Reimagining beef: Consumer attitudes and acceptance of upcycled animal feed

Abstract

Increasing environmental and ethical concerns are driving the transition toward more sustainable livestock production systems. However, consumer acceptance remains a critical and underexplored bottleneck, particularly for beef from animals fed agro-industrial by-products. In this context, we investigated Italian consumer attitudes and acceptance of beef derived from cattle fed hazelnut skins (HSs), a by-product of the hazelnut processing industry classified as waste under EU regulation, representing a novel circular economy application. An online survey (CAWI) was administered to 900 Italian beef consumers in 2023. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified five attitudinal patterns: Conscious and Confident, Food Neophilic, Environmentally Concerned, Animal Nutrition Concerned, and Food Neophobic. K-means cluster analysis on PCA scores yielded five consumer segments, characterized by socio-demographic variables and attitudes toward novel foods. Age and sensitivity to sustainability significantly predicted acceptance of HS-fed beef. The Informed, Curious, and Concerned segment (24%) reported the highest acceptability (mean = 5.58/7) and environmental sustainability scores (mean = 5.83/7). The Informed Meat-Eaters segment (14.2%) showed the strongest health benefit perceptions (mean = 5.13/7). Older consumers, concentrated on the Sustainable and Selective cluster, showed more moderate acceptance, moderated by food neophobia. We are some of the first to examine consumer segmentation in the context of beef from farms fed with by-products in Italy. Our findings provide actionable guidance for differentiated communication strategies across consumer segments and inform policymakers on promoting circular food systems.

Keywords

alternative feed / consumer segmentation / food industrial by-product / sustainable beef / food neophobia

References

[1] Mehrabi Z, Delzeit R, Ignaciuk A, et al. (2022) Research priorities for global food security under extreme events. One Earth 5: 756-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.008

[2] Komarek AM, Dunston S, Enahoro D, et al. (2021) Income, consumer preferences, and the future of livestock-derived food demand. Glob Environ Change 70: 102343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102343

[3] Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) (2025) EU beef market update: Lower demand weighs on prices despite lower production. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. Available from: https://ahdb.org.uk/news/eu-beef-market-update-lower-demand-weighs-on-prices-despite-lower-production.

[4] EC (2025) EU agricultural outlook for markets, 2023-2035. European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels. Available from: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/markets/outlook/medium-term_en.

[5] Gerber PJ, Mottet A, Opio CI, et al. (2015) Environmental impacts of beef production: Review of challenges and perspectives for durability. Meat Sci 109: 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.013

[6] Hocquette JF, Ellies-Oury MP, Lherm M, et al. (2018) Current situation and future prospects for beef production in Europe-A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 31: 1017-1035. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0196

[7] Greenwood PL (2021) An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Animal 15: 100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295

[8] Parlasca MC, Qaim M (2022) Meat consumption and sustainability. Annu Rev Resour Econ 14: 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340

[9] Hilborn R, Banobi J, Hall SJ, et al. (2018) The environmental cost of animal source foods. Front Ecol Environ 16: 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1822

[10] Pinotti L, Luciano A, Ottoboni M, et al. (2021) Recycling food leftovers in feed as opportunity to increase the sustainability of livestock production. J Clean Prod 294: 126290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126290

[11] Pinotti L, Mazzoleni S, Moradei A, et al. (2023) Effects of alternative feed ingredients on red meat quality: A review of algae, insects, agro-industrial by-products and former food products. Ital J Anim Sci 22: 695-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2023.2238784

[12] Khanal P (2024) Use of land-based and aquatic alternative feed resources to establish a circular economy within livestock production. J Agric Food Res 9: 101087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101087

[13] Rațu RN, Veleșcu ID, Stoica F, et al. (2023) Application of agri-food by-products in the food industry. Agriculture 13: 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081559

[14] Davison N, Christodoulou C, Humphries D, et al. (2026) Environmental and economic impacts of using brewers spent grains for animal feed and anaerobic digestion. J Cleaner Prod 538: 147365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147365

[15] Giannico F, Petrontino A, Bozzo F, et al. (2025) Grape pomace in diets for Podolian and crossbred young bulls: effects on growth performance, meat quality, and economic analysis of meat production. Front Anim Sci 6: 1547585.

[16] Molina-Alcaide E, Yáñez-Ruiz DR (2008) Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147: 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.021

[17] Arthington JD, Kunkle WE, Martin AM (2002) Citrus pulp for cattle. Vet Clin: Food Anim Pract 18: 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00023-3

[18] Mota-Gutierrez J, Merlino VM, Massaglia S, et al. (2025) Consumers' attitudes, perceptions and willingness to try hazelnut skins-fed beef. Meat Sci 219: 109687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109687

[19] Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1017 of 15 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1017/oj.

[20] Grossi S, Massa V, Giorgino A, et al. (2022) Feeding bakery former foodstuffs and wheat distiller’s as partial replacement for corn and soybean enhances the environmental sustainability and circularity of beef cattle farming. Sustainability 14: 4908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094908

[21] Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/2283/oj.

[22] Renna M, Lussiana C, Malfatto V, et al. (2020) Evaluating the suitability of hazelnut skin as a feed ingredient in the diet of dairy cows. Animals 10: 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091653

[23] Campione A, Natalello A, Valenti B, et al. (2020) Effect of feeding hazelnut skin on animal performance, milk quality, and rumen fatty acids in lactating ewes. Animals 10: 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040588

[24] Bolletta V, Menci R, Valenti B, et al. (2024) Feeding pigs with hazelnut skin and addition of a concentrated phenolic extract from olive-milling wastewaters during pork processing: Effects on salami quality traits and acceptance by the consumers. Meat Sci 213: 109479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109479

[25] Musati M, Frutos P, Bertino A, et al. (2024) Dietary combination of linseed and hazelnut skin as a sustainable strategy to enrich lamb with health promoting fatty acids. Sci Rep 14: 10133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60303-3

[26] Angón E, Requena F, Caballero-Villalobos J, et al. (2021) Beef from calves finished with a diet based on concentrate rich in agro-industrial by-products: Acceptability and quality label preferences in Spanish meat consumers. Animals 12: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010006

[27] Aguado-González L, Sierra-Pérez J, Forte C, et al. (2025) Cascade valorization of hazelnut industry by-products for industrial use through co-creative processes. J Clean Prod 494: 144989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144989

[28] Siegrist M, Hartmann C (2020) Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nat Food 1: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x

[29] Krystallis A, Grunert KG, de Barcellos, et al. (2012) Consumer attitudes towards sustainability aspects of food production: Insights from three continents. J Mark Manage 28: 334-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.658836

[30] De Koning W, Dean D, Vriesekoop F, et al. (2020) Drivers and inhibitors in the acceptance of meat alternatives: The case of plant and insect-based proteins. Foods 9: 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091292

[31] van Huis A, Rumpold B (2023) Strategies to convince consumers to eat insects? A review. Food Qual Prefer 110: 104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104927

[32] Rehman N, Ogrinc N (2024) Consumer perceptions and acceptance of edible insects in Slovenia. Foods 13: 2629 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162629

[33] Gohara-Beirigo AK, Matsudo MC, Cezare-Gomes EA, et al. (2022) Microalgae trends toward functional staple food incorporation: Sustainable alternative for human health improvement. Trends Food Sci Technol 125: 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.030

[34] Hosseinkhani N, McCauley JI, Ralph PJ (2022) Key challenges for the commercial expansion of ingredients from algae into human food products. Algal Res 64: 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2022.102696

[35] Tan HSG, Fischer AR, Tinchan P, et al. (2015) Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Qual Prefer 42: 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013

[36] Grahl S, Strack M, Mensching A, et al. (2020) Alternative protein sources in Western diets: Food product development and consumer acceptance of spirulina-filled pasta. Food Qual Prefer 84: 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103933

[37] Nanda PK, Das AK, Dandapat P, et al. (2021) Nutritional aspects, flavour profile and health benefits of crab meat-based novel food products and valorisation of processing waste to wealth: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol 112: 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.059

[38] Matos ÂP, Novelli E, Tribuzi G (2022) Use of algae as food ingredient: Sensory acceptance and commercial products. Front Food Sci Technol 2: 989801. https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2022.989801

[39] Weinrich R, Busch G (2021) Consumer knowledge about protein sources and consumers' openness to feeding micro-algae and insects to pigs and poultry. Future Foods 4: 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100100

[40] Diaz Vicuna E, Srikanthithasan K, Odore R, et al. (2024) Influence of age, gender, and willingness to adopt former foodstuffs on the perception of Italian farm animal veterinarians. Front Vet Sci 11: 1396807. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1396807

[41] Beghin JC, Gustafson CR (2021) Consumer valuation of and attitudes towards novel foods produced with new plant engineering techniques: A review. Sustainability 13: 11348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011348

[42] Ma CC, Chang HP (2022) The effect of novel and environmentally friendly foods on consumer attitude and behavior: A value-attitude-behavioral model. Foods 11: 2423. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162423

[43] Van Nerom S, Van Immerseel F, Robbens J, et al. (2025) Consumer perception and willingness to purchase chicken meat from algae-fed broilers: A survey in Flanders (Belgium). Phycology 5: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5030033

[44] Dagevos H (2021) A literature review of consumer research on edible insects: Recent evidence and new vistas from 2019 studies. J Insects Food Feed 7: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0052

[45] Siddiqui SA, Zannou O, Karim I, et al. (2022) Avoiding food neophobia and increasing consumer acceptance of new food trends-A decade of research. Sustainability 14: 10391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610391

[46] Laureati M, De Boni A, Saba A, et al. (2024) Determinants of consumers' acceptance and adoption of novel food in view of more resilient and sustainable food systems in the EU: A systematic literature review. Foods 13: 1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101534

[47] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

[48] ISTAT (2023) Available from: https://demo.istat.it/app/?i=POS&l=it.

[49] Olaussen C, Jelsness-Jørgensen LP, Tvedt CR, et al. (2021) Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey. Nurs Open 8: 1254-1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.742

[50] Sprague-Jones J, Bash K, Singh P, et al. (2023) The Spanish protective factors survey: Initial translation and preliminary validation. Child Youth Serv Rev 155: 107204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107204

[51] Mehta A,Serventi L,Kumar L, et al. (2024) Packaging, perception, and acceptability: A comprehensive exploration of extrinsic attributes and consumer behaviours in novel food product systems. Int J Food Sci Technol 59: 6725-6745. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16694

[52] Xu Z, Wu N, Chan SW (2024) How do socio-demographic factors, health status, and knowledge influence the acceptability of probiotics products in Hong Kong? Foods 13: 2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182971

[53] Pliner P, Hobden K (1992) Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 19: 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-W

[54] Rabadán A, Bernabéu R (2021) A systematic review of studies using the Food Neophobia Scale: Conclusions from thirty years of studies. Food Qual Prefer 93: 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104241

[55] Altintzoglou T, Honkanen P, Whitaker RD (2021) Influence of the involvement in food waste reduction on attitudes towards sustainable products containing seafood by-products. J Clean Prod 285: 125487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125487

[56] Escobedo del Bosque CI, Spiller A, Risius A (2021) Who wants chicken? Uncovering consumer preferences for produce of alternative chicken product methods. Sustainability 13: 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052440

[57] Merlino VM, Baima L, Costamagna C, et al. (2025) Evaluating consumer acceptance of technological advancements in sustainable agriculture. Appl Food Res 5: 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.101362

[58] Martins OM, Bucea-Manea-Țoniș R, Coelho AS, et al. (2022) Sensory perception nudge: Insect-based food consumer behavior. Sustainability 14: 11541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811541

[59] Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H (1999) Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 33: 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0232

[60] Verbeke W, Sioen I, Pieniak Z, et al. (2005) Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Public Health Nutr 8: 422-429. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2004697

[61] Lin-Schilstra L, Fischer AR (2022) Paradoxical consumers in four European countries: Meat-eating justification and willingness to pay for meat from animals treated by alternatives to surgical castration. Meat Sci 188: 108777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108777

[62] Melios S, Gkatzionis K, Liu J, et al. (2025) Potential cultured meat consumers in Greece: Attitudes, motives, and attributes shaping perceptions. Future Foods 11: 100538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100538

[63] Possidónio C, Prada M, Graça J, et al. (2021) Consumer perceptions of conventional and alternative protein sources: A mixed-methods approach with meal and product framing. Appetite 156: 104860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104860

[64] Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, et al. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31: 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

[65] Merlino VM, Renna M, Tarantola M, et al. (2025) "Home is where the cheese is": Consumption, preferences and future perspectives of cheese marketing strategies in Portugal. AIMS Agric Food 10: 719-743. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2025037

[66] Merlino VM, Renna M, Nery J, et al. (2022) Are local dairy products better? Using principal component analysis to investigate consumers' perception towards quality, sustainability, and market availability. Animals 12: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111421

[67] Jürkenbeck K, Spiller A, Meyerding SG (2020) Tomato attributes and consumer preferences-A consumer segmentation approach. Br Food J 122: 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2018-0628

[68] Alam MW, Kumar JV, Awad M, et al. (2025) Emerging trends in food process engineering: integrating sensing technologies for health, sustainability, and consumer preferences. J Food Process Eng 48: 70035. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70035

[69] Sheth J (2021) New areas of research in marketing strategy, consumer behavior, and marketing analytics: The future is bright. J Mark Theory Pract 29: 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860679

[70] Musova Z, Musa H, Drugdova J, et al. (2021) Consumer attitudes towards new circular models in the fashion industry. J Compet 13: 111-128. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.03.07

[71] Bryant C, Sanctorum H (2021) Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite 161: 105161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161

[72] Nica E, Sabie OM, Mascu S, Luţan AG (2022) Artificial intelligence decision-making in shopping patterns: Consumer values, cognition, and attitudes. Econ Manag Financ Mark 17: 31-43. https://doi.org/10.22381/emfm17120222

[73] Cembalo L, Caracciolo F, Lombardi A, et al. (2016) Determinants of individual attitudes toward animal welfare-friendly food products. J Agric Environ Ethics 29: 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9598-z

[74] Sánchez-Bravo P, Chambers E, Noguera-Artiaga L, et al. (2020) Consumers' attitude towards the sustainability of different food categories. Foods 9: 1608. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111608

[75] de Queiroz FLN, Raposo A, Han H, et al. (2022) Eating competence, food consumption and health outcomes: An overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084484

[76] Dell'Orto V, Baldi G (2014) Overview of beef cattle production in Italy. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop Animal Nutrition, Natural Feeding Sources and Environmental Sustainability, Arzachena, Sardinia, Italy, 24-30.

[77] Wakefield A, Axon S (2020) "I'm a bit of a waster": Identifying the enablers of, and barriers to, sustainable food waste practices. J Clean Prod 275: 122803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122803

[78] Cattaneo C,Lavelli V,Proserpio C, et al. (2019) Consumers' attitude towards food by-products: The influence of food technology neophobia, education and information. Int J Food Sci Technol 54: 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13978

[79] Chen YC, Lee CS, Kuan SH (2021) Tasty but nasty? The moderating effect of message appeals on food neophilia/neophobia as a personality trait: A case study of pig blood cake and meatballs. Foods 10: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051093

[80] Jezewska-Zychowicz M, Plichta M, Drywień ME, et al. (2021) Food neophobia among adults: Differences in dietary patterns, food choice motives, and food labels reading in Poles. Nutrients 13: 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051590

[81] Hussain K, Abbasi AZ, Rasoolimanesh SM, et al. (2023) Local food consumption values and attitude formation: The moderating effect of food neophilia and neophobia. J Hosp Tour Insights 6: 464-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-08-2021-0214

[82] Kamleh M, Khosa DK, Verbrugghe A, et al. (2020) A cross-sectional study of pet owners' attitudes and intentions towards nutritional guidance received from veterinarians. Vet Rec 187: 105604. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105604

[83] Carnovale F, Jin X, Arney D, Descovich K, et al. (2021) Chinese public attitudes towards, and knowledge of, animal welfare. Animals 11: 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030855

[84] Chang MY, Chen HS (2022) Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to animal welfare-friendly products: Evidence from Taiwan. Nutrients 14: 4571. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214571

[85] Sanchez-Sabate R, Sabaté J (2019) Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071220

[86] Civero G, Rusciano V, Scarpato D, et al. (2021) Food: Not only safety, but also sustainability. The emerging trend of new social consumers. Sustainability 13: 12967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312967

[87] Ernst J, Burcak F (2019) Young children's contributions to sustainability: The influence of nature play on curiosity, executive function skills, creative thinking, and resilience. Sustainability 11: 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154212

[88] Burke A, Sohrabi T (2022) Curiosity and literacy: Connecting children's curiosity to ocean sustainability-A lesson in stimulating creativity and engagement. In: Crushing ICE: Short-on-Theory, Long-on-Practical Approaches to Imagination Creativity Education, 37.

[89] Próchniak P, Ossowski A (2023) Development and validation of the curiosity of climate changes scale. Psychol Res Behav Manag 16: 4829-4838. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S425867

[90] Predieri S,Sinesio F,Monteleone E, et al. (2020) Gender, age, geographical area, food neophobia and their relationships with the adherence to the Mediterranean diet: New insights from a large population cross-sectional study. Nutrients 12: 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061778

[91] Ran Y, Lewis AN, Dawkins E, et al. (2022) Information as an enabler of sustainable food choices: A behavioural approach to understanding consumer decision-making. Sustain Prod Consum 31: 642-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.026

[92] Liu J, Chriki S, Kombolo M, et al. (2023) Consumer perception of the challenges facing livestock production and meat consumption. Meat Sci 200: 109144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109144

[93] Musova Z, Musa H, Matiova V (2021) Environmentally responsible behaviour of consumers: Evidence from Slovakia. Econ Sociol 14: 178-198. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-1/12

[94] Liang H, Wu Z, Du S (2024) Study on the impact of environmental awareness, health consciousness, and individual basic conditions on the consumption intention of green furniture. Sustain Futures 8: 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100245

[95] De Bakker E, Dagevos H (2011) Reducing meat consumption in today's consumer society: Questioning the citizen-consumer gap. J Agric Environ Ethics 25: 877-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9345-z

[96] Mosca O, Merlino VM, Fornara F, et al. (2025) Forging a sustainable agricultural future: Tradition and innovation in shaping acceptance of insect-based foods. Future Foods 11: 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100516

[97] Mota-Gutierrez J, Sparacino A, Merlino VM, et al. (2024) Socio-demographic and cross-country differences in attention to sustainable certifications and changes in food consumption. npj Sci Food 8: 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00274-x

[98] Timpanaro G, Cascone G (2025) Consumer behavior and sustainability: Exploring Italy's green cosmetics market with prickly pear seed oil. Heliyon 11: e42233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42233