A novel mouse model of calcific aortic valve stenosis

Ningjing Qian , Yaping Wang , Wangxing Hu , Naifang Cao , Yi Qian , Jinyong Chen , Juan Fang , Dilin Xu , Haochang Hu , Shuangshuang Yang , Dao Zhou , Hanyi Dai , Dongdong Wei , Jian’an Wang , Xianbao Liu

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 523 -532.

PDF (26635KB)
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 523 -532. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12393
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A novel mouse model of calcific aortic valve stenosis

Author information +
History +
PDF (26635KB)

Abstract

Background: Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is one of the most challenging heart diseases in clinical with rapidly increasing prevalence. However, study of the mechanism and treatment of CAVS is hampered by the lack of suitable, robust and efficient models that develop hemodynamically significant stenosis and typical calcium deposition. Here, we aim to establish a mouse model to mimic the development and features of CAVS.

Methods: The model was established via aortic valve wire injury (AVWI) combined with vitamin D subcutaneous injected in wild type C57/BL6 mice. Serial transthoracic echocardiography was applied to evaluate aortic jet peak velocity and mean gradient. Histopathological specimens were collected and examined in respect of valve thickening, calcium deposition, collagen accumulation, osteogenic differentiation and inflammation.

Results: Serial transthoracic echocardiography revealed that aortic jet peak velocity and mean gradient increased from 7 days post model establishment in a time dependent manner and tended to be stable at 28 days. Compared with the sham group, simple AVWI or the vitamin D group, the hybrid model group showed typical pathological features of CAVS, including hemodynamic alterations, increased aortic valve thickening, calcium deposition, collagen accumulation at 28 days. In addition, osteogenic differentiation, fibrosis and inflammation, which play critical roles in the development of CAVS, were observed in the hybrid model.

Conclusions: We established a novel mouse model of CAVS that could be induced efficiently, robustly and economically, and without genetic intervention. It provides a fast track to explore the underlying mechanisms of CAVS and to identify more effective pharmacological targets.

Keywords

animal model / calcific aortic valve stenosis / valve calcification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ningjing Qian, Yaping Wang, Wangxing Hu, Naifang Cao, Yi Qian, Jinyong Chen, Juan Fang, Dilin Xu, Haochang Hu, Shuangshuang Yang, Dao Zhou, Hanyi Dai, Dongdong Wei, Jian’an Wang, Xianbao Liu. A novel mouse model of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2024, 7(4): 523-532 DOI:10.1002/ame2.12393

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561-632.

[2]

Otto CM, Prendergast B. Aortic-valve stenosis—from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(8):744-756.

[3]

Boskovski MT, Gleason TG. Current therapeutic options in aortic stenosis. Circ Res. 2021;128(9):1398-1417.

[4]

Makkar RR, Thourani VH, Mack MJ, et al. Five-year outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):799-809.

[5]

Miller JD, Weiss RM, Serrano KM, et al. Evidence for active regulation of pro-osteogenic signaling in advanced aortic valve disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(12):2482-2486.

[6]

Gao C, Hu W, Liu F, et al. Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B induces aortic valve calcification by activating hippo signaling in valvular interstitial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021;150:54-64.

[7]

Nigam V, Srivastava D. Notch1 represses osteogenic pathways in aortic valve cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;47(6):828-834.

[8]

Varshney R, Murphy B, Woolington S, et al. Inactivation of platelet-derived TGF-β1 attenuates aortic stenosis progression in a robust murine model. Blood Adv. 2019;3(5):777-788.

[9]

Weiss RM, Chu Y, Brooks RM, et al. Discovery of an experimental model of Unicuspid aortic valve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(13):e006908.

[10]

Miller JD, Weiss RM, Heistad DD. Calcific aortic valve stenosis: methods, models, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2011;108(11):1392-1412.

[11]

Honda S, Miyamoto T, Watanabe T, et al. A novel mouse model of aortic valve stenosis induced by direct wire injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(2):270-278.

[12]

Niepmann ST, Steffen E, Zietzer A, et al. Graded murine wire-induced aortic valve stenosis model mimics human functional and morphological disease phenotype. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(8):847-856.

[13]

Zittermann A, Schleithoff SS, Koerfer R. Putting cardiovascular disease and vitamin D insufficiency into perspective. Br J Nutr. 2005;94(4):483-492.

[14]

Bogdanova M, Zabirnyk A, Malashicheva A, et al. Models and techniques to study aortic valve calcification in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. An Overview. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:835825.

[15]

Liu F, Chen J, Hu W, et al. PTP1B inhibition improves mitochondrial dynamics to alleviate calcific aortic valve disease via regulating OPA1 homeostasis. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022;7(7):697-712.

[16]

Liu Z, Dong N, Hui H, et al. Endothelial cell-derived tetrahydrobiopterin prevents aortic valve calcification. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(17):1652-1664.

[17]

Lindman BR, Clavel MA, Mathieu P, et al. Calcific aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16006. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.6

[18]

Marwick TH, Amann K, Bangalore S, et al. Chronic kidney disease and valvular heart disease: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2019;96(4):836-849.

[19]

Linefsky JP, O’Brien KD, Katz R, et al. Association of serum phosphate levels with aortic valve sclerosis and annular calcification: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(3):291-297.

[20]

Kruithof B, van de Pol V, Los T, et al. New calcification model for intact murine aortic valves. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021;156:95-104.

[21]

Wang Y, Gu J, Du A, et al. SPARC-related modular calcium binding 1 regulates aortic valve calcification by disrupting BMPR-II/p-p38 signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(3):913-928.

[22]

Cushing MC, Mariner PD, Liao JT, Sims EA, Anseth KS. Fibroblast growth factor represses Smad-mediated myofibroblast activation in aortic valvular interstitial cells. FASEB J. 2008;22:1769-1777. 10.1096/fj.07-087627

[23]

Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, et al. Multimodality molecular imaging identifies proteolytic and osteogenic activities in early aortic valve disease. Circulation. 2007;115(3):377-386.

[24]

Dayawansa NH, Baratchi S, Peter K. Uncoupling the vicious cycle of mechanical stress and inflammation in calcific aortic valve disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:783543.

[25]

Bogdanova M, Kostina A, Zihlavnikova Enayati K, et al. Inflammation and mechanical stress stimulate osteogenic differentiation of human aortic valve interstitial cells. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1635.

[26]

Shuvy M, Abedat S, Beeri R, et al. Uraemic hyperparathyroidism causes a reversible inflammatory process of aortic valve calcification in rats. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;79(3):492-499.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (26635KB)

237

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/