Promoting sustainable development goals through the Chinese concept of eco-civilization: A Delphi study of priority areas in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor

Abstract

The concept of eco-civilization, or “shengtai wenming jianshe” in Chinese, emerged in academic circles in the 1980s and was officially adopted by the Chinese Communist Party in 2007. This concept highlights the profound harm human activities inflicted on nature, climate, and biodiversity. Given the global environmental challenges posed by human actions and economic activities, it is crucial to promote ecological civilization universally. This paper aims to uncover the key aspects of eco-civilization to address challenges related to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a major project under the Belt and Road Initiative. It emphasizes aligning CPEC with green development goals to support sustainable economic progress in Pakistan and China. The study employs semi-structured interviews, a modified four-round Delphi method, and calculates a priority index. The research population includes climate experts, scholars, researchers, academics, policymakers, industrialists, and environmentalists from both countries, providing valuable insights into eco-civilization. Using an iterative approach with continuous feedback informing each round of the Delphi technique allows for systematic conceptualization, evaluation, and ranking of factors to develop a comprehensive priority index. The findings emphasize the necessity of embedding ecological principles in regional development strategies to maximize CPEC’s contribution to the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. By promoting ecological harmony, resilience, and sustainability, this research offers a strategic framework for leveraging CPEC as a model for sustainable development that could positively impact neighboring regions and global communities.

Keywords

Eco-civilization / China-Pakistan Economic Corridor / Green development / Sustainable development goals / Ecology / Climate change

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or any financial interest, or non-financial interest.

References

[1] Pan J. China’s Environmental Governing and Ecological Civilization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-47429-7

[2] Saifullah K. Member of the Senate Committee discussion in Report on China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. The United States Institute of Peace; 2017. Available from: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/pw135-the-china-pakistan-economic-corridor.pdf [Last assessed on 02 Oct 2024].

[3] Zheng G. The risk challenges of CPEC: An analysis of grand strategy and countermeasures. Pac J. 2016; 24(4):89-95.

[4] Lord E. Building an Ecological Civilization across the Rural/Urban Divide and the Politics of Environmental Knowledge Production in Contemporary China. [Dissertation]; 2018. Available from: utoronto. scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/acfa38d2-e8c7- 42cc-be36-107aee1147f3/content [Last assessed on 02 Oct 2024].

[5] Janjua S, Khan A, Asif N. Environment Protection Under CPEC-Focus on Relocation of Industries from China to Pakistan. Centre of Excellence for CPEC; 2018. Available from: https://cpec-centre.pk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/11-policy-paper.pdf [Last assessed on 02 Oct 2024].

[6] Shafique M, Kanwal L. Geo-ethnic dynamics of CPEC in Pakistan. J Res Soc Pak. 2018; 55(1):15-28.

[7] Saeed S, Khwaja MA, Urooj M. Preliminary environmental impact assessment (EIA) of the China- Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Route Road Construction Activities in Selected Districts of Haripur, Abbottabad, and Mansehra of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK). Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad; 2017. Available from: https://sdpi.org/sdpiweb/publications/files/preliminary-environmental-impact-assessment-study-of-cpec-nrrc-activities-in-kpk-pakistan(pb-59).pdf [Last assessed on 04 Oct 2024].

[8] Lechner AM, Chan FKS, Campos-Arceiz A. Biodiversity conservation should be a core value of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2(3):408-409. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0452-8

[9] Alcock I. The new rural reconstruction movement: A Chinese degrowth style movement? Ecol Econ. 2019; 161:261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.024

[10] Zinda JA, He J. Ecological civilization in the mountains: How walnuts boomed and busted in southwest China. J Peasant Stud. 2020; 47(5):1052-1076. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1638368

[11] Gare A. The eco-socialist roots of ecological civilization. Capital Nat Social. 2020; 32(1):37-55. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2020.1751223

[12] Geng Q, Lo K. Global ecological civilization: An analysis of macro-level policies of the Belt and Road Initiative. Res Glob. 2023; 7:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100141

[13] Wang W, Feng C, Liu F, Li J. Biodiversity conservation in China: A review of recent studies and practices. Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2020; 2:100025. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2020.100025

[14] Fang Y, Cote R, Qin R. Industrial sustainability in China: Practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. J Environ Manag. 2007; 83(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2006.03.007

[15] Saed. James Richard O’Connor’s ecological Marxism. Capital Nat Social. 2019; 30(4):1-12. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2018.1495307

[16] Dai H, Zhu Z, Trachung B, et al. Communities in ecosystem restoration: The role of inclusive values and local elites’ narrative innovations. People Nat. 2024; 6:1655-1667. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10675

[17] Jackson T. Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. 2^nd ed. London: Routledge; 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315677453

[18] Altenburg T, Rodrik D. Green industrial policy: Accelerating structural change towards wealthy green economies. In: Green Industrial Policy; 2017. Available from: https://www.un-page.org/static/91e62d2bc2fc4be983f5af57c522ecd3/green-industrial-policy-book-aw-web.pdf [Last assessed on 24 Aug 2024].

[19] Zhong W, Liu Y, Dong K, Ni G. Assessing the synergistic effects of artificial intelligence on pollutant and carbon emission mitigation in China. Energy Econ. 2024; 138:107829. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107829

[20] Evro S, Oni BA, Tomomewo OS. Global strategies for a low-carbon future: Lessons from the US, China, and EU’s pursuit of carbon neutrality. J Clean Prod. 2024; 142635. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142635

[21] Drumm S, Bradley C, Moriarty F. The development, “More of an art than a science”? design, and mechanics of the Delphi technique. Res Soc Admin Pharm. 2022; 18(1):2230-2236. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.11.002

[22] Bint e Tariq F, Bibi A. Discussion paper on public perception of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor in Pakistan. In: Asian Institute of Eco-Civilization Research and Development; 2023. Available from: https://aierd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/public-perception-about-china-pakistan-economic-corridor-in-pakistan.pdf [Last assessed on 21 Aug 2024].

[23] Ali A, Butt KM. Sustainable development of Chitral: A CPEC perspective. South Asian Stud. 2022; 36(1):193-206.

[24] Ullah S, Barykin S, Jianfu M, Saifuddin T, Khan MA, Kazaryan R. Green practices in mega development projects of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):5870. doi: 10.3390/su15075870

[25] Piccardo C, Canepa M. Cultural ecology:Paradigm for a sustainable man-nature relationship. In: Partnerships for the Goals. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 248-258. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78536-9_27

[26] Ramay SA. Eco Civilization: The Chinese Vision of Prosperity. Sustainable Development Policy Institute; 2020. Available from: https://sdpi.org/assets/lib/uploads/uploads/2020/09/eco-civilization-chinese-vision-of-prosperity-003-final.pdf [Last assessed on 28 Aug 2024].

[27] Ali A, Rizwan M. From Silk Road to China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): A comprehensive analysis of economic, geopolitical, socio-cultural, and environmental landscapes of Pakistan. Ann Soc Sci Perspect. 2024; 5(1):9-29. doi: 10.52700/assap.v5i1.329

[28] Aijaz U, Zaman CQ, Butt HD. Critical review of blue justice and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Bahria Univ J Human Soc Sci. 2023; 6(1):169-194.

[29] Mahmood S, Sun H, Iqbal A, Alhussan AA, El-Kenawy ESM. Green finance, sustainable infrastructure, and green technology innovation: Pathways to achieving sustainable development goals in the Belt and Road Initiative. Environ Res Commun. 2024; 6(10):105036. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad1f2e

[30] de Castro D, Wang R. Translocal implications of the Green Belt and Road Initiative: The China-Pakistan economic corridor case. Beijing Law Rev. 2023; 14:402. doi: 10.4236/blr.2023.141022

[31] Rajmil D, Morales L, Andreosso-O’Callaghan B. China’s “ecological civilization”: Geopolitical and geo-economic insights. Sustain Dev Energy Trans Eur Asia. 2020; 9:45-63. doi: 10.1002/9781119705222.ch3