Methanol-gasoline blends in spark-ignition engines: A review of research progress and application prospects
Zewei Hao , Danfeng Du , Xiangnan Bu , Zexin Liu , Chaowei Sun , Xiurong Guo
AIMS Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 834 -873.
Spark-ignition engines remain widely used in passenger cars, motorcycles, hybrid vehicles, and light-duty transport, making fuel flexibility and emission reduction important during the transition to low-carbon mobility. Methanol-gasoline blends have attracted attention as alternative fuels because methanol has high oxygen content, high octane quality, strong charge-cooling capacity, and flexible production routes. This review summarizes recent progress in methanol-gasoline blends for spark-ignition engines, covering fuel properties, blending ratios, combustion behavior, engine performance, regulated and unregulated emissions, life-cycle impacts, and application prospects. The literature shows that methanol addition can enhance knock resistance, promote oxygenated combustion, reduce soot-forming tendency, and support higher compression ratios, optimized ignition timing, and lean-burn operation. However, its lower energy density increases fuel consumption, while water affinity, phase separation, cold-start difficulty, corrosion, and material compatibility remain key barriers. Emission responses are strongly condition-dependent. CO and particulate emissions are often reduced, whereas HC and NOx vary with operating condition, mixture preparation, injection strategy, and after-treatment performance. Formaldehyde, unburned methanol, and cold-start oxygenated emissions require further attention. Life-cycle benefits depend mainly on methanol production pathways. Low-level blends are more suitable for near-term use in existing engines, while higher blends require optimized engines, compatible fuel systems, green methanol supply, infrastructure readiness, and cost reduction.
methanol-gasoline blends / spark-ignition engines / alternative fuels / methanol blending ratio / combustion behavior / exhaust emissions
| [1] |
Srikrishnan G, Shenbagamuthuraman V, Agbulut Ü, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Zhang Z, |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Agarwal A, Yadav O, Valera H (2024) Methanol (M85) port fuel-injected spark ignition motorcycle engine development-Part 1: Combustion optimization for efficiency improvement and emission reduction. SAE Int J Engines 17: 321-340. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-03-0018 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Mokhtar, |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Agarwal A, Yadav O, Valera H (2024) Methanol (M85) port-fuel-injected spark ignition motorcycle engine development-Part 2: Dynamic performance, transient emissions, and catalytic converter effectiveness. SAE Int J Engines 17: 341-353. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-03-0019 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Müller M, Mishra RK, |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
Marwaha A, Subramanian KA (2025) Control of regulated and unregulated emissions of an automotive spark ignition engine with alternative fuels (methanol, ethanol and hydrogen). Meas Energy 5: 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100039 |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
Aramco, Methanol Institute. (2024) Accelerating the net-zero transition: Assessing potentials of e-fuels in China’s road transport. Available from: https://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/AramcoMI-Joint-Report-Final.pdf. |
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
De Felice G, Eichkorn S, Gallucci F, |
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
Transportation Energy Institute (2024) E-fuels: Evaluating the viability of commercially deploying e-fuels in road transport. Available from: https://www.transportationenergy.org/research/reports/e-fuels-evaluating-the-viability-of-commercially-deploying-e-fuels-in-road-transport/. |
| [119] |
BloombergNEF, Climate Technology Coalition (2024) Scaling up hydrogen: The case for low-carbon methanol. Available from: https://assets.bbhub.io/media/sites/25/2024/06/BNEF-Methanol-Report_to-publish.pdf. |
| [120] |
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) Gasoline and diesel fuel update. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel. |
| [121] |
Methanex Corporation (2026) Methanol pricing: Regional posted contract prices. Available from: https://www.methanex.com/our-products/about-methanol/pricing. |
| [122] |
Alternative Fuels Data Center (2024) Fuel properties comparison chart. U.S. Department of Energy. Available from: https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/fuel_comparison_chart.pdf. |
| [123] |
Mission Green Fuels (2024) Roadmap for green fuels in transport and industry. Available from: https://missiongreenfuels.dk/roadmap-for-green-fuels/. |
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
Xi D, Chen S, Xiao G, |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |