The pRNA-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS): a generalizable scaffold-based approach to facilitate cryo-EM structure determination of small RNAs

Seth Scott , Nikolai Prokhorov , Wei Zhao , Paul J. Jardine , Marc C. Morais , Kyung H. Choi

AIMS Biophysics ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 287−301

PDF (974KB)
AIMS Biophysics ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) :287−301 DOI: 10.3934/biophy.2026017
Research article
research-article
The pRNA-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS): a generalizable scaffold-based approach to facilitate cryo-EM structure determination of small RNAs
Author information +
History +
PDF (974KB)

Abstract

RNA performs diverse biological functions that are often encoded in its three-dimensional structure. However, RNA-only structures represent a small fraction (~1%) of entries in the Protein Data Bank (wwPDB), limiting our knowledge of RNA structure–function relationships. The ribose-phosphate backbone of RNA is relatively flexible compared to proteins and typically forms weaker long-range tertiary interactions, resulting in structures that are less amenable to X-ray crystallography than folded proteins. Further, many functional RNAs range from 50 to 200 nt in size and are often too small for structure determination by cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM). To facilitate RNA structure determination by cryo-EM, we present the procapsid RNA (pRNA)-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS). In this approach, the RNA of interest is fused to the pRNA of bacteriophage Φ29 to enhance stability and reduce sample heterogeneity. The pRNA-linked RNA is then assembled onto the Φ29 procapsid to form a stable pentameric complex. This approach increases effective molecular mass, improves signal-to-noise ratio, and facilitates particle picking and alignments during cryo-EM imaging processing. Using pARIS, we determined a 4.8 Å structure of a 70 nt (~23 kDa) tRNA as proof of principle and a 6.7 Å structure of the liver-specific host microRNA-122 bound to its target site in the hepatitis C virus genome, demonstrating applicability to biologically relevant RNA targets.

Keywords

cryogenic electron microscopy / cryo-EM / RNA structure / RNA scaffold / bacteriophage Φ29 / pRNA / pRNA scaffold / tRNA / HCV 5’ UTR / miR-122

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Seth Scott, Nikolai Prokhorov, Wei Zhao, Paul J. Jardine, Marc C. Morais, Kyung H. Choi. The pRNA-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS): a generalizable scaffold-based approach to facilitate cryo-EM structure determination of small RNAs. AIMS Biophysics, 2026, 13 (3) : 287−301 DOI:10.3934/biophy.2026017

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, et al. (2005) The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309: 1559-1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112014

[2]

Cheng J, Kapranov P, Drenkow J, et al. (2005) Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution. Science 308: 1149-1154. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108625

[3]

Kapranov P, Cawley SE, Drenkow J, et al. (2002) Large-scale transcriptional activity in chromosomes 21 and 22. Science 296: 916-919. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068597

[4]

Lorenzi L, Chiu HS, Avila Cobos F, et al. (2021) The RNA Atlas expands the catalog of human non-coding RNAs. Nat Biotechnol 39: 1453-1465. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00936-1

[5]

Pertea M, Shumate A, Pertea G, et al. (2018) CHESS: a new human gene catalog curated from thousands of large-scale RNA sequencing experiments reveals extensive transcriptional noise. Genome Biol 19: 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1590-2

[6]

Cech TR (2012) The RNA worlds in context. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a006742. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006742

[7]

Cech TR, Steitz JA (2014) The noncoding RNA revolution-trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell 157: 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008

[8]

Miao Z, Westhof E (2017) RNA Structure: Advances and assessment of 3D structure prediction. Annu Rev Biophys 46: 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-034125

[9]

van Rooij E, Kauppinen S (2014) Development of microRNA therapeutics is coming of age. EMBO Mol Med 6: 851-864. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201100899

[10]

Ma H, Jia X, Zhang K, et al. (2022) Cryo-EM advances in RNA structure determination. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7: 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00916-0

[11]

Jackson RW, Smathers CM, Robart AR (2023) General strategies for RNA X-ray crystallography. Molecules 28: 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052111

[12]

Lee E, Bujalowski PJ, Teramoto T, et al. (2021) Structures of flavivirus RNA promoters suggest two binding modes with NS5 polymerase. Nat Commun 12: 2530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22846-1

[13]

Pujari N, Saundh SL, Acquah FA, et al. (2021) Engineering crystal packing in RNA structures I: Past and future strategies for engineering RNA packing in crystals. Crystals (Basel) 11: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080952

[14]

Gottipati K, McNeme SC, Tipo J, et al. (2023) Structural basis for cloverleaf RNA-initiated viral genome replication. Nucleic Acids Res 51: 8850-8863. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad618

[15]

Tipo J, Gottipati K, Slaton M, et al. (2024) Structure of HIV-1 RRE stem-loop II identifies two conformational states of the high-affinity Rev binding site. Nat Commun 15: 4198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48162-y

[16]

Cao S, Saha M, Zhao W, et al. (2014) Insights into the structure and assembly of the bacteriophage 29 double-stranded DNA packaging motor. J Virol 88: 3986-3996. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03203-13

[17]

Hill AC, Bartley LE, Schroeder SJ (2016) Prohead RNA: a noncoding viral RNA of novel structure and function. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 7: 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1330

[18]

Simpson AA, Tao Y, Leiman PG, et al. (2000) Structure of the bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor. Nature 408: 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1038/35047129

[19]

Morais MC, Koti JS, Bowman VD, et al. (2008) Defining molecular and domain boundaries in the bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor. Structure 16: 1267-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.05.010

[20]

Woodson M, Pajak J, Mahler BP, et al. (2021) A viral genome packaging motor transitions between cyclic and helical symmetry to translocate dsDNA. Sci Adv 7: eabc1955. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1955

[21]

Ding F, Lu C, Zhao W, et al. (2011) Structure and assembly of the essential RNA ring component of a viral DNA packaging motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 7357-7362. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016690108

[22]

Zhang C, Trottier M, Guo P (1995) Circularly permuted viral pRNA active and specific in the packaging of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA. Virology 207: 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1006/VIRO.1995.1103

[23]

Grimes S, Anderson D (1997) The bacteriophage phi29 packaging proteins supercoil the DNA ends. J Mol Biol 266: 901-914. https://doi.org/10.1006/JMBI.1996.0843

[24]

Zhao W, Morais MC, Anderson DL, et al. (2008) Role of the CCA bulge of prohead RNA of bacteriophage o29 in DNA packaging. J Mol Biol 383: 520-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.056

[25]

Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, et al. (2017) cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat Methods 14: 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4169

[26]

Sanchez-Garcia R, Gomez-Blanco J, Cuervo A, et al. (2021) DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun Biol 4: 874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1

[27]

Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, et al. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 486-501. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444910007493

[28]

Morais MC (2012) The dsDNA packaging motor in bacteriophage o29, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Boston: Springer, 511-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_23

[29]

Wichitwechkarn J, Bailey S, Bodley JW, et al. (1989) Prohead RNA of bacteriophage phi 29: size, stoichiometry and biological activity. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 3459-3468. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.9.3459

[30]

Henke JI, Goergen D, Zheng J, et al. (2008) microRNA-122 stimulates translation of hepatitis C virus RNA. EMBO J 27: 3300-3310. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.244

[31]

Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, et al. (2005) Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific microRNA. Science 309: 1577-1581. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113329

[32]

Li Y, Yamane D, Masaki T, et al. (2015) The yin and yang of hepatitis C: synthesis and decay of hepatitis C virus RNA. Nat Rev Microbiol 13: 544-558. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3506

[33]

Scott S, Li Y, Bermek O, et al. (2023) Binding of microRNA-122 to the hepatitis C virus 5' untranslated region modifies interactions with poly(C) binding protein 2 and the NS5B viral polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 51: 12397-12413. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1000

[34]

Chahal J, Gebert LFR, Gan HH, et al. (2019) miR-122 and ago interactions with the HCV genome alter the structure of the viral 5' terminus. Nucleic Acids Res 47: 5307-5324. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz194

[35]

Schult P, Roth H, Adams RL, et al. (2018) microRNA-122 amplifies hepatitis C virus translation by shaping the structure of the internal ribosomal entry site. Nat Commun 9: 2613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05053-3

[36]

Gebert LFR, Law M, MacRae IJ (2021) A structured RNA motif locks Argonaute2:miR-122 onto the 5' end of the HCV genome. Nat Commun 12: 6836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27177-9

[37]

Damas ND, Fossat N, Scheel TKH (2019) Functional interplay between RNA viruses and nnon-coding RNA in mammals. Noncoding RNA 5: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna5010007

[38]

Guo S, Tschammer N, Mohammed S, et al. (2005) Specific delivery of therapeutic RNAs to cancer cells via the dimerization mechanism of phi29 motor pRNA. Hum Gene Ther 16: 1097-1110. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2005.16.1097

[39]

Hao Y, Kieft JS (2014) Diverse self-association properties within a family of phage packaging RNAs. RNA 20: 1759-1774. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.045948.114

[40]

Li H, Zhang K, Pi F, et al. (2016) Controllable self-assembly of RNA tetrahedrons with precise shape and size for cancer targeting. Adv Mater 28: 7501-7507. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601976

[41]

Haack DB, Rudolfs B, Jin S, et al. (2025) Scaffold-enabled high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination of RNA. Nat Commun 16: 880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55699-5

[42]

Jones CP, Ferre-D'Amare AR (2026) Scaffolds with optimized quaternary symmetry for de novo cryoEM structure determination of small RNAs. Nat Methods 23: 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-026-03016-x

[43]

Langeberg CJ, Kieft JS (2023) A generalizable scaffold-based approach for structure determination of RNAs by cryo-EM. Nucleic Acids Res 51: e100. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad784

PDF (974KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉