Solution structure and stability for a two-parameter acoustic inverse scattering problem

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper investigated the structure and stability of solutions for simultaneously recovering density and bulk modulus in acoustic inverse scattering. The nonlinear scattering model was linearized via the Born approximation, and the inverse problem was casted as a 2 × 2 block operator equation. The off-diagonal blocks of this operator matrix captured the cross-coupling interactions between the two physical parameters. By employing the maximal Tseng generalized inverse, we developed an analytical formulation that remained valid even when diagonal blocks were non-invertible, overcoming limitations of traditional Schur complement methods. To address the inherent ill-posedness, we incorporated Tikhonov regularization into this linearized system, deriving explicit solution representations and establishing a rigorous stability estimate. Our analysis revealed that the strength of the off-diagonal interaction imposed a fundamental lower bound on the regularization parameter. As the parameter approached this bound, the reconstruction error exhibited singular behavior.

Keywords

acoustic inverse scattering / multi-parameter inversion / maximal Tseng generalized inverse / Tikhonov regularization / stability estimate

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] D. Colton, R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, Springer, Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30351-8

[2] K. Ito, B. Jin, Inverse Problems, Tikhonov Theory and Algorithms, World Scientific, Hackensack, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1142/9120

[3] G. Bao, P. Li, Maxwell's Equations in Periodic Structures, Springer, Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0061-6

[4] A. C. Kak, M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719277

[5] T. Hohage, Logarithmic convergence rates of the iteratively regularized Gauss-Newton method for an inverse potential and an inverse scattering problem, Inverse Probl., 13 (1997), 1279-1299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/13/5/012

[6] W. C. Chew, Y. M. Wang, Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted Born iterative method, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 9 (1990), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.56334

[7] A. N. Tikhonov, V. Y. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1137/1021044

[8] H. W. Engl, M. Hanke, A. Neubauer, Regularization of Inverse Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1996.

[9] C. W. Groetsch, The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind, Pitman, Boston, 1984.

[10] M. Hanke, Conjugate Gradient Type Methods for Ill-Posed Problems, Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315140193

[11] B. Kaltenbacher, A. Neubauer, O. Scherzer, Iterative Regularization Methods for Nonlinear Ill-Posed Problems, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208276

[12] L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D, 60 (1992), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F

[13] G. Bao, S. Hou, P. Li, Recent studies on inverse medium scattering problems, in Modeling and Computations in Electromagnetics, (2008), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73778-0_6

[14] K. Ito, B. Jin, T. Takeuchi, Multi-parameter Tikhonov regularization, Methods Appl. Anal., 18 (2011), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.4310/MAA.2011.v18.n1.a2

[15] M. V. Klibanov, J. Li, Inverse Problems and Carleman Estimates: Global Uniqueness, Global Convergence and Experimental Data, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110745481

[16] O. Y. Imanuvilov, M. Yamamoto, Carleman estimate and an inverse source problem for the Kelvin-Voigt model for viscoelasticity, Inverse Probl., 35 (2019), 125001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ab323e

[17] Y. Jia, J. Yang, Determination of embedded obstacle and its surrounding medium in electrodynamics, Inverse Probl., 41 (2025), 065008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/add75e

[18] D. Zhang, Y. Chang, Y. Guo, Jointly determining the point sources and obstacle from Cauchy data, Inverse Probl., 40 (2024), 015014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ad10c8

[19] D. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Guo, Imaging an acoustic obstacle and its excitation sources from phaseless near-field data, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 18 (2024), 797-812. https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2023055

[20] H. Wu, J. Yang, J. Li, The factorization method for simultaneous reconstruction of a piecewise homogeneous medium and a buried object from near-field data, Inverse Probl., 41 (2025), 065007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/addb6b

[21] S. J. Norton, Generation of separate density and compressibility images in tissue, Ultrason. Imaging, 5 (1983), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(83)90004-4

[22] J. Virieux, S. Operto, An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics, Geophysics, 74 (2009), WCC1-WCC26. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3238367

[23] S. Operto, Y. Gholami, V. Prieux, A. Ribodetti, R. Brossier, L. Metivier, et al., A guided tour of multiparameter full-waveform inversion with multicomponent data: From theory to practice, Geophysics, 32 (2013), 1040-1054. ttps://doi.org/ 10.1190/tle32091040.1

[24] Y. Gholami, R. Brossier, S. Operto, A. Ribodetti, J. Virieux, Which parametrization is suitable for acoustic VTI full-waveform inversion? Part 1: sensitivity and trade-off analysis, Geophysics, 78 (2013), R81-R105. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0204.1

[25] K. Ito, B. Jin, T. Takeuchi, Multi-parameter Tikhonov regularization-an augmented approach, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 35 (2014), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11401-014-0835-y

[26] J. Xu, J. Huang, A. Chen, Representation of a class of linear operators with coupled domain in a product space and its applications, Acta Math. Sin., 39 (2023), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-023-1387-4

[27] J. Xu, J. Huang, A. Chen, Analyticity and stability of semigroups related to an abstract initial-boundary value problem, Oper. Matrices, 17 (2023), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.7153/oam-2023-17-36

[28] J. Xu, J. Huang, A. Chen, Fredholm properties of a class of coupled operator matrices and their applications, Ann. Funct. Anal., 15 (2024), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43034-024-00318-z

[29] A. Kirsch, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Inverse Problems, Springer, Cham, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63343-1

[30] C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717570

[31] T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66282-9

[32] A. Ben-Israel, T. N. E. Greville, Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97366

[33] C. Y. Deng, H. K. Du, Representations of the Moore-Penrose inverse of 2 × 2 block operator valued matrices, J. Korean Math. Soc., 46 (2009), 1139-1150. https://doi.org/10.4134/JKMS.2009.46.6.1139