Establishment and evaluation of an improved rat model of open abdomen

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to establish an animal model of open abdomen (OA) through temporary abdominal closure via different techniques.

Methods: Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: group A (OA with polypropylene mesh alone); group B (OA with polypropylene mesh combined with a patch); and group C (OA with polypropylene mesh and a sutured patch). Vital signs, pathophysiological changes, and survival rates were closely monitored in the rats for 7 days after surgery. Abdominal X-rays and histopathological examinations were performed to assess abdominal organ changes and wound healing.

Results: The results showed no significant difference in mortality rates among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, rats in group B exhibited superior overall condition, cleaner wounds, and a higher rate of wound healing compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Abdominal X-rays indicated that varying degrees of distal intestinal obstruction in all groups. Histopathological examinations revealed fibrous hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration, neovascularization, and collagen deposition in all groups. Group B demonstrated enhanced granulation tissue generation, neovascularization, and collagen deposition compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Polypropylene mesh combined with patches is the most suitable method for establishing an animal model of OA. This model successfully replicated the pathological and physiological changes in postoperative patients with OA, specifically the progress of abdominal skin wound healing. It provides a practical and reliable animal model for OA research.

Keywords

animal models / open abdomen / patch / polypropylene mesh

References

[1] Wu XW, Ren JA. Interpretation of domestic and foreign guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of abdominal infection. Chinese J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2020;23(11):1023-1027.

[2] Poillucci G, Podda M, Russo G, et al. Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma EMERG S. 2021;47:1819-1825.

[3] Chinese consensus on open abdomen therapy (2023 edition). Chinese J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2023;26(3):207-214.

[4] Boolaky KN, Tariq AH, Hardcastle TC. Open abdomen in the trauma ICU patient: who? When? Why? And what are the outcome results? Eur J Trauma EMERG S. 2022;48(2SI):953-961.

[5] Ng-Kamstra JS, Rennert-May E, McKee J, Lundgren S, Manns B, Kirkpatrick AW. Protocol for a parallel economic evaluation of a trial comparing two surgical strategies in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis: the COOL-cost study. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(151):15.

[6] Wainstein DE, Calvi RJ, Rezzonico F, Deforel ML, Perrone N, Sisco P. Management of enteroatmospheric fistula: a ten-year experience following fifteen years of learning. Surgery. 2023;173(4):1079-1085.

[7] Zhao C, Wu X, Huang J, et al. Hybrid material for open abdomen: saving the wound from intestinal fistula. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 2019;30(1099):109.

[8] Li Z, Wu C, Liu Z, et al. A polypropylene mesh coated with interpenetrating double network hydrogel for local drug delivery in temporary closure of open abdomen. RSC Adv. 2020;10(3):1331-1340.

[9] Amano K, Okabe M, Yoshida T, et al. Hyperdry human amniotic membrane as a protective dressing for open wounds with exposed bowel in mice. J Surg Res. 2023;283:898-913.

[10] Katada J, Saito H, Ohashi A. Significance of cyclooxygenase-2 induced via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in mechanical stimulus-induced peritoneal adhesion in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;313(1):286-292.

[11] Wu W, Cheng R, Das Neves J, et al. Advances in biomaterials for preventing tissue adhesion. J Control Release. 2017;261:318-336.

[12] Coccolini F, Biffl W, Catena F, et al. The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10(32):32.

[13] Anastasiu M, Surlin V, Beuran M. The Management of the Open Abdomen – a literature review. Chirurgia. 2021;116(6):645-656.

[14] Dong Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. The protective effects of Xuebijing injection on intestinal injuries of mice exposed to irradiation. Animal Models Exp Med. 2022;5(6):565-574.

[15] Li Z, Qi X, Zhang X, et al. TRDMT1 exhibited protective effects against LPS-induced inflammation in rats through TLR4-NF-κB/MAPK-TNF-α pathway. Animal Models Exp Med. 2022;5(2):172-182.

[16] Vargo D, Richardson JD, Campbell A, et al. Management of the Open Abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg. 2009;75S(11): S1-S22.

[17] Adkins AL, Robbins J, Villalba M, Bendick P, Shanley CJ. Open abdomen management of intra-abdominal sepsis. Am Surg. 2004;70(2):137-140.

[18] Cheng Y, Wang K, Gong J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients. Cochrane DB Syst Rev. 2022;5(5):CD0137105.

[19] Kalaiselvan R, Slade DAJ, Soop M, et al. Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on enteroatmospheric fistulation in the septic open abdomen. Color Dis. 2022;25:111-117.

[20] Zhao Y, Li R, Liu Y, et al. An injectable, self-healable, antibacterial, and pro-healing oxidized pullulan polysaccharide/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel for early protection of open abdominal wounds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;250:126282.

[21] Deng Y, Ren J, Chen G, et al. Evaluation of polypropylene mesh coated with biological hydrogels for temporary closure of open abdomen. J Biomater Appl. 2016;31(2):302-314.

[22] Mayer B, Tuckermann J, Muche R. Could a phase model help to improve translational animal research? Animal Models and Experimental Medicine. 2022;5(6):550-556.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.