Feeder-constrained co-located BESS sizing for grid-interactive EV fast-charging stations: Branch-loading relief, voltage support, and recharge deliverability
Thi-Minh-Chau Le , Tien-Khai Nguyen , Trong-Nghia Le
AIMS Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 1033 -1058.
Co-located battery energy storage (BESS) is often sized as a single power and energy rating for electric-vehicle fast-charging stations (EVCSs), although feeder adequacy is governed by different limits. This paper separated five requirements on a single backward/forward-sweep (BFS) model: branch-loading relief, residual voltage support, power conversion system (PCS) apparent-power capability, storage energy, and post-stress recharge. Active power was sized against branch-loading alone; voltage was then restored through unity-power-factor correction and local capacitive support. On the IEEE 33-bus benchmark, two placements and four demand levels produced a nominal branch-loading-relief requirement of 0 to 855.56 kW, yet three of eight cases required no active storage while remaining voltage-infeasible. Exhaustive enumeration of 720 processing orders yielded 0.07% to 96.69% sequential excess. Independent tests with two published current-limit parameterizations showed strong capacity-data dependence: a 275/120 A set left only two cases requiring 20.25 and 158.53 kW, whereas a multi-tier set admitted no current-feasible active-only solution. Unity-power-factor correction was insufficient in all eight nominal cases, leaving 114.77 to 879.94 kVAr of additional support and 0.32% to 96.17% conditional PCS headroom. For a 4-hour design duration, synchronous recharge ranged from the 4.43 h active-rating/efficiency floor to 31.19 h under voltage limitation, while branch-loading never bound. A single MW/MWh rating therefore cannot represent all five adequacy requirements.
electric vehicle fast-charging / battery energy storage-sizing / distribution feeder / backward/forward sweep power flow / recharge deliverability
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Arias NB, López JC, Hashemi S, |
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
IEEE (2018) IEEE standard for interconnection and interoperability of distributed energy resources with associated electric power systems interfaces. IEEE Std 1547-2018: 1-138. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8332112 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Wan Y, Gebbran D, |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
ANSI/NEMA (2025) Electric Power Systems and Equipment-Voltage Ratings (60 Hz). ANSI/NEMA C84.1-2020 (R2025). Available from: https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/nema/ansinemac842020r2025. |
| [25] |
IEEE (2023) IEEE standard for calculating the current-temperature relationship of bare overhead conductors. IEEE Std 738-2023 (Revision of IEEE Std 738-2012) : 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2023.10382442 |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
IEEE (2019) IEEE guide for design, operation, and maintenance of battery energy storage systems, both stationary and mobile, and applications integrated with electric power systems. IEEE Std 2030.2.1-2019 . https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8930450 |
| [30] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |