An intelligent surface roughness prediction method based on automatic feature extraction and adaptive data fusion

Xun Zhang , Sibao Wang , Fangrui Gao , Hao Wang , Haoyu Wu , Ying Liu

Autonomous Intelligent Systems ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 27

PDF
Autonomous Intelligent Systems ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 27 DOI: 10.1007/s43684-024-00083-9
Original Article
research-article

An intelligent surface roughness prediction method based on automatic feature extraction and adaptive data fusion

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Machining quality prediction based on cutting big data is the core focus of current developments in intelligent manufacturing. Presently, predictions of machining quality primarily rely on process and signal analyses. Process-based predictions are generally constrained to the development of rudimentary regression models. Signal-based predictions often require large amounts of data, multiple processing steps (such as noise reduction, principal component analysis, modulation, etc.), and have low prediction efficiency. In addition, the accuracy of the model depends on tedious manual parameter tuning. This paper proposes a convolutional neural network quality intelligent prediction model based on automatic feature extraction and adaptive data fusion (CNN-AFEADF). Firstly, by processing signals from multiple directions, time-frequency domain images with rich features can be obtained, which significantly benefit neural network learning. Secondly, the corresponding images in three directions are fused into one image by setting different fusion weight parameters. The optimal fusion weight parameters and window length are determined by the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO). This data fusion method reduces training time by 16.74 times. Finally, the proposed method is verified by various experiments. This method can automatically identify sensitive data features through neural network fitting experiments and optimization, thereby eliminating the need for expert experience in determining the significance of data features. Based on this approach, the model achieves an average relative error of 2.95%, reducing the prediction error compared to traditional models. Furthermore, this method enhances the intelligent machining level.

The original online version of this article was revised: The statement of Competing interests has been added.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43684-025-00107-y.

Keywords

Surface roughness prediction / Short-time Fourier transform / Feature extraction / Data fusion / Convolutional neural network

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xun Zhang, Sibao Wang, Fangrui Gao, Hao Wang, Haoyu Wu, Ying Liu. An intelligent surface roughness prediction method based on automatic feature extraction and adaptive data fusion. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 2024, 4(1): 27 DOI:10.1007/s43684-024-00083-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ChenC., WuD., LiuY.. Recent advances of AI for engineering service and maintenance. Auton. Intell. Syst., 2022, 21. 19

[2]

GuoY., SunY., WuK.. Research and development of monitoring system and data monitoring system and data acquisition of CNC machine tool in intelligent manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 2020, 172. 1729881419898017

[3]

AniE.C., Olu-lawalK.A., OlajigaO.K., et al.. Intelligent monitoring systems in manufacturing: current state and future perspectives. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2024, 5(3): 750-759.

[4]

YaoL., GeZ.. Big data quality prediction in the process industry: a distributed parallel modeling framework. J. Process Control, 2018, 68: 1-13.

[5]

NasirV., KooshkbaghiM., CoolJ., et al.. Cutting tool temperature monitoring in circular sawing: measurement and multi-sensor feature fusion-based prediction. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 112: 2413-2424.

[6]

YanW., WangX., GongQ., et al.. A service-oriented energy assessment system based on BPMN and machine learning. Auton. Intell. Syst., 2022, 21. 18

[7]

WangD.. Robust data-driven modeling approach for real-time final product quality prediction in batch process operation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 2011, 7(2): 371-377.

[8]

NasirV., SassaniF.. A review on deep learning in machining and tool monitoring: methods, opportunities, and challenges. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, 115(9): 2683-2709.

[9]

WuestT., IrgensC., ThobenK.D.. An approach to monitoring quality in manufacturing using supervised machine learning on product state data. J. Intell. Manuf., 2014, 25: 1167-1180.

[10]

KovačičM., ŠarlerB.. Application of the genetic programming for increasing the soft annealing productivity in steel industry. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2009, 24(3): 369-374.

[11]

LiuN., et al.. A novel approach to predicting surface roughness based on specific cutting energy consumption when slot milling Al-7075. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2016, 118: 13-20.

[12]

ZhaoC.. A quality-relevant sequential phase partition approach for regression modeling and quality prediction analysis in manufacturing processes. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 2013, 11(4): 983-991.

[13]

XuQ., XuC., WangJ.. Forecasting the yield of wafer by using improved genetic algorithm, high dimensional alternating feature selection and SVM with uneven distribution and high-dimensional data. Auton. Intell. Syst., 2022, 21. 24

[14]

YinX., NiuZ., HeZ., et al.. Ensemble deep learning based semi-supervised soft sensor modeling method and its application on quality prediction for coal preparation process. Adv. Eng. Inform., 2020, 46. 101136

[15]

LiB.-h., HouB.-C., YuW.-T., LuX.-B., YangC.-W.. Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: a review. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2017, 18: 86-96.

[16]

WangJ. L., XuC.Q., ZhangJ., ZhongR.. Big data analytics for intelligent manufacturing systems: a review. J. Manuf. Syst., 2022, 62: 738-752.

[17]

KongX., LiX., ZhouQ., et al.. Attention recurrent autoencoder hybrid model for early fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2021, 70: 1-10

[18]

WangZ.H., WangS.B., WangS.L., et al.. An intelligent process parameters determination method based on multi-algorithm fusion: a case study in five-axis milling. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 2022, 73. 102244

[19]

XuL.H., HuangC.Z., NiuJ.H., et al.. Prediction of cutting power and surface quality and optimization of cutting parameters using new inference system in high-speed milling process. Adv. Manuf., 2021, 9: 388-402.

[20]

ZhaoZ.Y., WangS.B., WangZ.H., et al.. Surface roughness stabilization method based on digital twin-driven machining parameters self-adaption adjustment: a case study in five-axis machining. J. Intell. Manuf., 2022, 33: 1-10.

[21]

MengT., JingX.Y., YanZ., et al.. A survey on machine learning for data fusion. Inf. Fusion, 2020, 57: 115-129.

[22]

WuH., LiZ., TangQ., et al.. A practical prediction method for grinding accuracy based on multi-source data fusion in manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2023, 127(3): 1407-1417.

[23]

ZengS., PiD., XuT.. Milling surface roughness prediction method based on spatiotemporal ensemble learning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2023, 128(1–2): 91-119.

[24]

Z. Wang, S. Wang, S. Wang, et al., An intelligent prediction method of surface residual stresses based on multi-source heterogeneous data. J. Intell. Manuf., 1–17 (2023)

[25]

HeZ., ShiT., XuanJ.. Milling tool wear prediction using multi-sensor feature fusion based on stacked sparse autoencoders. Measurement, 2022, 190. 110719

[26]

HuangZ.W., ZhuJ.M., LeiJ.T., et al.. Tool wear predicting based on multi-domain feature fusion by deep convolutional neural network in milling operations. J. Intell. Manuf., 2020, 31: 953-966.

[27]

ZhangX.W., LengZ.J., ZhaoZ.B., et al.. Spatial-temporal dual-channel adaptive graph convolutional network for remaining useful life prediction with multi-sensor information fusion. Adv. Eng. Inform., 2023, 57. 102120

[28]

TakasuS., MasudaM., NishiguchiT., et al.. Influence of study vibration with small amplitude upon surface roughness in diamond machining. CIRP Ann., 1985, 34(1): 463-467.

[29]

BanerjiS., SinhaA., LiuC.. New image descriptors based on color, texture, shape, and wavelets for object and scene image classification. Neurocomputing, 2013, 117: 173-185.

[30]

KennedyJ., EberhartR.. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, 199519421948. IEEE4

[31]

HuangZ., ZhuJ., LeiJ., et al.. Tool wear predicting based on multi-domain feature fusion by deep convolutional neural network in milling operations. J. Intell. Manuf., 2020, 31: 953-966.

[32]

KingaD., AdamJ.B.. A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations, 20156ICLR5

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program Young Scientist Program(No. 2022YFB3402400)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 52375407)

Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province(CYS23141)

Chongqing Talent Program(No. CQYC202105002)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

178

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/