Silk fibroin scaffolds loaded with angiogenic genes in adenovirus vectors for tissue regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019; 13(5): 715-728.

[47] Davoodi-Roodbordeii F, Afshar M, Haji Abas Tabrizi F, et al. Topical hydrogel containing Fumaria vaillantii Loisel. Extract enhances wound healing in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019; 19(1): 254.

[48] Li J, Zhou C, Luo C, et al. N-acetyl cysteine-loaded graphene oxide-collagen hybrid membrane for scarless wound healing. Theranostics. 2019; 9(20): 5839-5853.

[49] Rashtbar M, Hadjati J, Ai J, et al. Critical-sized full-thickness skin defect regeneration using ovine small intestinal submucosa with or without mesenchymal stem cells in rat model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018; 106(6): 2177-2190.

[50] Parmaksiz M, Elcin AE, Elcin YM. Decellularized bSIS-ECM as a regenerative biomaterial for skin wound repair. Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1879: 175-185.

[51] Bordianu A, Bobirca F, Patrascu T. Skin grafting in the treatment of diabetic foot soft tissue defects. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2018; 113(5): 644-650.

[52] Montandon D, D'Andiran G, Gabbiani G. The mechanism of wound contraction and epithelialization: clinical and experimental studies. Clin Plast Surg. 1977; 4(3): 325-346.

[53] Zheng B, Shen C, Sun J, Guo W, Jin Y, Niu Y. Developing a simple burn model in rats of different ages. Journal of Burn Care & Research: Official Publication of the American Burn Association. 2019; 40(5): 639-647.

[54] Semple S, Cowlishaw G, Bennett PM. Immune system evolution among anthropoid primates: parasites, injuries and predators. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1495): 1031-1037.

[55] Naik S, Larsen SB, Gomez NC, et al. Inflammatory memory sensitizes skin epithelial stem cells to tissue damage. Nature. 2017; 550(7677): 475-480.

[56] Li L, Rutlin M, Abraira VE, et al. The functional organization of cutaneous low-threshold mechanosensory neurons. Cell. 2011; 147(7): 1615-1627.

[57] Aki R, Amoh Y, Li L, Katsuoka K, Hoffman RM. Nestin-expressing interfollicular blood vessel network contributes to skin transplant survival and wound healing. J Cell Biochem. 2010; 110: 80-86.

[58] Gagnon V, Larouche D, Parenteau-Bareil R, Gingras M, Germain L, Berthod F. Hair follicles guide nerve migration In vitro and In vivo in tissue-engineered skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2011; 131(6): 1375-1378.

[59] Zhang C, Chen Y, Fu X. Sweat gland regeneration after burn injury: is stem cell therapy a new hope? Cytotherapy. 2015; 17(5): 526-535.

[60] Lawrence WT. Physiology of the acute wound. Clin Plast Surg. 1998; 25(3): 321-340.

[61] Nanney LB, Magid M, Stoscheck CM, King LE. Comparison of epidermal growth factor binding and receptor distribution in normal human epidermis and epidermal appendages. J Invest Dermatol. 1984; 83(5): 385-393.

[62] Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration: Official Publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. 2008; 16(5): 585-601.

[63] Chen L, Tredget EE, Wu PY, Wu Y. Paracrine factors of mesenchymal stem cells recruit macrophages and endothelial lineage cells and enhance wound healing. PLoS One. 2008; 3(4):e1886.

[64] Limandjaja GC, van den Broek LJ, Waaijman T, et al. Increased epidermal thickness and abnormal epidermal differentiation in keloid scars. Br J Dermatol. 2017; 176(Jan): 116-126.

[65] Rostami H, Mohammadi R, Asri-Rezaei S, Tehrani A. Evaluation of application of chitosan/Nano selenium biodegradable film on full thickness excisional wound healing in rats. Iranian Veterinary Surgery Association. 2018; 13(1): 14-22.

[66] Mozaffari N, Mohammadi R, Delirezh N, Hobbenaghi R, Mohammadi V. Effect of local transplantation of mesenchymal stem cell/macrophage culture supernatants on oxidative stress markers in wound healing. Iran J Vet Surg. 2025; 20(1): 55-59.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.