Identification of a FIR system with binary-valued observation under data tampering attack and differential privacy preservation

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper explores the use of differential privacy encryption to protect against data tampering attacks in the context of finite impulse response (FIR) system identification under binary observation conditions. The study begins by introducing the core principles of differential privacy and discussing the current security challenges faced by FIR systems. It highlights the risks of data tampering and privacy leakage during the system identification process. To address these challenges, two distinct differential privacy algorithms are proposed, providing dual encryption protection for the system parameters. By integrating differential privacy mechanisms into the FIR system, the proposed approach ensures the security and privacy of both data and parameters during transmission and processing. Experimental results demonstrate that the dual differential privacy protection effectively safeguards data while providing accurate parameter estimation, validating the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Keywords

differential privacy encryption scheme / finite impulse response (FIR) system / multiparameter system protection

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] C. Dwork, A. Roth, The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy , Now Publishers Inc., 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0400000042

[2] Y. Kim, R. Eum, S. Park, Stealthy sensor attack detection and real-time performance recovery for resilient CPS, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 17 (2021), 7412-7422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3052182

[3] J. Guo, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Identification of FIR Systems with binaryvalued observations under replay attacks, Automatica, 172 (2025), 112001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.112001

[4] Y. Jiang, S. Wu, H. Yang, H. Luo, Z. Chen, S. Yin, et al., Secure data transmission and trustworthiness judgement approaches against cyberphysical attacks in an integrated datadriven framework, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., 52 (2022), 7799-7809. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3164024

[5] J. Glavaš, I. Uroda, B. Mandić, Managing digital transformation in public administration, in 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), (2021), 1466-1469. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9596775

[6] H. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Yang, M. Hu, Z. Jia, Z. Chen, et al., A secure and efficient public data auditing solution for the cloud, in 2024 16th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), (2024), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN63464.2024.10793330

[7] S. Saratkar, A. Chaudhari, T. Thute, R. Raut, G. Thakre, H. Kumar, Assessment of heartattack prediction using fuzzy rule based system, in 2024 8th International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), (2024), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA61740.2024.10774808

[8] D. B. Rawat, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, I. Stojmenovic, CyberPhysical Systems: From Theory to Practice , CRC Press, 2015.

[9] L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for the User , 2^nd edition, Prentice Hall, 1999.

[10] M. Pouliquen, E. Pigeon, O. Gehan, A. Goudjil, Identification using binary measurements for IIR systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 65 (2020), 786-793. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2019.2921657

[11] J. Guo, J. F. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Adaptive tracking of a class of firstorder systems with binaryvalued observations and fixed thresholds, J. Syst. Sci. Complexity, 25 (2012), 1041-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-012-1257-0

[12] T. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Yang, A comprehensive survey on local differential privacy toward data statistics and analysis, Sensors, 20 (2020), 7030. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247030

[13] D. Ding, Q. Han, Z. Wang, X. Ge, A survey on modelbased distributed control and filtering for industrial cyberphysical systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 15 (2019), 2483-2499. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2905295

[14] G. P. Liu, Networked learning predictive control of nonlinear cyber physical systems, J. Syst. Sci. Complexity, 33 (2020), 1719-1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-0243-1

[15] M. S. Mahmoud, M. M. Hamdan, U. A. Baroudi, Modeling and control of cyberphysical systems subject to cyberattacks: A survey of recent advances and challenges, Neurocomputing, 338 (2019), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.099

[16] R. Taheri, M. Shojafar, F. Arabikhan, A. Gegov, Unveiling vulnerabilities in deep learningbased malware detection: Differential privacy driven adversarial attacks, Comput. Secur., 146 (2024), 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104035

[17] S. Nabavirazavi, R. Taheri, S. S. Iyengar, Enhancing federated learning robustness through randomization and mixture, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 158 (2024), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.04.009

[18] R. Taheri, F. Arabikhan, A. Gegov, N. Akbari, Robust aggregation function in federated learning, in International Conference on Information and Knowledge Systems, (2023), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51664-1_12

[19] E. Nowroozi, I. Haider, R. Taheri, M. Conti, Federated learning under attack: Exposing vulnerabilities through data poisoning attacks in computer networks, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manage., 22 (2025), 822-831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2025.3525554

[20] S. Nabavirazavi, R. Taheri, M. Shojafar, S. S. Iyengar, Impact of aggregation function randomization against model poisoning in federated learning, in 22nd IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom 2023) , (2024), 165-172.

[21] R. Tian, J. Mei, Privacy preserving resilient constrained consensus for multiagent systems via state decomposition, in 2024 43rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC), (2024), 5806-5811. https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC63176.2024.10662823

[22] J. Cortés, G. E. Dullerud, S. Han, J. Le Ny, S. Mitra, G. J. Pappas, Differential privacy in control and network systems, in 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , (2016), 4252-4272. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2016.7798915

[23] C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, A. Smith, Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis, in Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality , (2006), 17-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/11681878_14

[24] J. Guo, X. Wang, W. Xue, Y. Zhao, System identification with binaryvalued observations under data tampering attacks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 66 (2020), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2020.3029325

[25] A. Teixeira, I. Shames, H. Sandberg, K. H. Johansson, A secure control framework for resourcelimited adversaries, Automatica, 51 (2015), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2014.10.067

[26] J. Guo, R. Jia, R. Su, Y. Zhao, Identification of FIR systems with binaryvalued observations against data tampering attacks, Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., 53 (2023), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2023.3276352