Intratracheal instillation for the testing of pulmonary toxicity in mice—Effects of instillation devices and feed type on inflammation

Niels Hadrup , Michael Guldbrandsen , Eva Terrida , Katja M. S. Bendtsen , Karin S. Hougaard , Nicklas R. Jacobsen , Ulla Vogel

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 378 -386.

PDF (2057KB)
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 378 -386. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12503
TECHNICAL NOTE

Intratracheal instillation for the testing of pulmonary toxicity in mice—Effects of instillation devices and feed type on inflammation

Author information +
History +
PDF (2057KB)

Abstract

Background: Inhalation exposure is the gold standard when assessing pulmonary toxicity. However, it typically requires substantial amounts of test material. Intratracheal instillation is an alternative administration technique, where the test substance is suspended in a liquid vehicle and deposited into the lung via the trachea. Instillation requires minimal test material, delivers an exact dose deep into the lung, and is less labor-intensive than inhalation exposures. However, one shortcoming is that the procedure may induce short-term inflammation. To minimize this, we tested different modifications of the technique to identify the potential for refinement.

Methods: First, we tested whether previous findings of increased inflammation could be confirmed. Next, we tested whether instillation with a disposable 1mL syringe with ball-tipped steel-needle (Disposable-syringe/steel-needle) induced less inflammation than the use of our standard set-up, a 250µL reusable glass syringe with a disposable plastic catheter (Glass-syringe/plastic-catheter). Finally, we tested if access to pelleted and liquid feed prior to instillation affected inflammation. We evaluated inflammation by neutrophil numbers in bronchoalveolar fluid 24h post-exposure.

Results: Vehicle-instilled mice showed a small increase in neutrophil numbers compared to untreated mice. Neutrophil numbers were slightly elevated in the groups instilled with Disposable-syringe/steel-needle; an interaction with feed type indicated that the increase in neutrophils was more pronounced in combination with feed pellets compared to liquid feed. We found no difference between the feed types when using the Glass-syringe/plastic-catheter combination.

Conclusion: The Glass-syringe/plastic-catheter combination induced the least exposure-related inflammation, confirming this as a preferred instillation procedure.

Keywords

inhalation / mouse / pulmonary / toxicity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Niels Hadrup, Michael Guldbrandsen, Eva Terrida, Katja M. S. Bendtsen, Karin S. Hougaard, Nicklas R. Jacobsen, Ulla Vogel. Intratracheal instillation for the testing of pulmonary toxicity in mice—Effects of instillation devices and feed type on inflammation. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2025, 8(2): 378-386 DOI:10.1002/ame2.12503

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Houck GH. Intratracheal instillation of liquid petrolatum: pulmonary injury therefrom. Cal West Med. 1938;49(3):187-191. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18744694

[2]

Vlad A, Winter D, Sauvard S, Stanescu C, Pal B. A new method for tracheal instillation with oesophageal obstruction in laboratory animals. Arzneimittelforschung. 1970;20(6):861. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5468906

[3]

Ho W, Furst A. Intratracheal instillation method for mouse lungs. Oncology. 1973;27(5):385-393.

[4]

Saber AT, Jacobsen NR, Mortensen A, et al. Nanotitanium dioxide toxicity in mouse lung is reduced in sanding dust from paint. Part FibreToxicol. 2012;9:1-15.

[5]

Saber AT, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, et al. Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of sanding dust generated from nanoparticle-containing paints and lacquers. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6:776-788.

[6]

Barfod KK, Bendtsen KM, Berthing T, et al. Increased surface area of halloysite nanotubes due to surface modification predicts lung inflammation and acute phase response after pulmonary exposure in mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;73:103266.

[7]

Danielsen PH, Knudsen KB, Štrancar J, et al. Effects of physicochemical properties of TiO2 nanomaterials for pulmonary inflammation, acute phase response and alveolar proteinosis in intratracheally exposed mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020;386:114830.

[8]

Gutierrez CT, Loizides C, Hafez I, et al. Acute phase response following pulmonary exposure to soluble and insoluble metal oxide nanomaterials in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2023;20(1):4.

[9]

Saber AT, Mortensen A, Szarek J, et al. Toxicity of pristine and paint-embedded TiO2 nanomaterials. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2019;38(1):11-24.

[10]

Di Ianni E, Møller P, Mortensen A, et al. Organomodified nanoclays induce less inflammation, acute phase response, and genotoxicity than pristine nanoclays in mice lungs. Nanotoxicology. 2020;14(7):869-892.

[11]

Husain M, Wu D, Saber AT, et al. Intratracheally instilled titanium dioxide nanoparticles translocate to heart and liver and activate complement cascade in the heart of C57BL/6 mice. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9:1013-1022.

[12]

Götz AA, Rozman J, Rödel HG, et al. Comparison of particle-exposure triggered pulmonary and systemic inflammation in mice fed with three different diets. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2011;8(1):30.

[13]

Renwick LC. Increased inflammation and altered macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particle types. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(5):442-447.

[14]

Stoeger T, Reinhard C, Takenaka S, et al. Instillation of six different ultrafine carbon particles indicates a surface area threshold dose for acute lung inflammation in mice. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(3):328-333.

[15]

Naya M, Kobayashi N, Endoh S, et al. In vivo genotoxicity study of single-wall carbon nanotubes using comet assay following intratracheal instillation in rats. RegulToxicolPharmacol. 2012;64:124-129.

[16]

Saber AT, Jensen KA, Jacobsen NR, et al. Inflammatory and genotoxic effects of nanoparticles designed for inclusion in paints and lacquers. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6:453-471.

[17]

Bonner JC, Silva RM, Taylor AJ, et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of rodent pulmonary responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO consortium. EnvironHealth Perspect. 2013;121:676-682.

[18]

Tian F, Habel NC, Yin R, et al. Pulmonary DWCNT exposure causes sustained local and low-level systemic inflammatory changes in mice. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;84(2):412-420.

[19]

Fujita K, Fukuda M, Endoh S, et al. Size effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes on in vivo and in vitro pulmonary toxicity. Inhal Toxicol. 2015;27(4):207-223.

[20]

Lasfargues G, Lison D, Maldague P, Lauwerys R. Comparative study of the acute lung toxicity of pure cobalt powder and cobalt–tungsten carbide mixture in rat. ToxicolApplPharmacol. 1992;112:41-50.

[21]

Yokohira M, Hashimoto N, Yamakawa K, et al. Lung carcinogenic bioassay of CuO and TiO(2) nanoparticles with Intratracheal instillation using F344 male rats. JToxicolPathol. 2009;22:71-78.

[22]

Danielsen PH, Poulsen SS, Knudsen KB, et al. Physicochemical properties of 26 carbon nanotubes as predictors for pulmonary inflammation and acute phase response in mice following intratracheal lung exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024;107:104413.

[23]

Wallin H, Kyjovska ZO, Poulsen SS, et al. Surface modification does not influence the genotoxic and inflammatory effects of TiO2 nanoparticles after pulmonary exposure by instillation in mice. Mutagenesis. 2017;32:47-57.

[24]

Hadrup N, Aimonen K, Ilves M, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of synthetic amorphous silica–effects of porosity and copper oxide doping. Nanotoxicology. 2021;15(1):96-113.

[25]

Hadrup N, Saber AT, Kyjovska ZO, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of Fe2O3, ZnFe2O4, NiFe2O4 and NiZnFe4O8 nanomaterials: inflammation and DNA strand breaks. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;74:103303.

[26]

Hadrup N, Knudsen KB, Carriere M, et al. Safe-by-design strategies for lowering the genotoxicity and pulmonary inflammation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: reduction of length and the introduction of COOH groups. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;87:103702.

[27]

Hadrup N, Knudsen KB, Berthing T, et al. Pulmonary effects of nanofibrillated celluloses in mice suggest that carboxylation lowers the inflammatory and acute phase responses. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;66:116-125.

[28]

Poulsen SS, Jackson P, Kling K, et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotube physicochemical properties predict pulmonary inflammation and genotoxicity. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:1263-1275.

[29]

Bendtsen KM, Gren L, Malmborg VB, et al. Particle characterization and toxicity in C57BL/6 mice following instillation of five different diesel exhaust particles designed to differ in physicochemical properties. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2020;17(1):38.

[30]

Jackson P, Lund SP, Kristiansen G, et al. An experimental protocol for maternal pulmonary exposure in developmental toxicology. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;108(3):202-207.

[31]

Driscoll KE. Intratracheal instillation as an exposure technique for the evaluation of respiratory tract toxicity: uses and limitations. Toxicol Sci. 2000;55(1):24-35.

[32]

Mikkelsen L, Sheykhzade M, Jensen KA, et al. Modest effect on plaque progression and vasodilatory function in atherosclerosis-prone mice exposed to nanosized TiO(2). Part FibreToxicol. 2011;8:32.

[33]

Gaté L, Knudsen KB, Seidel C, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of two different multi-walled carbon nanotubes in rat: comparison between intratracheal instillation and inhalation exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019;375:17-31.

[34]

Sørli JB, Jensen ACØ, Mortensen A, et al. Genotoxicity in the absence of inflammation after tungsten inhalation in mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023;98:104074.

[35]

Sørli JB, Jensen ACØ, Mortensen A, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of molybdenum disulphide after inhalation in mice. Toxicology. 2023;485:153428.

[36]

Gutierrez CT, Loizides C, Hafez I, et al. Comparison of acute phase response in mice after inhalation and intratracheal instillation of molybdenum disulphide and tungsten particles. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023;133(3):265-278.

[37]

Jacobsen NR, Moller P, Jensen KA, et al. Lung inflammation and genotoxicity following pulmonary exposure to nanoparticles in ApoE−/− mice. Part FibreToxicol. 2009;6:2.

[38]

Hadrup N, Bengtson S, Jacobsen NR, et al. Influence of dispersion medium on nanomaterial-induced pulmonary inflammation and DNA strand breaks: investigation of carbon black, carbon nanotubes and three titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Mutagenesis. 2017;32(6):581-597.

[39]

Sadauskas E, Jacobsen N, Danscher G, et al. Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles in mouse lung following intratracheal instillation. Chem Cent J. 2009;3(1):16.

[40]

Lipka J, Semmler-Behnke M, Sperling RA, et al. Biodistribution of PEG-modified gold nanoparticles following intratracheal instillation and intravenous injection. Biomaterials. 2010;31(25):6574-6581.

[41]

Kreyling WG, Hirn S, Möller W, et al. Air-blood barrier translocation of tracheally instilled gold nanoparticles inversely depends on particle size. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):222-233.

[42]

Billing AM, Knudsen KB, Chetwynd AJ, et al. Fast and robust proteome screening platform identifies neutrophil extracellular trap formation in the lung in response to cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2020;14(4):4096-4110.

[43]

Bengtson S, Knudsen KB, Kyjovska ZO, et al. Differences in inflammation and acute phase response but similar genotoxicity in mice following pulmonary exposure to graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178355.

[44]

Heinrich U, Fuhst R, Rittinghausen S, et al. Chronic inhalation exposure of Wistar rats and two different strains of mice to diesel engine exhaust, carbon black, and titanium dioxide. Inhal Toxicol. 1995;7:533-556.

[45]

Mauderly JL, Snipes MB, Barr EB, et al. Pulmonary toxicity of inhaled diesel exhaust and carbon black in chronically exposed rats. Part I: neoplastic and nonneoplastic lung lesions. ResRepHealth EffInst. 1994;68(Pt 1):1-75.

[46]

Elder A, Gelein R, Finkelstein JN, Driscoll KE, Harkema J, Oberdörster G. Effects of subchronically inhaled carbon black in three species. I. Retention kinetics, lung inflammation, and histopathology. Toxicol Sci. 2005;88(2):614-629.

[47]

Driscoll KE, Carter JM, Howard BW, et al. Pulmonary inflammatory, chemokine, and mutagenic responses in rats after subchronic inhalation of carbon black. ToxicolApplPharmacol. 1996;136:372-380.

[48]

Bourdon JA, Saber AT, Jacobsen NR, et al. Carbon black nanoparticle instillation induces sustained inflammation and genotoxicity in mouse lung and liver. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012;9(1):5.

[49]

Di Ianni E, Møller P, Cholakova T, Wolff H, Jacobsen NR, Vogel U. Assessment of primary and inflammation-driven genotoxicity of carbon black nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Nanotoxicology. 2022;16(4):526-546.

[50]

Cosnier F, Seidel C, Valentino S, et al. Retained particle surface area dose drives inflammation in rat lungs following acute, subacute, and subchronic inhalation of nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2021;18(1):29.

[51]

Skovmand A, Jacobsen Lauvås A, Christensen P, Vogel U, Sørig Hougaard K, Goericke-Pesch S. Pulmonary exposure to carbonaceous nanomaterials and sperm quality. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018;15(1):10.

[52]

Hadrup N, Bengtson S, Jacobsen NR, et al. Influence of dispersion medium on nanomaterial-induced pulmonary inflammation and DNA strand breaks: investigation of carbon black, carbon nanotubes and three titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Mutagenesis. 2017;32(6):581-597.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2057KB)

323

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/