Additive manufacturing of PHBH and PBAT biopolymers via fused filament fabrication: a comparison between thermal and thermo-mechanical properties

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the thermal and thermo-mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBH) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) as sustainable alternatives for fused filament fabrication (FFF). Starting from commercial pellets, both biopolymers were processed into filaments using an extruder carefully controlling thermal parameters to ensure dimensional consistency. Filaments of PHBH and PBAT were subsequently used to produce several parts by using FFF. Thermal characterization was performed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements to investigate the thermal behaviour of the two biopolymers, while their thermo-mechanical properties were assessed through dynamo-mechanical analysis (DMA) and tensile testing evaluating storage modulus, loss factor, elastic modulus, ultimate tensile strength, and elongation at break. The results evidenced that PHBH’s thermal stability slightly decreased progressively from pellet to filament extrusion up to the realization of printed components via FFF, with an important reduction of the degree of crystallinity. PHBH retains high stiffness and strength but remains brittle, limiting its use to applications where rigid components are required. On the contrary, PBAT maintains high thermal stability and thermal transitions quite similar during the whole processing with minor mechanical properties, which makes it useful for applications requiring high flexibility.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing (AM) / Fused filament fabrication (FFF) / Biopolymers / Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBH) / Poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)

References

[1] Abdulhameed O, Al-Ahmari A, Ameen W, et al.Additive manufacturing: challenges, trends, and applications. Adv Mech Eng, 2019, 11(2): 1-27.

[2] Sun C, Wang Y, McMurtrey MD, et al.Additive manufacturing for energy: a review. Appl Energy, 2021, 282116041

[3] Rasiya G, Shukla A, Saran KAdditive manufacturing—a review. Mater Today Proc, 2021, 47: 6896-6901.

[4] Pelzer L, Hopmann CAdditive manufacturing of non-planar layers with variable layer height. Addit Manuf, 2021, 37101697

[5] Bose S, Ke D, Sahasrabudhe H, et al.Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci, 2018, 93: 45-111.

[6] Bahnini I, Rivette M, Rechia A, et al.Additive manufacturing technology: the status, applications, and prospects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2018, 97: 147-161.

[7] Guo N, Leu MCAdditive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(3): 215-243.

[8] Yuan S, Shen F, Chua CK, et al.Polymeric composites for powder-based additive manufacturing: materials and applications. Prog Polym Sci, 2019, 91: 141-168.

[9] Ahangar P, Cooke ME, Weber MH, et al.Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl Sci, 2019, 9(8): 1713.

[10] Durakovic BDesign for additive manufacturing: benefits, trends and challenges. Period Eng Nat Sci, 2018, 6(2):179-191.

[11] Jiménez M, Romero L, Domínguez IA, et al.Additive manufacturing technologies: an overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects. Complexity, 2019, 2019: 9656938.

[12] Praveena BA, Lokesh N, Buradi A, et al.A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential. Mater Today Proc, 2022, 521309-1313.

[13] Beyer CStrategic implications of current trends in additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng, 2014, 136064701

[14] Ferro C, Grassi R, Seclì C, et al.Additive manufacturing offers new opportunities in UAV research. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 41: 1004-1010.

[15] Solomon IJ, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran JA review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today Proc, 2021, 37: 509-514.

[16] Nuñez PJ, Rivas A, García-Plaza E, et al.Dimensional and surface texture characterization in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with ABS plus. Procedia Eng, 2015, 132: 856-863.

[17] Weng Z, Wang J, Senthil T, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Mater Des, 2016, 102: 276-283.

[18] Cuiffo MA, Snyder J, Elliott AM, et al.Impact of the fused deposition (FDM) printing process on polylactic acid (PLA) chemistry and structure. Appl Sci, 2017, 7(6): 579.

[19] Knoop F, Schoeppner V (2015) Mechanical and thermal properties of FDM parts manufactured with polyamide 12. 2015 International solid freeform fabrication symposium. 935–948. https://hdl.handle.net/2152/89391

[20] Xiao J, Gao YThe manufacture of 3D printing of medical grade TPU. Prog Addit Manuf, 2017, 2: 117-123.

[21] Struz J, Trochta M, Hruzik L, et al.Wear and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) of samples produced via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing method. Polymers, 2024, 16(21): 3018.

[22] Ruiz-González S, Navarro-Lorbés P, Pascual-Martínez A et al (2024) Eco-design applied to FDM 3D printing technology. In: The 5th international conference in electronic engineering, information technology & education (EEITE), Chania, Greece, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEITE61750.2024.10654395

[23] Valerga AP, Batista M, Salguero J, et al.Influence of PLA filament conditions on characteristics of FDM parts. Materials, 2018, 11(8):1322.

[24] Flórez M, Cazón P, Vázquez MSelected biopolymers' processing and their applications: a review. Polymers, 2023, 15(3):641.

[25] Van De Velde K, Kiekens PBiopolymers: overview of several properties and consequences on their applications. Polym Test, 2002, 21433-442.

[26] Schnepp ZBiopolymers as a flexible resource for nanochemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 521096-1108.

[27] Fijoł N, Aguilar-Sánchez A, Mathew AP3D-printable biopolymer-based materials for water treatment: a review. Chem Eng J, 2022, 430132964

[28] Caputo MR, Fernández M, Aguirresarobe R, et al.Influence of FFF process conditions on the thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxy hexanoate). Polymers, 2023, 15(8): 1817.

[29] Mondragón-Herrera LI, Vargas-Coronado RF, Carrillo-Escalante H, et al.Mechanical, thermal, and physicochemical properties of filaments of poly(lactic acid), polyhydroxyalkanoates and their blend for additive manufacturing. Polymers, 2024, 16(8):1062.

[30] Yokoyama D, Takamura A, Tsuboi Y, et al.Large-scale omics dataset of polymer degradation provides robust interpretation for microbial niche and succession on different plastisphere. ISME Commun, 2023, 3: 54.

[31] Mehrpouya M, Vahabi H, Barletta M, et al.Additive manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) biopolymers: materials, printing techniques, and applications. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021, 127112216

[32] Eraslan K, Aversa C, Nofar M, et al.Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBH): synthesis, properties, and applications—a review. Eur Polym J, 2022, 167111044

[33] Kovalcik A, Sangroniz L, Kalina M, et al.Properties of scaffolds prepared by fused deposition modeling of poly(hydroxyalkanoates). Int J Biol Macromol, 2020, 161364-376.

[34] Giubilini A, Siqueira G, Clemens FJ, et al.3D-printing nanocellulose-poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) biodegradable composites by fused deposition modeling. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2020, 810292-10302.

[35] Valentini F, Dorigato A, Rigotti D, et al.Polyhydroxyalkanoates/fibrillated nanocellulose composites for additive manufacturing. J Polym Environ, 2019, 27: 1333-1341.

[36] Ivorra-Martinez J, Ferrer I, Aguado R, et al.Development of P(3HB-co-3HHx) nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) composites for scaffolds manufacturing by means of fused deposition modelling. Int J Bioprint, 2023, 10: 274-293.

[37] Mori RReplacing all petroleum-based chemical products with natural biomass-based chemical products: a tutorial review. RSC Sustain, 2023, 1: 179-212.

[38] Bianchi M, Dorigato A, Morreale M, et al.Evaluation of the physical and shape memory properties of fully biodegradable poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) (PBAT) blends. Polymers, 2023, 15(4): 881.

[39] Weng YX, Jin YJ, Meng QY, et al.Biodegradation behavior of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and their blend under soil conditions. Polym Test, 2013, 32: 918-926.

[40] Sciancalepore C, Togliatti E, Giubilini A, et al.Preparation and characterization of innovative poly(butylene adipate terephthalate)-based biocomposites for agri-food packaging application. J Appl Polym Sci, 2022, 13952370.

[41] Sciancalepore C, Togliatti E, Marozzi M, et al.Flexible PBAT-based composite filaments for tunable FDM 3D printing. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2022, 53219-3229.

[42] Yu W, Li M, Lei W, et al.FDM 3D printing and properties of PBAT/PLA blends. Polymers, 2024, 16(8): 1140.

[43] Zhang Z, He F, Wang B, et al.Biodegradable PGA/PBAT blends for 3D printing: material performance and periodic minimal surface structures. Polymers, 2021, 13(21):3757.

[44] Jeffri NI, Nurul Fazita MR, Leh CP et al (2023) Processing and characterization of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(butylene-co-adipate-terephthalate) (PBAT) blends for fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing. In: Chow WS, Jaafar M, Ariff ZM et al (eds) Proceedings of the 19th Asian workshop on polymer processing (AWPP 2022). Springer Proceedings in Materials, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2015-0_2

[45] Ali S, Deiab I, Pervaiz SOptimizing the properties of PHBV/PBAT blend for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2025, 131: 7-12.

[46] Apicella A, Scarfato P, Incarnato LStudy on 3D printability of PLA/PBAT/PHBV biodegradable blends for packaging applications. Polym Test, 2025, 145108748

[47] Laycock B, Arcos-Hernandez MV, Langford A, et al.Crystallisation and fractionation of selected polyhydroxyalkanoates produced from mixed cultures. N Biotechnol, 2014, 31345-356.

[48] Anderson KS, Schreck KM, Hillmyer MAToughening polylactide. Polym Rev, 2008, 48: 85-108.

[49] Huang F, Wu L, Li BGSulfonated biodegradable PBAT copolyesters with improved gas barrier properties and excellent water dispersibility: from synthesis to structure-property. Polym Degrad Stab, 2020, 182109391

[50] Giubilini A, Colucci G, De Trane G, et al.Novel 3D printable bio-based and biodegradable poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) microspheres for selective laser sintering applications. Mater Today Sustain, 2023, 22100379

[51] Colucci G, Piano M, Lupone F, et al.Preparation and 3D printability study of bio-based PBAT powder for selective laser sintering additive manufacturing. Mater Today Chem, 2023, 33101687

[52] Gace MT, Quinn EC, Shariatikia F, et al.Synergistic engineering of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) architecture and stereomicrostructure achieves enhanced material properties. Polym Chem, 2025, 16: 4557.

[53] Zubkiewicz A, Szymczyk A, Sablong RJ, et al.Bio-based aliphatic/aromatic poly(trimethylene furanoate/sebacate) random copolymers: correlation between mechanical, gas barrier performances and compostability and copolymer composition. Polym Degrad Stab, 2022, 195109800

[54] Walter R, Selzer R, Gurka M, et al.Effect of filament quality, structure, and processing parameters on the properties of fused filament fabricated short fiber-reinforced thermoplastics. Manuf Polym Compon, 2020, 2253-302.

[55] Hamat S, Ishak MR, Sapuan SM, et al.Influence of filament fabrication parameter on tensile strength and filament size of 3D printing PLA-3D850. Mater Today Proc, 2023, 74: 457-461.

[56] Tsou CH, Chen ZJ, Yuan S, et al.The preparation and performance of poly(butylene adipate) terephthalate/corn stalk composites. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem, 2022, 5100329

[57] Selli F, Hufenus R, Gooneie A, et al.Structure-property relationship in melt-spun poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hexanoate) monofilaments. Polymers, 2022, 14(1): 200.

[58] Pavon C, Aldas M, de la Rosa-Ramírez H, et al.Improvement of PBAT processability and mechanical performance by blending with pine resin derivatives for injection moulding rigid packaging with enhanced hydrophobicity. Polymers, 2020, 12(12):2891.

[59] Rahman MS, Mohd Al-Marhubi I, Al-Mahrouqi AMeasurement of glass transition temperature by mechanical (DMTA), thermal (DSC and MDSC), water diffusion and density methods: a comparison study. Chem Phys Lett, 2007, 440372-377.

[60] Gracia-Fernández CA, Gómez-Barreiro S, López-Beceiro J, et al.Comparative study of the dynamic glass transition temperature by DMA and TMDSC. Polym Test, 2010, 29(8): 1002-1006.

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca(Materials sUSTainability for polymer Additive manufacturiNG (MUSTANG) project – funded by European Union – Next Generation EU within the PRIN 2022 program (D.D. 104 - 02/02/2022 Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca).)

Politecnico di Torino

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)