Probability density prediction for linear systems under fractional Gaussian noise excitation using physics-informed neural networks

Baolan Li , Shaojuan Ma , Hufei Li , Hui Xiao

Electronic Research Archive ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 3007 -3036.

PDF (3660KB)
Electronic Research Archive ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) :3007 -3036. DOI: 10.3934/era.2025132
Research article
research-article
Probability density prediction for linear systems under fractional Gaussian noise excitation using physics-informed neural networks
Author information +
History +
PDF (3660KB)

Abstract

This study centered on employing the physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) approach for resolving the time-dependent Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov (FPK) equation for the first time, culminating in the derivation of the transient probability density function. First, we derived the FPK equation for a dynamical system driven by fractional Gaussian noise (FGN). Second, a deep learning method based on PINNs was introduced for resolving the corresponding time-dependent FPK equation. Finally, two examples under two different excitation conditions were discussed to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of the PINNs algorithm. The results show that the PINNs algorithm can get the transient solution of the system under additive and multiplicative FGN. Concurrently, the Monte Carlo approach was utilized to evaluate the precision and computational efficiency of the PINNs algorithm. We found that the different comparison results are in good consistency, which proves that the PINNs algorithm is not only efficient, but also effective and interpretable.

Keywords

Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation / physics-informed neural networks algorithm / dynamical system / fractional Gaussian noise / Monte Carlo approach

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Baolan Li, Shaojuan Ma, Hufei Li, Hui Xiao. Probability density prediction for linear systems under fractional Gaussian noise excitation using physics-informed neural networks. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33 (5) : 3007-3036 DOI:10.3934/era.2025132

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

C. Proppe, Exact stationary probability density functions for non-linear systems under poisson white noise excitation, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 38 (2003), 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00084-1

[2]

W. Q. Zhu, Nonlinear stochastic dynamics and control in hamiltonian formulation, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59 (2006), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2193137

[3]

J. Chen, J. Yang, K. Shen, Z. Zheng, Z. Chang, Stochastic dynamic analysis of rolling ship in random wave condition by using finite element method, Ocean Eng., 250 (2022) 110973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110973

[4]

E. Hirvijoki, T. Kurki-Suonio, S. Äkäslompolo, J. Varje, T. Koskela, J. Miettunen, Monte Carlo method and High Performance Computing for solving Fokker-Planck equation of minority plasma particles, J. Plasma Phys., 81 (2015), 435810301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377815000203

[5]

H. Fukushima, Y. Uesaka, Y. Nakatani, N. Hayashi, Numerical solutions of the fokker-planck equation by the finite difference method for the thermally assisted reversal of the magnetization in a single-domain particle, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 242 (2002), 1002-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)01364-6

[6]

Z. Ren, W. Xu, An improved path integration method for nonlinear systems under poisson white noise excitation, Appl. Math. Comput., 373 (2020), 125036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125036

[7]

Z. H. Liu, J. H. Geng, W. Q. Zhu, Transient stochastic response of quasi non-integerable hamiltonian system, Probab. Eng. Mech., 43 (2016), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.009

[8]

J. Biazar, P. Gholamin, K. Hosseini, Variational iteration method for solving Fokker-Planck equation, J. Franklin Inst., 347 (2010), 1137-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.04.007

[9]

S. Guo, F. Meng, Q. Shi, The generalized EPC method for the non-stationary probabilistic response of nonlinear dynamical system, Probab. Eng. Mech., 72 (2023), 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103420

[10]

S. Guo, Q. Shi, Z. Xu, Probabilistic solution for an MDOF hysteretic degrading system to modulated non-stationary excitations, Acta Mech., 234 (2023), 1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03435-9

[11]

W. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Huang, V. Rajic, Study on stationary probability density of a stochastic tumor-immune model with simulation by ANN algorithm, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 159 (2022), 112145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112145

[12]

Y. Xiao, L. Chen, Z. Duan, J. Sun, Y. Tang, An efficient method for solving high-dimension stationary FPK equation of strongly nonlinear systems under additive and/or multiplicative white noise, Probab. Eng. Mech., 77 (2024), 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2024.103668

[13]

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 378 (2019), 686-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

[14]

C. Rao, H. Sun, Y. Liu, Physics-informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled data, J. Eng. Mech., 147 (2021), 04021043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001947

[15]

Z. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Sun, Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce data, Nat. Commun., 12 (2021) 6136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26434-1

[16]

Y. Guan, W. Li, D. Huang, N. Gubeljak, A new LBFNN algorithm to solve FPK equations for stochastic dynamical systems under gaussian or non-gaussian excitation, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 173 (2023), 113641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113641

[17]

X. Wang, J. Jiang, L. Hong, J. Sun, Random vibration analysis with radial basis function neural networks, Int. J. Dyn. Control, 10 (2022), 1385-1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-021-00893-2

[18]

X. Wang, J. Jiang, L. Hong, J. Sun, Stochastic bifurcations and transient dynamics of probability responses with radial basis function neural networks, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 147 (2022), 104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.104244

[19]

W. Sun, J. Feng, J. Su, Y. Liang, Data driven adaptive gaussian mixture model for solving Fokker-Planck equation, Chaos, 32 (2022), 033131. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0083822

[20]

Y. Zhang, K. Yuen, Physically guided deep learning solver for time-dependent Fokker-Planck equation, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 147 (2022), 104202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.104202

[21]

Y. Xu, H. Zhang, Y. Li, K. Zhou, Q. Liu, J. Kurths, Solving Fokker-Planck equation using deep learning, Chaos, 30 (2020), 013133. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5132840

[22]

Y. Li, A data-driven method for the steady state of randomly perturbed dynamics, Commun. Math. Sci., 17 (2019), 1045-1059. https://doi.org/10.4310/cms.2019.v17.n4.a9

[23]

J. Zhai, M. Dobson, Y. Li, A deep learning method for solving fokker-planck equations, in Proceedings of the 2nd Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning Conference, (2022), 568-597.

[24]

B. B. Mandelbrot, J. W. Van Ness, Fractional brownian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev., 10 (1968), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.1137/1010093

[25]

T. E. Duncan, Y. Hu, B. Pasik-Duncan, Stochastic calculus for fractional brownian motion I, Theory, SIAM J. Control Optim., 38 (2000), 582-612. https://doi.org/10.1137/S036301299834171X

[26]

M. M. Vas’kovskii, Analog of the kolmogorov equations for one-dimensional stochastic differential equations controlled by fractional brownian motion with hurst exponent H ∈ (0, 1) , Differ. Equations, 58 (2022), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266122010025

[27]

F. Baudoin, L. Coutin, Operators associated with a stochastic differential equation driven by fractional brownian motions, Stochastic Processes Appl., 117 (2007), 550-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2006.09.004

[28]

M. Vaskouski, I. Kachan, Asymptotic expansions of solutions of stochastic differential equations driven by multivariate fractional brownian motions having hurst indices greater than 1/3, Stochastic Anal. Appl., 36 (2018), 909-931. https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2018.1483247

[29]

Y. Xu, B. Pei, J. Wu, Stochastic averaging principle for differential equations with non-lipschitz coefficients driven by fractional brownian motion, Stochastics Dyn., 17 (2017), 1750013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219493717500137

[30]

B. Pei, Y. Xu, J. Wu, Stochastic averaging for stochastic differential equations driven by fractional brownian motion and standard brownian motion, Appl. Math. Lett., 100 (2020) 106006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2019.106006

[31]

M. L. Deng, W. Q. Zhu, Stochastic averaging of quasi-non-integrable hamiltonian systems under fractional gaussian noise excitation, Nonlinear Dyn., 83 (2016), 1015-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2384-7

[32]

T. Eftekhari, J. Rashidinia, A novel and efficient operational matrix for solving nonlinear stochastic differential equations driven by multi-fractional Gaussian noise, Appl. Math. Comput., 429 (2022), 127218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127218

[33]

M. Kamrani, N. Jamshidi, Implicit euler approximation of stochastic evolution equations with fractional Brownian motion, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 44 (2017), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.07.023

[34]

L. Xu, Z. Li, J. Luo, Global attracting set and exponential decay of second-order neutral stochastic functional differential equations driven by fBm, Adv. Differ. Equations, 134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1186-2

[35]

G. Gripenberg, I. Norros, On the prediction of fractional Brownian motion, J. Appl. Probab., 33 (1996), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.2307/3215063

[36]

Y. Hu, X. Y. Zhou, Stochastic control for linear systems driven by fractional noises, SIAM J. Control Optim., 43 (2005), 2245-2277. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012903426045

[37]

L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, G. E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations, SIAM Rev., 63 (2021), 208-228. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1274067

[38]

C. Zeng, Y. Chen, Q. Yang, The fBm-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: Probability density function and anomalous diffusion, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 15 (2012), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13540-012-0034-z

[39]

A. V. Mikhajlovich, V. V. Ivanovich, Analysis of statistical characteristics of probability density distribution of the signal mixture and additive-multiplicative non-gaussian noise, in 2019 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics), (2019), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/Dynamics47113.2019.8944670

[40]

S. C. Q. Valente, R. D. C. L. Bruni, Z. G. Arenas, D. G. Barci, Effects of multiplicative noise in bistable dynamical systems, Entropy, 27 (2025), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27020155

[41]

G. Volpe, J. Wehr, Effective drifts in dynamical systems with multiplicative noise: A review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys., 79 (2016), 053901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/053901

PDF (3660KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉