Feeder-constrained co-located BESS sizing for grid-interactive EV fast-charging stations: Branch-loading relief, voltage support, and recharge deliverability

Thi-Minh-Chau Le , Tien-Khai Nguyen , Trong-Nghia Le

AIMS Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 1033 -1058.

PDF (794KB)
AIMS Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) :1033 -1058. DOI: 10.3934/energy.2026042
Research article
research-article
Feeder-constrained co-located BESS sizing for grid-interactive EV fast-charging stations: Branch-loading relief, voltage support, and recharge deliverability
Author information +
History +
PDF (794KB)

Abstract

Co-located battery energy storage (BESS) is often sized as a single power and energy rating for electric-vehicle fast-charging stations (EVCSs), although feeder adequacy is governed by different limits. This paper separated five requirements on a single backward/forward-sweep (BFS) model: branch-loading relief, residual voltage support, power conversion system (PCS) apparent-power capability, storage energy, and post-stress recharge. Active power was sized against branch-loading alone; voltage was then restored through unity-power-factor correction and local capacitive support. On the IEEE 33-bus benchmark, two placements and four demand levels produced a nominal branch-loading-relief requirement of 0 to 855.56 kW, yet three of eight cases required no active storage while remaining voltage-infeasible. Exhaustive enumeration of 720 processing orders yielded 0.07% to 96.69% sequential excess. Independent tests with two published current-limit parameterizations showed strong capacity-data dependence: a 275/120 A set left only two cases requiring 20.25 and 158.53 kW, whereas a multi-tier set admitted no current-feasible active-only solution. Unity-power-factor correction was insufficient in all eight nominal cases, leaving 114.77 to 879.94 kVAr of additional support and 0.32% to 96.17% conditional PCS headroom. For a 4-hour design duration, synchronous recharge ranged from the 4.43 h active-rating/efficiency floor to 31.19 h under voltage limitation, while branch-loading never bound. A single MW/MWh rating therefore cannot represent all five adequacy requirements.

Keywords

electric vehicle fast-charging / battery energy storage-sizing / distribution feeder / backward/forward sweep power flow / recharge deliverability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Thi-Minh-Chau Le, Tien-Khai Nguyen, Trong-Nghia Le. Feeder-constrained co-located BESS sizing for grid-interactive EV fast-charging stations: Branch-loading relief, voltage support, and recharge deliverability. AIMS Energy, 2026, 14 (5) : 1033-1058 DOI:10.3934/energy.2026042

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kersting WH (2017) Distribution System Modeling and Analysis , 4th Ed., Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315120782

[2]

Acharige SSG, Haque ME, Arif MT, et al. (2025) Grid integration of electric vehicles: Impact assessment and remedial measures. J Power Sources 650: 236697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236697

[3]

Powell S, Cezar GV, Min L, et al. (2022) Charging infrastructure access and operation to reduce the grid impacts of deep electric vehicle adoption. Nat Energy 7: 932-945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01105-7

[4]

Karmaker AK, Prakash K, Siddique MNI, et al. (2024) Electric vehicle hosting capacity analysis: Challenges and solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 189: 113916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113916

[5]

Bi T, Mao B, Liu H (2025) A distributionally robust calculation method for distribution network EV hosting capacity considering charging demand. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 172: 111342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111342

[6]

He S, Zhao H, Mai W, et al. (2026) Public centralized ultra-fast charging stations: A grid and service performance analysis. Green Energy Intell Transp. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2026.100445

[7]

Unterluggauer T, Rich J, Andersen PB, et al. (2022) Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning for integrated transportation and power distribution networks: A review. eTransportation 12: 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2022.100163

[8]

Yao H, Xiang Y, Gu C, et al. (2025) Optimal planning of distribution systems and charging stations considering PV-Grid-EV transactions. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 16: 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3429371

[9]

Mishra S, Mondal A, Mondal S (2024) Charging station siting and sizing considering uncertainty in electric vehicle charging demand distribution. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 25: 12709-12721. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3384537

[10]

Le TMC, Nguyen TK, Le TN (2026) Grid-impact-aware planning of electric vehicle charging infrastructure for a tourism-intensive island grid using mixed-integer optimization and AC power flow assessment. IEEE Access 14: 119449-119466. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3718247

[11]

Na HS, Yoon S, Jo S, et al. (2026) A mixed integer quadratically constrained programming model for optimal deployment of capacitated fast-charging stations for electric vehicles: A Bayesian optimization approach. Optim Eng. In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-026-10099-0

[12]

Argiolas L, Stecca M, Ramirez-Elizondo LM, et al. (2022) Optimal battery energy storage dispatch in energy and frequency regulation markets while peak shaving an EV fast charging station. IEEE Open Access J Power Energy 9: 374-385. https://doi.org/10.1109/OAJPE.2022.3198553

[13]

Arias NB, López JC, Hashemi S, et al. (2021) Multi-objective sizing of battery energy storage systems for stackable grid applications. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 12: 2708-2721. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2020.3042186

[14]

Ray S, Kasturi K, Nayak MR (2025) Multi-objective electric vehicle charge scheduling for photovoltaic and battery energy storage based electric vehicle charging stations in distribution network. Green Energy Intell Transp 4: 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2025.100296

[15]

IEEE (2018) IEEE standard for interconnection and interoperability of distributed energy resources with associated electric power systems interfaces. IEEE Std 1547-2018: 1-138. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2018.8332112

[16]

Liang Z, Qian T, Korkali M, et al. (2024) A vehicle-to-grid planning framework incorporating electric vehicle user equilibrium and distribution network flexibility enhancement. Appl Energy 376: 124231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124231

[17]

Giraldo JS, Arias NB, Vergara PP, et al. (2023) Estimating risk-aware flexibility areas for electric vehicle charging pools via AC stochastic optimal power flow. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 11: 1247-1256. https://doi.org/10.35833/MPCE.2022.000452

[18]

Wan Y, Wang N, Liu X, et al. (2025) Inertia-emulation-based fast frequency response from EVs: A multi-level framework with game-theoretic incentives and DRL. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 16: 5353-5364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2025.3603258

[19]

Wan Y, Gebbran D, Subroto RK, et al. (2024) Optimal day-ahead scheduling of fast EV charging station with multi-stage battery degradation model. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 39: 872-883. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2023.3335661

[20]

Jo S, Yoon S, Na HS, et al. (2026) Multi-period large-scale electric vehicle charging station deployment under latent charging demand: A Bayesian optimization-based large neighborhood search approach. Expert Syst Appl 323: 132054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132050

[21]

Wan Y, Wang N, Du E, et al. (2025) Coordinated operation of alternative fuel vehicle-integrated microgrid in a coupled power-transportation network: A Stackelberg-Nash game framework. Appl Energy 401: 126800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126800

[22]

Baran ME, Wu FF (1989) Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 4: 1401-1407. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.25627

[23]

Das D, Kothari DP, Kalam A (1995) Simple and efficient method for load flow solution of radial distribution networks. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 17: 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-0615(95)00050-0

[24]

ANSI/NEMA (2025) Electric Power Systems and Equipment-Voltage Ratings (60 Hz). ANSI/NEMA C84.1-2020 (R2025). Available from: https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/nema/ansinemac842020r2025.

[25]

IEEE (2023) IEEE standard for calculating the current-temperature relationship of bare overhead conductors. IEEE Std 738-2023 (Revision of IEEE Std 738-2012) : 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2023.10382442

[26]

Tercan SM, Elma O, Gokalp E, et al. (2022) An expansion planning method for extending distributed energy system lifespan with energy storage systems. Energy Explor Exploit 40: 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987211058304

[27]

Sosnowski R, Baszyński M, Konstantinou C (2024) An MDP-based approach for distribution system control with PV generation and battery storage. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm): 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm60555.2024.10738110

[28]

Rene EA, Tounsi Fokui WS, Nembou Kouonchie PK (2023) Optimal allocation of plug-in electric vehicle charging stations in the distribution network with distributed generation. Green Energy Intell Transp 2: 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2023.100094

[29]

IEEE (2019) IEEE guide for design, operation, and maintenance of battery energy storage systems, both stationary and mobile, and applications integrated with electric power systems. IEEE Std 2030.2.1-2019 . https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8930450

[30]

Khedar KK, Goyal GR, Singh P, et al. (2025) Business model & load profile for commercial EV charging stations. AIMS Energy 13: 1518-1537. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2025056

PDF (794KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉