Microproteins: How DNA’s dark matter is reshaping the drugs of the future

Giovanni Colonna , Domenico Aprile

AIMS Biophysics ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 225 -230.

PDF (368KB)
AIMS Biophysics ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) :225 -230. DOI: 10.3934/biophy.2026014
Editorial
research-article
Microproteins: How DNA’s dark matter is reshaping the drugs of the future
Author information +
History +
PDF (368KB)

Abstract

Approximately 1000 to 4000 genes that encode small proteins (less than 100 amino acids) are still officially uncataloged in the human proteome. These sequences, often called smORFs (small open reading frames), have eluded identification for decades, which has relegated them to the simple category of “noncoding RNA” [1]. These sequences have eluded identification for three main reasons: 1. Arbitrary criteria: Historically, bioinformaticians have set a minimum threshold of 100 amino acids to exclude genetic “noise”. 2. Technical difficulties: Small proteins degrade rapidly and are difficult to detect using standard mass spectrometry. 3. Misclassification: Many are hidden within regions previously classified as “noncoding RNA” (ncRNA) or in segments overlapping with other genes. Today, we know that this “genetic noise” hides precision regulators critical to molecular biology, development, and metabolism [2]. Integrating polymer physics (physical-chemical properties) and deep learning (AlphaFold) is one of the few ways to scale up the study of the 1000−4000 missing microproteins. Without these models, we would have to study them one by one with crystallography, which would take centuries.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Giovanni Colonna, Domenico Aprile. Microproteins: How DNA’s dark matter is reshaping the drugs of the future. AIMS Biophysics, 2026, 13 (2) : 225-230 DOI:10.3934/biophy.2026014

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Deutsch E W, Lindskog C, Budnik B, et al. (2026) The 2025 report on the human proteome from the HUPO human proteome project. J Proteome Res 25: 539-555. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00759

[2]

Ko S H, Cho B L, Shin D (2025) Microproteins in metabolic biology: emerging functions and potential roles as nutrient-linked biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 26: 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411883

[3]

Mohsen JJ, Martel AA, Slavoff SA (2023) Microproteins-Discovery, structure, and function. Proteomics 23: 2100211. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202100211

[4]

AlQuraishi M, Sorger PK (2021) Differentiable biology: using deep learning for biophysics-based and data-driven modeling of molecular mechanisms. Nat Methods 18: 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01283-4

[5]

Miller B, de Souza EV, Pai VJ, et al. (2025) ShortStop: a machine learning framework for microprotein discovery. BMC Methods 2: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44330-025-00037-4

[6]

Khoroshkin M, Buyan A, Dodel M, et al. (2024) Systematic identification of post-transcriptional regulatory modules. Nat Commun 15: 7872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52215-7

[7]

Porozova NO, Petukhova NV, Gureev MA, et al. (2025) Beyond monoclonal antibodies: constraints and the case for alternative PD-1/PD-L1-targeting formats. Front Immunol 16: 1729468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1729468

[8]

Du E, Tang X, Zhang W, et al. (2025) Emerging mechanically interlocked cages. Nat Rev Chem 9: 506-522. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-025-00721-7

[9]

Baumgart M, Röpke M, Mühlbauer ME, et al. (2021). Design of buried charged networks in artificial proteins. Nat Commun 12: 1895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21909-7

[10]

Perez-Riverol, Y (2022) Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages. Expert Rev Proteomic 19: 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2022.2160324

PDF (368KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉