The pRNA-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS): a generalizable scaffold-based approach to facilitate cryo-EM structure determination of small RNAs
Seth Scott , Nikolai Prokhorov , Wei Zhao , Paul J. Jardine , Marc C. Morais , Kyung H. Choi
AIMS Biophysics ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 287−301
RNA performs diverse biological functions that are often encoded in its three-dimensional structure. However, RNA-only structures represent a small fraction (~1%) of entries in the Protein Data Bank (wwPDB), limiting our knowledge of RNA structure–function relationships. The ribose-phosphate backbone of RNA is relatively flexible compared to proteins and typically forms weaker long-range tertiary interactions, resulting in structures that are less amenable to X-ray crystallography than folded proteins. Further, many functional RNAs range from 50 to 200 nt in size and are often too small for structure determination by cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM). To facilitate RNA structure determination by cryo-EM, we present the procapsid RNA (pRNA)-assisted RNA imaging scheme (pARIS). In this approach, the RNA of interest is fused to the pRNA of bacteriophage Φ29 to enhance stability and reduce sample heterogeneity. The pRNA-linked RNA is then assembled onto the Φ29 procapsid to form a stable pentameric complex. This approach increases effective molecular mass, improves signal-to-noise ratio, and facilitates particle picking and alignments during cryo-EM imaging processing. Using pARIS, we determined a 4.8 Å structure of a 70 nt (~23 kDa) tRNA as proof of principle and a 6.7 Å structure of the liver-specific host microRNA-122 bound to its target site in the hepatitis C virus genome, demonstrating applicability to biologically relevant RNA targets.
cryogenic electron microscopy / cryo-EM / RNA structure / RNA scaffold / bacteriophage Φ29 / pRNA / pRNA scaffold / tRNA / HCV 5’ UTR / miR-122
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Gottipati K, |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Emsley P, Lohkamp B, |
| [28] |
Morais MC (2012) The dsDNA packaging motor in bacteriophage o29, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Boston: Springer, 511-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_23 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Schult P, Roth H, |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |