Improved husbandry measures to enhance reproducibility of wound healing studies in the Lepr^db/db mouse

Abstract

The Lepr^db/db mouse is a common and well-studied model of type II diabetes mellitus that is often employed in biomedical research. Despite being one of the most commonly used models for the investigation of diabetic wound healing, there are a few specific guidelines for its husbandry, and wound complications such as infection and expansion are common. This study presents a modified animal husbandry approach for the Lepr^db/db mouse to reduce the incidence of complications during wound healing experiments. Compared to standard rodent housing protocols, the use of this modified protocol leads to decreased rates of complications among experimental animals across several experiments. The protocol includes increased cage size, decreased housing density, and more frequent cage replacements. The use of improved husbandry for the Lepr^db/db mouse decreases the total number of animals required, minimizes harm during experimentation, and improves the consistency and reproducibility of wound healing studies.

Keywords

animal husbandry / animal models of diabetes / diabetic mice / mouse husbandry / wound healing

References

[1] Karamanou M, Protogerou A, Tsoucalas G, Androutsos G, Poulakou-Rebelakou E. Milestones in the history of diabetes mellitus: the main contributors. World J Diabetes. 2016; 7(1): 1-7.

[2] Keck FS, Duntas LH. Brunner's missing ‘Aha experience’ delayed progress in diabetes research by 200 years. 2007.

[3] King A, Bowe J. Animal models for diabetes: understanding the pathogenesis and finding new treatments. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016; 99: 1-10.

[4] King AJ. The use of animal models in diabetes research. Br J Pharmacol. 2012; 166(3): 877-894.

[5] Armstrong DG, McCulloch DK, de Asla RJ. Management of diabetic foot ulcers. UpToDate. UpToDate; 2019.

[6] Okonkwo UA, DiPietro LA. Diabetes and Wound Angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(7): 1419.

[7] Buck DW, Jin DP, Geringer M, Hong SJ, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA. The TallyHo polygenic mouse model of diabetes: implications in wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(5): 427e-437e.

[8] Barakat M, DiPietro LA, Chen L. Limited treatment options for diabetic wounds: barriers to clinical translation despite therapeutic success in murine models. Adv Wound Care New Rochelle. 2021; 10(8): 436-460.

[9] Hummel KP, Dickie MM, Coleman DL. Diabetes, a new mutation in the mouse. Science. 1966; 153(3740): 1127-1128.

[10] Coleman DL. Obese and diabetes: two mutant genes causing diabetes-obesity syndromes in mice. Diabetologia. 1978; 14(3): 141-148.

[11] Leiter EH, Coleman DL, Hummel KP. The influence of genetic background on the expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. III. Effect of H-2 haplotype and sex. Diabetes. 1981; 30(12): 1029-1034.

[12] Leiter EH, Chapman HD, Coleman DL. The influence of genetic background on the expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. V. Interaction between the db gene and hepatic sex steroid sulfotransferases correlates with gender-dependent susceptibility to hyperglycemia. Endocrinology. 1989; 124(2): 912-922.

[13] Hummel KP, Coleman DL, Lane PW. The influence of genetic background on expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. I. C57BL-KsJ and C57BL-6J strains. Biochem Genet. 1972; 7(1): 1-13.

[14] Coleman DL, Hummel KP. The influence of genetic background on the expression of the obese (Ob) gene in the mouse. Diabetologia. 1973; 9(4): 287-293.

[15] Coleman DL. The influence of genetic background on the expression of mutations at the diabetes (db) locus in the mouse. VI: hepatic malic enzyme activity is associated with diabetes severity. Metabolism. 1992; 41(10): 1134-1136.

[16] Amin N, Doupis J. Diabetic foot disease: from the evaluation of the “foot at risk” to the novel diabetic ulcer treatment modalities. World J Diabetes. 2016; 7(7): 153-164.

[17] Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(24): 2367-2375.

[18] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. National Diabetes Statistics Report; 2017. https://dev.diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/cdc-statistics-report-2017.pdf

[19] WHO. Global Report on Diabetes. World Health Organization; 2016.

[20] Barakat M, Han C, Chen L, et al. Non-electrophilic NRF2 activators promote wound healing in human keratinocytes and diabetic mice and demonstrate selective downstream gene targeting. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 25258.

[21] Dhall S, Do D, Garcia M, et al. A novel model of chronic wounds: importance of redox imbalance and biofilm-forming bacteria for establishment of chronicity. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10): e109848.

[22] Kim JH, Yang B, Tedesco A, et al. High levels of oxidative stress and skin microbiome are critical for initiation and development of chronic wounds in diabetic mice. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 19318.

[23] Kim SY, Kim TH, Choi JY, et al. Predictors for amputation in patients with diabetic foot wound. Vasc Specialist Int. 2018; 34(4): 109-116.

[24] Dhall S, Do DC, Garcia M, et al. Generating and reversing chronic wounds in diabetic mice by manipulating wound redox parameters. J Diabetes Res. 2014; 2014: 562625.

[25] Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005; 366(9498): 1736-1743.

[26] Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010; 89(3): 219-229.

[27] Chen H, Charlat O, Tartaglia LA, et al. Evidence that the diabetes gene encodes the leptin receptor: identification of a mutation in the leptin receptor gene in db/db mice. Cell. 1996; 84(3): 491-495.

[28] Chua SC, Chung WK, Wu-Peng XS, et al. Phenotypes of mouse diabetes and rat fatty due to mutations in the OB (leptin) receptor. Science. 1996; 271(5251): 994-996.

[29] Herberg L, Coleman DL. Laboratory animals exhibiting obesity and diabetes syndromes. Metabolism. 1977; 26(1): 59-99.

[30] Kappel S, Hawkins P, Mendl MT. To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals Basel. 2017; 7(12): 88.

[31] National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; 2010. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf

[32] Whittaker AL, Howarth GS, Hickman DL. Effects of space allocation and housing density on measures of wellbeing in laboratory mice: a review. Lab Anim. 2012; 46(1): 3-13.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.