Quorum quenching enzymes disrupt bacterial communication in a sex- and dose-dependent manner

Aneesh Syal , Maria Martell , Rakesh Sikdar , Matthew Dietz , Zachary Ziegert , Cyrus Jahansouz , Mikael H. Elias , Christopher Staley

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 473 -482.

PDF
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 473 -482. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12520
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Quorum quenching enzymes disrupt bacterial communication in a sex- and dose-dependent manner

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background: Over the past 50 years, the incidence of obesity has gradually increased, necessitating investigation into the multifactorial contributors to this disease, including the gut microbiota. Bacteria within the human gut microbiome communicate using a density-dependent process known as quorum sensing (QS), in which autoinducer (AI) molecules (e.g., N-acyl-homoserine lactones [AHLs]) are produced to enable bacterial interactions and regulate gene expression.

Methods: We aimed to disrupt QS using quorum quenching (QQ) lactonases GcL and SsoPox, which cleave AHL signaling molecules in a taxa-specific manner based on differing enzyme affinities for different substrates. We hypothesized that QQ hinders signals from obesity-associated pathobionts, thereby slowing or preventing obesity.

Results: In a murine model of diet-induced obesity, we observed GcL and SsoPox treatments have separate sex-dependent and dose-dependent effects on intestinal community composition and diversity. Notably, male mice given 2 mg/mL SsoPox exhibited significant changes in the relative abundances of gram-negative taxa, including Porphyromonadaceae, Akkermansiaceae, Muribaculaceae, and Bacteroidales (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001). Additionally, we used covariance matrix network analysis to model bacterial taxa co-occurrence due to QQ enzyme administration. There were more associations among taxa in control mice, particularly among gram-negative bacteria, whereas mice receiving SsoPox had the fewest associations.

Conclusions: Overall, our study establishes proof of concept that QQ is a targetable strategy for microbial control in vivo. Further characterization and dosage optimization of QQ enzymes are necessary to harness their therapeutic capability for the treatment of chronic microbial-associated diseases.

Keywords

microbiome / microbiota therapeutics / obesity / quorum sensing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aneesh Syal, Maria Martell, Rakesh Sikdar, Matthew Dietz, Zachary Ziegert, Cyrus Jahansouz, Mikael H. Elias, Christopher Staley. Quorum quenching enzymes disrupt bacterial communication in a sex- and dose-dependent manner. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2025, 8(3): 473-482 DOI:10.1002/ame2.12520

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lin X, Li H. Obesity: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics. Front Endocrinol. 2021; 12: 706978.

[2]

Tilg H, Moschen AR, Kaser A. Obesity and the microbiota. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136(5): 1476-1483.

[3]

Barlow GM, Yu A, Mathur R. Role of the gut microbiome in obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 30(6): 787-797.

[4]

Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019; 92: 6-10.

[5]

Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002; 360(9343): 1347-1360.

[6]

Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes. 2008; 32(9): 1431-1437.

[7]

Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, et al. A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science. 2007; 316(5826): 889-894.

[8]

Falà AK, Álvarez-Ordóñez A, Filloux A, Gahan CGM, Cotter PD. Quorum sensing in human gut and food microbiomes: significance and potential for therapeutic targeting. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 1002185.

[9]

Meyre D, Delplanque J, Chèvre JC, et al. Genome-wide association study for early-onset and morbid adult obesity identifies three new risk loci in European populations. Nat Genet. 2009; 41(2): 157-159.

[10]

Tseng CH, Wu CY. The gut microbiome in obesity. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019; 118: S3-S9.

[11]

Ghosh S, Bouchard C. Convergence between biological, behavioural and genetic determinants of obesity. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18(12): 731-748.

[12]

Vrieze A, Van Nood E, Holleman F, et al. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(4): 913-916.e7.

[13]

Bäckhed F, Ding H, Wang T, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004; 101(44): 15718-15723.

[14]

Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, et al. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science. 2013; 341(6150): 1241214.

[15]

Shen XJ, Rawls JF, Randall T, et al. Molecular characterization of mucosal adherent bacteria and associations with colorectal adenomas. Gut Microbes. 2010; 1(3): 138-147.

[16]

De Palma G, Nadal I, Medina M, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10: 63.

[17]

Carroll IM, Chang YH, Park J, Sartor RB, Ringel Y. Luminal and mucosal-associated intestinal microbiota in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2010; 2(1): 19.

[18]

Fragiadakis GK, Wastyk HC, Robinson JL, Sonnenburg ED, Sonnenburg JL, Gardner CD. Long-term dietary intervention reveals resilience of the gut microbiota despite changes in diet and weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020; 111(6): 1127-1136.

[19]

Hense BA, Kuttler C, Müller J, Rothballer M, Hartmann A, Kreft JU. Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 5(3): 230-239.

[20]

Schikora A, Schenk ST, Hartmann A. Beneficial effects of bacteria-plant communication based on quorum sensing molecules of the N-acyl homoserine lactone group. Plant Mol Biol. 2016; 90(6): 605-612.

[21]

Sharif DI, Gallon J, Smith CJ, Dudley E. Quorum sensing in cyanobacteria: N-octanoyl-homoserine lactone release and response, by the epilithic colonial cyanobacterium Gloeothece PCC6909. ISME J. 2008; 2(12): 1171-1182.

[22]

Huang YL, Ki JS, Case RJ, Qian PY. Diversity and acyl-homoserine lactone production among subtidal biofilm-forming bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2008; 52(2): 185-193.

[23]

Zhang G, Zhang F, Ding G, et al. Acyl homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing in a methanogenic archaeon. ISME J. 2012; 6(7): 1336-1344.

[24]

Kumar S, Kolodkin-Gal I, Engelberg-Kulka H. Novel quorum-sensing peptides mediating interspecies bacterial cell death. MBio. 2013; 4(3): e00314-00313.

[25]

Hense BA, Schuster M. Core principles of bacterial autoinducer systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR. 2015; 79(1): 153-169.

[26]

Sikdar R, Elias M. Quorum quenching enzymes and their effects on virulence, biofilm, and microbiomes: a review of recent advances. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2020; 18(12): 1221-1233.

[27]

Diggle SP, Gardner A, West SA, Griffin AS. Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal? Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2007; 362(1483): 1241-1249.

[28]

Moura-Alves P, Puyskens A, Stinn A, et al. Host monitoring of quorum sensing during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Science. 2019; 366: 1472.

[29]

Bock KW. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), integrating energy metabolism and microbial or obesity-mediated inflammation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021; 184: 114346.

[30]

Uroz S, Dessaux Y, Oger P. Quorum sensing and Quorum quenching: the yin and Yang of bacterial communication. Chembiochem. 2009; 10(2): 205-216.

[31]

Bzdrenga J, Daudé D, Rémy B, et al. Biotechnological applications of quorum quenching enzymes. Chem Biol Interact. 2017; 267: 104-115.

[32]

Wellington S, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing signal selectivity and the potential for interspecies cross talk. MBio. 2019; 10(2): e00146-19.

[33]

Rémy B, Plener L, Decloquement P, et al. Lactonase specificity is key to Quorum quenching in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 2020; 11: 762.

[34]

Bergonzi C, Schwab M, Elias M. The quorum-quenching lactonase from Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus: purification, characterization, crystallization and crystallographic analysis. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Commun. 2016; 72(Pt 9): 681-686.

[35]

Hiblot J, Gotthard G, Elias M, Chabriere E. Differential active site loop conformations mediate promiscuous activities in the lactonase SsoPox. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9): e75272.

[36]

Bergonzi C, Schwab M, Naik T, Elias M. The structural determinants accounting for the broad substrate specificity of the Quorum quenching lactonase GcL. Chembiochem. 2019; 20(14): 1848-1855.

[37]

Rémy B, Plener L, Poirier L, Elias M, Daudé D, Chabrière E. Harnessing hyperthermostable lactonase from Sulfolobus solfataricus for biotechnological applications. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1): 37780.

[38]

Jacquet P, Hiblot J, Daudé D, et al. Rational engineering of a native hyperthermostable lactonase into a broad spectrum phosphotriesterase. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 16745.

[39]

Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS. Chromogenic and fluorogenic assays for the lactonase activity of serum paraoxonases. Chembiochem Eur J Chem Biol. 2006; 7(1): 49-53.

[40]

Hintze KJ, Benninghoff AD, Cho CE, Ward RE. Modeling the Western diet for preclinical investigations. Adv Nutr Bethesda Md. 2018; 9(3): 263-271.

[41]

Claesson MJ, Wang Q, O'Sullivan O, et al. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(22): e200.

[42]

Gohl DM, Vangay P, Garbe J, et al. Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9): 942-949.

[43]

Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012; 6(8): 1621-1624.

[44]

Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M. International nucleotide sequence database collaboration. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39: D19-D21.

[45]

Schloss PD. Reintroducing mothur: 10 years later. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020; 86(2): e02343-19.

[46]

Staley C, Kaiser T, Vaughn BP, et al. Predicting recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation. Microbiome. 2018; 6(1): 166.

[47]

Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(21): 7188-7196.

[48]

Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12(7): 1889-1898.

[49]

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(16): 2194-2200.

[50]

Westcott SL, Schloss PD. OptiClust, an improved method for assigning amplicon-based sequence data to operational taxonomic units. mSphere. 2017; 2(2): e00073-17.

[51]

Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: D141-D145.

[52]

Ma S, Shungin D, Mallick H, et al. Population structure discovery in meta-analyzed microbial communities and inflammatory bowel disease using MMUPHin. Genome Biol. 2022; 23(1): 208.

[53]

Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland Forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 1957; 27(4): 326-349.

[54]

Clarke KR. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol. 1993; 18(1): 117-143.

[55]

Anderson MJ, Willis TJ. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology. 2003; 84(2): 511-525.

[56]

Molstad AJ, Ekvall KO, Suder PM. Direct covariance matrix estimation with compositional data. Electron J Stat. 2024; 18(1): 1702-1748.

[57]

Oliveira RA, Cabral V, Torcato I, Xavier KB. Deciphering the quorum-sensing lexicon of the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2023; 31(4): 500-512.

[58]

Rothman KJ. BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes. 2008; 32(3): S56-S59.

[59]

Dickschat S, Quorum J. Sensing and bacterial biofilms. Nat Prod Rep. 2010; 27(3): 343-369.

[60]

Neuman H, Debelius JW, Knight R, Koren O. Microbial endocrinology: the interplay between the microbiota and the endocrine system. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015; 39(4): 509-521.

[61]

Thorlund K, Mills EJ. Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2012; 1(1): 41.

[62]

Salvi PS, Cowles RA. Butyrate and the intestinal epithelium: modulation of proliferation and inflammation in homeostasis and disease. Cells. 2021; 10(7): 1775.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

9

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/